|
minerpage
|
 |
December 20, 2014, 10:02:23 PM |
|
can I run multiple wallets/miners from the same network (IP address)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
john-connor (OP)
|
|
December 20, 2014, 10:42:25 PM |
|
can I run multiple wallets/miners from the same network (IP address)?
Certainly but not 100's of nodes because the consensus will start rejecting the blocks as SPAM. Thank you for your support. |
|
|
|
|
NoobKidOnTheBlock
|
|
December 20, 2014, 10:51:21 PM |
|
can I run multiple wallets/miners from the same network (IP address)?
Certainly but not 100's of nodes because the consensus will start rejecting the blocks as SPAM. Thank you for your support. but how would one do that? From multiple computers? all with the same I.P address? cause I can't download another vanilla wallet and run it right now on the computer I'm running mine on right now right? |
▇
▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇
▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇ | | ... | ............NoobKidOnThe.BLOCK.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
minerpage
|
|
December 20, 2014, 10:52:47 PM |
|
can I run multiple wallets/miners from the same network (IP address)?
Certainly but not 100's of nodes because the consensus will start rejecting the blocks as SPAM. Thank you for your support. but how would one do that? From multiple computers? all with the same I.P address? cause I can't download another vanilla wallet and run it right now on the computer I'm running mine on right now right? Multiple computers in one home network (same WAN IP) |
|
|
|
|
|
Riseman
|
|
December 20, 2014, 10:56:55 PM |
|
The miner seems to be using only about 25% of CPU. Is there any way to make it run on a full load? Maybe some command line parameters or configs? |
|
|
|
|
|
minerpage
|
|
December 20, 2014, 11:08:20 PM |
|
The miner seems to be using only about 25% of CPU. Is there any way to make it run on a full load? Maybe some command line parameters or configs? or a slider so everyone can set the way it works best... |
|
|
|
|
|
NoobKidOnTheBlock
|
|
December 20, 2014, 11:08:45 PM |
|
The miner seems to be using only about 25% of CPU. Is there any way to make it run on a full load? Maybe some command line parameters or configs? or a slider so everyone can set the way it works best... ya that would be an alright idea |
▇
▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇
▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇ | | ... | ............NoobKidOnThe.BLOCK.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number6
|
|
December 20, 2014, 11:17:25 PM |
|
can I run multiple wallets/miners from the same network (IP address)?
Certainly but not 100's of nodes because the consensus will start rejecting the blocks as SPAM. Thank you for your support. Lol, so let me get this straight. In order to make it fair you are going to penalize a few home users who have access to multiple machines from a single IP address, but yet allow the botnet operators free reign, as the 1000's of computers they could potentially control would all be from different addresses... One of the reasons I am following this is I admire your attempt for a fair distribution, but think about this aspect a little. I do not think you will be able to find a way to 100% guarantee fair distribution to everyone, but I would rather it error on the side of a few users with many legitimate PCs, than with the botnet operators. |
BTC: 18jdvLeM6r943eUY4DEC5B9cQZPuDyg4Zn LTC: LeBh9akQ3RwxwpUU6pJQ9YGs9PrC1Zc9BK
|
|
|
Jookly
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1131
Merit: 1007
|
|
December 20, 2014, 11:23:32 PM |
|
The miner seems to be using only about 25% of CPU. Is there any way to make it run on a full load? Maybe some command line parameters or configs? or a slider so everyone can set the way it works best... ya that would be an alright idea FFS go read the whitepaper. Using little CPU power is part of the coins implementation. You guys frustrate me. |
|
|
|
|
|
Riseman
|
|
December 20, 2014, 11:32:02 PM |
|
Also how can I choose a different data directory folder? The usual -datadir option doesn't work.
|
|
|
|
|
MisO69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1005
My mule don't like people laughing
|
|
December 21, 2014, 01:13:52 AM |
|
I had forks happen when the wallet started to mint staked coins. It looked like 2 different forks but for all I know it could have been more. I think PoS needs more testing.
Also, has anyone else noticed that the current blockchain is moving along very slowly. The previous one was going good until the PoS blocks kicked in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
john-connor (OP)
|
|
December 21, 2014, 01:32:49 AM
Last edit: December 21, 2014, 01:48:33 AM by john-connor |
|
Lol, so let me get this straight. In order to make it fair you are going to penalize a few home users who have access to multiple machines from a single IP address, but yet allow the botnet operators free reign, as the 1000's of computers they could potentially control would all be from different addresses...
One of the reasons I am following this is I admire your attempt for a fair distribution, but think about this aspect a little. I do not think you will be able to find a way to 100% guarantee fair distribution to everyone, but I would rather it error on the side of a few users with many legitimate PCs, than with the botnet operators.
Do you intend to run 100 peers from one IP address at your home? If not then it's fair, if so then you are trying to mine selfishly and the consensus will not allow it. Regarding "Bot Nets", it is impossible for someone to implement a Vanillacoin "Bot Net" but if you want to try it then go ahead and have a very successful failure.  Thank you for your support. |
|
|
|
|
Number6
|
|
December 21, 2014, 02:04:35 AM |
|
Lol, so let me get this straight. In order to make it fair you are going to penalize a few home users who have access to multiple machines from a single IP address, but yet allow the botnet operators free reign, as the 1000's of computers they could potentially control would all be from different addresses...
One of the reasons I am following this is I admire your attempt for a fair distribution, but think about this aspect a little. I do not think you will be able to find a way to 100% guarantee fair distribution to everyone, but I would rather it error on the side of a few users with many legitimate PCs, than with the botnet operators.
Do you intend to run 100 peers from one IP address at your home? If not then it's fair, if so then you are trying to mine selfishly and the consensus will not allow it. Regarding "Bot Nets", it is impossible for someone to implement a Vanillacoin "Bot Net" but if you want to try it then go ahead and have a very successful failure. Thank you for your support. How would it be impossible may I ask? If I control a few hundred PCs, I could simply install the wallet on them and begin mining, xfer all the coins to central address ... *Disclaimer considering where I am posting, the above is hypothetical, I do not have 100's of PCs, nor do I have anything to do with botnets, I am just looking for an explanation on how this coin is supposedly protected from such scenarios. |
BTC: 18jdvLeM6r943eUY4DEC5B9cQZPuDyg4Zn LTC: LeBh9akQ3RwxwpUU6pJQ9YGs9PrC1Zc9BK
|
|
|
|
john-connor (OP)
|
|
December 21, 2014, 02:12:06 AM
Last edit: December 21, 2014, 05:04:17 AM by john-connor |
|
Lol, so let me get this straight. In order to make it fair you are going to penalize a few home users who have access to multiple machines from a single IP address, but yet allow the botnet operators free reign, as the 1000's of computers they could potentially control would all be from different addresses...
One of the reasons I am following this is I admire your attempt for a fair distribution, but think about this aspect a little. I do not think you will be able to find a way to 100% guarantee fair distribution to everyone, but I would rather it error on the side of a few users with many legitimate PCs, than with the botnet operators.
Do you intend to run 100 peers from one IP address at your home? If not then it's fair, if so then you are trying to mine selfishly and the consensus will not allow it. Regarding "Bot Nets", it is impossible for someone to implement a Vanillacoin "Bot Net" but if you want to try it then go ahead and have a very successful failure. Thank you for your support. How would it be impossible may I ask? If I control a few hundred PCs, I could simply install the wallet on them and begin mining, xfer all the coins to central address ... *Disclaimer considering where I am posting, the above is hypothetical, I do not have 100's of PCs, nor do I have anything to do with botnets, I am just looking for an explanation on how this coin is supposedly protected from such scenarios. The Mac and Windows binaries take zero command line arguments so mining cannot be started without human intervention and I have zero concerns about Linux. The miner source code and fairness algorithm will not be released to the public until RPC is implemented and the first pool is online. All other source code will be released in a timely manner sometime after launch. The coin is protected from selfishness and greed from all angles so lets stop with the FUD and focus on the testing. Thank you for your support. |
|
|
|
sanbashiyi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 895
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 21, 2014, 03:05:02 AM |
|
my pc works fine in testnet
|
|
|
|
|
|
minerpage
|
|
December 21, 2014, 04:41:46 PM |
|
Excellent... first time I have a balance of 128 coins with the newest version... let me know if anybody wants a transaction of some Vanilla coins to their wallet (to test)...
|
|
|
|
|
|
DenisZabar
|
|
December 21, 2014, 05:06:32 PM |
|
Excellent... first time I have a balance of 128 coins with the newest version... let me know if anybody wants a transaction of some Vanilla coins to their wallet (to test)...
+1 post here adress i will send some...  |
|
|
|
|
popolite11
|
|
December 21, 2014, 05:11:03 PM |
|
my pc works fine in testnet
Mine also and have no problem so far. |
|
|
|
|
Jookly
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1131
Merit: 1007
|
|
December 21, 2014, 05:11:50 PM |
|
I am not sure mine is working correctly. It seems like I mined way too many coins over night compared to what I had mined the previous days. I also notice it says I have 0 connections but coins continue to mine and mint. Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
groggin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1894
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 21, 2014, 05:32:51 PM |
|
VvJ6Ww97hTDtMoqyqaXLwmb97Hzh9dYm7U  |
|
|
|
|
