Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
July 24, 2012, 04:14:09 PM |
|
whats wrong with u? are u lacking in selfconfidence... just shouting for attention... such a tit... ur momma shud be ashamed
Let's stay on an abstract level without any personal insults. BCX gives us a favor doing free testing of LTC network.
|
|
|
|
ohforf
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 327
Merit: 250
we are legion
|
|
July 24, 2012, 04:15:19 PM |
|
@ BitcoinEXpress You, my Friend, are an Asshole.
Didn't your Mom teach you that its rude to break other Kid's toys ?
|
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ▀██████ EAT SLEEP DECENTRALIZE ██████▀▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
|
|
|
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
I heart thebaron
|
|
July 24, 2012, 04:37:20 PM |
|
I intend to drive the difficulty to all time highs, then simply quit.
~BCX~
Looks to me that you have conceded to the fact that you don't have a hope in hell of a 51% attack and are changing your tune slightly here.... So which is it ? a 51% attack or simply an attempt to drive up difficulty ? if you are unable to perform a fork and 51% attack, then the WORST you could do is double difficulty (for a VERY short time, till you go broke) and the nice thing about Litecoin is the FAST block Rate and Retarget times. This is still a joke to me...lol
|
|
|
|
The Koolio
|
|
July 24, 2012, 04:41:39 PM |
|
I intend to drive the difficulty to all time highs, then simply quit.
~BCX~
Looks to me that you have conceded to the fact that you don't have a hope in hell of a 51% attack and are changing your tune slightly here.... So which is it ? a 51% attack or simply an attempt to drive up difficulty ? if you are unable to perform a fork and 51% attack, then the WORST you could do is double difficulty (for a VERY short time, till you go broke) and the nice thing about Litecoin is the FAST block Rate and Retarget times. This is still a joke to me...lol again bitlane +1... talking sense
|
1. Litecoin 2. Bitcoin 3. Any of the Anon coins
|
|
|
Litecoin
|
|
July 24, 2012, 04:46:32 PM |
|
Yeah, changing the story. Next week we'll be hearing stories how he/she was testing the network. LOL. Get on the ShortBus with Bulanula. ...and leave the pools alone. Just wasting our time.
|
|
|
|
bitcoiners
|
|
July 24, 2012, 05:13:04 PM |
|
Read though this whole thing and all I can say is the OP is such a man-child.
Wow dude, grow up.
"Someone hurt my feelings. Now I'm going to F up everyone's hard work. sniffle"
Get a life.
|
|
|
|
Graet
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 24, 2012, 05:56:42 PM |
|
not sure of the exact methods planned but attacking peoples computers is illegal in many countries http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-legality-of-denial-of-service-attacks/ relates to the US one snippet In terms of criminal violations, there’s the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (the “CFAA”), which prohibits a person from “knowingly caus[ing] the transmission of a program, information code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damages without authorization to a protected computer” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A)). The requisite “damage” element under the CFAA is “any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)( ) and a “protected computer” is defined as a computer “which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)(B)). but ppl that get upset over what goes on in a shoutbox probably think that wont relate to them...
|
|
|
|
Simran
|
|
July 24, 2012, 05:57:29 PM |
|
not sure of the exact methods planned but attacking peoples computers is illegal in many countries http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-legality-of-denial-of-service-attacks/ relates to the US one snippet In terms of criminal violations, there’s the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (the “CFAA”), which prohibits a person from “knowingly caus[ing] the transmission of a program, information code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damages without authorization to a protected computer” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A)). The requisite “damage” element under the CFAA is “any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)( ) and a “protected computer” is defined as a computer “which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)(B)). but ppl that get upset over what goes on in a shoutbox probably think that wont relate to them... I was thinking he would crash using a botnet.
|
*Image Removed* Donate LTC: LRgbgTa3XNQSEUhnwC6Ye2vjiCV2CNRpib Donate BTC: 1AGP6xPTRvsAVhsRsBX13NUH6p6LJjyeiA
|
|
|
Litecoin
|
|
July 24, 2012, 06:09:45 PM |
|
not sure of the exact methods planned but attacking peoples computers is illegal in many countries http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-legality-of-denial-of-service-attacks/ relates to the US one snippet In terms of criminal violations, there’s the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (the “CFAA”), which prohibits a person from “knowingly caus[ing] the transmission of a program, information code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damages without authorization to a protected computer” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A)). The requisite “damage” element under the CFAA is “any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)( ) and a “protected computer” is defined as a computer “which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)(B)). but ppl that get upset over what goes on in a shoutbox probably think that wont relate to them... Did BCX ever claim to be a US citizen, or even live there ? If he didn't, how relevant is all that verbiage ? It makes no difference where you at. If someone from France hacked banks located in the US, then the yanks will go after the hacker, drag him to the US and prosecute him there.
|
|
|
|
Brunic
|
|
July 24, 2012, 06:12:20 PM |
|
I find it sad that all the work towards Litecoin made by the people around here will go to waste. Especially since it was an honorable attempt for a cryptocurrency, not trying to scam or destroy Bitcoin, but simply to complement it.
I don't see the point. It's a complete waste of time for BCX, because nobody will benefit from this. Not BCX, not the developers, not the community, nobody.
|
|
|
|
bitcoiners
|
|
July 24, 2012, 06:14:52 PM |
|
not sure of the exact methods planned but attacking peoples computers is illegal in many countries http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-legality-of-denial-of-service-attacks/ relates to the US one snippet In terms of criminal violations, there’s the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (the “CFAA”), which prohibits a person from “knowingly caus[ing] the transmission of a program, information code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damages without authorization to a protected computer” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A)). The requisite “damage” element under the CFAA is “any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)( ) and a “protected computer” is defined as a computer “which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)(B)). but ppl that get upset over what goes on in a shoutbox probably think that wont relate to them... Did BCX ever claim to be a US citizen, or even live there ? If he didn't, how relevant is all that verbiage ? Very relevant. If I get hit by a ddos, I will turn it over to the feds. And yes unless he lives in IRAN he will be brought to the US on those charges. Good Luck though.
|
|
|
|
smoothie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
|
|
July 24, 2012, 06:15:52 PM |
|
@Coblee
This isn't personal at all but your fellow miners over at BTC-E are taking on some serious Solidcoin type attitudes.
The challenge has a been made and apparently support over there was with them on it, in making a challenge that I couldn't 51% LTC.
Nothing like that to give me reason to resurrect some serious GPU hashpower, build up some EC2's (keep in mind even Coinhunter verfied I had over 700 EC2's running at the SC2 launch), connect up with some botnetter friends and bring some BTC out of USB deep freeze for fees... LOL....
This is fair warning to all.
Challenge accepted.
~BCX~
Standard shorter tactics: 1. Badmouth the security 2. Announce a major negative event for it 3. Crash the price 4. Buy a ton when it's worth nothing. And y'all are swallowing the whole thing hook line and sinker. yeah, i just bought everything up to .006 again. thanks for helping me get some coins! I hope you realize right now you're not getting anything really cheap at all...especially if the price falls and people sell...
|
███████████████████████████████████████
,╓p@@███████@╗╖, ,p████████████████████N, d█████████████████████████b d██████████████████████████████æ ,████²█████████████████████████████, ,█████ ╙████████████████████╨ █████y ██████ `████████████████` ██████ ║██████ Ñ███████████` ███████ ███████ ╩██████Ñ ███████ ███████ ▐▄ ²██╩ a▌ ███████ ╢██████ ▐▓█▄ ▄█▓▌ ███████ ██████ ▐▓▓▓▓▌, ▄█▓▓▓▌ ██████─ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─ ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩ ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀ ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀` ²²² ███████████████████████████████████████
| . ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM My PGP fingerprint is A764D833. History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ . LEALANA BITCOIN GRIM REAPER SILVER COINS. |
|
|
|
Litecoin
|
|
July 24, 2012, 06:17:30 PM |
|
not sure of the exact methods planned but attacking peoples computers is illegal in many countries http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-legality-of-denial-of-service-attacks/ relates to the US one snippet In terms of criminal violations, there’s the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (the “CFAA”), which prohibits a person from “knowingly caus[ing] the transmission of a program, information code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damages without authorization to a protected computer” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A)). The requisite “damage” element under the CFAA is “any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)( ) and a “protected computer” is defined as a computer “which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)(B)). but ppl that get upset over what goes on in a shoutbox probably think that wont relate to them... Did BCX ever claim to be a US citizen, or even live there ? If he didn't, how relevant is all that verbiage ? It makes no difference where you at. If someone from France hacked banks located in the US, then the yanks will go after the hacker, drag him to the US and prosecute him there. But, if the authorities don't think you are big and bad enough to drag you from one country to another then... What happens when a lengthy, highly technical investigation shows that the cybercriminals are located in a foreign country? The only way to bring them to court is to cooperate with foreign law enforcement authorities. But what if these foreign law enforcement authorities do not want to collaborate, or do not have the technical capabilities to assist the investigators? Unfortunately, this type of case scenario happens all the time. This poses a major challenge to the prosecution of cybercrime and there does not seem to be any magical solution other than international cooperation. Cybercrime is a transnational crime, and solving the issue of cyber jurisdiction requires nations to work on harmonizing substantive laws and fostering cooperation between law enforcement agencies worldwide. Indeed, the Interpol (International Police Force) has a plan for international cooperation against crime, including cybercrime, that most countries have joined.
|
|
|
|
bitcoiners
|
|
July 24, 2012, 06:19:10 PM |
|
@Coblee
This isn't personal at all but your fellow miners over at BTC-E are taking on some serious Solidcoin type attitudes.
The challenge has a been made and apparently support over there was with them on it, in making a challenge that I couldn't 51% LTC.
Nothing like that to give me reason to resurrect some serious GPU hashpower, build up some EC2's (keep in mind even Coinhunter verfied I had over 700 EC2's running at the SC2 launch), connect up with some botnetter friends and bring some BTC out of USB deep freeze for fees... LOL....
This is fair warning to all.
Challenge accepted.
~BCX~
Standard shorter tactics: 1. Badmouth the security 2. Announce a major negative event for it 3. Crash the price 4. Buy a ton when it's worth nothing. And y'all are swallowing the whole thing hook line and sinker. yeah, i just bought everything up to .006 again. thanks for helping me get some coins! I hope you realize right now you're not getting anything really cheap at all...especially if the price falls and people sell... First of all some asshat is not going to destroy my confidence in LTC. I will continue to buy even if it tanks back to 0 and will weather the storm. Don't see how he'll gain anything though. Other than maybe federal charges.
|
|
|
|
dishwara
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016
|
|
July 24, 2012, 07:22:06 PM |
|
Dark knight Because some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned or negotiated with. Some men just wanna watch the world burn.
They also forget one thing. The earth is never a flat one, but a circular one. If one gives pain to other, then they will get the same or more.
|
|
|
|
Litecoin
|
|
July 24, 2012, 07:23:05 PM |
|
not sure of the exact methods planned but attacking peoples computers is illegal in many countries http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-legality-of-denial-of-service-attacks/ relates to the US one snippet In terms of criminal violations, there’s the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (the “CFAA”), which prohibits a person from “knowingly caus[ing] the transmission of a program, information code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damages without authorization to a protected computer” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A)). The requisite “damage” element under the CFAA is “any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)( ) and a “protected computer” is defined as a computer “which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)(B)). but ppl that get upset over what goes on in a shoutbox probably think that wont relate to them... Did BCX ever claim to be a US citizen, or even live there ? If he didn't, how relevant is all that verbiage ? Very relevant. If I get hit by a ddos, I will turn it over to the feds. And yes unless he lives in IRAN he will be brought to the US on those charges. Good Luck though. You vastly over-estimated the leverage the US actually has over other sovereign nations. If the nation in question is the UK, then yes, perhaps, they having been the poodle on the US lap for quite a while now. Not so for the rest of the world. Of course, most likely no one will be dragged from one country to another cause he/she attacked pools. If your pool is located in the US and the attacker is located in the EU, the authorities will work together but its going to be hell of a long process.
|
|
|
|
k9quaint
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 24, 2012, 07:29:55 PM |
|
It might be a catch 22. If BCX succeeds and destroys Litecoin, then good luck proving damages. The coin was not viable and therefore without value. If BCX fails, no damage occurs and thus no plane ticket to Gitmo from our jackboots.
P.S. no wonder SoiledCoin development ground to a halt, Groinhunter spends all his time here trolling threads instead of coding.
|
Bitcoin is backed by the full faith and credit of YouTube comments.
|
|
|
bitcoiners
|
|
July 24, 2012, 07:36:24 PM |
|
It might be a catch 22. If BCX succeeds and destroys Litecoin, then good luck proving damages. The coin was not viable and therefore without value. If BCX fails, no damage occurs and thus no plane ticket to Gitmo from our jackboots.
P.S. no wonder SoiledCoin development ground to a halt, Groinhunter spends all his time here trolling threads instead of coding.
LTC isn't getting destroyed. The price may crash temporarily but that just enriches me in the long run as I'll just stop mining and start buying from all the BTC I've all ready made. Not to mention there are big names in BTC heavily invested in LTC already. It's not going anywhere. I will take it personally though. I will go after those who willingly try to destroy my investments. He better not be in the US or any of his "help" better not be. That's all I have to say.
|
|
|
|
iddo
|
|
July 24, 2012, 07:37:36 PM |
|
Looking for this Friday or early Saturday.The attack will last for several days and after a couple of resets, I intend to drive the difficulty to all time highs, then simply quit. NMC hell all over again.
That's inaccurate: the Litecoin retarget window is 3.5 days, unlike Bitcoin/Namecoin 14 days, so if the difficulty shoots up then it should take 4x less time (compared to what happened with Namecoin) to return to normal.
|
|
|
|
RodeoX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147
The revolution will be monetized!
|
|
July 24, 2012, 07:40:40 PM |
|
I understand the controversy, but succeed or fail, this attempt will be good for us. If he breaks it then it's better him than a crook. If he fails we can all have more confidence that our money is secure.
|
|
|
|
|