Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
July 31, 2016, 10:29:47 AM |
|
i will no more answer to your pitty cries, there is no buttons on the pool to improve miners luck, sorry.
the wallet works very well, since beginning... never had to touch it
note: sorry to be rude, i answer in your language
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
July 31, 2016, 10:44:29 AM |
|
no matter what pool you mine, there is always a certain % of loss, i suspect this has to do with how the block reward works here, the increment of 1 every 100 block...
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 31, 2016, 10:45:54 AM |
|
i will no more answer to your pitty cries, there is no buttons on the pool to improve miners luck, sorry.
the wallet works very well, since beginning... never had to touch it
note: sorry to be rude, i answer in your language
Stats on pools can be manipulated. That aside, it's entirely possible for pools to be buggy and not find blocks or have something wrong with it. In this case due to the change in luck on the two pools I mentioned, with exactly the same lucky (roughly), it probably means something is up with yiimp. Just like mining software can be buggy and flake out. Just because something exists doesn't mean it's working perfectly.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
July 31, 2016, 10:48:35 AM |
|
no, good sample is decred, each block reward can be different ... same in all cryptos due to the tx fees
And Orphans just reset the amount to 0, there was none here
Almost sure you already tried to solo mine... its the same at pool level, 2x more cards give more than 2x more blocks in general
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 31, 2016, 01:19:42 PM |
|
i will no more answer to your pitty cries, there is no buttons on the pool to improve miners luck, sorry.
the wallet works very well, since beginning... never had to touch it
note: sorry to be rude, i answer in your language
Stats on pools can be manipulated. That aside, it's entirely possible for pools to be buggy and not find blocks or have something wrong with it. In this case due to the change in luck on the two pools I mentioned, with exactly the same lucky (roughly), it probably means something is up with yiimp. Just like mining software can be buggy and flake out. Just because something exists doesn't mean it's working perfectly. Some pools have funky stats reporting also. I can't make sense of Coinmine having well over 60% of the hashrate, finds about 50% of the blocks, and still it somehow manages to estimate that it had 60% luck finding recent blocks (when it actually consistently has about 100% or worse). So yeah, something must be wrong with Yiimp
|
|
|
|
maxim000
|
|
July 31, 2016, 01:49:25 PM |
|
last half day yiimp lbry lucky very pretty
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 31, 2016, 02:31:39 PM |
|
last half day yiimp lbry lucky very pretty
That's because Bensam left. He was holding the pool back.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
July 31, 2016, 03:46:58 PM |
|
Some pools have funky stats reporting also. I can't make sense of Coinmine having well over 60% of the hashrate, finds about 50% of the blocks, and still it somehow manages to estimate that it had 60% luck finding recent blocks (when it actually consistently has about 100% or worse). So yeah, something must be wrong with Yiimp One of the things I've always liked about yaamp/yiimp is it has the most transparent stats of any pool. When one is able to see more of the process there is a chance one will see some things they either don't understand or don't like but have always existed.
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
July 31, 2016, 05:54:48 PM |
|
Some pools have funky stats reporting also. I can't make sense of Coinmine having well over 60% of the hashrate, finds about 50% of the blocks, and still it somehow manages to estimate that it had 60% luck finding recent blocks (when it actually consistently has about 100% or worse). So yeah, something must be wrong with Yiimp One of the things I've always liked about yaamp/yiimp is it has the most transparent stats of any pool. When one is able to see more of the process there is a chance one will see some things they either don't understand or don't like but have always existed. TROUBLE COMPILING CPU-OPT IN LINUX-- I'll shift this question to your thread in order to stay on topic. Usually the "build.sh" script ( I think it was written by tpruvot) just runs, maybe with an adjustment to Makefile.am in ccminer. I can't get cpu-opt to compile in Lubunto 14.04.4, and I have the standard setup to compile ccminer. Like I said, Ill post the same question in your CPU-OPT thread, we can figure it out there. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
|
|
August 01, 2016, 12:56:55 AM |
|
i will no more answer to your pitty cries, there is no buttons on the pool to improve miners luck, sorry.
the wallet works very well, since beginning... never had to touch it
note: sorry to be rude, i answer in your language
Stats on pools can be manipulated. That aside, it's entirely possible for pools to be buggy and not find blocks or have something wrong with it. In this case due to the change in luck on the two pools I mentioned, with exactly the same lucky (roughly), it probably means something is up with yiimp. Just like mining software can be buggy and flake out. Just because something exists doesn't mean it's working perfectly. Some pools have funky stats reporting also. I can't make sense of Coinmine having well over 60% of the hashrate, finds about 50% of the blocks, and still it somehow manages to estimate that it had 60% luck finding recent blocks (when it actually consistently has about 100% or worse). So yeah, something must be wrong with Yiimp Still better then MNpool and Suprnova. Tried out Coinmine and got pretty much what was estimated on average on the pool page over 24hr. last half day yiimp lbry lucky very pretty
That's because Bensam left. He was holding the pool back. Apparently... Or Epsylon turned off his skimmer. XD
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
August 01, 2016, 02:37:53 AM |
|
yep we got some :p... 4 consecutive blocks in 3mn by different users.. Thing which should be almost impossible with the chain block time... But when that happens the net diff go very high (was at block 21118) its more than luck at this level more a lottery winner. we are over estimated rewards today
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
|
|
August 01, 2016, 02:58:50 AM |
|
yep we got some :p... 4 consecutive blocks in 3mn by different users.. Thing which should be almost impossible with the chain block time... But when that happens the net diff go very high (was at block 21118) its more than luck at this level more a lottery winner. we are over estimated rewards today I still don't believe that... The more data points you have, with the more hashrate you have, the more 'luck' will normalize. Variance decreases when the amount of data points increases. That's why people generally stick to larger pools, it minimizes variance and 'bad days'.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
corsica
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2016, 08:31:03 AM |
|
i am grateful for epsylon for his work,
learned much using his pool statistics and graphs
thank you really mate
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
|
|
August 01, 2016, 09:02:45 AM |
|
There is one realllly big miner that I've seen hop on and off of Lbry the past couple days. Somewhere around 300GH. I think there is another one around 200GH that is constantly on the coin I saw pop off once.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
induktor
|
|
August 01, 2016, 12:41:39 PM |
|
Hello as anyone be able to use ccminer with the GTX 1070 ?, i installed the new drivers 367 (xubuntu 14.04 x64) nvidia-smi works perfectly and I can set power target, but ccminer won't load. i tried sp's ccminer, tpruvot's ccminer and same, it won't load.
i'm still with CUDA 7.5 (i have cuda 8 ready but i didn't install it yet because i wanted to test how it went first with 7.5 but it does not load.
both compiled from source after the driver install. was anyone able to make it work under linux?
|
BTC addr: 1vTGnFgaM2WJjswwmbj6N2AQBWcHfimSc
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
August 01, 2016, 12:50:24 PM |
|
Hello as anyone be able to use ccminer with the GTX 1070 ?, i installed the new drivers 367 (xubuntu 14.04 x64) nvidia-smi works perfectly and I can set power target, but ccminer won't load. i tried sp's ccminer, tpruvot's ccminer and same, it won't load.
i'm still with CUDA 7.5 (i have cuda 8 ready but i didn't install it yet because i wanted to test how it went first with 7.5 but it does not load.
both compiled from source after the driver install. was anyone able to make it work under linux?
Yes it worked right away for me. I just updated the driver for pascal support. Even the old binaries worked without recompile. Nothing different.
|
|
|
|
induktor
|
|
August 01, 2016, 02:16:33 PM |
|
Hi pallas For some reason ccminer (all versions) does not seems to detect the new driver i get: ccminer --version SP-Mod 1.5.79 Compiled with GCC 4.8 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 7.5
Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34 Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot and tsiv.
[2016-08-01 16:15:05] Unable to query number of CUDA devices! Is an nVidia driver installed?
lsmod | grep nvidia nvidia_uvm 642693 0 nvidia_drm 14412 0 nvidia_modeset 764277 1 nvidia_drm drm 303102 1 nvidia_drm nvidia 11245276 2 nvidia_modeset,nvidia_uvm
nvcc --version nvcc: NVIDIA (R) Cuda compiler driver Copyright (c) 2005-2015 NVIDIA Corporation Built on Tue_Aug_11_14:27:32_CDT_2015 Cuda compilation tools, release 7.5, V7.5.17
nvidia-smi +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | NVIDIA-SMI 367.35 Driver Version: 367.35 | |-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ | GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC | | Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. | |===============================+======================+======================| | 0 GeForce GTX 1070 Off | 0000:01:00.0 Off | N/A | | 0% 28C P0 35W / 180W | 0MiB / 8113MiB | 0% Default | +-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Processes: GPU Memory | | GPU PID Type Process name Usage | |=============================================================================| | No running processes found | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
is a ccminer issue, a driver issue, i will try to install ethminer to see if it detects the card.
|
BTC addr: 1vTGnFgaM2WJjswwmbj6N2AQBWcHfimSc
|
|
|
joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
August 01, 2016, 03:00:25 PM |
|
Hi pallas For some reason ccminer (all versions) does not seems to detect the new driver i get:
Can you confirm you are actually using the new proprietary nvidia driver and not the open source nouveau? Did you install from the repository or use the run file? I have Linux Mint based on Ubuntu 14.4 so I'm very interested in this issue. In mint there is a driver manager with one click switching to the proprietary driver. It still shows the old 352 version as recommended and I haven't found 367 packaged for Ubuntu 14.4 yet.
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
August 01, 2016, 03:04:35 PM |
|
Hi pallas For some reason ccminer (all versions) does not seems to detect the new driver i get:
Can you confirm you are actually using the new proprietary nvidia driver and not the open source nouveau? Did you install from the repository or use the run file? I have Linux Mint based on Ubuntu 14.4 so I'm very interested in this issue. In mint there is a driver manager with one click switching to the proprietary driver. It still shows the old 352 version as recommended and I haven't found 367 packaged for Ubuntu 14.4 yet. using the run file for months and didn't have any issue. of course you must reinstall it every time a new kernel version is booted.
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1003
|
|
August 01, 2016, 08:36:00 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|