[ANN][NKA] INCAKOIN l Perú l Launched Aug 2013 | update v.1.5.2.0 released

[Blockhunter]

bump

called it Perú,
and focus in Perú
(inca is the formal name, PERU or PRU is the ticker

Drop this over here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1399518.msg14207951#msg14207951

[madross]

incakoin delisting at https://c-cex.com/?p=nka-btc today please withdraw your coins within 24 hours any coins after this will be non retrieval

[Rw13enlib88]

incakoin delisting at https://c-cex.com/?p=nka-btc today please withdraw your coins within 24 hours any coins after this will be non retrieval

What da fuck are you doing?

You better stop that bullshit. If we lose my money because of you youll fucking whats gonna happend to your bullshit credibility

[madross]

incakoin delisting at https://c-cex.com/?p=nka-btc today please withdraw your coins within 24 hours any coins after this will be non retrieval

What da fuck are you doing?

You better stop that bullshit. If we lose my money because of you youll fucking whats gonna happend to your bullshit credibility

the reason c-cex are delisting nka is because we didn't receive enough trading volume for the last 30 days just like a few other coins there this has nothing to do with me i am just advising nka holders

[vashshawn]

yay for a name change and swap to new code updated base, I voted for the name I want you all should too

[madross]

Drop this link here so everyone can cast there votes  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1399518.0

[Yannic]

I got a question  

I stake on 2 wallets, one on my laptop and one on my server.
Both have their own address and millions

Both was at something like 60 to 65 days age on somes address/coins

Yesterday i decided to change my old laptop hard drive to an ssd with a fresh windows install and i decided instead of staking on it, to stake only on my server but i dont know if i make a good decision  

I exported and copied my public/private keys from my old drive and imported them via "importprivkey" console command on my server but ...

Now if i look on coin control, coins i have imported is only aged with 10 days instead of 60+ days  

What's wrong

did i have to rollback my server to a date before the importprivkey and i reinstall my old hard drive to keep my 60+ days  

PS: Sorry for my english

[madross]

I got a question  

I stake on 2 wallets, one on my laptop and one on my server.
Both have their own address and millions

Both was at something like 60 to 65 days age on somes address/coins

Yesterday i decided to change my old laptop hard drive to an ssd with a fresh windows install and i decided instead of staking on it, to stake only on my server but i dont know if i make a good decision  

I exported and copied my public/private keys from my old drive and imported them via "importprivkey" console command on my server but ...

Now if i look on coin control, coins i have imported is only aged with 10 days instead of 60+ days  

What's wrong

did i have to rollback my server to a date before the importprivkey and i reinstall my old hard drive to keep my 60+ days  

PS: Sorry for my english

have you tried the repair wallet command to see if thats fixes the issue also did you make a backup of your wallet.dat and loaded that up in the wallet too see if you still have 60+ days

[Yannic]

i tried yesterday to delete all in the app folder (except my wallet.dat ) but same after synching

I tried the repairwallet command i got "wallet check passed" : true


I have a .dat copy on my old hard drive, i will play on it i think when i have time

[madross]

i tried yesterday to delete all in the app folder (except my wallet.dat ) but same after synching

I tried the repairwallet command i got "wallet check passed" : true


I have a .dat copy on my old hard drive, i will play on it i think when i have time

ok let me know once you have had a try i have never come across the issue when importing private keys i would assume that your coins should still be at the same stake age

[Rw13enlib88]

Re Branding winner:

IncaKoin

People has decided to keep the name and the mission.

Smart guys!!!

[Yannic]

Re Branding winner:

IncaKoin

People has decided to keep the name and the mission.

Smart guys!!!

That's the worst option i think
A swap to a new blockchain, and a new brand name leave the old incakoin alive for people who dont want to swap as long there is nodes and wallets for it and give for the new coin a real new start

Now if some peoples dont want to swap, and would like to keep the old inakoin alive thats will sound bad for them with the same name.

But perhaps all of us want to swap (in this case,no problem)

Anyway i will swap

[ice00]

I vote for Inkacoin for having the new coin named like incakoin2.
I had see many coin changed with a swap and I see that the new names was as the previous with just one letters to differentiate the previous.

[Rw13enlib88]

Re Branding winner:

IncaKoin

People has decided to keep the name and the mission.

Smart guys!!!

That's the worst option i think
A swap to a new blockchain, and a new brand name leave the old incakoin alive for people who dont want to swap as long there is nodes and wallets for it and give for the new coin a real new start

Now if some peoples dont want to swap, and would like to keep the old inakoin alive thats will sound bad for them with the same name.

But perhaps all of us want to swap (in this case,no problem)

Anyway i will swap

Here we go with the HITLER style.

You gonna say what good for the rest of us.

No! Thanks!

We choose INCAKOIN because that's the name and the mission we want.

Stop doing the fucking asshole.

Just create a new coin for you bastards!!!

[Rw13enlib88]

btw, research the swap history in the crypto space.

ALL FAIL!!

I explain it to you step by step:
1) Incredibly intelligent dev decides his work is not reflected in the price and decides to play the FED role
2) Propose the swap. Some of the investors realice about it. Some dont.
3) Swap for some investors. Others loose their money.
4) Once they realice they lost their money, they came here asking for it.
5) This coin is fuck up.

Again and again the same story.

Just make a proper research before proposing anything, more if you dont know a fuck about it...

[Yannic]

Re Branding winner:

IncaKoin

People has decided to keep the name and the mission.

Smart guys!!!

That's the worst option i think
A swap to a new blockchain, and a new brand name leave the old incakoin alive for people who dont want to swap as long there is nodes and wallets for it and give for the new coin a real new start

Now if some peoples dont want to swap, and would like to keep the old inakoin alive thats will sound bad for them with the same name.

But perhaps all of us want to swap (in this case,no problem)

Anyway i will swap

Here we go with the HITLER style.

You gonna say what good for the rest of us.

No! Thanks!

We choose INCAKOIN because that's the name and the mission we want.

Stop doing the fucking asshole.

Just create a new coin for you bastards!!!

Please keep calm, i'm just saying my opinion.

All opinions are good as long as their are polite and respect others.

A swap to a new blockchain and new coin name is like you want (i think, perhaps i'm wrong?, because it's not a real swap, it's just an exchange). The dev go to a newcoin and people who want to go with him can exchange their incakoins to the new coins while others who dont want can stay with their incakoins and wait for a new dev.

Perhaps i'm wrong ? but that's i was thinking and that's why i prefer the dev go to a new coin name instead of keeping the incakoin name.

Perhaps it's better to call that "an exchange program" instead of "a swap"

[Rw13enlib88]

Re Branding winner:

IncaKoin

People has decided to keep the name and the mission.

Smart guys!!!

That's the worst option i think
A swap to a new blockchain, and a new brand name leave the old incakoin alive for people who dont want to swap as long there is nodes and wallets for it and give for the new coin a real new start

Now if some peoples dont want to swap, and would like to keep the old inakoin alive thats will sound bad for them with the same name.

But perhaps all of us want to swap (in this case,no problem)

Anyway i will swap

Here we go with the HITLER style.

You gonna say what good for the rest of us.

No! Thanks!

We choose INCAKOIN because that's the name and the mission we want.

Stop doing the fucking asshole.

Just create a new coin for you bastards!!!

Please keep calm, i'm just saying my opinion.

All opinions are good as long as their are polite and respect others.

A swap to a new blockchain and new coin name is like you want (i think, perhaps i'm wrong?, because it's not a real swap, it's just an exchange). The dev go to a newcoin and people who want to go with him can exchange their incakoins to the new coins while others who dont want can stay with their incakoins and wait for a new dev.

Perhaps i'm wrong ? but that's i was thinking and that's why i prefer the dev go to a new coin name instead of keeping the incakoin name.

Perhaps it's better to call that "an exchange program" instead of "a swap"

Yes, you are wrong.

I want to keep the INCA blockchain, INCA name and INCA mission.

I dont fucking care what dev wants

If he want to create a new coin, new blockchain and new proyect, go for it.

But Stop fucking messing with INCA proyect.

[Yannic]

Yes, you are wrong.

I want to keep the INCA blockchain, INCA name and INCA mission.

I dont fucking care what dev wants

If he want to create a new coin, new blockchain and new proyect, go for it.

But Stop fucking messing with INCA proyect.

I think, you dont understand me.

Since the dev create a coin and blockchain, it's better that's he take another name like "Voyager coin" or another one for the coin instead of taking "incakoin" too

that's why i'm saying it's the worst option voting "incakoin" as coin name.

[Rw13enlib88]

Yes, you are wrong.

I want to keep the INCA blockchain, INCA name and INCA mission.

I dont fucking care what dev wants

If he want to create a new coin, new blockchain and new proyect, go for it.

But Stop fucking messing with INCA proyect.

I think, you dont understand me.

Since the dev create a coin and blockchain, it's better that's he take another name like "Voyager coin" or another one for the coin instead of taking "incakoin" too

that's why i'm saying it's the worst option voting "incakoin" as coin name.

Ok, now I understand what you mean.

What you didnt understand is that the fucking asshole dev believes he's god and he did want to make a swap with INCA.

I agree with you, he must create a new coin with a new name, and leave INCA fucking alone.

[Yannic]

For me a swap to have :

- A new and light blockchain,
- A recent source code
- Few ajust change like 1 min block time instead of 30s block time.

is OK and in this case, Incakoin can stay Incakoin

But a swap where our wallets are divised by 1000 while PoW is only divised by 2 (25 coins per min instead of 30s.) is NOT OK.