CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[bathrobehero]

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4vn1ax/another_class_action_lawsuit_980/
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz?  On the 970.  thx

From the same thread:

Reasons:

Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the GTX 970 devices were sold based on misleading representations that the devices:

1. Operate with a full 4 gigabytes (“GB”) of video access memory (“VRAM”) instead of the actual 3.5 GB of VRAM and a “less performant” and decoupled 0.5 GB spillover segment that operates as slow as one seventh the speed of the 3.5 GB pool once the device is required to access more than 3.5 GB of memory
2. have 64 render output processors (“ROPs”), as opposed to 56 ROPs
3. have an L2 cache capacity of 2,048 kilobytes (“KB”), as opposed to 1,792 KB, and omitted material facts to the contrary.
4. Defendants have denied these allegations and asserted numerous defenses.

[1713923004]

1713923004

[1713923004]

1713923004

[1713923004]

1713923004

[1713923004]

1713923004

[tbearhere]

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4vn1ax/another_class_action_lawsuit_980/
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz?  On the 970.  thx

From the same thread:

Reasons:

Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the GTX 970 devices were sold based on misleading representations that the devices:

1. Operate with a full 4 gigabytes (“GB”) of video access memory (“VRAM”) instead of the actual 3.5 GB of VRAM and a “less performant” and decoupled 0.5 GB spillover segment that operates as slow as one seventh the speed of the 3.5 GB pool once the device is required to access more than 3.5 GB of memory
2. have 64 render output processors (“ROPs”), as opposed to 56 ROPs
3. have an L2 cache capacity of 2,048 kilobytes (“KB”), as opposed to 1,792 KB, and omitted material facts to the contrary.
4. Defendants have denied these allegations and asserted numerous defenses.

Thx bathrobehero.
So this could lead to instabilities?
I have 2 980ti and 2 970gtx. Wonder if I can get $ for that?

[tbearhere]

last half day yiimp lbry lucky very pretty

That's because Bensam left. He was holding the pool back.

[tbearhere]

I am doing great at yiimp testing another pool then back to yiimp.

[induktor]

Hi pallas
For some reason ccminer (all versions) does not seems to detect the new driver i get:

Can you confirm you are actually using the new proprietary nvidia driver and not the open source nouveau?
Did you install from the repository or use the run file?

I have Linux Mint based on Ubuntu 14.4 so I'm very interested in this issue.
In mint there is a driver manager with one click switching to the proprietary driver. It still shows the
old 352 version as recommended and I haven't found 367 packaged for Ubuntu 14.4 yet.

Hi
The driver IS working properly, I also had parts of older drivers 349 and 352, that i had to weed out 
i can see the card specific status, i can set power target limit.
i installed using repositories (ppa:graphics-drivers) so far it seems to be the only way to install from repo, since the driver is in beta.
also to get cuda 8 i had to register as a developer in nvidia 
it seems that this driver requires CUDA 8, I thought that maybe i can test first with cuda 7.5 and then install cuda 8 and see the difference, but no, this driver requires cuda 8 to work, so right now i'm installing it (it takes like an hour or so install it on a flash drive) I'll post results later

[bathrobehero]

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4vn1ax/another_class_action_lawsuit_980/
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz?  On the 970.  thx

From the same thread:

Reasons:

Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the GTX 970 devices were sold based on misleading representations that the devices:

1. Operate with a full 4 gigabytes (“GB”) of video access memory (“VRAM”) instead of the actual 3.5 GB of VRAM and a “less performant” and decoupled 0.5 GB spillover segment that operates as slow as one seventh the speed of the 3.5 GB pool once the device is required to access more than 3.5 GB of memory
2. have 64 render output processors (“ROPs”), as opposed to 56 ROPs
3. have an L2 cache capacity of 2,048 kilobytes (“KB”), as opposed to 1,792 KB, and omitted material facts to the contrary.
4. Defendants have denied these allegations and asserted numerous defenses.

Thx bathrobehero.
So this could lead to instabilities?
I have 2 980ti and 2 970gtx. Wonder if I can get $ for that?

I have no idea on any of those fronts. I never had any issues with my WF3OC 970's for mining or gaming. Not even when using more than 3.5 GB memory.

I basically love everything about these cards.

[tbearhere]

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4vn1ax/another_class_action_lawsuit_980/
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz?  On the 970.  thx

From the same thread:

Reasons:

Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the GTX 970 devices were sold based on misleading representations that the devices:

1. Operate with a full 4 gigabytes (“GB”) of video access memory (“VRAM”) instead of the actual 3.5 GB of VRAM and a “less performant” and decoupled 0.5 GB spillover segment that operates as slow as one seventh the speed of the 3.5 GB pool once the device is required to access more than 3.5 GB of memory
2. have 64 render output processors (“ROPs”), as opposed to 56 ROPs
3. have an L2 cache capacity of 2,048 kilobytes (“KB”), as opposed to 1,792 KB, and omitted material facts to the contrary.
4. Defendants have denied these allegations and asserted numerous defenses.

Thx bathrobehero.
So this could lead to instabilities?
I have 2 980ti and 2 970gtx. Wonder if I can get $ for that?

I have no idea on any of those fronts. I never had any issues with my WF3OC 970's for mining or gaming. Not even when using more than 3.5 GB memory.

I basically love everything about these cards.

Thx
I hate these cards clocks locked at 1400 and just loves to crash.
Tomorrow going to try to set the clocks to where their supposed to be see if that helps.

[bensam1231]

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4vn1ax/another_class_action_lawsuit_980/
and had one for the 970
Anybody know why plz?  On the 970.  thx

From the same thread:

Reasons:

Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the GTX 970 devices were sold based on misleading representations that the devices:

1. Operate with a full 4 gigabytes (“GB”) of video access memory (“VRAM”) instead of the actual 3.5 GB of VRAM and a “less performant” and decoupled 0.5 GB spillover segment that operates as slow as one seventh the speed of the 3.5 GB pool once the device is required to access more than 3.5 GB of memory
2. have 64 render output processors (“ROPs”), as opposed to 56 ROPs
3. have an L2 cache capacity of 2,048 kilobytes (“KB”), as opposed to 1,792 KB, and omitted material facts to the contrary.
4. Defendants have denied these allegations and asserted numerous defenses.

Thx bathrobehero.
So this could lead to instabilities?
I have 2 980ti and 2 970gtx. Wonder if I can get $ for that?

I have no idea on any of those fronts. I never had any issues with my WF3OC 970's for mining or gaming. Not even when using more than 3.5 GB memory.

I basically love everything about these cards.

Thx
I hate these cards clocks locked at 1400 and just loves to crash.
Tomorrow going to try to set the clocks to where their supposed to be see if that helps.

The 3.5GB partition has been known for a couple years now. It hasn't ever effected mining. However there has never been a algo that has filled 4GB of memory on these cards, so Ethereum will probably be the first if there is one... But considering they aren't super amazing in Eth to begin with and Eth going PoS in a couple months, it's not going to ever happen.

[bathrobehero]

The 3.5GB partition has been known for a couple years now. It hasn't ever effected mining. However there has never been a algo that has filled 4GB of memory on these cards, so Ethereum will probably be the first if there is one... But considering they aren't super amazing in Eth to begin with and Eth going PoS in a couple months, it's not going to ever happen.

Some algos like Neoscrypt/scrypt-jane and at least a couple others can fill 4GB and then some if you increase the intensity.

[bensam1231]

Yeah... Scrypt... Yeah.... >>

Neoscrypt you never mine at those intensities as it causes crashing.


In other news, ANYONE working on a Steem GPU miner? Hit me up with a message and I'll buy in on it for a 'preview' build, similar to Epsylons.

[Epsylon3]

my sia preview is almost ready, but for now only for suprnova... 1GH/s on 970

[klondike_bar_recovery]

The 3.5GB partition has been known for a couple years now. It hasn't ever effected mining. However there has never been a algo that has filled 4GB of memory on these cards, so Ethereum will probably be the first if there is one... But considering they aren't super amazing in Eth to begin with and Eth going PoS in a couple months, it's not going to ever happen.

Some algos like Neoscrypt/scrypt-jane and at least a couple others can fill 4GB and then some if you increase the intensity.

oh? wonder if the 8GB GTX 10 series might be able to make good use of tat. AFAIK they are good, but not mindblowing, at neoscrypt. definitely not as profitable as lbry/lyra2/lyra2r2

[go6ooo1212]

my sia preview is almost ready, but for now only for suprnova... 1GH/s on 970

Will it work on solo , also

[Epsylon3]

no, not standard, dont want crap in ccminer code, its already a mess with reusable code. When you see suprnova finding one block per day... you can see its fully useless also

[bensam1231]

my sia preview is almost ready, but for now only for suprnova... 1GH/s on 970

So a 12% improvement over the GO miner?

When you do stuff like this, you should push your personal pool so you can get a small percentage back and maybe make something more for yourself. Everyone pays pool fees already by mining on other pools.

[Epsylon3]

ccminer is not a pool, sia will never be on yiimp, crappy rpc, worst than eth

[Liquid71]

Very bad today , with 4x gtx 1070 and 1 ghs power   :
[...]

All pools have good days and bad days. Some do seem to have more bad days than most, but that is definitely not the case for Yiimp! My personal experience on Yiimp, is that it performs much better than most other pools that support the same coins.

Deposit stats are the worst place to look for your recent mining performance though. You should look at the pool stats instead.
What if the pool had some downtime? What if you had some internet issues? What if your rig has a couple of crashed cards? Note, I'm not saying that one of these was the case for the past 24h, just that looking at exchange deposits is really the worst way to go about measuring performance...

Cheers!

Yeah, that was up till a day ago. Now it seems to be doing perpetually bad and isn't showing any sign of improving. I think I'll be moving my hashrate off. When you have 10% network hashrate, things usually balance out. Should be earning about 30% more then it is.

BTW Suprnova's pool luck is at ~75% and Coinmines is at 75%. That either means Yiimp is having a reallllllly bad day due to the amount of hashrate it has or something is broken on the pool. Either way, 36 hours is too long to be losing out on 30% of my hashrate.

You're a fucking idiot. If anything you'd jump on a pool with bad luck because it's "due" for a correction. Seriously if you can't tell the difference between bad luck and a pool operator robbing you it's time to find a new hobby

[bensam1231]

Very bad today , with 4x gtx 1070 and 1 ghs power   :
[...]

All pools have good days and bad days. Some do seem to have more bad days than most, but that is definitely not the case for Yiimp! My personal experience on Yiimp, is that it performs much better than most other pools that support the same coins.

Deposit stats are the worst place to look for your recent mining performance though. You should look at the pool stats instead.
What if the pool had some downtime? What if you had some internet issues? What if your rig has a couple of crashed cards? Note, I'm not saying that one of these was the case for the past 24h, just that looking at exchange deposits is really the worst way to go about measuring performance...

Cheers!

Yeah, that was up till a day ago. Now it seems to be doing perpetually bad and isn't showing any sign of improving. I think I'll be moving my hashrate off. When you have 10% network hashrate, things usually balance out. Should be earning about 30% more then it is.

BTW Suprnova's pool luck is at ~75% and Coinmines is at 75%. That either means Yiimp is having a reallllllly bad day due to the amount of hashrate it has or something is broken on the pool. Either way, 36 hours is too long to be losing out on 30% of my hashrate.

You're a fucking idiot. If anything you'd jump on a pool with bad luck because it's "due" for a correction. Seriously if you can't tell the difference between bad luck and a pool operator robbing you it's time to find a new hobby

And you're a idiot if you believe that RNG will go the opposite direction in some extreme form because it has a 'correction' coming. RNG is RNG, if a pool is doing bad, it doesn't mean it'll do really good after it. There is no order to 'luck'.

Also you know absolutely nothing about statistics, in this case the law of large numbers. More data points minimizes variance. I pointed out two possible causes, one is possible skimming, the other was the pool was having issues. One more possible then the other as I pointed out in later posts, which you didn't even bother reading before quoting a post from two days ago.

If you're going to act like a douche at least use a bit of logic, a bit of research about what you're talking about, and points to back up what you're saying. Now go excuse yourself and remove your foot from your mouth. <3

[Vegetablepin]

Does anyone know how the TDP reduction works on the new cards?

[tbearhere]

The 3.5GB partition has been known for a couple years now. It hasn't ever effected mining. However there has never been a algo that has filled 4GB of memory on these cards, so Ethereum will probably be the first if there is one... But considering they aren't super amazing in Eth to begin with and Eth going PoS in a couple months, it's not going to ever happen.

Some algos like Neoscrypt/scrypt-jane and at least a couple others can fill 4GB and then some if you increase the intensity.

Yes easily too.