proletariat
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1005
|
 |
October 01, 2015, 09:01:15 PM |
|
so guys what's the status of BCR right now?
nice to know someone transacted a lot of millions of bcr past days, just before the bad things happened.?
Date / Time Blocks Height Interval Transactions Value Out Difficulty Generated+Fees
2015-09-26 Sat 4 210004 21600.0 0 18.0 BCR 0.0000 ± 84% 54.0
2015-09-25 Fri 653 210000 132.3 14 1,044,739.361 BCR 0.0000 ± 99% 41,718.0
2015-09-24 Thu 900 209347 96.0 20 74,289.793 BCR 0.0000 ± 99% 46,164.0
2015-09-23 Wed 888 208447 97.3 59 1,154,051.995 BCR 0.0000 ± 99% 45,948.0
2015-09-22 Tue 855 207559 101.1 293 1,039,399.793 BCR 0.0000 ± 99% 45,354.0
2015-09-21 Mon 909 206704 95.0 219 321,319.839 BCR 0.0000 ± 100% 46,326.0
2015-09-20 Sun 891 205795 97.0 36 1,982,492.665 BCR 0.0000 ± 100% 46,002.0
2015-09-19 Sat 513 204904 168.4 832 1,009,716.957 BCR 0.0000 ± 99% 9,216.0
2015-09-18 Fri 739 204391 116.9 47 89,172.35 BCR 0.0000 ± 100% 43,266.0
a working higher node 62.194.60.156
around 500k were dumped in the past week but not several million. Those tx in your list must be just moving inputs. |
|
|
|
|
|
alganonim
|
|
October 01, 2015, 09:53:22 PM |
|
on 91.230.123.11:
bitcredit-cli getinfo
{
"version" : 301703,
"protocolversion" : 70012,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 50024.24807342,
"darksend_balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 210004,
"timeoffset" : 66,
"connections" : 7,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00000007,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1443320432,
"keypoolsize" : 3,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"relayfee" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : "Warning: We do not appear to fully agree with our peers! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."
}
Same warning, using your node, latest "g" version from new-bla-bla-ver, clear sync from start, but now after using segenerate I'm at block 210005 |
|
|
|
|
|
dextronomous
|
|
October 01, 2015, 09:58:17 PM |
|
in the test version wallet's folder i got a file dunno why called 5 no extension..
inside it
{
unspent_outputs:[
{
tx_hash:cd86564d526fc809d143345614c27cec86bc7f7da6bdb8b1f471c5bb51a5884b,
tx_hash_big_endian:4b88a551bbc571f4b1b8bda67d7fbc86ec7cc214563443d109c86f524d5686cd,
tx_index:99223051,
tx_output_n:0,
script:76a9143e0c4c0800102ad71cd3ece920e3a376f9161a0f88ac,
value:100000,
value_hex:0186a0,
confirmations:5158
},
{
tx_hash:4aedcc343e307304aae26cb83ce7e08012932bbad14a6b761ebeb195c47a2847,
tx_hash_big_endian:47287ac495b1be1e766b4ad1ba2b931280e0e73cb86ce2aa0473303e34cced4a,
tx_index:102497418,
tx_output_n:1,
script:76a9143e0c4c0800102ad71cd3ece920e3a376f9161a0f88ac,
value:4000000,
value_hex:3d0900,
confirmations:1430
},
{
tx_hash:e226eed770e8c17d3e8f5124400a2503722555ae0666aad27208a6a4babbaf2b,
tx_hash_big_endian:2bafbbbaa4a60872d2aa6606ae55257203250a4024518f3e7dc1e870d7ee26e2,
tx_index:102981774,
tx_output_n:0,
script:76a9143e0c4c0800102ad71cd3ece920e3a376f9161a0f88ac,
value:1000000,
value_hex:0f4240,
confirmations:1149
},
{
tx_hash:eeb7d0a6ae1f3c56efd9636da375c2723ff550090d418ce1047c505cc1f441d5,
tx_hash_big_endian:d541f4c15c507c04e18c410d0950f53f72c275a36d63d9ef563c1faea6d0b7ee,
tx_index:103263478,
tx_output_n:1,
script:76a9143e0c4c0800102ad71cd3ece920e3a376f9161a0f88ac,
value:100000,
value_hex:0186a0,
confirmations:816
},
{
tx_hash:7ed2b9d00b13db2fa259ec2d4139b410da956620d9fd47291bab6b7e574cc943,
tx_hash_big_endian:43c94c577e6bab1b2947fdd9206695da10b439412dec59a22fdb130bd0b9d27e,
tx_index:103337561,
tx_output_n:1,
script:76a9143e0c4c0800102ad71cd3ece920e3a376f9161a0f88ac,
value:1000000,
value_hex:0f4240,
confirmations:747
},
{
tx_hash:21ac3e33b43af92398ea8239ac4c97608219ab168629b59074e6a8c4570cf371,
tx_hash_big_endian:71f30c57c4a8e67490b5298616ab198260974cac3982ea9823f93ab4333eac21,
tx_index:103557767,
tx_output_n:1,
script:76a9143e0c4c0800102ad71cd3ece920e3a376f9161a0f88ac,
value:1200000,
value_hex:124f80,
confirmations:510
}
am reindexing again with that other wallet.. still saying o.o.s
|
|
|
|
|
tombcoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
October 01, 2015, 10:41:10 PM |
|
With -reindex everyrhing worked fine fresh sync is hard work. Had to restart daemon various times to finish All synced until block 210004 Will there be another update or can I update my other nodes as well? lg t. Forgot some infos  on fresh install / sync are the following files missing (Or are they not created anymore?) balances.dat ratings-folder bnlist.dat (maybe for the lack of active BNs) And can´t start banknode for "out of sync" reason: bitcredit-cli banknode start sync in process. Must wait until client is synced to start. Ok, when you are @ block 210004 there has not yet been a message requiring build of grantsDb, if you "setgenerate true" it will build the grantDb and try to mine block 210005. balances.dat should be created, are you sure you are on the last commit "try now" or after? Banknodes will start if you mine 210005 while connected to another synced peer. I was able to mine the block. Daemon is Version from this afternoon. No grantdb error or something else seen. bitcreditd -version Bitcredit Core Daemon version v0.30.17.3-892e7c0-dirty Can you please verfy? So 2 BNs are now on the chain. bitcredit-cli banknode list { "188.193.114.167:9995" : "ENABLED", "91.230.123.11:8877" : "ENABLED" } This ist the decoded transaction: { "txid" : "26df3b688b41d4488e98135f6f744927b1cab04f4008e7197842a62f98352251", "version" : 1, "locktime" : 0, "vin" : [ { "coinbase" : "035534030109062f503253482f", "sequence" : 4294967295 } ], "vout" : [ { "value" : 12.15000000, "n" : 0, "scriptPubKey" : { "asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 23ea5bdfb62292a58784ffd57d4d45ed417415eb OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG", "hex" : "76a91423ea5bdfb62292a58784ffd57d4d45ed417415eb88ac", "reqSigs" : 1, "type" : "pubkeyhash", "addresses" : [ "5tL9DZMCBmhcFKf3tVUJa2f1mYjTujiu87" ] } }, { "value" : 1.80000000, "n" : 1, "scriptPubKey" : { "asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 08226e8d382b07d2cfe02c678937c82275b960aa OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG", "hex" : "76a91408226e8d382b07d2cfe02c678937c82275b960aa88ac", "reqSigs" : 1, "type" : "pubkeyhash", "addresses" : [ "5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7" ] } }, { "value" : 1.80000000, "n" : 2, "scriptPubKey" : { "asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 6d7733df664a56f942602300facd7c4119d52bd9 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG", "hex" : "76a9146d7733df664a56f942602300facd7c4119d52bd988ac", "reqSigs" : 1, "type" : "pubkeyhash", "addresses" : [ "6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL" ] } }, { "value" : 2.25000000, "n" : 3, "scriptPubKey" : { "asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 dcee7e519cc25c52f52439dc9012e3d884d5ef18 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG", "hex" : "76a914dcee7e519cc25c52f52439dc9012e3d884d5ef1888ac", "reqSigs" : 1, "type" : "pubkeyhash", "addresses" : [ "6BCRBKZLmq2JwWLWDtJZL26ao4uHhqG6mH" ] } } ] } So next block must be mined by another banknode, according to the new rules? lg t. |
|
|
|
|
Bagdar13
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
October 01, 2015, 10:54:47 PM |
|
So next block must be mined by another banknode, according to the new rules?
lg t.
If we get a new windows build out/approved I will turn my bank nodes on. |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcreditscc (OP)
|
|
October 02, 2015, 01:15:16 AM |
|
Everyone synced to 210004 should be able to start their banknodes now. Also if someone broadcasts a valid block...ie contains grants, the chain will move for everyone
I looked at the price too, price went down but buy support is the same amount.
|
|
|
|
jasemoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
|
|
October 02, 2015, 01:31:14 AM |
|
Everyone synced to 210004 should be able to start their banknodes now. Also if someone broadcasts a valid block...ie contains grants, the chain will move for everyone
I looked at the price too, price went down but buy support is the same amount.
is there a win build for the new wallet or anyone with banknodes on 17.3 windows can start too..? |
$MAID & $BTC other than that some short hodls and some long held garbage.
|
|
|
|
bitcreditscc (OP)
|
|
October 02, 2015, 01:58:50 AM |
|
Everyone synced to 210004 should be able to start their banknodes now. Also if someone broadcasts a valid block...ie contains grants, the chain will move for everyone
I looked at the price too, price went down but buy support is the same amount.
is there a win build for the new wallet or anyone with banknodes on 17.3 windows can start too..? Not yet, but should be available sometime in the morning. For now all the guys who were debugging are synced to 210004. What we are doing now is verifying that everything is being built ok (specifically the databases) once we are sure, we'll start the net. I want each user to be able to build all their databases without need for external sources. While people can just as easily bootstrap, it is very important that the software work without reliance on such manual , complicated methods. I know many prefer a moving network, but we've already spent a lot of time and effort ironing out issues, let's just do it right and never have to look back at this portion of code until we are doing routine maintenance. |
|
|
|
|
alganonim
|
|
October 02, 2015, 04:40:01 AM |
|
Everyone synced to 210004 should be able to start their banknodes now. Also if someone broadcasts a valid block...ie contains grants, the chain will move for everyone
I looked at the price too, price went down but buy support is the same amount.
is there a win build for the new wallet or anyone with banknodes on 17.3 windows can start too..? Not yet, but should be available sometime in the morning. For now all the guys who were debugging are synced to 210004. What we are doing now is verifying that everything is being built ok (specifically the databases) once we are sure, we'll start the net. I want each user to be able to build all their databases without need for external sources. While people can just as easily bootstrap, it is very important that the software work without reliance on such manual , complicated methods. I know many prefer a moving network, but we've already spent a lot of time and effort ironing out issues, let's just do it right and never have to look back at this portion of code until we are doing routine maintenance. Sorry but I'm not so sure about it, same conditions but different output, in my case since I started segenerate (grantdb.dat created) I'm at block 210005 |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcreditscc (OP)
|
|
October 02, 2015, 04:56:43 AM |
|
Everyone synced to 210004 should be able to start their banknodes now. Also if someone broadcasts a valid block...ie contains grants, the chain will move for everyone
I looked at the price too, price went down but buy support is the same amount.
is there a win build for the new wallet or anyone with banknodes on 17.3 windows can start too..? Not yet, but should be available sometime in the morning. For now all the guys who were debugging are synced to 210004. What we are doing now is verifying that everything is being built ok (specifically the databases) once we are sure, we'll start the net. I want each user to be able to build all their databases without need for external sources. While people can just as easily bootstrap, it is very important that the software work without reliance on such manual , complicated methods. I know many prefer a moving network, but we've already spent a lot of time and effort ironing out issues, let's just do it right and never have to look back at this portion of code until we are doing routine maintenance. Sorry but I'm not so sure about it, same conditions but different output, in my case since I started segenerate (grantdb.dat created) I'm at block 210005 decode the block and post the transactions you broadcasted, also if you are not connected to the others then the block will just be on your end. |
|
|
|
|
alganonim
|
|
October 02, 2015, 05:18:51 AM
Last edit: October 02, 2015, 05:40:55 AM by alganonim |
|
{
"version" : 301703,
"protocolversion" : 70012,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 153.90010703,
"darksend_balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 210005,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 2,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00000003,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1442735310,
"keypoolsize" : 3,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"relayfee" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : "Warning: We do not appear to fully agree with our peers! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."
}
{
"chain" : "main",
"blocks" : 210005,
"headers" : 211752,
"bestblockhash" : "00ce37d19bfcdb3184bafe3126fb6935ec08dd5e6c77a634cdfef05d88deb0f6",
"difficulty" : 0.00000003,
"verificationprogress" : 0.99435650,
"chainwork" : "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000f58883919"
}
I'm still learning, what else command to use ? This transaction gets the same warning. It's a cold wallet, with bn mining set to BN address, what I found out lastly is that when I firstly was using bn mining (before conf bnmining= was introduced) it was mining to bn empty cold wallet. EDIT: hmmm, time to delete these dust wallets, maybe it's a part of disagreement ? |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcreditscc (OP)
|
|
October 02, 2015, 05:39:51 AM |
|
{
"version" : 301703,
"protocolversion" : 70012,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 153.90010703,
"darksend_balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 210005,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 2,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00000003,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1442735310,
"keypoolsize" : 3,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"relayfee" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : "Warning: We do not appear to fully agree with our peers! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade."
}
{
"chain" : "main",
"blocks" : 210005,
"headers" : 211752,
"bestblockhash" : "00ce37d19bfcdb3184bafe3126fb6935ec08dd5e6c77a634cdfef05d88deb0f6",
"difficulty" : 0.00000003,
"verificationprogress" : 0.99435650,
"chainwork" : "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000f58883919"
}
I'm still learning, what else command to use ? This transaction gets the same warning. It's a cold wallet, with bn mining set to BN address, what I found out lastly is that when I firstly was using bn mining (before conf bnmining= was introduced) it was mining to bn empty cold wallet. "getblock <blockhashhere>" "getrawtransaction <transactionhashhere>" "decoderawtransaction <hexhere>" it will list the transactions you published. Aslo do "getpeerinfo" and post that too try connecting to 23.94.239.139. if your block is valid, it will sync my node |
|
|
|
|
alganonim
|
|
October 02, 2015, 05:57:45 AM |
|
{
"chain" : "main",
"blocks" : 210005,
"headers" : 211752,
"bestblockhash" : "00ce37d19bfcdb3184bafe3126fb6935ec08dd5e6c77a634cdfef05d88deb0f6",
"difficulty" : 0.00000003,
"verificationprogress" : 0.99435650,
"chainwork" : "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000f58883919"
}
banknode-cli getblock 210005
error: {"code":-5,"message":"Block not found"}
banknode-cli getrawtransaction 00ce37d19bfcdb3184bafe3126fb6935ec08dd5e6c77a634cdfef05d88deb0f6
error: {"code":-5,"message":"No information available about transaction"}
banknode-cli decoderawtransaction 00ce37d19bfcdb3184bafe3126fb6935ec08dd5e6c77a634cdfef05d88deb0f6
error: {"code":-22,"message":"TX decode failed"}
banknode-cli getpeerinfo
[
{
"id" : 62,
"addr" : "146.90.136.80:8877",
"addrlocal" : "104.238.186.50:41852",
"services" : "0000000000000001",
"lastsend" : 1443765257,
"lastrecv" : 1443765257,
"bytessent" : 18246,
"bytesrecv" : 965808,
"conntime" : 1443742681,
"pingtime" : 0.07829900,
"version" : 70012,
"subver" : "/Section32:0.30.17.3/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 2930,
"banscore" : 0,
"servicesdesc" : "MSG RELAY ASSETS ESCROW IBTP BANK BRIDGE",
"synced_headers" : 91381,
"synced_blocks" : -1,
"inflight" : [
],
"whitelisted" : false
},
{
"id" : 209,
"addr" : "91.230.123.101:8877",
"addrlocal" : "104.238.186.50:35119",
"services" : "0000000000000001",
"lastsend" : 1443765337,
"lastrecv" : 1443765337,
"bytessent" : 3096,
"bytesrecv" : 3320,
"conntime" : 1443760295,
"pingtime" : 0.06890100,
"version" : 70012,
"subver" : "/Section32:0.30.17.3/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 12143,
"banscore" : 0,
"servicesdesc" : "MSG RELAY ASSETS ESCROW IBTP BANK BRIDGE",
"synced_headers" : -1,
"synced_blocks" : -1,
"inflight" : [
],
"whitelisted" : false
},
{
"id" : 249,
"addr" : "91.230.123.11:8877",
"addrlocal" : "104.238.186.50:52638",
"services" : "0000000000000001",
"lastsend" : 1443765264,
"lastrecv" : 1443765264,
"bytessent" : 504,
"bytesrecv" : 766,
"conntime" : 1443765143,
"pingtime" : 0.10624100,
"version" : 70012,
"subver" : "/Section32:0.30.17.3/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 8625,
"banscore" : 0,
"servicesdesc" : "MSG RELAY ASSETS ESCROW IBTP BANK BRIDGE",
"synced_headers" : -1,
"synced_blocks" : -1,
"inflight" : [
],
"whitelisted" : false
}
It could be on my end or am I just messing commands ? |
|
|
|
|
|
dragos_bdi
|
|
October 02, 2015, 05:59:07 AM |
|
bitcredit-cli getblock 008f3c91e5dc40b00a991fc93d4d56ea16fe51236c93900b14466815ac8c13fb
{
"hash" : "008f3c91e5dc40b00a991fc93d4d56ea16fe51236c93900b14466815ac8c13fb",
"confirmations" : 1,
"size" : 289,
"height" : 210005,
"version" : 2,
"merkleroot" : "cd11870528d8d011111f3f46d0a4b41c215752fe5e049128af23aa4a2f1bce1d",
"tx" : [
"cd11870528d8d011111f3f46d0a4b41c215752fe5e049128af23aa4a2f1bce1d"
],
"time" : 1443764842,
"nonce" : 1,
"BirthdayA" : 50805649,
"BirthdayB" : 51070687,
"bits" : "20025e53",
"difficulty" : 0.00000003,
"chainwork" : "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000f58883919",
"previousblockhash" : "005286b1c29917aa464967ee2294957b5869761679c939fcdd6bf8df4fb4e802"
}
bitcredit-cli getrawtransaction "cd11870528d8d011111f3f46d0a4b41c215752fe5e049128af23aa4a2f1bce1d"
01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff0d035534030110062f503253482fffffffff04c06d6b48000000001976a9146af0e2751aecb3 d5e4813548b08cc748d663f8da88ac0095ba0a000000001976a91408226e8d382b07d2cfe02c678 937c82275b960aa88ac0095ba0a000000001976a9146d7733df664a56f942602300facd7c4119d5 2bd988ac403a690d000000001976a914dcee7e519cc25c52f52439dc9012e3d884d5ef1888ac000 00000
bitcredit-cli decoderawtransaction 01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff0d035534030110062f503253482fffffffff04c06d6b48000000001976a9146af0e2751aecb3 d5e4813548b08cc748d663f8da88ac0095ba0a000000001976a91408226e8d382b07d2cfe02c678 937c82275b960aa88ac0095ba0a000000001976a9146d7733df664a56f942602300facd7c4119d5 2bd988ac403a690d000000001976a914dcee7e519cc25c52f52439dc9012e3d884d5ef1888ac000 00000
{
"txid" : "cd11870528d8d011111f3f46d0a4b41c215752fe5e049128af23aa4a2f1bce1d",
"version" : 1,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"coinbase" : "035534030110062f503253482f",
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 12.15000000,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 6af0e2751aecb3d5e4813548b08cc748d663f8da OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9146af0e2751aecb3d5e4813548b08cc748d663f8da88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"5zoh1bN2XTbFrbM5yPiBEK1R2nomhPa9dY"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 1.80000000,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 08226e8d382b07d2cfe02c678937c82275b960aa OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a91408226e8d382b07d2cfe02c678937c82275b960aa88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 1.80000000,
"n" : 2,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 6d7733df664a56f942602300facd7c4119d52bd9 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9146d7733df664a56f942602300facd7c4119d52bd988ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 2.25000000,
"n" : 3,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 dcee7e519cc25c52f52439dc9012e3d884d5ef18 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914dcee7e519cc25c52f52439dc9012e3d884d5ef1888ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"6BCRBKZLmq2JwWLWDtJZL26ao4uHhqG6mH"
]
}
}
]
}
getworktemplate after I found 210005 if failing with
bitcredit-cli getblocktemplate
error: {"code":-1,"message":"CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed"}
and stoped mining
|
Thank You for your tips!
BCR - 5u7KPyiHKeg6sbdvd9XhT9HHpvh5c2ppTe
BTC - 1ASJQ7SE84sgQketS2kQCTQLV3DJesYnLh
|
|
|
|
alganonim
|
|
October 02, 2015, 06:05:28 AM
Last edit: October 02, 2015, 06:16:27 AM by alganonim |
|
After trying to connect to your node, deamon starts and then stops ...
2015-10-02 05:59:16 LoadBlockIndexDB: last block file = 1
2015-10-02 05:59:16 LoadBlockIndexDB: last block file info: CBlockFileInfo(blocks=76225, size=125333529, heights=133783...210005, time=2015-06-08...2015-10-01)
2015-10-02 05:59:16 Checking all blk files are present...
2015-10-02 05:59:16 LoadBlockIndexDB(): transaction index disabled
2015-10-02 05:59:16 LoadBlockIndexDB(): address index disabled
2015-10-02 05:59:16 LoadBlockIndexDB(): hashBestChain=00ce37d19bfcdb3184bafe3126fb6935ec08dd5e6c77a634cdfef05d88deb0f6 height=210005 date=2015-10-01 21:46:40 progress=0.993764
2015-10-02 05:59:16 init message: Verifying blocks...
2015-10-02 05:59:16 Verifying last 50 blocks at level 4
2015-10-02 05:59:16 === Grant Database Block Height -1 ===
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitcreditscc (OP)
|
|
October 02, 2015, 07:04:18 AM |
|
bitcredit-cli getblock 008f3c91e5dc40b00a991fc93d4d56ea16fe51236c93900b14466815ac8c13fb
{
"hash" : "008f3c91e5dc40b00a991fc93d4d56ea16fe51236c93900b14466815ac8c13fb",
"confirmations" : 1,
"size" : 289,
"height" : 210005,
"version" : 2,
"merkleroot" : "cd11870528d8d011111f3f46d0a4b41c215752fe5e049128af23aa4a2f1bce1d",
"tx" : [
"cd11870528d8d011111f3f46d0a4b41c215752fe5e049128af23aa4a2f1bce1d"
],
"time" : 1443764842,
"nonce" : 1,
"BirthdayA" : 50805649,
"BirthdayB" : 51070687,
"bits" : "20025e53",
"difficulty" : 0.00000003,
"chainwork" : "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000f58883919",
"previousblockhash" : "005286b1c29917aa464967ee2294957b5869761679c939fcdd6bf8df4fb4e802"
}
bitcredit-cli getrawtransaction "cd11870528d8d011111f3f46d0a4b41c215752fe5e049128af23aa4a2f1bce1d"
01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff0d035534030110062f503253482fffffffff04c06d6b48000000001976a9146af0e2751aecb3 d5e4813548b08cc748d663f8da88ac0095ba0a000000001976a91408226e8d382b07d2cfe02c678 937c82275b960aa88ac0095ba0a000000001976a9146d7733df664a56f942602300facd7c4119d5 2bd988ac403a690d000000001976a914dcee7e519cc25c52f52439dc9012e3d884d5ef1888ac000 00000
bitcredit-cli decoderawtransaction 01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff0d035534030110062f503253482fffffffff04c06d6b48000000001976a9146af0e2751aecb3 d5e4813548b08cc748d663f8da88ac0095ba0a000000001976a91408226e8d382b07d2cfe02c678 937c82275b960aa88ac0095ba0a000000001976a9146d7733df664a56f942602300facd7c4119d5 2bd988ac403a690d000000001976a914dcee7e519cc25c52f52439dc9012e3d884d5ef1888ac000 00000
{
"txid" : "cd11870528d8d011111f3f46d0a4b41c215752fe5e049128af23aa4a2f1bce1d",
"version" : 1,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"coinbase" : "035534030110062f503253482f",
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 12.15000000,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 6af0e2751aecb3d5e4813548b08cc748d663f8da OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9146af0e2751aecb3d5e4813548b08cc748d663f8da88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"5zoh1bN2XTbFrbM5yPiBEK1R2nomhPa9dY"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 1.80000000,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 08226e8d382b07d2cfe02c678937c82275b960aa OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a91408226e8d382b07d2cfe02c678937c82275b960aa88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 1.80000000,
"n" : 2,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 6d7733df664a56f942602300facd7c4119d52bd9 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9146d7733df664a56f942602300facd7c4119d52bd988ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 2.25000000,
"n" : 3,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 dcee7e519cc25c52f52439dc9012e3d884d5ef18 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914dcee7e519cc25c52f52439dc9012e3d884d5ef1888ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"6BCRBKZLmq2JwWLWDtJZL26ao4uHhqG6mH"
]
}
}
]
}
getworktemplate after I found 210005 if failing with
bitcredit-cli getblocktemplate
error: {"code":-1,"message":"CreateNewBlock() : TestBlockValidity failed"}
and stoped mining
[/qoute]
Please look in the debug.log for exact reason getblocktemplate fails , this should be the last item |
|
|
|
|
dragos_bdi
|
|
October 02, 2015, 07:14:36 AM |
|
seems like my banknode minigkey is invalid ... ?!?
2015-10-02 07:12:59 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-10-02 07:12:59 nActualTimespan = 447470 before bounds
2015-10-02 07:12:59 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-02 07:12:59 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60 nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-02 07:12:59 Before: 20025e53 025e530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-02 07:12:59 After: 2001e186 01e186eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
2015-10-02 07:12:59 nActualTimespan = 447470 before bounds
2015-10-02 07:12:59 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-02 07:12:59 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60 nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-02 07:12:59 Before: 20025e53 025e530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-02 07:12:59 After: 2001e186 01e186eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
2015-10-02 07:12:59 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:12:59 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:12:59 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:12:59 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:12:59 - Connect 1 transactions: 0.01ms (0.013ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [0.00s]
2015-10-02 07:12:59 ERROR: ConnectBlock(): banknode miningkey invalid
|
Thank You for your tips!
BCR - 5u7KPyiHKeg6sbdvd9XhT9HHpvh5c2ppTe
BTC - 1ASJQ7SE84sgQketS2kQCTQLV3DJesYnLh
|
|
|
|
dragos_bdi
|
|
October 02, 2015, 07:19:14 AM |
|
bnminingkey is not the address who received the 50k ??
|
Thank You for your tips!
BCR - 5u7KPyiHKeg6sbdvd9XhT9HHpvh5c2ppTe
BTC - 1ASJQ7SE84sgQketS2kQCTQLV3DJesYnLh
|
|
|
|
dragos_bdi
|
|
October 02, 2015, 07:21:19 AM |
|
till now, successfully synced till 210005 and banknode started on 2 nodes: 91.230.123.101:8888 91.230.123.11:8877 Edit2: after he found a block, the mining process stopEdit: on both nodes "getblocktemplate" tells me that my bnminingkey is invalid, but mining works ... 2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 - Connect 1 transactions: 0.01ms (0.012ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [0.00s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-840000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7 , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-600000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 - Verify 0 txins: 14.20ms (0.000ms/txin) [65.05s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Running BitcreditMiner with 1 transactions in block (289 bytes)
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 nActualTimespan = 447470 before bounds
2015-10-02 07:22:01 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60 nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Before: 20025e53 025e530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 After: 2001e186 01e186eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
2015-10-02 07:22:01 nActualTimespan = 447470 before bounds
2015-10-02 07:22:01 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60 nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Before: 20025e53 025e530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 After: 2001e186 01e186eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 - Connect 1 transactions: 0.01ms (0.015ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [0.00s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-840000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7 , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-600000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 - Verify 0 txins: 16.55ms (0.000ms/txin) [65.07s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Running BitcreditMiner with 1 transactions in block (289 bytes) |
Thank You for your tips!
BCR - 5u7KPyiHKeg6sbdvd9XhT9HHpvh5c2ppTe
BTC - 1ASJQ7SE84sgQketS2kQCTQLV3DJesYnLh
|
|
|
|
bitcreditscc (OP)
|
|
October 02, 2015, 07:50:01 AM |
|
till now, successfully synced till 210005 and banknode started on 2 nodes: 91.230.123.101:8888 91.230.123.11:8877 Edit2: after he found a block, the mining process stopEdit: on both nodes "getblocktemplate" tells me that my bnminingkey is invalid, but mining works ... 2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 - Connect 1 transactions: 0.01ms (0.012ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [0.00s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-840000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7 , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-600000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 - Verify 0 txins: 14.20ms (0.000ms/txin) [65.05s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Running BitcreditMiner with 1 transactions in block (289 bytes)
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 nActualTimespan = 447470 before bounds
2015-10-02 07:22:01 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60 nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Before: 20025e53 025e530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 After: 2001e186 01e186eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
2015-10-02 07:22:01 nActualTimespan = 447470 before bounds
2015-10-02 07:22:01 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60 nActualTimespan = 480
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Before: 20025e53 025e530000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 After: 2001e186 01e186eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Using non-specific banknode payments 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 CheckBlock() : Found banknode payment 210006
2015-10-02 07:22:01 - Connect 1 transactions: 0.01ms (0.015ms/tx, 0.000ms/txin) [0.00s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-840000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7 , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL , amount :-180000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 New vout address:- 6C4maPsTQYkPjgkU2sw3pNCobo1Uw5uRZB , amount :-600000000
2015-10-02 07:22:01 - Verify 0 txins: 16.55ms (0.000ms/txin) [65.07s]
2015-10-02 07:22:01 Running BitcreditMiner with 1 transactions in block (289 bytes) Good, good, we are getting somewhere. Now, check your balances.dat and look for the address you are trying to use to mine. the balance is xxxxx/100000000. if that number is > 50000 then your key is valid. 1) Remember you cannot mine consecutive blocks with the same key (i'll write a method to automatically try multiple keys later) 2) If your balances.dat is corrupted (you can tell if there are negative numbers), then your key may be rejected. |
|
|
|
|
