[ANN][NKA] INCAKOIN l Perú l Launched Aug 2013 | update v.1.5.2.0 released

[OSMIUMCOIN]

DEV SELL FOR BTC OR BOUNTY NKA



eXAMPLE BANNER

[madross]

windows wallet updated to QT version 5.4.2  updated openssl to fix the vunerability http://openssl.org/news/secadv/20150709.txt please update your windows wallet

[Blockhunter]

DEV SELL FOR BTC OR BOUNTY NKA



eXAMPLE BANNER

very nice work! I hear also the whispers of some games black jack wheels slots! Can't wait great progress

[Blockhunter]

windows wallet updated to QT version 5.4.2  updated openssl to fix the vunerability http://openssl.org/news/secadv/20150709.txt please update your windows wallet

right on! Fix for the open SSL vulnerability:)

[m3rt1x]

one of those old 2013 coins that still is here.
Keep up the good work, i see many nice new things coming for inca last weeks.

It's nice to see a coin still alive after 2 years!Will be watching!

[HarryPorter]

one of those old 2013 coins that still is here.
Keep up the good work, i see many nice new things coming for inca last weeks.

It's nice to see a coin still alive after 2 years!Will be watching!

there is something worth to watch:https://youtu.be/XyH3rsWbqTM   - enjoy

[HarryPorter]

love it,  

 2 things i saw that are not completely correct in my opinion.

1 coinmarketcap show 1 billion coin, instead of 190 million in the video.

2. we are still not on cryptsy.

i love the brand, the logo and the history of inca, what we would need is something unique beside of that.
Maybe a currency with focus for south america or so? this was first i thought when i read about it.

video based on the information from this forum and website, so if they incorrect dev. should fix them.

ad.1. this number was taken from first page of this thread - look at: " 2.) Fair supply....  That’s why we remain transparent. Keeps us honest. 190 million INCA coins are a very reasonable number as far as supply of  digital gold. This number better reflects the worlds supply of gold if we choose for it to be the basis of our backing.  "

ad.2. on three last exchanges there is "(voting)" - information under links, as we got it on announcement (1st page) here as well.

Thank for feedback

[Blockhunter]

love it,  

 2 things i saw that are not completely correct in my opinion.

1 coinmarketcap show 1 billion coin, instead of 190 million in the video.

2. we are still not on cryptsy.

i love the brand, the logo and the history of inca, what we would need is something unique beside of that.
Maybe a currency with focus for south america or so? this was first i thought when i read about it.

video based on the information from this forum and website.

ad.1. this number was taken from first page of this thread - look at: " 2.) Fair supply....  That’s why we remain transparent. Keeps us honest. 190 million INCA coins are a very reasonable number as far as supply of  digital gold. This number better reflects the worlds supply of gold if we choose for it to be the basis of our backing.  "

ad.2. on three last exchanges there is "(voting)" - information under links, as we got it on announcement (1st page) here as well.

all is correct 190 million POW generated coins. Also I notice the coinmarketcap info is wrong see explorer for total supply.

[Blockhunter]

People seem to worry much on total supply. I believe this is important topic..
Here is my opinion. Currency needs to grow. Just like population grows.  It is the way it has been in every country. See this chart. http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article11576.html
I am interested in everyone's opinion on this topic. It seems with Incakoin it helps with stability of price. Some worry price is low. I think it's better to have a low price and a system that rewards the people who save.
Thoughts?....

[HarryPorter]

People seem to worry much on total supply. I believe this is important topic..
Here is my opinion. Currency needs to grow. Just like population grows.  It is the way it has been in every country. See this chart. http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article11576.html
I am interested in everyone's opinion on this topic. It seems with Incakoin it helps with stability of price. Some worry price is low. I think it's better to have a low price and a system that rewards the people who save.
Thoughts?....

I have seen it many times, ppl buying easy when price is already very hi... and they can not see nothing wrong about it (look at BTS 2,5bil total coins, price hit 10000 sat, and what happen after... 893 sat right now and very clear down trend), but seems to be problem invest in other coin when is on 1-2sat. All is about to get in right time.
If the investment is not correct when you buy a low-priced?...

[spanjii]

i agree that there needs to be some kind of pos reduction or in the future investors might get scared of the total supply / market-cap of the coin.

theoretically the price can't go any lower than 1 sat but people might loose interest and that will result low or no volume at all.   

[madross]

We plan to lower the pos interest in the near future we have discussed this many times among the communty and are taking into account all options once we have all the information from the community we will be putting it to a vote and the best way to go about the pos interest rates

[killerjoegreece]

i think with quarterly 100 percent interest there need to be a discussion about a reduction in pos rate at a point.

Lets say half are staking right now 2.5 billion coins in total right? so 3 months:3,75 billion,     6 months: 5,5 billion     9 months: 8,3 billion

and so on.

I think price stability is a good point yes, but when you have too much coins generated it can go in the wrong direction too.
Then price is always set at 1 satoshi and at one point maybe no one even want to pay that much for it (dont get me wrong i like this coin and will support every decission that is made)

thats my opinion and im open for any other

it seems people dont want that much inflation

[maokoto]

I voted "change the pos to 100% per annually and lower minimum stake age"

I feel that the 90 days to stake makes many people do not get into the coin as they want to see results sooner. Even though a 100% stake is very generous, we leave in days when people want to see results fast.

[etele2k7]

"change the pos to 100% per annually and lower minimum stake age" (yeah that is a vote)

Btw, don't really see the point, why newly registered users of the site can't vote the normal way...
If  someone is new that not means she/he is totally dumb.

OFF start

(Sorry for my bad English, if it is the case (who cxan speak Hungarian or Romanian better as a born English can drop that rock on me.))

OFF end

[Yannic]

"change the pos to 100% per annually and lower minimum stake age" (yeah that is a vote)

Btw, don't really see the point, why newly registered users of the site can't vote the normal way...
If  someone is new that not means she/he is totally dumb.

Cant vote too and agree for this stupid rule.

then i virtual vote 3: "change the pos to 100% per annually and lower minimum stake age"  

[Blockhunter]

"change the pos to 100% per annually and lower minimum stake age" (yeah that is a vote)

Btw, don't really see the point, why newly registered users of the site can't vote the normal way...
If  someone is new that not means she/he is totally dumb.

OFF start

(Sorry for my bad English, if it is the case (who cxan speak Hungarian or Romanian better as a born English can drop that rock on me.))

OFF end

I voted "change the pos to 100% per annually and lower minimum stake age"

I feel that the 90 days to stake makes many people do not get into the coin as they want to see results sooner. Even though a 100% stake is very generous, we leave in days when people want to see results fast.

i think with quarterly 100 percent interest there need to be a discussion about a reduction in pos rate at a point.

Lets say half are staking right now 2.5 billion coins in total right? so 3 months:3,75 billion,     6 months: 5,5 billion     9 months: 8,3 billion

and so on.

I think price stability is a good point yes, but when you have too much coins generated it can go in the wrong direction too.
Then price is always set at 1 satoshi and at one point maybe no one even want to pay that much for it (dont get me wrong i like this coin and will support every decission that is made)

thats my opinion and im open for any other

it seems people dont want that much inflation

We plan to lower the pos interest in the near future we have discussed this many times among the communty and are taking into account all options once we have all the information from the community we will be putting it to a vote and the best way to go about the pos interest rates

"change the pos to 100% per annually and lower minimum stake age" (yeah that is a vote)

Btw, don't really see the point, why newly registered users of the site can't vote the normal way...
If  someone is new that not means she/he is totally dumb.

Cant vote too and agree for this stupid rule.

then i virtual vote 3: "change the pos to 100% per annually and lower minimum stake age"  

Some of us are talking 9% every 5 weeks... That would stake 10X per year instead of current 4X/year
Thoughts?

[Yannic]

i virtual vote 9%/5weeks then 

[yeswepump]

can't vote the poll as newbie, but I vote for
change pos to 9% every 5 weeks

[adolfo_hp]

change pos to 9% every 5 weeks
 its my vote