tombcoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
October 05, 2015, 12:10:53 PM |
|
Got it Now diff is acceptable again. { "version" : 301705, "protocolversion" : 70012, "walletversion" : 60000, "balance" : "darksend_balance" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 210288, "timeoffset" : 0, "connections" : 2, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 0.00000143, "testnet" : false, "keypoololdest" : 1442913009, "keypoolsize" : 2, "paytxfee" : 0.00000000, "relayfee" : 0.00001000, "errors" : "" }
|
|
|
|
|
bitcreditscc (OP)
|
|
October 05, 2015, 02:03:24 PM |
|
I changed that logic users now use the miningkeys.dat file with the required keys for mining.
|
|
|
|
tombcoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
October 05, 2015, 02:37:44 PM |
|
I changed that logic users now use the miningkeys.dat file with the required keys for mining. Can confirm that it works. But it seems that it does not take the keys one by one. It think is just hopping between the first keys. Since chainz is behind, I just decoded some blocks by hand. Also put no comments behind the keys nor between the lines in the miningkey.dat. Throws out an error: wrong key lg t.
|
|
|
|
thelonecrouton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 05, 2015, 02:43:32 PM |
|
Heh, thanks for doubling the networkhashps/hashespermin vars. getmininginfo { "blocks" : 210375, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 0.00000032, "errors" : "", "genproclimit" : 1, "networkhashps" : 11.81779068, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false, "chain" : "main", "generate" : true, "hashespermin" : 5.48705968 }
|
|
|
|
dragos_bdi
|
|
October 05, 2015, 02:43:58 PM |
|
I changed that logic users now use the miningkeys.dat file with the required keys for mining. Can confirm that it works. But it seems that it does not take the keys one by one. It think is just hopping between the first keys. Since chainz is behind, I just decoded some blocks by hand. Also put no comments behind the keys nor between the lines in the miningkey.dat. Throws out an error: wrong key lg t. I can confirm myself the bug
|
Thank You for your tips! BCR - 5u7KPyiHKeg6sbdvd9XhT9HHpvh5c2ppTe BTC - 1ASJQ7SE84sgQketS2kQCTQLV3DJesYnLh
|
|
|
thelonecrouton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 05, 2015, 02:46:10 PM |
|
Can confirm that it works. But it seems that it does not take the keys one by one. It think is just hopping between the first keys.
I don't think the other miningkeys are used yet as the rule still just 'not consecutive' rather than the eventually intended 'one in twenty?'
|
|
|
|
bitcreditscc (OP)
|
|
October 05, 2015, 02:53:02 PM |
|
Can confirm that it works. But it seems that it does not take the keys one by one. It think is just hopping between the first keys.
I don't think the other miningkeys are used yet as the rule still just 'not consecutive' rather than the eventually intended 'one in twenty?' Exactly, the loop just uses the first viable key it can find, so if you have 3 keys, just the first two are used. But when we move to 1/20 or 1/40, it'll keep searching till it finds a viable key. However as the network is right now i think we can all agree that extreme caution is required at this stage to prevent the chain from freezing up. Right now i'd like to finish up what i have under construction, optimize the code and then update.
|
|
|
|
jasemoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
|
|
October 05, 2015, 04:24:42 PM |
|
new windows wallet didnt work until i removed bnminingkey= from bitcredit.conf, and created a miningkeys.dat in %appdata%/bitcredits which contained the address of my 50k input
|
$MAID & $BTC other than that some short hodls and some long held garbage.
|
|
|
cisahasa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 05, 2015, 04:56:19 PM |
|
looks rather interesting, although what are the devs doing with the premine?
Glad you think so, yes, please take the time to read. premine = premine millions of coins are a risk. no swaps occured so far? question what will be an issue: rate? if hxx would swap, people would want about +2.5milloin coins, i guess you would offer 60000.. and i took some time reading, got a feeling that this is not working. but good idea. my solution= burn the coins price will only get better then. It's funny how people always look to me on that issue, yet they claim to have read the thread. The coins are in escrow, and will only be released by community consensus. And right now the vast majority of the regulars don't really much care about those coins because we have no immediate solution for them. If you want to tackle the issue then fine, but instead of directing your enquiries to me, ask everyone else since this decision lies in their hands. We now have a voting platform, one that can be used once there are visible options. All i do is give you the tools, it's up to the rest to use them. a. The coins are in escrow = proof? b. released by community = how do determine it? c. 8bit is in big trouble, make a deal with them d. i think this will be big some day, not now e. dev is working and have good skills, but minor mistakes happen, you cant avoid those.. f. dev is alone, when more devs step in ----> to the moon
|
|
|
|
bitcreditscc (OP)
|
|
October 05, 2015, 05:55:37 PM |
|
new windows wallet didnt work until i removed bnminingkey= from bitcredit.conf, and created a miningkeys.dat in %appdata%/bitcredits which contained the address of my 50k input
In a sall while all that can be entered and modded from the GUI. Just so much work and remembering all the to-do items
|
|
|
|
bitcreditscc (OP)
|
|
October 05, 2015, 06:28:47 PM |
|
looks rather interesting, although what are the devs doing with the premine?
Glad you think so, yes, please take the time to read. premine = premine millions of coins are a risk. no swaps occured so far? question what will be an issue: rate? if hxx would swap, people would want about +2.5milloin coins, i guess you would offer 60000.. and i took some time reading, got a feeling that this is not working. but good idea. my solution= burn the coins price will only get better then. It's funny how people always look to me on that issue, yet they claim to have read the thread. The coins are in escrow, and will only be released by community consensus. And right now the vast majority of the regulars don't really much care about those coins because we have no immediate solution for them. If you want to tackle the issue then fine, but instead of directing your enquiries to me, ask everyone else since this decision lies in their hands. We now have a voting platform, one that can be used once there are visible options. All i do is give you the tools, it's up to the rest to use them. a. The coins are in escrow = proof? b. released by community = how do determine it? c. 8bit is in big trouble, make a deal with them d. i think this will be big some day, not now e. dev is working and have good skills, but minor mistakes happen, you cant avoid those.. f. dev is alone, when more devs step in ----> to the moon Search for proof in this thread. It's determined by vote, ergo if an idea gets the most votes, it wins. 8bit got my offer, it's up to them to accept or decline. Lot more than minor mistakes made, but learning. Would be nice if we got soeone experienced to help out. 2 major issues need attention
|
|
|
|
dragos_bdi
|
|
October 05, 2015, 06:33:30 PM |
|
new windows wallet didnt work until i removed bnminingkey= from bitcredit.conf, and created a miningkeys.dat in %appdata%/bitcredits which contained the address of my 50k input
In a sall while all that can be entered and modded from the GUI. Just so much work and remembering all the to-do items Could you remove this qDebug. I saw that many time, on windows just close the wallet here. https://github.com/bitcreditscc/bicreditsnew/blob/master/src/qt/transactiontablemodel.cpp#L77Thx
|
Thank You for your tips! BCR - 5u7KPyiHKeg6sbdvd9XhT9HHpvh5c2ppTe BTC - 1ASJQ7SE84sgQketS2kQCTQLV3DJesYnLh
|
|
|
jasemoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
|
|
October 05, 2015, 09:46:58 PM |
|
looks rather interesting, although what are the devs doing with the premine?
Glad you think so, yes, please take the time to read. premine = premine millions of coins are a risk. no swaps occured so far? question what will be an issue: rate? if hxx would swap, people would want about +2.5milloin coins, i guess you would offer 60000.. and i took some time reading, got a feeling that this is not working. but good idea. my solution= burn the coins price will only get better then. It's funny how people always look to me on that issue, yet they claim to have read the thread. The coins are in escrow, and will only be released by community consensus. And right now the vast majority of the regulars don't really much care about those coins because we have no immediate solution for them. If you want to tackle the issue then fine, but instead of directing your enquiries to me, ask everyone else since this decision lies in their hands. We now have a voting platform, one that can be used once there are visible options. All i do is give you the tools, it's up to the rest to use them. a. The coins are in escrow = proof? b. released by community = how do determine it? c. 8bit is in big trouble, make a deal with them d. i think this will be big some day, not now e. dev is working and have good skills, but minor mistakes happen, you cant avoid those.. f. dev is alone, when more devs step in ----> to the moon Search for proof in this thread. It's determined by vote, ergo if an idea gets the most votes, it wins. 8bit got my offer, it's up to them to accept or decline. Lot more than minor mistakes made, but learning. Would be nice if we got soeone experienced to help out. 2 major issues need attention A few different people including myself mined the 10 mil premine in block 6 when there was no seednode to keep the launch network from forking. After bitcredits proved everyone was on the right chain and he controlled the ICO block no one talked to much about it since. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcr/block.dws?0812e7d85669525cfb329037ec63e7d65b68eb30f521a956c9174f42b1f67615.htmThe ICO was cancelled and the 10 mil turned into: 6 milllion BCR Reserve held by Empoex https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=896133.msg10107816#msg10107816https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcr/address.dws?5qH4yHaaaRuX1qKCZdUHXNJdesssNQcUct.htm 6,000,000BCR 4 million BCR Bank - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=896133.msg10897613#msg10897613https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcr/address.dws?6AdcTCyVuZJ8Y9enJyrEAP9z9EDu385cjq.htm ~2,600,000BCR current balance, likely the other BCR has been used for bounties and development costs it seems. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, this 2.6mil address never did hold a complete 4mil chunk so maybe I'm wrong. I only rejoined this topic in the last 2 months, and most of it has been plagued with getting the bid system up and the blockchain flowing smoothly which is still underway. What are the 2 major things you would want help with developing and need funding for? Maybe a quick writeup on how we could vote on these issues I dont see specifically how to vote in the wallet. Truth is theres been a lot of Good, and some Crazy ideas thrown around in the last ~200 pages. This second might not be the best time to stop and take a look back and shine a light on some old questions, but as soon as the chains smooth and bids are working I personally would love to know... - How to work the vote system including:
- What should we be voting on, projects/expected funds needed
- A writeup of the current&historical state of the 4mil coins that did not end up in the Escrow
- A detailed writeup of the 3/5 multisig controlling the BTC/LTC/Dash asset backing addresses, who has those keys?
- And a silly question, are we able to borrow BTC/LTC/Dash from the backing with BCR?
- I guess what we need are some concrete writeups for banknodes/50k input mining in terms of configs, voting instructions and vote request setup, borrowing repaying and loaning through the bank system
I'm excited for the superblock later today and seeing how much new $ will come in for the next superblock which should be tomorrow but likely would come in 2-3days at this rate. It's going to be a big issue if no one funds the superblocks and the payout price is under 100sat/bcr. Bittrex volume was nil for the past few days, the bid system right now basically forces .1BTC daily to be injected into the chain to maintain current price if people plan to bid/dump. so once everything is smooth we can do some marketing on the asset backing/superblock system in place to get some more interest in Bitcredit. And we need to make sure new users to the bid process do not send from anywhere they dont control the keys. could be helpful to add a blurb about this inside the wallet. maybe to view the bid address. (I know it says privkey for redeem but people are not smart these days, and no way in fuck bittrex is going to give you the privkey to an address they sent form on your behalf)
|
$MAID & $BTC other than that some short hodls and some long held garbage.
|
|
|
cisahasa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 05, 2015, 11:31:32 PM |
|
looks rather interesting, although what are the devs doing with the premine?
Glad you think so, yes, please take the time to read. premine = premine millions of coins are a risk. no swaps occured so far? question what will be an issue: rate? if hxx would swap, people would want about +2.5milloin coins, i guess you would offer 60000.. and i took some time reading, got a feeling that this is not working. but good idea. my solution= burn the coins price will only get better then. It's funny how people always look to me on that issue, yet they claim to have read the thread. The coins are in escrow, and will only be released by community consensus. And right now the vast majority of the regulars don't really much care about those coins because we have no immediate solution for them. If you want to tackle the issue then fine, but instead of directing your enquiries to me, ask everyone else since this decision lies in their hands. We now have a voting platform, one that can be used once there are visible options. All i do is give you the tools, it's up to the rest to use them. a. The coins are in escrow = proof? b. released by community = how do determine it? c. 8bit is in big trouble, make a deal with them d. i think this will be big some day, not now e. dev is working and have good skills, but minor mistakes happen, you cant avoid those.. f. dev is alone, when more devs step in ----> to the moon Search for proof in this thread. It's determined by vote, ergo if an idea gets the most votes, it wins. 8bit got my offer, it's up to them to accept or decline. Lot more than minor mistakes made, but learning. Would be nice if we got soeone experienced to help out. 2 major issues need attention a. Search for proof in this thread = done do i trust it? (irrelevant) b. 8bit got my offer = get this deal, it is proof of trust(rates...the issue) c. Would be nice if we got someone experienced to help out = you will have if things gets better(i could also help but we talk same things with different terms...we cant understand each other..) d. good luck
|
|
|
|
jasemoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
|
|
October 06, 2015, 12:19:51 AM Last edit: October 06, 2015, 12:32:40 AM by jasemoney |
|
Congrats on passing the superblock! is there a wait period to award the funds? looks like the same funds are showing in my bidtracker as before the block even after updating also i imported my btc privkey and did not see a payment from the superblock, the address shows in the bidtracker also restarting after importing bitcoin address privkey is now causing it to crash. loads with fresh wallet, crashes with normal wallet + imported privkey, reverting to a backup wallet form an hour ago loads fine. error shows: 2015-10-06 00:24:03 GUI: PaymentServer::LoadRootCAs : Loaded 0 root certificates 2015-10-06 00:24:03 GUI: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile GUI: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile GUI: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile GUI: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile GUI: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile GUI: libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile 2015-10-06 00:25:32 AppInit2 : parameter interaction: -externalip set -> setting -discover=0 2015-10-06 00:25:32 GUI: "registerShutdownBlockReason: Successfully registered: Bitcredit Core didn't yet exit safely..." 2015-10-06 00:25:32 just fucking aroudn with some stuff, i deleted bidtracker folder: relaunch=crash, added the folder and a blank final.dat file= crash, put everything the way it was=crash, rolled back my walle tto my hour ago backup = all good.. BACKUP YOUR WALLETS PEOPLE
|
$MAID & $BTC other than that some short hodls and some long held garbage.
|
|
|
thelonecrouton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 06, 2015, 12:42:38 AM |
|
Looks like 6BWBUastjKmn4KnPMNPqfKdF36JgbgE8qM was the lucky miner, no payouts to bidders:
|
|
|
|
jasemoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
|
|
October 06, 2015, 12:58:20 AM Last edit: October 06, 2015, 01:08:54 AM by jasemoney |
|
lame, and chainz is stuck on a p2pool mined block from 12 hrs ago.. should really get these pools shut down so they stop forking the chain. until any of them start mining against 50k BCR inputs theyre hurting not helping.
edit* (nevermind chainz shows every extraction since block 40,000 as coming from P2Pool)
|
$MAID & $BTC other than that some short hodls and some long held garbage.
|
|
|
thelonecrouton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 06, 2015, 01:07:08 AM |
|
lame, and chainz is stuck on a p2pool mined block from 12 hrs ago.. should really get these pools shut down so they stop forking the chain. until any of them start mining against 50k BCR inputs theyre hurting not helping. (nevermind chainz shows every extraction since block 40,000 as coming from P2Pool)
I think chainz counts everything as mined-by-p2pool for BCR regardless. The BN address that mined the block has the needed funds, and by the look of the IP's in the BN list whoever owns that address also has another 7/8 BNs, might even be bitcreditscc. I haven't had the same problem as you though with the client crashing after importing any (DASH) privkeys. Haven't made any bids with anything else yet. That libpng error is just QT moaning about some icon it doesn't like the look of, it does that anyway.
|
|
|
|
jasemoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
|
|
October 06, 2015, 01:09:53 AM |
|
lame, and chainz is stuck on a p2pool mined block from 12 hrs ago.. should really get these pools shut down so they stop forking the chain. until any of them start mining against 50k BCR inputs theyre hurting not helping. (nevermind chainz shows every extraction since block 40,000 as coming from P2Pool)
I think chainz counts everything as mined-by-p2pool for BCR regardless. The BN address that mined the block has the needed funds, and by the look of the IP's in the BN list whoever owns that address also has another 7/8 BNs, might even be bitcreditscc. I haven't had the same problem as you though with the client crashing after importing any (DASH) privkeys. Haven't made any bids with anything else yet. That libpng error is just QT moaning about some icon it doesn't like the look of, it does that anyway. yeah it was weird, might not have been related to the import seems really finicky right now, i can't tell whats causing it to hate loading at the moment. runs fine when its open. guess its like a jet engine, if it starts its probably good to go. back to the superblock looks like it paid 6BWBUastjKmn4KnPMNPqfKdF36JgbgE8qM 23991.75 5qoFUCqPUE4pyjus6U6jD6ba4oHR6NZ7c7 3000 6133GZGV2XRnS53DkLSWrK661TsQMqnewL 3000 6Ah2Gb2Vkeo1bnajmecU8aJ5CTX2UGRsjq 6 6BCRBKZLmq2JwWLWDtJZL26ao4uHhqG6mH 1.8 6BCRdofKg8ThBV8hbK5tik425gMuy8wreJ 0.45 total 30,000 which includes a 6bcr payout to the banknode selected, and 1.8 to whatever that goes to, but it skipped the 8.4 reward for mining and the other 1.8bcr reward for whatever.
|
$MAID & $BTC other than that some short hodls and some long held garbage.
|
|
|
|