◈◈Bitcredit ◈◈ Migrating to UniQredit◈◈

[dragos_bdi]

.....That libpng error is just QT moaning about some icon it doesn't like the look of, it does that anyway.

Take a look ... https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1269845#p1269845

[jasemoney]

.....That libpng error is just QT moaning about some icon it doesn't like the look of, it does that anyway.

Take a look ... https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1269845#p1269845

yeah i am not worried about the png error, it shows even when the wallet loads proper.

[dragos_bdi]

.....That libpng error is just QT moaning about some icon it doesn't like the look of, it does that anyway.

Take a look ... https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1269845#p1269845

yeah i am not worried about the png error, it shows even when the wallet loads proper.

It would be nice, if there is a possibility, to remove spamming the debug.log with unwanted messages tough ...

[jasemoney]

.....That libpng error is just QT moaning about some icon it doesn't like the look of, it does that anyway.

Take a look ... https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1269845#p1269845

yeah i am not worried about the png error, it shows even when the wallet loads proper.

It would be nice, if there is a possibility, to remove spamming the debug.log with unwanted messages tough ...

bigger fish to fry at this point..

[dragos_bdi]

************************
EXCEPTION: St12out_of_range       
basic_string::substr: __pos (which is 18446744073709551615) > this->size() (which is 0)       
D:\Users\Sensei\Desktop\bitcredit-qt.exe in updatebids   

[bitcreditscc]

************************
EXCEPTION: St12out_of_range       
basic_string::substr: __pos (which is 18446744073709551615) > this->size() (which is 0)       
D:\Users\Sensei\Desktop\bitcredit-qt.exe in updatebids   

Was studying your suggested diff adj.

I have to ask , why should we change the interval? Are we worried about how long the adj is taking or how it ends up looking? If we are worried about both then your solution works. But if all we want to change is how the diff changes then we should only modify the multiplier....

I fear that if we push diff adj too far we can end up with a frozen chain, unlike the 1-3 block solution we already have. I was under the impression that what we want to do is smooth out the increases so they do not go too far too quickly.

That error is a headache from bidtracker. Haven't been able to make json work.

[dragos_bdi]

************************
EXCEPTION: St12out_of_range       
basic_string::substr: __pos (which is 18446744073709551615) > this->size() (which is 0)       
D:\Users\Sensei\Desktop\bitcredit-qt.exe in updatebids   

Was studying your suggested diff adj.

I have to ask , why should we change the interval? Are we worried about how long the adj is taking or how it ends up looking? If we are worried about both then your solution works. But if all we want to change is how the diff changes then we should only modify the multiplier....

I fear that if we push diff adj too far we can end up with a frozen chain, unlike the 1-3 block solution we already have. I was under the impression that what we want to do is smooth out the increases so they do not go too far too quickly.

That error is a headache from bidtracker. Haven't been able to make json work.

... that what we want to do is smooth out the increases so they do not go too far too quickly. ...

This is was my intention too ..

[bitcreditscc]

************************
EXCEPTION: St12out_of_range       
basic_string::substr: __pos (which is 18446744073709551615) > this->size() (which is 0)       
D:\Users\Sensei\Desktop\bitcredit-qt.exe in updatebids   

Was studying your suggested diff adj.

I have to ask , why should we change the interval? Are we worried about how long the adj is taking or how it ends up looking? If we are worried about both then your solution works. But if all we want to change is how the diff changes then we should only modify the multiplier....

I fear that if we push diff adj too far we can end up with a frozen chain, unlike the 1-3 block solution we already have. I was under the impression that what we want to do is smooth out the increases so they do not go too far too quickly.

That error is a headache from bidtracker. Haven't been able to make json work.

... that what we want to do is smooth out the increases so they do not go too far too quickly. ...

This is was my intention too ..

Yeah, i just want to know if you don't think we may suffer as a result of extending the period between diff changes to 900 blocks. in terms of momentum , that is a very long period. a single block of diff 0.0001 could takes days to solve.

[dragos_bdi]

************************
EXCEPTION: St12out_of_range       
basic_string::substr: __pos (which is 18446744073709551615) > this->size() (which is 0)       
D:\Users\Sensei\Desktop\bitcredit-qt.exe in updatebids   

Was studying your suggested diff adj.

I have to ask , why should we change the interval? Are we worried about how long the adj is taking or how it ends up looking? If we are worried about both then your solution works. But if all we want to change is how the diff changes then we should only modify the multiplier....

I fear that if we push diff adj too far we can end up with a frozen chain, unlike the 1-3 block solution we already have. I was under the impression that what we want to do is smooth out the increases so they do not go too far too quickly.

That error is a headache from bidtracker. Haven't been able to make json work.

... that what we want to do is smooth out the increases so they do not go too far too quickly. ...

This is was my intention too ..

Yeah, i just want to know if you don't think we may suffer as a result of extending the period between diff changes to 900 blocks. in terms of momentum , that is a very long period. a single block of diff 0.0001 could takes days to solve.

in this case, i misunderstood the code. I was thinking that it takes the time between 2 consecutive blocks, and my intention was to extend that analysis in last 900 blocks to smooth out the increasing diff

[thelonecrouton]

Can diff be made 'harder' (or slower) to increase than to decrease? Or have the client cap hashespersec and stop mining if whatever threshold is breached, but that presents another enforcement challenge.

I'm still struggling to see what useful purpose PoW serves in the current BCR model that can't be better (and surely more easily from a coding and maintenance POV?) served by BN-only consensus without the extra complicated cog in the machine.

[antonio8]

What nodes/peer should we have in the config.

I am running the 0.30.17.5 wallet but no connections at all. Stuck on block 206553.

Thanks.

[thelonecrouton]

What nodes/peer should we have in the config.

I am running the 0.30.17.5 wallet but no connections at all. Stuck on block 206553.

Thanks.

Try:

addnode=91.230.123.101:8888
addnode=91.230.123.11:8877
addnode=82.211.1.181:8877
addnode=91.230.123.101:8877

[bitcreditscc]

Can diff be made 'harder' (or slower) to increase than to decrease? Or have the client cap hashespersec and stop mining if whatever threshold is breached, but that presents another enforcement challenge.

I'm still struggling to see what useful purpose PoW serves in the current BCR model that can't be better (and surely more easily from a coding and maintenance POV?) served by BN-only consensus without the extra complicated cog in the machine.

That's the plan for now, to make increases slower.

As for getting rid of PoW altogether , i'd love that, but i think that's better implemented in a whole new blockchain design. I've been mulling over the idea, after seeing some of the limitations with current BTC based model, but it just won't be possible anytime soon, the cost is too high an my talents alone pale in comparison to what would be required to do it in 6-12 months.

I think after we add assets and loans we can try fund raising and if we get enough, then i'll do BCR full time and hire a good team.

[bitcreditscc]

Where can we hire someone to write a digital booklet with full instructions for using everything in the client?

[dragos_bdi]

@bitcreditscc
6CJd8iD8Er59UUcc4jSP9K3NMXeEnkQiuA is your address ?

[bitcreditscc]

@bitcreditscc
6CJd8iD8Er59UUcc4jSP9K3NMXeEnkQiuA is your address ?

Translated key for BTC address already in bidding list, i lost the priv key when my apartment was ransacked. It's a hack but only way i could think of for now to test enforcement methods.

No QT fixes added yet, i want us to coordinate with tlc since he knows exactly what he did to replace overview with the tx page. Maybe we can finally nail down those issues.

[cisahasa]

@bitcreditscc
6CJd8iD8Er59UUcc4jSP9K3NMXeEnkQiuA is your address ?

Translated key for BTC address already in bidding list, i lost the priv key when my apartment was ransacked. It's a hack but only way i could think of for now to test enforcement methods.

No QT fixes added yet, i want us to coordinate with tlc since he knows exactly what he did to replace overview with the tx page. Maybe we can finally nail down those issues.

qt fix is a simple thing. if you mean the errors in the debug file.

[thelonecrouton]

No QT fixes added yet, i want us to coordinate with tlc since he knows exactly what he did to replace overview with the tx page. Maybe we can finally nail down those issues.

IIRC, I recreated the balances bit at the top of overviewpage in transactionview.cpp. (GUI parts are coded in the .cpp, there's no transactionview.ui form, and the code to display the balances I lifted from overviewpage.cpp.) Didn't touch the transactionview stuff at all apart from moving the Export button from where it was down at the bottom to the top to save vertical space. Then just pointed overviewaction in bitcreditgui.cpp to transactionview instead.

Is there an issue with it on Win? Never gave me any grief on linux.

[dragos_bdi]

No QT fixes added yet, i want us to coordinate with tlc since he knows exactly what he did to replace overview with the tx page. Maybe we can finally nail down those issues.

IIRC, I recreated the balances bit at the top of overviewpage in transactionview.cpp. (It's coded in the .cpp, there's no .ui form for it.) Didn't touch the transactionview stuff at all apart from moving the Export button from where it was down at the bottom to the top to save vertical space. Then just pointed overviewaction in bitcreditgui.cpp to transactionview instead.

Is there an issue with it on Win? Never gave me any grief on linux.

Please provide every dependencies version. It would be helpful ..

Boost
DB
Libpng
Miniupnpc
Openssl
Protobuf
Qrencode
QTbase
QTTools
Curl

[thelonecrouton]

Please provide every dependencies version. It would be helpful ..

I'm not sure what you mean - there were no additional dependencies needed. I possibly had to #include some QT widgets that weren't needed previously.