TeslaFreeEnergy
|
|
June 12, 2016, 11:35:04 PM |
|
Guys, why NKA not on C-CEX?
NKA was listed on c-cex for well over a year but we got delisted this year due to low trading volume over a 30 day period which was a shame as i had almost finished setting up the new slots casino i was working on that required c-cex merchant services to handle the deposits that's sad... hope we can get back soon. Is c-cex the only one with merchant sevices?
|
|
|
|
|
Blockhunter
|
|
June 23, 2016, 10:29:37 PM |
|
I will check my wallet and the community wallet.
|
|
|
|
kelsey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 24, 2016, 04:33:54 AM |
|
mine doesn't seem to want to stake, coins are mature and network weight many many times that of the network with client saying expected time to next reward 0 secs
|
|
|
|
Yannic
|
|
June 24, 2016, 11:41:45 AM |
|
yes there is a problem with Stake, i wached yesterday and see stake are less than 1 NKA per days for the whole community
|
|
|
|
|
Blockhunter
|
|
June 24, 2016, 02:21:45 PM |
|
Note: Madross transferred .22BTC to me to promote on Facebook. Hopefully soon I will come up with something for that.
|
|
|
|
Yannic
|
|
June 25, 2016, 10:51:14 PM |
|
Thanks madross for your quick reply and the quick update to solve the problem
|
|
|
|
Fuzzbawls
|
|
June 25, 2016, 11:18:25 PM |
|
There was an issue in the reward calculation, it was divided by the COIN value (1000000) twice, once inside the function and once outside the function, leading to very small values. Here is a fixed version lock your wallets untill the below date if your coins haven't staked yet sorry for any trouble this has caused people github has been updated exchanges and other services will be contacted windows wallet https://mega.nz/#!hkwFGJgT!gDFxXzoaB6I1qGvky4tufQFkZAlhhYRAgLd5XGAOmPw all other wallets will be compiled shortly Reward correctly changes to 9% every 35 days after July 9 00:00:00 GMT Just wondering... did you remove miniupnpc 1.9 compatibility, reintroduce the antiquated and generally insecure irc based peer fetching, remove the more up-to-date pnSeed nodes, revert to a non-standard difficulty RPC return, and revert the signature verification patches on purpose?
|
|
|
|
madross (OP)
|
|
June 26, 2016, 12:01:55 AM |
|
There was an issue in the reward calculation, it was divided by the COIN value (1000000) twice, once inside the function and once outside the function, leading to very small values. Here is a fixed version lock your wallets untill the below date if your coins haven't staked yet sorry for any trouble this has caused people github has been updated exchanges and other services will be contacted windows wallet https://mega.nz/#!hkwFGJgT!gDFxXzoaB6I1qGvky4tufQFkZAlhhYRAgLd5XGAOmPw all other wallets will be compiled shortly Reward correctly changes to 9% every 35 days after July 9 00:00:00 GMT Just wondering... did you remove miniupnpc 1.9 compatibility, reintroduce the antiquated and generally insecure irc based peer fetching, remove the more up-to-date pnSeed nodes, revert to a non-standard difficulty RPC return, and revert the signature verification patches on purpose? no that was an accident on my end i did assume that the coder pulled from the latest github but it seems he didn't
|
INCAKOIN HEAD DEVELOPER NKA=Nj5t2Lh74LT4LXT5WZNVyyp7d4CN2aNcGS BTC=1LRbDKaTjZh7HzPesnhzPzrJkMvvazynu2
|
|
|
Fuzzbawls
|
|
June 26, 2016, 12:06:53 AM |
|
There was an issue in the reward calculation, it was divided by the COIN value (1000000) twice, once inside the function and once outside the function, leading to very small values. Here is a fixed version lock your wallets untill the below date if your coins haven't staked yet sorry for any trouble this has caused people github has been updated exchanges and other services will be contacted windows wallet https://mega.nz/#!hkwFGJgT!gDFxXzoaB6I1qGvky4tufQFkZAlhhYRAgLd5XGAOmPw all other wallets will be compiled shortly Reward correctly changes to 9% every 35 days after July 9 00:00:00 GMT Just wondering... did you remove miniupnpc 1.9 compatibility, reintroduce the antiquated and generally insecure irc based peer fetching, remove the more up-to-date pnSeed nodes, revert to a non-standard difficulty RPC return, and revert the signature verification patches on purpose? no that was an accident on my end i did assume that the coder pulled from the latest github but it seems he didn't thought so...wise to never give work to coders that only offer files in a zip/tarball for FOSS projects that already have a public git repository. A pull request from a forked repo would have shown this and no assumptions would needed to be made.
|
|
|
|
madross (OP)
|
|
June 26, 2016, 12:13:19 AM |
|
There was an issue in the reward calculation, it was divided by the COIN value (1000000) twice, once inside the function and once outside the function, leading to very small values. Here is a fixed version lock your wallets untill the below date if your coins haven't staked yet sorry for any trouble this has caused people github has been updated exchanges and other services will be contacted windows wallet https://mega.nz/#!hkwFGJgT!gDFxXzoaB6I1qGvky4tufQFkZAlhhYRAgLd5XGAOmPw all other wallets will be compiled shortly Reward correctly changes to 9% every 35 days after July 9 00:00:00 GMT Just wondering... did you remove miniupnpc 1.9 compatibility, reintroduce the antiquated and generally insecure irc based peer fetching, remove the more up-to-date pnSeed nodes, revert to a non-standard difficulty RPC return, and revert the signature verification patches on purpose? no that was an accident on my end i did assume that the coder pulled from the latest github but it seems he didn't thought so...wise to never give work to coders that only offer files in a zip/tarball for FOSS projects that already have a public git repository. A pull request from a forked repo would have shown this and no assumptions would needed to be made. wise advice i will use this in the future he was the original coder who applied the pos changes first and once i realized of the rewards calculation issue i promtly contacted him since it was his work that created the issue
|
INCAKOIN HEAD DEVELOPER NKA=Nj5t2Lh74LT4LXT5WZNVyyp7d4CN2aNcGS BTC=1LRbDKaTjZh7HzPesnhzPzrJkMvvazynu2
|
|
|
Yannic
|
|
June 26, 2016, 12:42:26 AM Last edit: June 26, 2016, 01:41:17 AM by Yannic |
|
github has been updated exchanges and other services will be contacted windows wallet https://mega.nz/#!hkwFGJgT!gDFxXzoaB6I1qGvky4tufQFkZAlhhYRAgLd5XGAOmPw all other wallets will be compiled shortly Reward correctly changes to 9% every 35 days after July 9 00:00:00 GMT Just wondering...
did you remove miniupnpc 1.9 compatibility, reintroduce the antiquated and generally insecure irc based peer fetching, remove the more up-to-date pnSeed nodes, revert to a non-standard difficulty RPC return, and revert the signature verification patches on purpose?
This wallet linked is correct ?
|
|
|
|
Fuzzbawls
|
|
June 26, 2016, 03:04:54 AM |
|
github has been updated exchanges and other services will be contacted windows wallet https://mega.nz/#!hkwFGJgT!gDFxXzoaB6I1qGvky4tufQFkZAlhhYRAgLd5XGAOmPw all other wallets will be compiled shortly Reward correctly changes to 9% every 35 days after July 9 00:00:00 GMT Just wondering...
did you remove miniupnpc 1.9 compatibility, reintroduce the antiquated and generally insecure irc based peer fetching, remove the more up-to-date pnSeed nodes, revert to a non-standard difficulty RPC return, and revert the signature verification patches on purpose?
This wallet linked is correct ? if the linked windows wallet is built from the current git commit (dff4131) then it does have the correct subsity, but it also contains a number of regressions. Also worth mentioning that the linked wallet will force disconnect any client with a protocol version below it, including the current v1.3.0.0 clients (which are still valid until July 9th)
|
|
|
|
Yannic
|
|
June 26, 2016, 04:04:19 AM |
|
github has been updated exchanges and other services will be contacted windows wallet https://mega.nz/#!hkwFGJgT!gDFxXzoaB6I1qGvky4tufQFkZAlhhYRAgLd5XGAOmPw all other wallets will be compiled shortly Reward correctly changes to 9% every 35 days after July 9 00:00:00 GMT Just wondering...
did you remove miniupnpc 1.9 compatibility, reintroduce the antiquated and generally insecure irc based peer fetching, remove the more up-to-date pnSeed nodes, revert to a non-standard difficulty RPC return, and revert the signature verification patches on purpose?
This wallet linked is correct ? if the linked windows wallet is built from the current git commit (dff4131) then it does have the correct subsity, but it also contains a number of regressions. Also worth mentioning that the linked wallet will force disconnect any client with a protocol version below it, including the current v1.3.0.0 clients (which are still valid until July 9th) Thanks Fuzzbawls, i will wait a little before to update then.
|
|
|
|
kelsey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 26, 2016, 04:06:35 AM |
|
There was an issue in the reward calculation, it was divided by the COIN value (1000000) twice, once inside the function and once outside the function, leading to very small values. Here is a fixed version lock your wallets untill the below date if your coins haven't staked yet sorry for any trouble this has caused people github has been updated exchanges and other services will be contacted windows wallet https://mega.nz/#!hkwFGJgT!gDFxXzoaB6I1qGvky4tufQFkZAlhhYRAgLd5XGAOmPw all other wallets will be compiled shortly Reward correctly changes to 9% every 35 days after July 9 00:00:00 GMT seems now the new client wants to dl the whole chain again previous bootstrap doesn't seem to work with it either. any new bootstrap?
|
|
|
|
madross (OP)
|
|
June 30, 2016, 08:13:57 PM Last edit: July 03, 2016, 10:47:37 PM by madross |
|
There was an issue in the reward calculation, it was divided by the COIN value (1000000) twice, once inside the function and once outside the function, leading to very small values. Here is a fixed version lock your wallets untill the below date if your coins haven't staked yet sorry for any trouble this has caused people github https://github.com/madross/incakoin-newplease recompile using the new above source windows wallet https://mega.nz/#!45w0yZSY!uWhrudngcZKyG20Y-W9TXisEH5RMxSeeU2uA8HUtbQs bootstrap https://mega.nz/#!I4YEmZZa!-uFaLS4RUMe8EZphl06MiErqipWfd73XL4nwUgroF_k Android update pushed to playstore should be available in the next 24-48 hours all other wallets will be available once completed Reward correctly changes to 9% every 35 days after July 9 00:00:00 GMT
|
INCAKOIN HEAD DEVELOPER NKA=Nj5t2Lh74LT4LXT5WZNVyyp7d4CN2aNcGS BTC=1LRbDKaTjZh7HzPesnhzPzrJkMvvazynu2
|
|
|
|
ice00
|
|
July 03, 2016, 11:01:24 AM |
|
Did other have compilation problem on linux? make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- /bin/sh ../share/genbuild.sh obj/build.h g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/opt/multi-pool/src/IncaKoin/src -I/opt/multi-pool/src/IncaKoin/src/obj -DUSE_IPV6=1 -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -MMD -MF obj/rpcwallet.d -o obj/rpcwallet.o rpcwallet.cpp In file included from IncaKoinrpc.h:16:0, from rpcwallet.cpp:8: json/json_spirit_writer_template.h: In function ‘String_type json_spirit::non_printable_to_string(unsigned int)’: json/json_spirit_writer_template.h:31:50: warning: typedef ‘Char_type’ locally defined but not used [-Wunused-local-typedefs] typedef typename String_type::value_type Char_type; ^ rpcwallet.cpp: In function ‘json_spirit::Value checkwallet(const Array&, bool)’: rpcwallet.cpp:1698:50: warning: the address of ‘nOrphansFound’ will never be NULL [-Waddress] if (nMismatchSpent == 0) && nOrphansFound == 0); ^ rpcwallet.cpp:1698:51: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘)’ token if (nMismatchSpent == 0) && nOrphansFound == 0); ^ rpcwallet.cpp:1698:52: warning: statement has no effect [-Wunused-value] if (nMismatchSpent == 0) && nOrphansFound == 0); ^ rpcwallet.cpp:1700:5: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘else’ else ^ rpcwallet.cpp:1698:33: error: label ‘nOrphansFound’ used but not defined if (nMismatchSpent == 0) && nOrphansFound == 0); ^ rpcwallet.cpp: In function ‘json_spirit::Value repairwallet(const Array&, bool)’: rpcwallet.cpp:1720:68: error: ‘nOrphansFound’ was not declared in this scope pwalletMain->FixSpentCoins(nMismatchSpent, nBalanceInQuestion, nOrphansFound); ^ rpcwallet.cpp:1722:50: warning: the address of ‘nOrphansFound’ will never be NULL [-Waddress] if (nMismatchSpent == 0) && nOrphansFound == 0) ^ rpcwallet.cpp:1722:51: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘)’ token if (nMismatchSpent == 0) && nOrphansFound == 0) ^ rpcwallet.cpp:1723:57: warning: statement has no effect [-Wunused-value] result.push_back(Pair("wallet check passed", true)); ^ rpcwallet.cpp:1722:33: error: label ‘nOrphansFound’ used but not defined if (nMismatchSpent == 0) && nOrphansFound == 0) ^ makefile.unix:148: set di istruzioni per l'obiettivo "obj/rpcwallet.o" non riuscito make: *** [obj/rpcwallet.o] Errore 1
|
NXT: 1408301140704352478 EMC: Ec2TpuRxcYr4WHMp12vZYck5ch3ymzskbZ
|
|
|
ice00
|
|
July 03, 2016, 04:59:19 PM |
|
I installed the new Windows Wallet onto Pc, but it not generate POS.
I have:
your weight is 20277856928 network weight is 2184 expected time is 0 seconds
normally it catches POS
|
NXT: 1408301140704352478 EMC: Ec2TpuRxcYr4WHMp12vZYck5ch3ymzskbZ
|
|
|
|