111magic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 23, 2017, 10:58:42 AM |
|
Does anyone know Suprnova will work?
Don't know. You can ask OCminer pm here on bitcointalk. He is a friendly guy.
|
bitcoin: bc1qyadvvyv29z08ln2ta7g3uqwzkscr7wq4p09wuz
|
|
|
111magic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 23, 2017, 10:58:57 AM |
|
Is there a community in TELEGRAN? If so, please give me the link. Thank you it would be nice. in OP there is no link to MAGI`s telegram group Here is the telegram group created by jleonc01, https://t.me/joinchat/GVNlf0KUl9wA2xZosHEVQwFeel free to join (put it in OP too). Lol i joined.
|
bitcoin: bc1qyadvvyv29z08ln2ta7g3uqwzkscr7wq4p09wuz
|
|
|
scaran
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 1
|
|
September 23, 2017, 10:59:16 AM |
|
Hi everyone. Im newbie. I download 1.4.3 wallet and network synchronization was stoped at 132605 block (9.16%). Download 1.4.4.1 wallet and when i open it, i see "error loading block database". How i can get full sync and fix "error loading block database". Thx
Go here: http://coinmagi.org/bin/block-chain/Delete everything you have in %appdata%\roaming\magi EXCEPT WALLET.DAT (that is in windows) Download a most recent blockchain from the address above and unzip it into %appdata%\roaming\magi. Using this you'll be up to date in 10-15 minutes. Use Magi 1.4.4.1 Check also magi.conf file. THX
|
|
|
|
webtimmi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 0
|
|
September 23, 2017, 01:29:18 PM |
|
After updating, my wallet stopped with the stake. Can someone help me?
Use coin control (settings -- options -- display -- display coin control features) then you can select inputs (send -- inputs -- list) to send to your own address. What is the optimal block size to stake? hi. how many coins should be in my wallet to start POS ?
|
|
|
|
jcreyesb
|
|
September 23, 2017, 04:14:31 PM |
|
i configure in algoProperties.js to deploy magic pool m7mhash: { hash: function(){ return function(){ return multiHashing.m7mhash.apply(this, arguments); } } } the system is ok [2017-09-23 12:51:14.705] [INFO] [default] - New Relic [2017-09-23 12:51:14.707] [DEBUG] [default] - NewRelic Monitor New Relic initiated [2017-09-23 12:51:14.708] [INFO] [default] - POSIX Not Installed [2017-09-23 12:51:14.708] [DEBUG] [default] - POSIX Connection Limit (Safe to ignore) POSIX module not installed and resource (connection) limit was not raised [2017-09-23 12:51:14.708] [INFO] [default] - Run Workers [2017-09-23 12:51:14.966] [DEBUG] [default] - Master PoolSpawner Spawned 1 pool(s) on 1 thread(s) [2017-09-23 12:51:15.398] [INFO] [default] - New Relic [2017-09-23 12:51:15.401] [INFO] [default] - POSIX Not Installed [2017-09-23 12:51:15.402] [INFO] [default] - Run Workers [2017-09-23 12:51:15.410] [INFO] [default] - Switching Setup Thread 1 Loading last proxy state from redis [2017-09-23 12:51:15.417] [DEBUG] [default] - Pool magicoin Thread 1 Share processing setup with redis (127.0.0.1:6379) [2017-09-23 12:51:15.448] [DEBUG] [default] - Pool magicoin Thread 1 started for magicoin [XMG] {m7mhash} Network Connected: Mainnet font=Verdana]Detected ReOSrd Type: POW Current Block Height: 1489428 Current Connect Peers: 2 Current Block Diff: 2.305667004 Network Difficulty: NaN Network Hash Rate: 30.37 MH Stratum Port(s): 3008, 3032, 3256 Pool Fee Percent: 1% Block polling every: 1000 ms [2017-09-23 12:51:15.449] [DEBUG] [default] - Switching Setup m7mhash Setting proxy difficulties after pool start [2017-09-23 12:51:24.719] [DEBUG] [default] - Master CLI CLI listening on port 17117 [2017-09-23 12:51:25.598] [INFO] [default] - New Relic [2017-09-23 12:51:25.597] [INFO] [default] - New Relic [2017-09-23 12:51:25.604] [INFO] [default] - POSIX Not Installed [2017-09-23 12:51:25.605] [INFO] [default] - Run Workers [2017-09-23 12:51:25.604] [INFO] [default] - POSIX Not Installed [2017-09-23 12:51:25.605] [INFO] [default] - Run Workers [2017-09-23 12:51:25.633] [DEBUG] [default] - Payments magicoin Payment processing setup to run every 600 sekannon(s) with daemon (magi@127.0.0.1:8232) and redis (127.0.0.1:6379) [2017-09-23 12:51:25.676] [DEBUG] [default] - Website Server Website started on xxxxx:80
the worker connect [2017-09-23 12:51:30.848] [DEBUG] [default] - Pool magicoin Thread 1 getting block notification via RPC polling [2017-09-23 12:51:31.600] [DEBUG] [default] - Pool magicoin Thread 1 Authorized 9QodNwAEKeetejjtNZiX6N4xxxxxx:x [190.38.xx]
now whe the worker send [2017-09-23 08:59:56] Stratum requested work restart [2017-09-23 08:59:56] thread 2: 261273 hashes, 5.11 khash/s [2017-09-23 08:59:56] thread 4: 530541 hashes, 10.37 khash/s [2017-09-23 08:59:56] thread 3: 194764 hashes, 8.83 khash/s [2017-09-23 08:59:56] thread 5: 333126 hashes, 10.01 khash/s [2017-09-23 08:59:56] thread 0: 495504 hashes, 9.69 khash/s [2017-09-23 08:59:56] thread 1: 263041 hashes, 5.14 khash/s [2017-09-23 09:00:07] thread 3: 124013 hashes, 11.22 khash/s [color=red][2017-09-23 09:00:07] stratum_recv_line failed [2017-09-23 09:00:07] Stratum connection interrupted[/color]
the pool crash /home/ubuntu/unomp/node_modules/merged-pooler/lib/algoProperties.js:227 return multiHashing.m7mhash.apply(this, arguments); ^ TypeError: Cannot call method 'apply' of undefined at /home/ubuntu/unomp/node_modules/merged-pooler/lib/algoProperties.js:227:45 at JobManager.processShare (/home/ubuntu/unomp/node_modules/merged-pooler/lib/jobManager.js:263:26) at null.<anonymous> (/home/ubuntu/unomp/node_modules/merged-pooler/lib/pool.js:630:46) at EventEmitter.emit (events.js:117:20) at handleSubmit (/home/ubuntu/unomp/node_modules/merged-pooler/lib/stratum.js:175:15) at handleMessage (/home/ubuntu/unomp/node_modules/merged-pooler/lib/stratum.js:88:17) at /home/ubuntu/unomp/node_modules/merged-pooler/lib/stratum.js:248:25 at Array.forEach (native) at Socket.<anonymous> (/home/ubuntu/unomp/node_modules/merged-pooler/lib/stratum.js:234:26) at Socket.EventEmitter.emit (events.js:95:17)
Really i don't find answer Ofcourse we will pay you for your services P.M
|
|
|
|
|
MdbM
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 0
|
|
September 23, 2017, 08:07:59 PM |
|
Hello Magi community !
It is possible to use Minerd with a priority option ? -E Efficiency & -T Thread option are useless...
Idle option or Priority would be great.
|
|
|
|
jcreyesb
|
|
September 23, 2017, 08:17:34 PM |
|
Hello Magi community !
It is possible to use Minerd with a priority option ? -E Efficiency & -T Thread option are useless...
Idle option or Priority would be great.
m-minerd you can
|
|
|
|
MdbM
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 0
|
|
September 23, 2017, 08:22:52 PM |
|
m-minerd you can
-t thread_numbers -e cpu_efficiency It's the same thing. What parameters for priority ?
|
|
|
|
jcreyesb
|
|
September 23, 2017, 09:21:51 PM |
|
m-minerd you can
-t thread_numbers -e cpu_efficiency It's the same thing. What parameters for priority ? yes.. it is
|
|
|
|
MdbM
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 0
|
|
September 23, 2017, 10:10:44 PM Last edit: September 23, 2017, 10:30:41 PM by MdbM |
|
I think you did not understand my request. Im talking about possibility to use minerd in priority mode (priority process) Idle or Priority.
-E -T options = manual cpu use.
For example : If im launching programe using alot CPU , Minerd puts in place to give priority to the other program. If my program use 95% CPU, then Minerd use 5%
|
|
|
|
seeksilence
|
|
September 23, 2017, 10:33:07 PM |
|
Linux use renice command renice -n 10 -p pid windows I do not know.
|
|
|
|
pmsk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 0
|
|
September 23, 2017, 11:23:15 PM |
|
Hello Magi community !
It is possible to use Minerd with a priority option ? -E Efficiency & -T Thread option are useless...
Idle option or Priority would be great.
use "start /low minerd.exe" in command line.
|
|
|
|
|
jcreyesb
|
|
September 24, 2017, 12:46:23 AM |
|
Thanks, i am using some file from edward0181.. but always, get messages... . return multiHashing.m7m.apply(this, arguments); ^ TypeError: Cannot call method 'apply' of undefined
|
|
|
|
|
seeksilence
|
|
September 24, 2017, 01:47:41 AM |
|
Also, based on current Hashrate, two big pools get most of the shares. There is no chance for small pool to survive. Small pool is playing for pure luck.
Don't waste your time to setup a new small pool. Not worth it.
|
|
|
|
jcreyesb
|
|
September 24, 2017, 03:09:46 AM |
|
Also, based on current Hashrate, two big pools get most of the shares. There is no chance for small pool to survive. Small pool is playing for pure luck.
Don't waste your time to setup a new small pool. Not worth it.
Really is for my own pool and practices
|
|
|
|
jcreyesb
|
|
September 24, 2017, 03:10:35 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|