Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 07:15:45 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN]Joincoin (J) ToR Anonymous All Algorithm mining! *1.3 WALLET UPDATE!*  (Read 118638 times)
sushipooo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 12:39:56 AM
 #221

    "version" : 1010101,
    "protocolversion" : 1001,
    "walletversion" : 300,
    "balance" : 2.50000000,
    "blocks" : 391,
    "timeoffset" : -1,
    "connections" : 12,
    "proxy" : "",
    "pow_algo_id" : 2,
    "pow_algo" : "x13",
    "difficulty" : 0.15833305,
    "difficulty_sha" : 2385.81132495,
    "difficulty_x11" : 4.01287318,
    "difficulty_x13" : 0.15833305,
    "difficulty_x15" : 0.02978161,
    "difficulty_scrypt" : 0.01562477,
    "difficulty_nist5" : 0.20509619,
    "difficulty_groestle" : 8.95962472,
    "difficulty_pentablake" : 0.38569512,
    "difficulty_whirlpool" : 0.84984568,
    "difficulty_luffa" : 0.79904166,
    "difficulty_keccak" : 0.34481761,
    "difficulty_quark" : 0.02626831,
    "difficulty_bastion" : 0.49461871,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1407970251,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""



@Dev: To give you a clue.. Check Diff and nBits ... (for the X algos)


Working quickly to fix this issue with the x algos before normal block rewards come in to play. Will have updated wallet and github asap.

Good... Next time contact a pool admin for the code review and TEST it before  (every algo, not just SHA) Grin Wink

We tested it and they all worked but this was at diffs we could produce, sha was not the only algo we tested and if you believe that then I am sorry for your misconception.

Fix pushed to Github, compiling windows wallet now.


I can easily get diff > 3 or 4 with a single 280x @ x11/x13/x15 ...

I'll be standing clear from now on.

Sorry guys - you'll be fine.


+1

Maybe an apology in is in order to Ocminer, dude has run top notch pools for months and you crucify him trying for actually trying to tell people to do some due diligence?  This coin's team should actually tap into his talent or people like him to find a simple flaw he found in the code in a very short amount of time.  You cheerleaders amaze me at times.
I gave him a +1 after the apology.

Cannabis Coin CANN - Smoke a <////////////>~ and start thinking positive. Join the movement ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=661885.0
The network tries to produce one block per 10 minutes. It does this by automatically adjusting how difficult it is to produce blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714893345
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714893345

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714893345
Reply with quote  #2

1714893345
Report to moderator
MickGhee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000

Fucker of "the system"


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 12:52:32 AM
 #222

I NEED A NODE TO CONNECT MY WALLET !!!!!!!
nodes
nodes
nodes
nodes

Last night, while you were sleeping. I fucked the system!
Reese212
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 12:52:48 AM
 #223


cool, i can call myself a market Manipulator with my 0.1btc buy @ 1800sat. i'm much more powerful than i thought, thanks for reminding me!

Dear Lord, please grant me the ability...
AltcoinRambo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 12:54:36 AM
 #224

    "version" : 1010101,
    "protocolversion" : 1001,
    "walletversion" : 300,
    "balance" : 2.50000000,
    "blocks" : 391,
    "timeoffset" : -1,
    "connections" : 12,
    "proxy" : "",
    "pow_algo_id" : 2,
    "pow_algo" : "x13",
    "difficulty" : 0.15833305,
    "difficulty_sha" : 2385.81132495,
    "difficulty_x11" : 4.01287318,
    "difficulty_x13" : 0.15833305,
    "difficulty_x15" : 0.02978161,
    "difficulty_scrypt" : 0.01562477,
    "difficulty_nist5" : 0.20509619,
    "difficulty_groestle" : 8.95962472,
    "difficulty_pentablake" : 0.38569512,
    "difficulty_whirlpool" : 0.84984568,
    "difficulty_luffa" : 0.79904166,
    "difficulty_keccak" : 0.34481761,
    "difficulty_quark" : 0.02626831,
    "difficulty_bastion" : 0.49461871,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1407970251,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""



@Dev: To give you a clue.. Check Diff and nBits ... (for the X algos)


Working quickly to fix this issue with the x algos before normal block rewards come in to play. Will have updated wallet and github asap.

Good... Next time contact a pool admin for the code review and TEST it before  (every algo, not just SHA) Grin Wink

We tested it and they all worked but this was at diffs we could produce, sha was not the only algo we tested and if you believe that then I am sorry for your misconception.

Fix pushed to Github, compiling windows wallet now.


I can easily get diff > 3 or 4 with a single 280x @ x11/x13/x15 ...

I'll be standing clear from now on.

Sorry guys - you'll be fine.


+1

Maybe an apology in is in order to Ocminer, dude has run top notch pools for months and you crucify him trying for actually trying to tell people to do some due diligence?  This coin's team should actually tap into his talent or people like him to find a simple flaw he found in the code in a very short amount of time.  You cheerleaders amaze me at times.

I don't think anybody has an issue with him pointing out that people should do their due diligence or pointing out legitimate flaws in the code. The issue was that his original posting was a bit FUDdy and threw around some wild accusations. All of this happened before the current wallet flaw was known.

As for him finding the problem in the code: great job, there's nothing else to say about that part.
AltcoinRambo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 148
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 12:55:15 AM
 #225

Ehi guys, DEV will work on the code. Where is the problem? Stay calm and BUY LOW!

+1
billotronic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000


Crackpot Idealist


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 12:55:57 AM
 #226

I might be stupid, but I cannot seem to get the qt to build on Linux Mint... I'm pretty sure this .pro file is garbage.

Anyone have any luck?

[edit] yes, the daemon built fine.

This post sums up why all this bullshit is a scam
Read It. Hate It. Change the facts that it represents.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1606638.msg16139644#msg16139644
Love_of_Algo (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 01:01:15 AM
 #227

Yes this is completely our mistake, when Pride at C-CEX looked over our code he wasn't looking for mining difficulty issues, was looking for malicious code. Ocminer we appreciate you pointing this out quickly so we could resolve it. Trying to say that C-CEX didn't do their due diligence is completely wrong though, this will be fixed and algorithms will all be working when we have contact with the main dev at C-CEx to update wallet.  Again our apologies, this is not anyone's fault but a mistake on our part that was fixed in 5 minutes, we just cannot release the new github commit and wallet until C-CEX does to prevent a potential fork.
Cesare1985
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 01:02:43 AM
 #228

I'm boring. Too FUD on this thread.
The only thing I can say is: a big whale bought all the pre-sale and he'll sell his bag to 10K-15K.
Buy buy and good night!
infernoman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 964
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 14, 2014, 01:04:51 AM
Last edit: August 14, 2014, 01:22:28 AM by infernoman
 #229

having trouble finding some things in the source for the p2pool. the address_version and the p2p prefix or secret code for p2p

https://github.com/joincoin/joincoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp i am trying to use the values from here.

address_version=43,
p2p_prefix='f1b4dc9e'.decode('hex'),
sushipooo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 01:36:49 AM
 #230

having trouble finding some things in the source for the p2pool. the address_version and the p2p prefix or secret code for p2p

https://github.com/joincoin/joincoin/blob/master/src/chainparams.cpp i am trying to use the values from here.

address_version=43,
p2p_prefix='f1b4dc9e'.decode('hex'),

I'm not sure but I think there is an issue with mining until C-CEX main dude comes back and updates the wallet at CCEX.

Cannabis Coin CANN - Smoke a <////////////>~ and start thinking positive. Join the movement ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=661885.0
infernoman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 964
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 14, 2014, 01:38:46 AM
 #231

okay understandable. can anyone tell me if i have the values correct then?
sushipooo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 02:01:50 AM
 #232

okay understandable. can anyone tell me if i have the values correct then?

wish I could help bro, But I think everyone is waiting to see what info comes out from the devs and CCEX admins.

Cannabis Coin CANN - Smoke a <////////////>~ and start thinking positive. Join the movement ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=661885.0
helloword2013
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 333
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 02:16:02 AM
 #233

need nodes.
billotronic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000


Crackpot Idealist


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 02:17:32 AM
 #234

need nodes.

not sure if this will help since my client is dead at block 416 but here ya go

Code:
21:16:43

[
{
"addr" : "3o2mhw35ksxoo6pq.onion:17941",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1407982492,
"lastrecv" : 1407982493,
"bytessent" : 947,
"bytesrecv" : 582,
"conntime" : 1407982492,
"version" : 1001,
"subver" : "/Joincoin:1.1.1.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 416,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
{
"addr" : "ja3v33azywzgxtju.onion:17941",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1407982497,
"lastrecv" : 1407982499,
"bytessent" : 246,
"bytesrecv" : 582,
"conntime" : 1407982496,
"version" : 1001,
"subver" : "/Joincoin:1.1.1.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 416,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "vfuj3avleabbnsgt.onion:17941",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1407982500,
"lastrecv" : 1407982501,
"bytessent" : 246,
"bytesrecv" : 582,
"conntime" : 1407982500,
"version" : 1001,
"subver" : "/Joincoin:1.1.1.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 416,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "fwhy5hy2ljmeeul2.onion:17941",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1407982509,
"lastrecv" : 1407982510,
"bytessent" : 246,
"bytesrecv" : 582,
"conntime" : 1407982508,
"version" : 1001,
"subver" : "/Joincoin:1.1.1.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 416,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "m3l7qwq5ziadyj55.onion:17941",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1407982512,
"lastrecv" : 1407982513,
"bytessent" : 246,
"bytesrecv" : 582,
"conntime" : 1407982512,
"version" : 1001,
"subver" : "/Joincoin:1.1.1.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 416,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "4yyak3dyhg2hh66w.onion:17941",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1407982520,
"lastrecv" : 1407982522,
"bytessent" : 246,
"bytesrecv" : 552,
"conntime" : 1407982519,
"version" : 1001,
"subver" : "/Joincoin:1.1.1.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 416,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "ywh5ouwnhagz5sa2.onion:17941",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1407982525,
"lastrecv" : 1407982534,
"bytessent" : 246,
"bytesrecv" : 487,
"conntime" : 1407982524,
"version" : 1001,
"subver" : "/Joincoin:1.1.1.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 416,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "127.0.0.1:59624",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1407982534,
"lastrecv" : 1407982529,
"bytessent" : 547,
"bytesrecv" : 191,
"conntime" : 1407982528,
"version" : 1001,
"subver" : "/Joincoin:1.1.1.1/",
"inbound" : true,
"startingheight" : 416,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "p46we3plowvljfqt.onion:17941",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1407982531,
"lastrecv" : 1407982532,
"bytessent" : 246,
"bytesrecv" : 582,
"conntime" : 1407982530,
"version" : 1001,
"subver" : "/Joincoin:1.1.1.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 416,
"banscore" : 0
}
]

This post sums up why all this bullshit is a scam
Read It. Hate It. Change the facts that it represents.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1606638.msg16139644#msg16139644
MickGhee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000

Fucker of "the system"


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 02:20:15 AM
 #235

so we are all stuck on 416

Last night, while you were sleeping. I fucked the system!
billotronic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000


Crackpot Idealist


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 02:21:04 AM
Last edit: August 14, 2014, 12:23:50 PM by billotronic
 #236

_

This post sums up why all this bullshit is a scam
Read It. Hate It. Change the facts that it represents.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1606638.msg16139644#msg16139644
anhpt192
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 628
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 14, 2014, 02:24:06 AM
 #237

current price is not worth for mining  Angry
BTMan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100

BTMan


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 02:59:28 AM
 #238

very good

ANN Monitor System http://ann.ymq123.com  (chrome Or IE7-IE9)
Donation BTC: 1F4zvgxAqpbCktYp8oKeupjY2oL3JWVFa3      QQ Group: 229207518
ANN监控系统创世帖 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=657764.0
InitialDat
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 02:59:59 AM
 #239

Yes this is completely our mistake, when Pride at C-CEX looked over our code he wasn't looking for mining difficulty issues, was looking for malicious code. Ocminer we appreciate you pointing this out quickly so we could resolve it. Trying to say that C-CEX didn't do their due diligence is completely wrong though, this will be fixed and algorithms will all be working when we have contact with the main dev at C-CEx to update wallet.  Again our apologies, this is not anyone's fault but a mistake on our part that was fixed in 5 minutes, we just cannot release the new github commit and wallet until C-CEX does to prevent a potential fork.


New wallet will be out soon.
portice
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 999
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 14, 2014, 03:05:15 AM
 #240

Yes this is completely our mistake, when Pride at C-CEX looked over our code he wasn't looking for mining difficulty issues, was looking for malicious code. Ocminer we appreciate you pointing this out quickly so we could resolve it. Trying to say that C-CEX didn't do their due diligence is completely wrong though, this will be fixed and algorithms will all be working when we have contact with the main dev at C-CEx to update wallet.  Again our apologies, this is not anyone's fault but a mistake on our part that was fixed in 5 minutes, we just cannot release the new github commit and wallet until C-CEX does to prevent a potential fork.


New wallet will be out soon.

Timeline for soon?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!