You reasoning is wrong. Some of the same people run Intersango.
After reading 76+ pages of so called "security" investigation and "payout" threads for over 2 months, there is little to nothing that can prove these guys are innocent
Hey, stop that Bullshit!
Your reasoning is outright wired, arrogant and delusional.
Who is filling 76+ pages with assumptions, guessing, and musings?
Who is getting more and more thrilled and excited in constructing one conspiracy theory after another??
And what exactly does this prove? Only that you and your buddies are having fun playing detective here in these threads.
We all agree that Bitcoinica failed and neither the communication nor the payouts were handled as you'd expect.
But to apply a scammer tag to some individual people, you first need to come up with a proof (mind me, not some random guesses)
that
exactly these people did
purposefully trick and scam someone else with the goal of stealing money.
More specifically...
can you prove that Zhou Tong purposefully betrayed someone?
can you prove that Genjix purposefully betrayed someone?
can you prove that Patrick purposefully betrayed someone and ran with the money to the island?
No you cant. In fact,
you guys are mud-slingers and witch hunters.
Come on, lets behave like adults and stick to the facts.
We know that there where insufficient security measures in place. But we don't know who exactly was responsible at what point and who was bound to care for some detail and failed to do so. In fact, the involved people cross-wise blame each other.
But we don't have the slightest proof, that they purposefully blame each other while in fact someone purposefully opened a backdoor somewhere for stealing money.
Next, we know the business people, namely Tihan and Donald Norman disagree on the question of responsibility.
But we don't have the slightest proof, that they purposefully set up this disagreement as a scam to buy time, while speculating with the money meanwhile.
Moreover, we know that the life database was destroyed by the hacker, but that some transfer logs and accounting snapshots where available, plus the data provided by the people in the claims process. We even know that some real scammers entered fake claims, because the total sum of claimed funds don't add up.
Yet we don't know what data is available and what is missing, and we don't know why the decision was made to pay some people and don't pay others. And we don't have the slightest proof, that those people having received a payment are affiliated in any way with the people processing the payouts. Just someone heard from someone else that someone else got the impression this might be the case.
And besides that information, we don't know much. We don't even know who
is Bitcoinica. Who is/was the general partner at what time? How is the financial situation? Is the business insolvent? We've just heard lots of guesses and semi information on those core questions.
Poll
