mxxxxxx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 06, 2014, 05:52:35 PM |
|
Good one
|
|
|
|
URSAY
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1010
|
|
November 06, 2014, 05:53:31 PM |
|
Check out facts, evidence, and scientific reason. They are kind of neat.
|
|
|
|
Stinky_Pete
|
|
November 06, 2014, 05:54:47 PM |
|
Check out facts, evidence, and scientific reason. They are kind of neat. It's hard to find any disinterested witnesses...
|
|
|
|
dan7777777
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
November 06, 2014, 05:55:25 PM |
|
Cant stand the tension. Not going to look at this thread until this is all over. One thing I will say, I dont think the Dev team and PR team are bad guys but they do seem disorganised and everything seems rushed and last minute. I know they had a MASSIVE amount of FUD to deal with but I still think their organisation skills could be better. However saying that, this would be a sad day in crypto if such a great oppertunity is spoilt by greedy & jealous FUDSTERS. Bowing out until its over.
|
|
|
|
chips-dev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:00:46 PM |
|
Cant stand the tension. Not going to look at this thread until this is all over. One thing I will say, I dont think the Dev team and PR team are bad guys but they do seem disorganised and everything seems rushed and last minute. I know they had a MASSIVE amount of FUD to deal with but I still think their organisation skills could be better. However saying that, this would be a sad day in crypto if such a great oppertunity is spoilt by greedy & jealous FUDSTERS. Bowing out until its over.
It could have been delt with much better. Not that huge amount of BTC in the ICO. PR. Why letting for example NHZ or the others get a part of the ICO? There was alot of shitty fud, sure. Not all fud though.. it was questions from regular users of BCT.
|
|
|
|
sust1200
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:04:11 PM |
|
Has the trading started on some exchanges?, i see BLOCK down to 20k @ Poloniox
|
|
|
|
mxxxxxx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:05:24 PM |
|
Has the trading started on some exchanges?, i see BLOCK down to 20k @ Poloniox
You could trade on Poloniex from day one of the ITO
|
|
|
|
notsofast
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1517
Merit: 1042
@notsofast
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:12:43 PM |
|
I don't foresee any problem with buybacks bringing the invested BTC below the go-ahead threshold.
It should be fairly simple to create another mini-ITO using BTC at potentially a slightly discounted price on CoinGateway (since presumably they're still set up for it), to make up the shortfall.
Or revise the go-ahead threshold downward.
Or make up the shortfall in a private deal with a single angel investor.
My point is, there are several ways to ensure the continuation of the project while still honouring its initial rules.
|
twitter.com/notsofast
|
|
|
sysco32
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:16:41 PM |
|
I don't foresee any problem with buybacks bringing the invested BTC below the go-ahead threshold.
It should be fairly simple to create another mini-ITO using BTC at potentially a slightly discounted price on CoinGateway (since presumably they're still set up for it), to make up the shortfall.
Or revise the go-ahead threshold downward.
Or make up the shortfall in a private deal with a single angel investor.
My point is, there are several ways to ensure the continuation of the project while still honouring its initial rules.
I was thinking the same.I don't see the point to stop this project,while there are several of us who wants this to succeed.There is always a way to make it happen.
|
|
|
|
notsofast
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1517
Merit: 1042
@notsofast
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:17:32 PM |
|
I see plenty of Bittrex investors buying on Poloniex at sub-ITO price, then selling an equivalent amount of their captive BLOCK into the Bittrex buywall. Cross-exchange arbitrage.
|
twitter.com/notsofast
|
|
|
BitcoiNaked
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:20:15 PM |
|
I see plenty of Bittrex investors buying on Poloniex at sub-ITO price, then selling an equivalent amount of their captive BLOCK into the Bittrex buywall. Cross-exchange arbitrage.
I believe deposits and withdrawals are closed during this 48 hour so you can't arbitrage.
|
|
|
|
jahl
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:20:20 PM |
|
I see plenty of Bittrex investors buying on Poloniex at sub-ITO price, then selling an equivalent amount of their captive BLOCK into the Bittrex buywall. Cross-exchange arbitrage.
yea, that was to be expected
|
|
|
|
WhiteNotWright
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Fibre Knight
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:20:40 PM |
|
I see plenty of Bittrex investors buying on Poloniex at sub-ITO price, then selling an equivalent amount of their captive BLOCK into the Bittrex buywall. Cross-exchange arbitrage.
That would be a trick considering there are no deposits or withdraws to block on bittrex.
|
|
|
|
jahl
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:21:02 PM |
|
I see plenty of Bittrex investors buying on Poloniex at sub-ITO price, then selling an equivalent amount of their captive BLOCK into the Bittrex buywall. Cross-exchange arbitrage.
I believe deposits and withdrawals are closed during this 48 hour so you can't arbitrage. what he means is, they buy the same amount of btc on polo as they did on trex and then get rid of their trex stach and keep the polo stach
|
|
|
|
leewilson
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:22:44 PM |
|
I don't foresee any problem with buybacks bringing the invested BTC below the go-ahead threshold.
It should be fairly simple to create another mini-ITO using BTC at potentially a slightly discounted price on CoinGateway (since presumably they're still set up for it), to make up the shortfall.
Or revise the go-ahead threshold downward.
Or make up the shortfall in a private deal with a single angel investor.
My point is, there are several ways to ensure the continuation of the project while still honouring its initial rules.
I was thinking the same.I don't see the point to stop this project,while there are several of us who wants this to succeed.There is always a way to make it happen. In other words, both of you believe the continuation of changing the rules set by the coin itself until it works is a perfectly fine business model. Bravo. What about those who have pulled back the curtain and do not like what they see?
|
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State BlockNet can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State BlockNet to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State BlockNet.” - Joseph Goebbels
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:25:55 PM |
|
I see plenty of Bittrex investors buying on Poloniex at sub-ITO price, then selling an equivalent amount of their captive BLOCK into the Bittrex buywall. Cross-exchange arbitrage.
I believe deposits and withdrawals are closed during this 48 hour so you can't arbitrage. what he means is, they buy the same amount of btc on polo as they did on trex and then get rid of their trex stach and keep the polo stach If they can withdraw bitcoins after selling blocks this is compleatly feasable and disgusting.
|
|
|
|
xojex
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:26:49 PM |
|
I see plenty of Bittrex investors buying on Poloniex at sub-ITO price, then selling an equivalent amount of their captive BLOCK into the Bittrex buywall. Cross-exchange arbitrage.
I believe deposits and withdrawals are closed during this 48 hour so you can't arbitrage. what he means is, they buy the same amount of btc on polo as they did on trex and then get rid of their trex stach and keep the polo stach risky move if they are doing that, no refund guarantee with that scenario.
|
|
|
|
Specialkey
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:30:14 PM |
|
I see plenty of Bittrex investors buying on Poloniex at sub-ITO price, then selling an equivalent amount of their captive BLOCK into the Bittrex buywall. Cross-exchange arbitrage.
I believe deposits and withdrawals are closed during this 48 hour so you can't arbitrage. what he means is, they buy the same amount of btc on polo as they did on trex and then get rid of their trex stach and keep the polo stach risky move if they are doing that, no refund guarantee with that scenario. and stupid too. If everybody does this the project could fail.
|
|
|
|
jahl
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:30:19 PM |
|
I see plenty of Bittrex investors buying on Poloniex at sub-ITO price, then selling an equivalent amount of their captive BLOCK into the Bittrex buywall. Cross-exchange arbitrage.
I believe deposits and withdrawals are closed during this 48 hour so you can't arbitrage. what he means is, they buy the same amount of btc on polo as they did on trex and then get rid of their trex stach and keep the polo stach risky move if they are doing that, no refund guarantee with that scenario. yep, i hope ppl are taking that into consideration.. I wish they would halt trading untill after the refund period
|
|
|
|
Longenecker
|
|
November 06, 2014, 06:30:44 PM |
|
It looks like if another 100 BTC (conservative estimate, it might be considerably less) is sold into the Bittrex buy wall, the ITO will, "fail," according to the ITO terms established.
|
|
|
|
|