|
4theLOVEofCrypto
|
 |
March 04, 2015, 04:23:16 PM |
|
Has cryptodevil ever asked a question with the intent to receive a credible answer? No. He only asks questions with the intent to discredit the Blocknet project. I wonder why? An article worth reading to give you an idea of just how much development work is going on in the background for this and the other superNET coins:
[snip]
It's pretty easy to determine the reason behind people's negativity towards any given project by simply checking their post history. Ordinarily, the ones who criticize a project non-stop are the ones who see it is a direct threat to their own wallets. My advice: If someone is repeatedly critical towards a project, view their post history to help frame how you engage them. Isn't that the truth. Good advice too. Cryptodevil is a troll. Go back to SuperNet. |
|
|
|
|
holepunch
Member
 Offline
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
|
|
March 04, 2015, 09:34:24 PM
Last edit: March 04, 2015, 09:46:47 PM by holepunch |
|
so what interest in blocknet will the 'executive board' in the incorporated company have.There has to be a director etc.How will they be renumerated, will they be disclosing their blocknet holdings and their blocknet income,How many blocknet tokens/hz asset shares will the incorporated company(directors etc) own and what percentage of the total assets will this be? Will each blocknet token be able to be exchanged 1 to 1 with hz asset exchange 'shares' or will the company inc have say 50% hz assets and the remaining 50% be represented by blocknet tokens/hz asset shares. How will it be structured?
Sorry guys, seems i shook up a hornets nest  , as a holder of several thousand 'blocknet' just wanted to know how things were going to be set up - which in turn would affect my investment! Would i be right in saying that the ITO funds are being used to develop/marketing etc and the inc 'company' will derive income from services based on the 'blocknet' protocol. If not please explain where i am going wrong as i feel these are pertinent/ relevant questions with regard to my investment in 'blocknet' my blocknet address BoiC3s68WrT1NHjGfUiy2B2DuiHKki7Gd2 |
|
|
|
|
CryptoClub
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
cryptocollectorsclub.com
|
|
March 04, 2015, 09:36:40 PM |
|
I bought a little bit of Block and am back in now, mostly to be amused when (haters) people figure out this is all real and the FUD was just FUD. New website looks great by the way.
|
...
|
|
|
holepunch
Member
Offline
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
|
|
March 04, 2015, 09:53:30 PM |
|
he he - just had a look through some previous postings, think i got hijacked!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Longenecker
|
|
March 05, 2015, 12:46:34 AM |
|
I bought a little bit of Block and am back in now, mostly to be amused when (haters) people figure out this is all real and the FUD was just FUD. New website looks great by the way.
Out of the darkness and into the light. Welcome back!  |
|
|
|
|
|
SouthernBTC
|
|
March 05, 2015, 12:51:11 AM |
|
I bought a little bit of Block and am back in now, mostly to be amused when (haters) people figure out this is all real and the FUD was just FUD. New website looks great by the way.
Well, ya might want to grab yourself some xcurrency too if you haven't already! |
|
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
March 05, 2015, 01:09:55 AM
Last edit: March 05, 2015, 01:20:46 AM by battbot |
|
 Just FYI: to anyone new or not paying close attention, it's worth noting that the current marketcap of Blocknet is ~$176,619.28 (as opposed to coinmarketcap's calculation of $456,077). This is because the total supply of BLOCK is not 10 million, but closer to 3.9 million coins (roughly 6.1m coins have been burnt to this address: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/block/address.dws?1374.htm). If BLOCK were to begin trading at it's ITO price of 0.00025000 BTC, it's marketcap would be roughly $266,175 (if everything else remained constant). See: http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/ITO_Results |
|
|
|
|
|
starblocks
|
|
March 05, 2015, 02:21:57 PM |
|
I bought a little bit of Block and am back in now, mostly to be amused when (haters) people figure out this is all real and the FUD was just FUD. New website looks great by the way.
Out of the darkness and into the light. Welcome back! Speaking of dark and light, i always wondered if both sides could work together (supernet and blocknet) but now it seems more extremities have come into play, and these examples may stand for a lifetime unless someone changes them |
|
|
|
synechist (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
March 05, 2015, 02:48:19 PM
Last edit: March 05, 2015, 03:49:49 PM by synechist |
|
Speaking of dark and light, i always wondered if both sides could work together (supernet and blocknet) but now it seems more extremities have come into play, and these examples may stand for a lifetime unless someone changes them
Personally I'd love to work with them. They're a technically competent and interesting project, and I respect what they're doing. (I don't think they want to work with us, but I'm open.) Furthermore, we'd enhance each other's service offerings if, say, a SuperNET node could offer Blocknet services. IMO we're both incentivised to work together. How about we put an XBridge in the SuperNET? |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
starblocks
|
|
March 05, 2015, 03:15:43 PM
Last edit: March 06, 2015, 06:49:02 AM by starblocks |
|
Speaking of dark and light, i always wondered if both sides could work together (supernet and blocknet) but now it seems more extremities have come into play, and these examples may stand for a lifetime unless someone changes them
Personally I'd love to work with them. They're both technically competent and interesting projects, and I respect what they're doing. (I don't think they want to work with us, but I'm open.) Furthermore, we'd enhance each other's service offerings if, say, a SuperNET node could offer Blocknet services. IMO we're both incentivised to work together. How about we put an XBridge in the SuperNET? Sounds like a great idea |
|
|
|
synechist (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
March 05, 2015, 05:35:11 PM |
|
Boom.  [Click the image to read the rest of the article.]
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
March 05, 2015, 06:31:40 PM |
|
Huge.
Blocknet has the potential to revolutionize the entire crypto-field, as it serves as a decentralized, open source bridge between all blockchains, including bitcoins -- it is a game-changer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
starblocks
|
|
March 05, 2015, 07:14:30 PM |
|
Boom. [Click the image to read the rest of the article.] Ok, you just dropped the bomb I imagined you would but would you at least consider what I said please |
|
|
|
synechist (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
March 05, 2015, 07:17:51 PM |
|
@starblocks
- You mean about needing to find a way to get the two projects to work together asap?
Yes, I'd welcome ideas on that topic.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sugarboy321
|
|
March 05, 2015, 08:40:19 PM |
|
I bought a little bit of Block and am back in now, mostly to be amused when (haters) people figure out this is all real and the FUD was just FUD. New website looks great by the way.
Out of the darkness and into the light. Welcome back! Speaking of dark and light, i always wondered if both sides could work together (supernet and blocknet) but now it seems more extremities have come into play, and these examples may stand for a lifetime unless someone changes them I'm with you, Supernet and Blocknet to combine to form SuperBlocknet!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
Longenecker
|
|
March 05, 2015, 09:20:25 PM |
|
Wow, amazing news today! The Bitnation partnership is HUGE!
Has anyone else noticed that 50 btc buy order on bittrex?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vlizzjeffrey
|
|
March 05, 2015, 09:36:34 PM |
|
Wow, amazing news today! The Bitnation partnership is HUGE!
Has anyone else noticed that 50 btc buy order on bittrex?
lmao i didnt see that, but i have now thx 2 you ( canceld my sell order also lol) |
|
|
|
|
