|
locohammerhead
|
 |
December 02, 2014, 12:32:45 AM |
|
XQN is a better buy than MMXIV, even if MMXIV has higher PoS (2014% vs 1618%) and lower coin count. MMXIV has really no roadmap just like Balls, just the purpose to thrive off of high PoS only.
BALLS and MMXIV also has a dev that has a tendency to fork his coin when things are going poorly. He is a play by ear and figures crossed lets hope this works kind of dev. I played the pump of BALLS and now im out. He's the same guy that was involved with TIX and Spots, those are not even mentioned now a days after a year plus from being released. Oh wow, this is news to me! I wonder what other coins he has been behind. There has to be others if im still finding out about coins he has "developed" in the past. I've been in cryptos for about 2 years plus, you kind of know who certain people are and their track record/habits/intentions. TIX was a pump and dump, no longer has any support. Balls is looking like the same, sadly MMXIV is probably going to follow if things don't change. I usually like to give people the benefit of the doubt. Let's try and stay on topic.  Where should I do an XQN Giveaway? If i do it on twitter, it would be nice to have some retweets. It's kind of on topic, shows what not to do with high PoS coins and/or any coins in general....lol.....XQN is definitely doing the opposite and good thing....=) Post it on Twitter, I'll do a retweet and sure others will too..... Haha you're right, XQN doesn't exhibit any of the normal signs of slowing down, when it comes to development. Okay I will do a giveaway later today or tomorrow. Can follow me @Antiiclimax if you want. If you haven't done it already you should do it on the Chan #quotient my bud Drew is setting a tipbot up right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
SpeedDemon13
|
|
December 02, 2014, 01:38:59 AM |
|
Is anyone else getting an error with the wallet? Seems like an error with the bittrex API...
|
CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911 |
|
|
billotronic
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
|
|
December 02, 2014, 01:40:48 AM |
|
Is anyone else getting an error with the wallet? Seems like an error with the bittrex API...
Looks like there is something up with bittrex... " Error 1002 Ray ID: 1923d00039d410bd DNS points to local or disallowed IP " |
|
|
|
z38630610
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 02, 2014, 01:47:53 AM |
|
what's time pos end ? dev
|
|
|
|
|
HunterS
|
|
December 02, 2014, 04:01:23 AM |
|
what's time pos end ? dev
I dont think PoS ends friend.Its a PoS coin.If PoS ends what doing you think will happen to blockchain |
|
|
|
|
jibble
|
|
December 02, 2014, 04:03:22 AM |
|
what's time pos end ? dev
I dont think PoS ends friend.Its a PoS coin.If PoS ends what doing you think will happen to blockchain i Think he means the considered reduction in POS % cos of it being so huge. |
|
|
|
|
|
CedricQuotient (OP)
|
|
December 02, 2014, 07:40:43 PM |
|
Is anyone else getting an error with the wallet? Seems like an error with the bittrex API...
Looks like there is something up with bittrex... " Error 1002 Ray ID: 1923d00039d410bd DNS points to local or disallowed IP " Yes, whenever Bittrex goes down, the wallet error message pop-ups come up every 2 minutes  I am going to change that in the new build so it puts those messages in a panel on the Quant page, instead of flooding us with pop-ups overnight |
|
|
|
|
|
gysca
|
|
December 03, 2014, 11:29:31 AM |
|
"blocks" : 31330,
"timeoffset" : -1,
"moneysupply" : 2461087.97037239,
"blocks" : 31330,
"netstakeweight" : 589788.96471069,
|
|
|
|
|
Zenithar
|
|
December 04, 2014, 01:32:21 AM |
|
Quick post just to clarify that my suggestion to have a tighter max stake reward, does not change the absolute interest rate.
The interest rate would continue to sit at 1618%. The only consequence is that staking would become extremely competitive - sooner - and so not all blocks would be allowed their maximum reward.
Also, note that the max generation is always eventually reached at some point in the future. With the current specifications, perhaps the saturation point would take a year or two to reach. If we would change the max stake reward to be 10x smaller ( 61.8 ), we would simply hit that daily generation ceiling much sooner, likely in the range of a few months, and with a much smaller number of coins being generated per day.
I think this is a great idea! |
|
|
|
|
|
kyma
|
|
December 04, 2014, 11:31:12 PM |
|
devs are aware of the flickering (visual) of the client yes? As far as I know this is only an issue on mac.
...also love the tabs on the left but you should make them scroll or something... the icons are too big to fit on most of my screens.. even fullscreen. Another option would be to move the logo elsewhere within the client to make room for all the tabs on the left.
|
|
|
|
magaura
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 05, 2014, 01:15:54 AM |
|
Nice..going to the hell? ...  |
|
|
|
anticlimax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 05, 2014, 01:19:29 AM |
|
Nice..going to the hell? ... Why are we going there? |
twitter @antiiclimax
|
|
|
magaura
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 05, 2014, 02:20:42 AM |
|
This price is for this coin is a joke... like a scam.. sad..
|
|
|
|
|
HunterS
|
|
December 05, 2014, 02:52:28 AM |
|
This price is for this coin is a joke... like a scam.. sad..
What do you mean?You dont make any sense  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kruemmelmonster
|
|
December 05, 2014, 07:07:17 AM |
|
that's not true. the block explorer you have mentioned isn't working. we already have ~2.6mill coins. ... |
|
|
|
|
|
neo666
|
|
December 05, 2014, 07:34:09 AM |
|
lol, exchange maybe, did you think of that? |
|
|
|
|
Farndogg
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
|
|
December 05, 2014, 02:32:42 PM |
|
As far as the Block Explorer goes i'm #6 on the list and my balance is accurate.
|
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 05, 2014, 03:45:14 PM |
|
It's only natural that distribution is not optimal yet, especially as we've only seen minor volume on the exchanges so far. Those on the top spots didn't get their coins for free anyhow, so they are interested parties in seeing XQN doing well. The ongoing dumping - as much as it pains me to see valuation dropping - is actually quite healthy as it favors better distribution. More people are getting their hands on XQN, and (in my view), they are getting it cheap.  On other news: I just made it to the top 50  |
|
|
|
|
Zenithar
|
|
December 05, 2014, 07:58:59 PM |
|
lol, exchange maybe, did you think of that? Of course. They are active stakers, did you think of that? Exchanges don't typically stake. It's only natural that distribution is not optimal yet, especially as we've only seen minor volume on the exchanges so far. Those on the top spots didn't get their coins for free anyhow, so they are interested parties in seeing XQN doing well. The ongoing dumping - as much as it pains me to see valuation dropping - is actually quite healthy as it favors better distribution. More people are getting their hands on XQN, and (in my view), they are getting it cheap. I bet it gets "a lot more healthy" by your definition then |
|
|
|
|
|
