Bitcoin Forum
November 12, 2024, 01:59:47 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: **PUBLIC ALERT** Change with process of "mining" BTC or it WILL fail.  (Read 6557 times)
Billbags
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

Brainwashed this way


View Profile
October 31, 2014, 03:58:47 PM
 #121


Pascal's Scams

http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2012/07/pascals-scams-ii.html?m=1

Listen: meat beat manifesto ~ Edge of no control (pt.1)
Read:"He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past." ~ George Orwell
Think: http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-dawn-of-trustworthy-computing.html
sublime5447
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 31, 2014, 04:08:55 PM
 #122

pow or pos makes no difference. Coins cant be mined into existence. That won't work. Coins need to be issued into existence from trusted parties. 
I would never put a penny into some old boy network coin. They are worthless to me. The fact that anyone can compete for coins makes senses and is fair. Issuing coins is one of the big problems in monetary systems that bitcoin solves.

Such hypocritical bullshit spews out of bitcoin zealots mouth.. Let me dumb it down for you.. bitcoin's networks is a good old boys network now. That is what this thread is about. Everyone can not participate or compete.   
So who are the lucky people who will receive your coins? Am I going to get some? Or am I suposed to buy them from your friends?

I gave and sold off all my coins 10 months ago. I am not in it for personal gain and no longer support bitcoin or the scarcity model for currency.
Bitcoin Magazine
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 31, 2014, 04:09:18 PM
 #123

bitcoin is the shittiest, smelliest noggin of poop on the planet!

i am here.
hromobiti
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 118
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 31, 2014, 05:25:38 PM
 #124

I gave and sold off all my coins 10 months ago. I am not in it for personal gain and no longer support bitcoin or the scarcity model for currency.

So now your just paid bank shill, right? Or how can I interpret when you saying Bitcoin is going nowhere, there should be coin issued by trusted party ?

Coin issued by trusted party - it is the fiat scheme if you didnot noticed.
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007


View Profile
October 31, 2014, 05:27:25 PM
 #125

The point is people shouldn't make money or get rich from mining, as that obviously leads to centralization. (just my OPINION - Holiday relax)

Who says so? You? Who are you to say what should people get from mining or not?

AviThour
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 31, 2014, 05:29:49 PM
 #126

Quote
Something needs to be changed to give THE PEOPLE back power, which was the whole point of Bitcoin..
Very nice point their, i support you mate.  Wink
freakying99
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 429
Merit: 250


Pythagoras and Plato are my brothers.


View Profile
October 31, 2014, 05:38:41 PM
 #127

Quote
Something needs to be changed to give THE PEOPLE back power, which was the whole point of Bitcoin..
Very nice point their, i support you mate.  Wink

Anybody can start hashing, hashing is not restricted to anybody. If you cry you cant be profitable because of the power company wanting so much per KWh, it is not Bitcoin fault
RodeoX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147


The revolution will be monetized!


View Profile
October 31, 2014, 05:41:35 PM
 #128

pow or pos makes no difference. Coins cant be mined into existence. That won't work. Coins need to be issued into existence from trusted parties.  
I would never put a penny into some old boy network coin. They are worthless to me. The fact that anyone can compete for coins makes senses and is fair. Issuing coins is one of the big problems in monetary systems that bitcoin solves.

Such hypocritical bullshit spews out of bitcoin zealots mouth.. Let me dumb it down for you.. bitcoin's networks is a good old boys network now. That is what this thread is about. Everyone can not participate or compete.  
So who are the lucky people who will receive your coins? Am I going to get some? Or am I suposed to buy them from your friends?

I gave and sold off all my coins 10 months ago. I am not in it for personal gain and no longer support bitcoin or the scarcity model for currency.

I meant the coins in the system you outlined. My concern with any system that issues coins is that the issuer has total control over that process. They can issue them or not issue them to whom ever they like. The fact that bitcoin solves the problem of distributing coins by rewarding anyone willing to strengthen the network is brilliant.
I just don't trust a system that requires people I don't know to do the right thing, especially when there is an incentive to do the wrong thing. Nobody decides who I can buy bitcoins from. Nor can anyone tell another peer that they can't try for a block reward.  Who decides in an issued coin system?

The gospel according to Satoshi - https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Free bitcoin in ? - Stay tuned for this years Bitcoin hunt!
sublime5447
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 31, 2014, 06:01:27 PM
 #129

pow or pos makes no difference. Coins cant be mined into existence. That won't work. Coins need to be issued into existence from trusted parties.  
I would never put a penny into some old boy network coin. They are worthless to me. The fact that anyone can compete for coins makes senses and is fair. Issuing coins is one of the big problems in monetary systems that bitcoin solves.

Such hypocritical bullshit spews out of bitcoin zealots mouth.. Let me dumb it down for you.. bitcoin's networks is a good old boys network now. That is what this thread is about. Everyone can not participate or compete.  
So who are the lucky people who will receive your coins? Am I going to get some? Or am I suposed to buy them from your friends?

I gave and sold off all my coins 10 months ago. I am not in it for personal gain and no longer support bitcoin or the scarcity model for currency.

I meant the coins in the system you outlined. My concern with any system that issues coins is that the issuer has total control over that process. They can issue them or not issue them to whom ever they like. The fact that bitcoin solves the problem of distributing coins by rewarding anyone willing to strengthen the network is brilliant.
I just don't trust a system that requires people I don't know to do the right thing, especially when there is an incentive to do the wrong thing. Nobody decides who I can buy bitcoins from. Nor can anyone tell another peer that they can't try for a block reward.  Who decides in an issued coin system?


Under the proposed system anyone with the ability to produce something of value to other people could issue their own coins. If you can back a coin you can issue a coin people can choose if they want to accept it or not. If you dont have credibility people are unlikely to take your credit.

watch this.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyWfUqEyIZc     
There is a full proposal outlined here http://www.moneyasdebt.net/  ,the system I am talking about was not developed by me but Paul grignon. I am just a rabid supporter of it.


quote by E.C. Riegel

"There is a treasure buried in your consciousness. If you will dig it up from the debris of superstition and fear that covers it you will gain a freedom and self-mastery that will lift your life to a higher plane. This is the money power in you.

The power to create money with which to purchase wealth, health and happiness actually lies dormant within you. You have thought of the money power as something remote from you and beyond your grasp. You have dreamed of the good you could and would do if you had money power. You have blamed others for not accomplishing this good. You have blamed them for evil economic and political conditions; for unemployment, for poverty, for crime, for war.

It is quite logical to blame these maladies upon the malfunction of the money power, but you have not suspected that the money power resides in you and because of your failure to exert it the world is afflicted with miseries. You have the power; you have the responsibility. The power and responsibility to banish poverty, unemployment, insecurity, misery and war rests entirely with you.

You, in cooperation with other intelligent persons, can drive economic and political evils further and further from the area of your life and ultimately they may be driven from the face of the earth. You can do this by the money power in you, expressed first in your own prosperity and happiness, and radiating to others. You can do it and you must do it. There is no power outside of you that can bring these blessings to you.

Petitioning the Government is like writing to Santa Claus. You need no laws — there is a law, a natural law that governs your money power. You need no government aid. You need only cooperation with and from persons who, like you, have resolved to exert the money power inherent in us all. This power in each of us needs only the recognition and respect of our fellows to spring forth and exert its blessings.

We need not petition Congress and we need not waste time to denounce bankers, for they can neither help nor hinder our natural right to extend credit to each other, and this is the perfect basis for a money system."
tondaS
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 122
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 31, 2014, 06:07:37 PM
 #130

Amen. It seems Riegel got inspired by Satoshi whitepaper
sublime5447
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 31, 2014, 06:09:49 PM
 #131

Money Power In You
E.C Riegel, Private Enterprise Money, 1944

tondaS
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 122
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 31, 2014, 06:23:25 PM
 #132

Money Power In You
E.C Riegel, Private Enterprise Money, 1944


Maybe because he was wrong in this:

they can neither help nor hinder our natural right to extend credit to each other, and this is the perfect basis for a money system.

You need a lot of trust to issue credit to others, or your credit is worth nothing.
sublime5447
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 31, 2014, 06:28:02 PM
 #133

Money Power In You
E.C Riegel, Private Enterprise Money, 1944


Maybe because he was wrong in this:

they can neither help nor hinder our natural right to extend credit to each other, and this is the perfect basis for a money system.

You need a lot of trust to issue credit to others, or your credit is worth nothing.

There are lots of people with lots of trust and trade requires trust so it is really just a matter of who to trust.
tondaS
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 122
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 31, 2014, 06:39:32 PM
 #134

There are lots of people with lots of trust and trade requires trust so it is really just a matter of who to trust.

You can only trust to Escrow with as much Bitcoins as it is not likely (economical) for the Escrow to scam you instead (and just the Escrow risking loosing trust)

But some trades might require more trust than any Escrow can provide, no?
tvbcof
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4746
Merit: 1282


View Profile
October 31, 2014, 06:54:57 PM
 #135


Mining consolidation is bothersome to be sure, but I'm not excessively concerned about it as long as the transfer mechanisms remain in tact.  This because in a worst-case scenario where miners attack the system (highly likely for deeply invested entities under judicial duress) it would not be impossible for Bitcoin to adapt.  The threat of this happening would probably be enough to make it not be attempted.

On the other hand, if Bitcoin tries to support the world's exchange economies it will certainly grow to the point where it is fairly unfeasible for any but the same sorts of highly invested interest to support the transfer functions as well.  That is to say, the whole ball of wax.  Gavin's proposal to make bitcoin growth exponential pretty much guarantees that this will happen eventually.  And people basing their propensity to hold BTC on future value (the smart ones) will need to factor this in.  I certainly will be.

Sidechains could solve the problem by allowing Bitcoin to be the value basis for a world-wide exchange economy while preserving the Bitcoin core in a form where it could be realistically supported by semi-individuals.  Attempts to attack the solution from the top down (by attacking individual sidechains) would be a futile whack-a-mole adventure.  Hopefully.

I'll mention again that at a rate of 7 TPS or something in this general ballpark it would be very difficult to quash traffic even if one had complete control of the global internet infrastructure and was leveraging deep packet filtering and the like.  The farther we stray from these kinds of traffic rates, the more difficult it becomes to slip through the various inevitable cracks which wold exist even in a highly controlled system.


sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
RodeoX
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147


The revolution will be monetized!


View Profile
October 31, 2014, 07:03:33 PM
 #136

Ok, I think I understand you better now. You are more thinking of a plurality of coins issued by individuals and backed by their personal credibility. More of a credit system? I can see a role for something like that. I origionally thought you were proposing a bitcoin like coin that has a central authority to hand them out. With many such coins representing individuals, are their valued based on the demand for your credibility? So that a scammer type has little chance of finding buyers vs. a good guy. ?

 I think I get it.

The gospel according to Satoshi - https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Free bitcoin in ? - Stay tuned for this years Bitcoin hunt!
Interized (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

Coolness: ∞


View Profile
October 31, 2014, 07:47:58 PM
 #137

The point is people shouldn't make money or get rich from mining, as that obviously leads to centralization. (just my OPINION - Holiday relax)

Who says so? You? Who are you to say what should people get from mining or not?

It is called an opinion.  Roll Eyes

Gold isn't the answer.
sublime5447
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 31, 2014, 07:50:03 PM
 #138

Ok, I think I understand you better now. You are more thinking of a plurality of coins issued by individuals and backed by their personal credibility. More of a credit system? I can see a role for something like that. I origionally thought you were proposing a bitcoin like coin that has a central authority to hand them out. With many such coins representing individuals, are their valued based on the demand for your credibility? So that a scammer type has little chance of finding buyers vs. a good guy. ?

 I think I get it.


You get are getting much closer to getting it. The value of the coin is set by what it is redeemable for but would fluctuate against your actual ability or perceived ability to redeem them. If you over issue, your coins might trade at a discount because of the risk premium. 
sublime5447
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 31, 2014, 08:07:05 PM
 #139

Watch this its 10 little mins.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAZAmQXvB7I
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!