wangx024
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
February 05, 2015, 05:21:21 AM |
|
is it right now?32core+128G How such a low rate? 2015-Feb-05 13:18:19.132063 getNumConnections: flag is 2, in=0, out=4, res=4 2015-Feb-05 13:18:19.943264 [miner 3]0.00753347 H/s (132.741 s/H), difficulty=15 71 2015-Feb-05 13:18:20.052464 [P2P7][143.239.71.92:6180 OUT] SYNCHRONIZED OK 2015-Feb-05 13:18:40.706901 [miner 2]0.00651512 H/s (153.489 s/H), difficulty=15 71 2015-Feb-05 13:18:47.477313 [miner 0]0.0124615 H/s (80.247 s/H), difficulty=1571 2015-Feb-05 13:18:53.951324 [miner 4]0.0119873 H/s (83.4215 s/H), difficulty=157 1 2015-Feb-05 13:19:01.891738 [miner 1]0.0114438 H/s (87.3835 s/H), difficulty=157 1 2015-Feb-05 13:19:10.050552 [miner 7]0.0109334 H/s (91.463 s/H), difficulty=1571 2015-Feb-05 13:19:19.020568 [miner 5]0.00807435 H/s (123.849 s/H), difficulty=15 71 2015-Feb-05 13:19:26.118581 [miner 8]0.00910672 H/s (109.809 s/H), difficulty=15 71 2015-Feb-05 13:19:34.854596 [miner 6]0.0103441 H/s (96.673 s/H), difficulty=1571 China can not use the wallet solo it? The state, right?
2015-Feb-05 09:40:26.106494 [miner 2]0.0140054 H/s (71.401 s/H), difficulty=1487
2015-Feb-05 09:40:30.630502 [miner 6]0.0109896 H/s (90.995 s/H), difficulty=1487
2015-Feb-05 09:40:55.949347 ERROR ..\..\..\src\wallet\wallet2.cpp:239 !r. THROW EXCEPTION: error::no_connection_to_daemon 2015-Feb-05 09:40:55.949347 ..\..\..\src\wallet\wallet2.cpp:239:struct tools::er ror::no_connection_to_daemon: no connection to daemon, request = getblocks.bin 2015-Feb-05 09:40:56.557748 ERROR ..\..\..\src\wallet\wallet2.cpp:239 !r. THROW EXCEPTION: error::no_connection_to_daemon 2015-Feb-05 09:40:56.557748 ..\..\..\src\wallet\wallet2.cpp:239:struct tools::er ror::no_connection_to_daemon: no connection to daemon, request = getblocks.bin 2015-Feb-05 09:40:57.166149 ERROR ..\..\..\src\wallet\wallet2.cpp:239 !r. THROW EXCEPTION: error::no_connection_to_daemon 2015-Feb-05 09:40:57.166149 ..\..\..\src\wallet\wallet2.cpp:239:struct tools::er ror::no_connection_to_daemon: no connection to daemon, request = getblocks.bin 2015-Feb-05 09:40:57.571750 ERROR ..\..\..\src\wallet\wallet2.cpp:239 !r. THROW EXCEPTION: error::no_connection_to_daemon 2015-Feb-05 09:40:57.571750 ..\..\..\src\wallet\wallet2.cpp:239:struct tools::er ror::no_connection_to_daemon: no connection to daemon, request = getblocks.bin 2015-Feb-05 09:40:57.571750 ERROR ..\..\..\src\wallet\wallet2.cpp:321 pull_block s failed, try_count=3 2015-Feb-05 09:40:59.927354 [miner 3]0.00894039 H/s (111.852 s/H), difficulty=14 87 2015-Feb-05 09:41:06.323365 [RPC0][sock 2172] Some problems at write: 远程主机强 迫关闭了一个现有的连接。:10054 2015-Feb-05 09:41:06.323365 [RPC1][sock 2600] Some problems at write: 远程主机强 迫关闭了一个现有的连接。:10054 2015-Feb-05 09:41:06.510565 [P2P8][143.239.71.92:6180 OUT] SYNCHRONIZED OK
You don't have pebblecoind running.
|
|
|
|
XPB (OP)
|
|
February 05, 2015, 09:05:51 PM |
|
The Windows miner binary is now available. WARNING: Requires 13 GB RAM! How to run it: minerd.exe -o stratum+tcp://69.60.113.21:3350 -u YOUR_WALLET_ADDRESS -p x
|
|
|
|
PeaMine
|
|
February 05, 2015, 11:17:30 PM |
|
The Windows miner binary is now available. WARNING: Requires 13 GB RAM! How to run it: minerd.exe -o stratum+tcp://69.60.113.21:3350 -u YOUR_WALLET_ADDRESS -p x Thanks!
|
Datacenter Technician and Electrician. If you have any questions feel free to ask me as I am generally bored looking at logs and happy to help during free time.
|
|
|
|
GingerAle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
|
February 06, 2015, 03:41:50 AM |
|
okay, so is the daemon miner as efficient as the standalone? and wolf, what kinda bounty you need to make a gpu / more efficient CPU miner ? i've seen your work. Like I've said before, I'm all for decentralization through difficult POW, and I like pebble's concept - I just wanna make sure its for real.
|
|
|
|
wangx024
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
February 06, 2015, 06:14:04 AM |
|
i use windows wallet minerd ,but thread for 2 or 8 ,Speed is also 0.12.why? My server is E5 2650v2*2 128G
|
|
|
|
noteminer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
February 06, 2015, 06:49:06 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
joehoebot
|
|
February 06, 2015, 12:44:34 PM |
|
same problem here. how can we kick in a windows 40 core xeon box with 128GB ram to go above .11 - .12 ? frustrating
|
|
|
|
GingerAle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
|
February 06, 2015, 03:11:45 PM |
|
same problem here. how can we kick in a windows 40 core xeon box with 128GB ram to go above .11 - .12 ? frustrating Welp, at 128, you're 9.8 X 13 gigs. So, my poor little lappy that I'm torturing with this coin has 16 gigs, so im only running 1 thread, and I get about 0.011-0.02 h/s (using daemon miner) So, theoretically, you should get ~0.145, which I don't think is far off from 0.11 - 0.12 Thus, looks like the algorithm is doing what its supposed to. Distributing hashrate. Frustrating? No. Good for decentralization? We'll see. Problem is at the right xpb price, will make sense to buy ridiculous GPUs that are essentially the same price as ASICs (or rent a boatload of servers). Only difference is that GPUs have resale value outside of cryptocurrency.... and then we get into this whole debate again.
|
|
|
|
magaura
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 06, 2015, 06:16:26 PM |
|
Nice going up.. no need to rush..we need slow rise..
|
|
|
|
PeaMine
|
|
February 06, 2015, 08:07:00 PM |
|
Wow! What happened with the price. There went all my sells way back at 1800 lol. Now worth 2250 Difficulty has gone up a ton though, seems like this is taking off and I sold too soon.
|
Datacenter Technician and Electrician. If you have any questions feel free to ask me as I am generally bored looking at logs and happy to help during free time.
|
|
|
PeaMine
|
|
February 06, 2015, 08:09:27 PM Last edit: February 06, 2015, 08:38:11 PM by PeaMine |
|
Also on the main pool, I'm getting: [2015-02-06 20:06:58] Stratum connection timed out [2015-02-06 20:06:58] Stratum connection interrupted [2015-02-06 20:06:58] Stratum detected new block Over and over, though my stats seem to show up, they're much lower than the local miner shows. Anything going on?
|
Datacenter Technician and Electrician. If you have any questions feel free to ask me as I am generally bored looking at logs and happy to help during free time.
|
|
|
GingerAle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
|
February 06, 2015, 08:40:00 PM |
|
just friggin solo mine fer crissakes.
|
|
|
|
e1ghtSpace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
|
|
February 06, 2015, 08:47:27 PM |
|
Damn, my computer only has 8Gb. So I can't solo mine. Right?
|
|
|
|
kondiomir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1000
Twitter @Acimirov
|
|
February 06, 2015, 08:49:45 PM |
|
I think, you may not be able to mine in pool too.
|
|
|
|
e1ghtSpace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
|
|
February 06, 2015, 08:56:04 PM |
|
I'm going to take a chance and invest 0.37 btc. But first, do you think I should?
|
|
|
|
magaura
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 06, 2015, 09:43:43 PM |
|
I'm going to push this up .. moaaar.. who is with me..? ..
|
|
|
|
GingerAle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
|
February 06, 2015, 09:44:48 PM |
|
I'm going to take a chance and invest 0.37 btc. But first, do you think I should?
you're asking the thread of people who are in some way invested in the coin whether or not you should invest in the coin. OF COURSE you should! Please, drive up the price... but after I buy up some more. 8 GB guy - apparently you can still mine, it'll use your virtual memory / scratch pad whatever u call it, but the performance will blow.
|
|
|
|
e1ghtSpace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
|
|
February 06, 2015, 09:49:21 PM |
|
I'm going to push this up .. moaaar.. who is with me..? .. I am. How much u got? I just bought ~0.2 and have ~0.15 sitting in buys at 2200. It's not a lot but it will be after we go up.
|
|
|
|
XPB (OP)
|
|
February 06, 2015, 09:52:54 PM |
|
okay, so is the daemon miner as efficient as the standalone? Yes, they use the same algorithm.
|
|
|
|
|