The Treadmill of Atheism

[Vod]

The complexity of the universe is the evidence for God. And not only is it evidence, but it is evidence that comes closer to proof than any other evidence does for anything else, while at the same time, not being proof.

The universe is not complex.  It started out as nothing but hydrogen.  Simplest thing you can have.  

That is evidence and proof there is no god.

 

And you are just the guy (or are you a gal?) who knows this for an absolute fact, right?  

I know there is no evidence for god, yes.  It's called common sense.

Are you getting tired, BADecker?  You've made 9 pages of nonsense posts, proven nothing, you have EVERYONE posting against you, and yet you continue on with your "I am special" smile, posting nothing but your priest's opinion on the bible.

You remind me a lot of dank - another fool with a damaged mind for with there is no arguing.  

[BADecker]

Imagine that you have two people who are really bad people. And let's say that they are just about the same in the quality and quantity of bad stuff that they do. One of the guys dies at age 25, the other at age 50. In the resurrection, which of the two will thank God for death more? Won't it be the guy who died younger? After all, he will have 25 years of sin to be punished for throughout all eternity in hell. Thank God He lets us die.

How can you thank someone if you are dead?

Your scenario makes no sense.

 

I know, who has time to read the whole thing?

... In the resurrection...

But you said the men died.  There is no proof (or even evidence of any kind) for resurrection, so we don't consider it.

Dead men cannot thank anyone.  

 

That's what faith is all about, be it my religion of Christianity, or your religion of atheism.  

[Vod]

Show me where in the bible it says that god savored his work, fool.

Easy to post things - more difficult to back them up with proof.  That's why you stick to your churches, for you need prove nothing to the brainwashed.

 

Showed you already. But I'll re-show it, because this thread is growing by leaps and bounds, and you might have missed it.

God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning—the sixth day.

So it doesn't say anywhere he "savored" it - that was just an opinion your priest gave you.

Stick to your church, fool.   

You don't have any imagination at all, do you? 

Ah, so your interpretations of the bible are based on imagination.  Well, my arguments are based on science and fact.

You lose.  

 

[Vod]

That's what faith is all about, be it my religion of Christianity, or your religion of atheism.  

There is no faith required to be an atheist.  We believe in facts.

 

[BADecker]

Science defined it, and you use that definition. 

 

But it was there long before science defined it.  

Do you understand what science is?  It doesn't invent - it understands.

Gravity existed for billions of years before we discovered it. 

The fact is, you need to use scientific principals to explain your fairy tales - so you have to believe in them a little.

Well, isn't that what speaking is all about? We wouldn't be speaking back and forth if we didn't have something of a similar language, right? So, what of gravity or other scientific terms. We use whatever language we understand to express it.

[Vod]

Well, isn't that what speaking is all about? We wouldn't be speaking back and forth if we didn't have something of a similar language, right? So, what of gravity or other scientific terms. We use whatever language we understand to express it.

You wouldn't be using science words such as "entropy" unless you actually believed in the science behind it.

So I'm curious, where in science do you stop believing in the facts, and start believing in Harry Potter?

[BADecker]

Show me where in the bible it says that god savored his work, fool.

Easy to post things - more difficult to back them up with proof.  That's why you stick to your churches, for you need prove nothing to the brainwashed.

 

Showed you already. But I'll re-show it, because this thread is growing by leaps and bounds, and you might have missed it.

God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning—the sixth day.

So it doesn't say anywhere he "savored" it - that was just an opinion your priest gave you.

Stick to your church, fool.   

You don't have any imagination at all, do you? 

Ah, so your interpretations of the bible are based on imagination.  Well, my arguments are based on science and fact.

You lose.  

 

If your arguments are based on science and fact, it is by accident, because you don't know any of it.

[BADecker]

That's what faith is all about, be it my religion of Christianity, or your religion of atheism.  

There is no faith required to be an atheist.  We believe in facts.

 

The only atheistic fact that there is, is that you believe superficially that atheism exists. Everything inside atheism is understood by faith.

[Vod]

If your arguments are based on science and fact, it is by accident, because you don't know any of it.

Yet I continue to be right, as usual.  You can't disprove any of my facts any more than you can prove any of your beliefs.

I think you need to stick to your church where people will believe anything you say.  Here, on a bitcoin forum, you aren't doing too well.

 

[Vod]

The only atheistic fact that there is, is that you believe superficially that atheism exists. Everything inside atheism is understood by faith.

More nonsense.  I don't need to have faith when I have science.  Science is what will happen.  Faith is what you hope will happen.

 

[BADecker]

Well, isn't that what speaking is all about? We wouldn't be speaking back and forth if we didn't have something of a similar language, right? So, what of gravity or other scientific terms. We use whatever language we understand to express it.

You wouldn't be using science words such as "entropy" unless you actually believed in the science behind it.

So I'm curious, where in science do you stop believing in the facts, and start believing in Harry Potter?

Entropy started immediately upon sin coming into the world. Using the word "entropy" is a lot easier than trying to explain it every time I want to talk about it. Nothing better to do than play bantering games?

[Vod]

Entropy started immediately upon sin coming into the world. Using the word "entropy" is a lot easier than trying to explain it every time I want to talk about it. Nothing better to do than play bantering games?

Entropy started at the universe's creation - the Big Bang.  Your idea of good vs bad had nothing to do with it.

 

[BADecker]

If your arguments are based on science and fact, it is by accident, because you don't know any of it.

Yet I continue to be right, as usual.  You can't disprove any of my facts any more than you can prove any of your beliefs.

I think you need to stick to your church where people will believe anything you say.  Here, on a bitcoin forum, you aren't doing too well.

 

Here's where you are wrong in this. If something is proven, then it is a fact and not a belief. Because of this, I will never be able to prove any of my beliefs, not if I want to keep them as beliefs. And I DO want to keep them as beliefs, because it is by faith that I am saved.

I can guess about what your facts might be, but until you show me some, I can't even attempt to disprove them. And you can't show me any of your facts, because you don't have any. Everything you have is perceived through faith, faith in your atheistic religion.

[Vod]

And you can't show me any of your facts, because you don't have any. Everything you have is perceived through faith, faith in your atheistic religion.

Nonsense.  I don't have faith - I have science.  I know for a fact that if I step off a cliff, gravity will pull me down.  You know it too.  

That's the difference between you and me.  I rely on facts - you rely on Harry Potter for your morals.

 

[BADecker]

And you can't show me any of your facts, because you don't have any. Everything you have is perceived through faith, faith in your atheistic religion.

Nonsense.  I don't have faith - I have science.  I know for a fact that if I step off a cliff, gravity will pull me down.  You know it too.  

That's the difference between you and me.  I rely on facts - you rely on Harry Potter for your morals.

 

That stepping off a cliff thing was known long before science as we know it came into being. 

[Vod]

That stepping off a cliff thing was known long before science as we know it came into being.  

No it wasn't.  Science has always existed.  The first time a Neanderthal looked up at the sky and saw a star, that was science.

systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.

We've had science for tens of thousands of years.

If no one saw the first caveman fall off a cliff, no one would know NOT to do that.  Observation. 

 

[Vod]

I have to thank you Badecker.  I just completed work I thought would take me all day tomorrow (today) to do.  While I've been chatting with you, I've been working in my other monitor.  The conversation has kept me awake and alert and it's been a very productive night for me!

So while you are clearly a brainwashed idiot, for me tonight you've been useful.  Thanks!  

[Buffer Overflow]

Don't worry BADecker. Dank will be along shortly backing you up with his golden nuggets of eternal wisdom.

[Vod]

Don't worry BADecker. Dank will be along shortly backing you up with his golden nuggets of eternal wisdom.

Actually, maybe the law has caught up with dank - he hasn't posted in days.  Hopefully I am right.  

[Bitcoin-hotep]

Here is a PRIME example of the "Shit Slinging Brand Atheist"

I posted the "Treadmill of Atheism" to a bunch of atheist, including the Atheism group on Google Plus. And this morning I noticed basically a response video, though it is not labeled as such.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hltr8WM8BVo

First I want to say that I think everyone should have the right to get married and I don't see what religion has to do with Marriage. That being said. This guy brings up the Gay rights court cases that have been happening recently, and says that in the past the only reason they didn't legalize gay marriage was "tradition". That is him shitting in his hand. Then he proceeds to sling that shit, by generalizing ALL religions as "Tradition" and all tradition as "Bad".

The supreme court justices that stalled gay marriage were largely Catholic, but Atheists don't actually know enough about this stuff to see the difference.

And secondly, WESTERN MEDICINE IS A TRADITION, having a court system is tradition, etc. Atheists need to stop acting like all traditions are bad. PLEASE SCULPT YOUR SHIT BEFORE THROWING. Thank you.