[ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure

[Valta Crypto]

ito launch time & zone? (sorry if asked before)

[1713882448]

1713882448

[1713882448]

1713882448

[1713882448]

1713882448

[1713882448]

1713882448

[1713882448]

1713882448

[onemorebtc]

OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).

1) you claimed and described using other coins features for a little fee: i told you this wont work

- We have not discussed slippage. I linked you to my last post about it, but you haven't referred to it yet.

2) now its about services: you fail to deliever ANY technical infos about how to implement, find and use them

- Services aren't some new idea I've just introduced. Read the OP and the FAQ. It's not complicated.
- I have not delivered "technical infos" on implementing services because the application platform has not been created yet.

only thing left is the exchange between participating coins...
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)

- refer to the post I linked earlier and we can discuss it.
- the decentralised exchange has not been created yet, so the "technical infos" will not be code repos or something similar.

so i really think you just want to scam. i am not unethical: proove me wrong and i will reedit my other thread - i dont have a problem to be wrong.

- Starting a project with clear high-level information on what we're going to do,
- stating that we need funding to create this tech,
- and having am impressive track record of similar tech (XC's Xnode protocol, its ad hoc mesh networking, etc.),
does not constitute a scam, it constitutes a project in its early stages.

If you don't like the level of risk in our ITO, don't buy.
The level of risk is clear. We're not hiding anything about the stage the project is at.

for an ipo you need more than an idea saying "we want to join coins and have some kind of service marketplace"

i dont ask for sourcecode

[synechist]

OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).

1) you claimed and described using other coins features for a little fee: i told you this wont work

- We have not discussed slippage. I linked you to my last post about it, but you haven't referred to it yet.

2) now its about services: you fail to deliever ANY technical infos about how to implement, find and use them

- Services aren't some new idea I've just introduced. Read the OP and the FAQ. It's not complicated.
- I have not delivered "technical infos" on implementing services because the application platform has not been created yet.

only thing left is the exchange between participating coins...
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)

- refer to the post I linked earlier and we can discuss it.
- the decentralised exchange has not been created yet, so the "technical infos" will not be code repos or something similar.

so i really think you just want to scam. i am not unethical: proove me wrong and i will reedit my other thread - i dont have a problem to be wrong.

- Starting a project with clear high-level information on what we're going to do,
- stating that we need funding to create this tech,
- and having am impressive track record of similar tech (XC's Xnode protocol, its ad hoc mesh networking, etc.),
does not constitute a scam, it constitutes a project in its early stages.

If you don't like the level of risk in our ITO, don't buy.
The level of risk is clear. We're not hiding anything about the stage the project is at.

for an ipo you need more than an idea saying "we want to join coins and have some kind of service marketplace"

i dont ask for sourcecode

We have a provided whole lot more than that.

Have you read this thread? I've provided fairly in-depth information on how the XBridge will work, what technologies it'll employ (telehash v.3 mesh, DHT, and the Xnode protocol), and how the technologies will work together.

Furthermore we'll be releasing info today on the development timeline, budget, and accountability measures for the funding.

[cryptico]

Exactly this can be resolved simply by letting join all the coins that want to join the blocknet and then the fundation will then mark them as reputable of trust or not. that's it. the customer than can differ scam coins from others and no centralized control

still a little centralized (esp if you look at WHO is at the blocknet foundation - coindevs) but its ok - its a little like googles playstore vs amazons app store..

i can live with that

Someone can offer as well an indipendent escrow service for that in the blocknet as a service multiple indipendent escrows to review  new coins will be created and the most respectfull will be followed and enstablished in the free Market. The foundation can still express their opinion upon other Escrow services.

[g0re79]

OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).

1) you claimed and described using other coins features for a little fee: i told you this wont work

- We have not discussed slippage. I linked you to my last post about it, but you haven't referred to it yet.

2) now its about services: you fail to deliever ANY technical infos about how to implement, find and use them

- Services aren't some new idea I've just introduced. Read the OP and the FAQ. It's not complicated.
- I have not delivered "technical infos" on implementing services because the application platform has not been created yet.

only thing left is the exchange between participating coins...
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)

- refer to the post I linked earlier and we can discuss it.
- the decentralised exchange has not been created yet, so the "technical infos" will not be code repos or something similar.

so i really think you just want to scam. i am not unethical: proove me wrong and i will reedit my other thread - i dont have a problem to be wrong.

- Starting a project with clear high-level information on what we're going to do,
- stating that we need funding to create this tech,
- and having am impressive track record of similar tech (XC's Xnode protocol, its ad hoc mesh networking, etc.),
does not constitute a scam, it constitutes a project in its early stages.

If you don't like the level of risk in our ITO, don't buy.
The level of risk is clear. We're not hiding anything about the stage the project is at.

for an ipo you need more than an idea saying "we want to join coins and have some kind of service marketplace"

i dont ask for sourcecode

I would like to see sourcecode, or at least some other proof that develop is in progress. Only fancy words and graphics so far, too little to ask $1m for it

[cryptico]

OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).

1) you claimed and described using other coins features for a little fee: i told you this wont work

- We have not discussed slippage. I linked you to my last post about it, but you haven't referred to it yet.

2) now its about services: you fail to deliever ANY technical infos about how to implement, find and use them

- Services aren't some new idea I've just introduced. Read the OP and the FAQ. It's not complicated.
- I have not delivered "technical infos" on implementing services because the application platform has not been created yet.

only thing left is the exchange between participating coins...
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)

- refer to the post I linked earlier and we can discuss it.
- the decentralised exchange has not been created yet, so the "technical infos" will not be code repos or something similar.

so i really think you just want to scam. i am not unethical: proove me wrong and i will reedit my other thread - i dont have a problem to be wrong.

- Starting a project with clear high-level information on what we're going to do,
- stating that we need funding to create this tech,
- and having am impressive track record of similar tech (XC's Xnode protocol, its ad hoc mesh networking, etc.),
does not constitute a scam, it constitutes a project in its early stages.

If you don't like the level of risk in our ITO, don't buy.
The level of risk is clear. We're not hiding anything about the stage the project is at.

for an ipo you need more than an idea saying "we want to join coins and have some kind of service marketplace"

i dont ask for sourcecode

We have a provided whole lot more than that.

Have you read this thread? I've provided fairly in-depth information on how the XBridge will work, what technologies it'll employ (telehash v.3 mesh, DHT, and the Xnode protocol), and how the technologies will work together.

Furthermore we'll be releasing info today on the development timeline, budget, and accountability measures for the funding.

Why no whitepaper this will bring confidence in Investors. Xbridge is open source

[synechist]

OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).

1) you claimed and described using other coins features for a little fee: i told you this wont work

- We have not discussed slippage. I linked you to my last post about it, but you haven't referred to it yet.

2) now its about services: you fail to deliever ANY technical infos about how to implement, find and use them

- Services aren't some new idea I've just introduced. Read the OP and the FAQ. It's not complicated.
- I have not delivered "technical infos" on implementing services because the application platform has not been created yet.

only thing left is the exchange between participating coins...
please provide technical infos (as you should have done weeks before your ipo start so people have a chance to check them)

- refer to the post I linked earlier and we can discuss it.
- the decentralised exchange has not been created yet, so the "technical infos" will not be code repos or something similar.

so i really think you just want to scam. i am not unethical: proove me wrong and i will reedit my other thread - i dont have a problem to be wrong.

- Starting a project with clear high-level information on what we're going to do,
- stating that we need funding to create this tech,
- and having am impressive track record of similar tech (XC's Xnode protocol, its ad hoc mesh networking, etc.),
does not constitute a scam, it constitutes a project in its early stages.

If you don't like the level of risk in our ITO, don't buy.
The level of risk is clear. We're not hiding anything about the stage the project is at.

for an ipo you need more than an idea saying "we want to join coins and have some kind of service marketplace"

i dont ask for sourcecode

I would like to see sourcecode, or at least some other proof that develop is in progress. Only fancy words and graphics so far, too little to ask $1m for it

Yes, this is something we're considering seriously.

Part of the XBridge code is completed already, and it would make sense for us to make it public.

[onemorebtc]

Why no whitepaper this will bring confidence in Investors. Xbridge is open source

exactly, this is all i really want...
not a pr person who admits not know the technics very well to describe something about it

[synechist]

Why no whitepaper this will bring confidence in Investors. Xbridge is open source

exactly, this is all i really want...

The Blocknet does not have a "whitepaper".

What we do have, which is better, is:
- the Xnode protocol, which is already coded, live and functioning on XCurrency nodes.
- Telehash v.3 documentation: https://github.com/telehash/telehash.org/tree/v3/v3
- Serverless Telehash with DHT: see the above link, and also https://github.com/quartzjer/TeleHash/blob/master/org/proto/kademlia.md


P.S. Personally I would like it if there was a whitepaper, because it would set certain people's minds at rest. However a whitepaper by no means guarantees the success of a project. Spelling out a solution is not some sort of guarantee that the solution will work.

[SumthngsWrong]

Why no whitepaper this will bring confidence in Investors. Xbridge is open source

exactly, this is all i really want...
not a pr person who admits not know the technics very well to describe something about it

All I want is a member who doesn't butcher the English language.

[McHammer]

all i want is your money.let's sing all together.

[crackfoo]

Why no whitepaper this will bring confidence in Investors. Xbridge is open source

exactly, this is all i really want...

The Blocknet does not have a "whitepaper".

What we do have, which is better, is:
- the Xnode protocol, which is already coded, live and functioning on XCurrency nodes.
- Telehash v.3 documentation: https://github.com/telehash/telehash.org/tree/v3/v3
- Serverless Telehash with DHT: see the above link, and also https://github.com/quartzjer/TeleHash/blob/master/org/proto/kademlia.md


P.S. Personally I would like it if there was a whitepaper, because it would set certain people's minds at rest. However a whitepaper by no means guarantees the success of a project. Spelling out a solution is not some sort of guarantee that the solution will work.

Is there a link to the xbridge opensource?

[synechist]

Why no whitepaper this will bring confidence in Investors. Xbridge is open source

exactly, this is all i really want...

The Blocknet does not have a "whitepaper".

What we do have, which is better, is:
- the Xnode protocol, which is already coded, live and functioning on XCurrency nodes.
- Telehash v.3 documentation: https://github.com/telehash/telehash.org/tree/v3/v3
- Serverless Telehash with DHT: see the above link, and also https://github.com/quartzjer/TeleHash/blob/master/org/proto/kademlia.md


P.S. Personally I would like it if there was a whitepaper, because it would set certain people's minds at rest. However a whitepaper by no means guarantees the success of a project. Spelling out a solution is not some sort of guarantee that the solution will work.

Is there a link to the xbridge opensource?

Only part of the XBridge protocol has been completed and this was not done in an open source way.

However the XBridge will be open source.

We're considering releasing the part-completed code to serve as proof-of-concept.

[hoertest]

Why no whitepaper this will bring confidence in Investors. Xbridge is open source

exactly, this is all i really want...

The Blocknet does not have a "whitepaper".

What we do have, which is better, is:
- the Xnode protocol, which is already coded, live and functioning on XCurrency nodes.
- Telehash v.3 documentation: https://github.com/telehash/telehash.org/tree/v3/v3
- Serverless Telehash with DHT: see the above link, and also https://github.com/quartzjer/TeleHash/blob/master/org/proto/kademlia.md


P.S. Personally I would like it if there was a whitepaper, because it would set certain people's minds at rest. However a whitepaper by no means guarantees the success of a project. Spelling out a solution is not some sort of guarantee that the solution will work.

Is there a link to the xbridge opensource?

Only part of the XBridge protocol has been completed and this was not done in an open source way.

However the XBridge will be open source.

We're considering releasing the part-completed code to serve as proof-of-concept.

do so. before the ito. it saves you a lot of stress and repeating arguments. makes everybodys lives easier.

[racer2012]

So the all coins in blocknet marketcap value goes up so does blocknet shares value goes up too?

[synechist]

So the all coins in blocknet marketcap value goes up so does blocknet shares value goes up too?

No, Blocknet tokens are independent of the value of participating coins and are not asset-backed. (We feel that this avoids centralisation of altcoins' money supply.)

The value of the Blocknet's funding will go up if participating altcoins go up, because part of its funds will be denominated in altcoins.

[synechist]

Why no whitepaper this will bring confidence in Investors. Xbridge is open source

exactly, this is all i really want...

The Blocknet does not have a "whitepaper".

What we do have, which is better, is:
- the Xnode protocol, which is already coded, live and functioning on XCurrency nodes.
- Telehash v.3 documentation: https://github.com/telehash/telehash.org/tree/v3/v3
- Serverless Telehash with DHT: see the above link, and also https://github.com/quartzjer/TeleHash/blob/master/org/proto/kademlia.md


P.S. Personally I would like it if there was a whitepaper, because it would set certain people's minds at rest. However a whitepaper by no means guarantees the success of a project. Spelling out a solution is not some sort of guarantee that the solution will work.

Is there a link to the xbridge opensource?

Only part of the XBridge protocol has been completed and this was not done in an open source way.

However the XBridge will be open source.

We're considering releasing the part-completed code to serve as proof-of-concept.

do so. before the ito. it saves you a lot of stress and repeating arguments. makes everybodys lives easier.

I couldn't agree more. :-)

[McHammer]

i'd like to see a poll / further arguments weather blocknet is watering down the value of the participating coins or not ....
the faq is not satisfying

[synechist]

i'd like to see a poll / further arguments weather blocknet is watering down the value of the participating coins or not ....
the faq is not satisfying

You should present an argument. Personally I think the FAQ is pretty satisfying.

What do you think is left out of it?

I'm very happy to discuss this and to update the FAQ with relevant details.

[mxxxxxx]

ito launch time & zone? (sorry if asked before)

ITO will begin on 5am EST Oct 29th and run until November 5th 23:59:00