Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 01:02:34 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 [279] 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 ... 1310 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay]  (Read 2375282 times)
JasonXtreme
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 09:05:30 PM
 #5561


Windows 64 bit miner

I have updated this with a newer, smaller, slightly faster minerd.exe and it performs better with multiple threads too.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ydk8z59wwgysh1e/Spexx-Wolf0-V2-generic-Win64-XMGminerd.zip

It is around 1.5 percent faster than the previous offering.

I have tried to build something for AVX and AVX2 instruction set support but I get a slightly slower minerd.exe when I do that. It is really quite odd!

This latest miner code responds to compiler flags in a completely different way to the earlier code. I do not know if this would work for Linux but I get faster code using -Os than with -Ofast.

Happy hashing Cheesy

This one is a beast  Cheesy Getting 67KHash/s on my i7 3610QM, not that that is a laptop processor Cheesy

EDIT: And yet I get 56.5Khash/s using only 5 of my 8 threads...  Undecided This should mean I could get about 80 running full speed, no?
The Bitcoin software, network, and concept is called "Bitcoin" with a capitalized "B". Bitcoin currency units are called "bitcoins" with a lowercase "b" -- this is often abbreviated BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
hefty
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 09:11:57 PM
Last edit: January 29, 2015, 09:23:54 PM by hefty
 #5562

Keep them coming spexx , thank You  Grin

Great vid guys, thanks for sharing

kondiomir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1000


Twitter @Acimirov


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 09:23:20 PM
 #5563



Magi on Bitcoin event 2015 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
 Smiley


LOL Quite impressive! Another proof that this project have proffesional hard working team and a bright future!!
Keep the good job guys!! I'm with you!  Cool
jawitech
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 09:46:36 PM
 #5564

This one is a beast  Cheesy

I agree. With the improved miners from wolf0 and Joe I doubled my hashrate but yours gets the most out of my crappy old AMD without the problem with the 2 others that my windows gets problems. Spexx, you're a f*cking genius  Kiss

That deserves some donations!

Spexx:
9EQ342ssXSxmpDURs6XNxAajB14DQzJDNX

Spexx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


Mining Co-operative


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 09:52:58 PM
 #5565

EDIT: And yet I get 56.5Khash/s using only 5 of my 8 threads...  Undecided This should mean I could get about 80 running full speed, no?

No, unfortunately, not quite. With 5/8 running there is very little competition for CPU time and you will see a high hashrate per thread. As you load up towards the maximum 8/8 then the hashrate per thread will reduce a bit, although running 8/8 will give you maximum total hashrate.

hefty
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 10:01:40 PM
 #5566

EDIT: And yet I get 56.5Khash/s using only 5 of my 8 threads...  Undecided This should mean I could get about 80 running full speed, no?

No, unfortunately, not quite. With 5/8 running there is very little competition for CPU time and you will see a high hashrate per thread. As you load up towards the maximum 8/8 then the hashrate per thread will reduce a bit, although running 8/8 will give you maximum total hashrate.


your first miner is still the fastest one on haswells , but only if you load 8 instances for 8 threads this one is fastest one if you load only one instance for 8 threads , but it gives me 2 more khash on phenom than your first one, i need to test on others  

Mergesort
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 10:19:35 PM
 #5567

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?
Spexx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


Mining Co-operative


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 10:28:01 PM
 #5568

your first miner is still the fastest one on haswells , but only if you load 8 instances for 8 threads this one is fastest one if you load only one instance for 8 threads , but it gives me 2 more khash on phenom than your first one, i need to test on others  

Thanks for the feedback, which is always appreciated.

Yeah that first 64 bit one built with Cygwin64 was not bad at all, except for the multiple threads issue and all the required dll files. This latest version matches the performance without the issues. I will be playing around with AVX and AVX2 support to see what I can do to improve matters there.

I just received some very generous donations. Thank you! I love this coin Smiley

The Frisian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1019
Merit: 1003


Senior Developer and founder of ViMeAv ICT


View Profile WWW
January 29, 2015, 10:30:41 PM
 #5569

the block amount is already gone down,
because of the new miners, i suppose
Spexx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


Mining Co-operative


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 10:33:05 PM
 #5570

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

Is that overclocked?

I would expect you to be able to get a bit more out of it than 55 Kh/s. What operating system do you have and what minerd are you using?

hefty
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 10:57:20 PM
 #5571

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

Is that overclocked?

I would expect you to be able to get a bit more out of it than 55 Kh/s. What operating system do you have and what minerd are you using?


thats 13,75 per core thats faster than any amd per core at that clock i5 4690k is hashing 15 per core at 4.6 ghz
i think thats about that but i cant be sure i dont have that cpu, i think that hyperthreaded intels are best with these miners although they have same number of physical cores they give 35/40% better hash.


NewtonsMthd
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 11:02:05 PM
 #5572

Any way to check via the command line?  Didn't see anything in the header files.
USE: getinfo, and locate a line "expected time ...", notice the expected time is only an estimate.

There is no "expected time..." line in the getinfo output...
Mergesort
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 11:10:25 PM
 #5573

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

Is that overclocked?

I would expect you to be able to get a bit more out of it than 55 Kh/s. What operating system do you have and what minerd are you using?


yes it's overclocked, iam on widows 8.1 and iam using your latest 64 bit miner. Would -e cpu_efficiency improve anything
Spexx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


Mining Co-operative


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 11:15:12 PM
 #5574

Any way to check via the command line?  Didn't see anything in the header files.
USE: getinfo, and locate a line "expected time ...", notice the expected time is only an estimate.

There is no "expected time..." line in the getinfo output...

I think Joe meant to say use getmininginfo Wink

Zywiec
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 414
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 11:16:35 PM
 #5575



Magi on Bitcoin event 2015 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
 Smiley


LOL Quite impressive! Another proof that this project have proffesional hard working team and a bright future!!
Keep the good job guys!! I'm with you!  Cool


Well done!!!

Welcome new official promo movie of MAGI? I would say YES
Spexx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


Mining Co-operative


View Profile
January 29, 2015, 11:25:50 PM
Last edit: January 29, 2015, 11:50:29 PM by Spexx
 #5576

I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

Is that overclocked?

I would expect you to be able to get a bit more out of it than 55 Kh/s. What operating system do you have and what minerd are you using?


yes it's overclocked, iam on widows 8.1 and iam using your latest 64 bit miner. Would -e cpu_efficiency improve anything

No. The -e option is default 100 percent and can only be set to something less. I don't think that the version of source code that I used includes this option anyway. I have an external application that creates the same effect - the XMG Miner Speed Controller :-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wbtmlktiy32b3xw/XMGMinerSpeed.exe

This is a self-extracting zip file which will unzip to C:\XMGminer\MinerSpeed by default. When unzipped, run the Setup.bat file which creates a startup script and a Desktop icon for you.

EDIT: That overclocking looks extreme. Are you sure that the CPU is not "throttling" due to over-temperature? The miner pushes your CPU to the limit.

2nd EDIT: You might also try running multiple instances of minerd.exe with a single thread each, as opposed to a single instance of minerd.exe with multiple threads. There is a measurable difference.

Spexx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


Mining Co-operative


View Profile
January 30, 2015, 12:48:58 AM
 #5577


Nice lump of cheap XMG on Poloniex right now. 5300 seems a very fair price.

ulfie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2015, 02:09:43 AM
 #5578

I will take some of that.
Spexx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


Mining Co-operative


View Profile
January 30, 2015, 03:41:37 AM
 #5579

I will take some of that.

Had a bite myself. No BTC left to buy any more Sad

ihascryptos
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


Am i broke yet?


View Profile
January 30, 2015, 04:29:29 AM
 #5580

XMG speed controller is great!  tried it on my old dual core E6600 machine.  set it to 85% speed and it keeps the temps down. My 1st core likes to overheat.

Great program.


I got a i5 2500 @ ~4,5ghz. right now i am getting ~55khs/s, is that normal or is there a way to improve my rate?

Is that overclocked?

I would expect you to be able to get a bit more out of it than 55 Kh/s. What operating system do you have and what minerd are you using?


yes it's overclocked, iam on widows 8.1 and iam using your latest 64 bit miner. Would -e cpu_efficiency improve anything

No. The -e option is default 100 percent and can only be set to something less. I don't think that the version of source code that I used includes this option anyway. I have an external application that creates the same effect - the XMG Miner Speed Controller :-

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wbtmlktiy32b3xw/XMGMinerSpeed.exe

This is a self-extracting zip file which will unzip to C:\XMGminer\MinerSpeed by default. When unzipped, run the Setup.bat file which creates a startup script and a Desktop icon for you.

EDIT: That overclocking looks extreme. Are you sure that the CPU is not "throttling" due to over-temperature? The miner pushes your CPU to the limit.

2nd EDIT: You might also try running multiple instances of minerd.exe with a single thread each, as opposed to a single instance of minerd.exe with multiple threads. There is a measurable difference.

I like tacos!
Pages: « 1 ... 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 [279] 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 ... 1310 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!