[lee group]1980$! the sales of first batch hosted antminer s7(psu included)

[sjc1490]

Disregard change notice on Pool, all looks good now. What is the current price if aI want to add another?

[no141]

Host website is having an error again. I hope that means they are around, I have 2 change requests in there. One for a machine that's mining, but not showing up anywhere.

EDIT: It's back up.

Interestingly though, the cost to buy one on that host website is still $419

[paczcz]

If anyone is interested in buying 1 of my S5 hosted with lee just PM me.

[Swimmer63]

I am getting a lot of pool jumping on my miners, most of which are in NeiMeng but also some in Chengdu.  My first two pools are KANO and GHASH as a backup.  No pool issues, but the miners can't seem to stay in one spot for more than 10 minutes without hopping.
Anyone else experiencing this issue?

[arorts]

I might be interested to buy several S5 from anyone currently hosting with Lee if we reach a good price. Please PM me.

Thx.

[pcfli]

update: the price of hosted S5 re-adjust to 419$ following the bitmain's policy

[invader]

I read that other people also having this problem sometimes, but now i'm experienced this myself.
One of my miners config is suddenly changed to

stratum+tcp://bj.ltc1btc.com:9999   pcfli.nm
stratum+tcp://stratum.f2pool.com:3333   pcfli2.nm
stratum+tcp://stratum.mining.eligius.st:3334   1GwHVTfV3cGMkZXFF36fhzhNbPhyy7TcQr

From the pool hashrate graph it looks like this event was around 12hrs ago.
I already submitted now the pool settings change request on that miner, but also would like to know how this event would be compensated.

[clgrissom3]

I read that other people also having this problem sometimes, but now i'm experienced this myself.
One of my miners config is suddenly changed to

stratum+tcp://bj.ltc1btc.com:9999   pcfli.nm
stratum+tcp://stratum.f2pool.com:3333   pcfli2.nm
stratum+tcp://stratum.mining.eligius.st:3334   1GwHVTfV3cGMkZXFF36fhzhNbPhyy7TcQr

From the pool hashrate graph it looks like this event was around 12hrs ago.
I already submitted now the pool settings change request on that miner, but also would like to know how this event would be compensated.

I have concluded that this happens sometimes when the Lee Group team swaps out physical S5s to proactively fix problems.  I saw this on one of my miners last week where pool 1 was correct but pools 2 and 3 were set to something and someone completely different.  When I put in the change request, I noticed the IP address was different than it used to be for that machine.  The good news is my change request was finished and correct within 40 minutes.

[invader]

The IP is the same, but the pool setting is changed. And my change request is still hanging, so around 14hrs downtime for that miner already, which is not recorded in the lee monitoring.
I hope lee would clarify what caused such event and how this "forced" downtime would be counted.

[no141]

The IP is the same, but the pool setting is changed. And my change request is still hanging, so around 14hrs downtime for that miner already, which is not recorded in the lee monitoring.
I hope lee would clarify what caused such event and how this "forced" downtime would be counted.

Mark down *All* downtime you incur, keep good records. At the beginning of next month, you'll get an email with what Lee thinks your compensation should be, but reply with your notes and the corrected amount and that's what you should get.

I had the following changes compared to just what the offline changes were:
24 hours downtime before the downtime counter on the web started for one machine
10 hours downtime for a miner taken over exactly as yours was
Also two miners were added after the middle of the month, so I adjusted down the 14.4 hours on each and prorated it to be 2% downtime unpaid for those machines only based on the days they were running.

These changes made a huge impact compared to the initial compensation calculation shown.

Those hours of takeover time, really should have been outside the calculation and brought back in at the end for compensation. As it wasn't downtime and it was mining for Lee, I would suggest you do just that. Meaning bypass the deduction of the franchise hours for the hours your machine mines for Lee.

[alienesb]

update: the price of hosted S5 re-adjust to 419$ following the bitmain's policy

What new policy? I see individual miners still being sold for $340 + shipping which comes to around $390 for shipping to the US.

That discount price on the 1600 units is pretty sweet.

[HerbPean]

update: the price of hosted S5 re-adjust to 419$ following the bitmain's policy

What new policy? I see individual miners still being sold for $340 + shipping which comes to around $390 for shipping to the US.

That discount price on the 1600 units is pretty sweet.

Kind of bad for you

[no141]

I'm wondering if people that have miners listed under both Chengdu and NeiMeng-1 have seen the following:

Chengdu machine runs better than the average in NeiMeng-1
Chengdu machines have roughly half the invalids of machines in NeiMeng-1

This really doesn't make much sense, unless the machines are actually better. Since Chengdu should be all filled up, it's miners may have to compete for internet, but the stats say otherwise.

Lee, is there any hope for machines in NeiMeng-1, to make that tiny statistical* jump to be on par for what I see with Chengdu?

* in accepts it's 0.229% or for invalids it's 43% less than averages, in the limited sample set I have calculated.

[pcfli]

I read that other people also having this problem sometimes, but now i'm experienced this myself.
One of my miners config is suddenly changed to

stratum+tcp://bj.ltc1btc.com:9999   pcfli.nm
stratum+tcp://stratum.f2pool.com:3333   pcfli2.nm
stratum+tcp://stratum.mining.eligius.st:3334   1GwHVTfV3cGMkZXFF36fhzhNbPhyy7TcQr

From the pool hashrate graph it looks like this event was around 12hrs ago.
I already submitted now the pool settings change request on that miner, but also would like to know how this event would be compensated.

will count to your downtime, it is my own mining setting, it is also the mining setting before give the miner to you
maybe they automatically back to the initial setting by accident

[pcfli]

update: the price of hosted S5 re-adjust to 419$ following the bitmain's policy

What new policy? I see individual miners still being sold for $340 + shipping which comes to around $390 for shipping to the US.

That discount price on the 1600 units is pretty sweet.

the price they offer for me is 360$ for miner only, however, the miner they provide donot include  psu. the golden psu will cost me another 45$(include shipment fee).
so basically if all miner is fine, i can earn 14$ for each miner.However， that is ideal situation,  there are always one or two miner is problematic in one batch. so our profit is usually not as good as expect. i also donot count the fee we need pay to the extra worker to set up the miner.

[alienesb]

update: the price of hosted S5 re-adjust to 419$ following the bitmain's policy

What new policy? I see individual miners still being sold for $340 + shipping which comes to around $390 for shipping to the US.

That discount price on the 1600 units is pretty sweet.

the price they offer for me is 360$ for miner only, however, the miner they provide donot include  psu. the golden psu will cost me another 45$(include shipment fee).
so basically if all miner is fine, i can earn 14$ for each miner.However， that is ideal situation,  there are always one or two miner is problematic in one batch. so our profit is usually not as good as expect. i also donot count the fee we need pay to the extra worker to set up the miner.

Ok, thanks for the explanation.

[no141]

To get more new people onboard, maybe calculate the psu as part of the new people's hosting fee? That way maybe you'll sell out of machines quicker and get us lower hosting fees.

Were you losing money selling at $340? Also if you are currently mining with the machines you are selling as new, you are deprecating their value(as time also does), and you could pass that savings along.

[tricass]

looking to sell 5 of my miners for $385. the hosting fees are all paid up to the 20th of this month and all hashing consistently around 1153ghs. PM me if you're interested and we can ask Li to escrow if he's willing.

[Swimmer63]

I have two miners down at NeiMeng that I sent a ticket in for.  The odd thing is that they show up on the monitor as hashing with the pools Alive.  This has happened before.  Makes me wonder what the monitor is reading.

[no141]

I was wondering if we could have our machine's cgminer upgraded. I'm mainly asking to enable the extranonce subscription for Nicehash