Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 04:52:55 AM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
News
: Latest Bitcoin Core release:
27.0
[
Torrent
]
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
More
Bitcoin Forum
>
Alternate cryptocurrencies
>
Altcoin Discussion
>
This message was too old and has been purged
Pages:
«
1
2
3
4
[
5
]
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
»
All
« previous topic
next topic »
Print
Author
Topic: This message was too old and has been purged (Read 26052 times)
qwizzie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 09:32:41 PM
#81
lets not deviate this into a monero versus darkcoin discussion, frankly thats not really popcorn material.
People will regret having bought popcorn for this thread then.
Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
1714884775
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1714884775
Ignore
1714884775
1714884775
#2
1714884775
Report to moderator
1714884775
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1714884775
Ignore
1714884775
1714884775
#2
1714884775
Report to moderator
1714884775
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1714884775
Ignore
1714884775
1714884775
#2
1714884775
Report to moderator
NastyFans - The UNOFFICIAL Nasty Mining Fan Club
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714884775
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1714884775
Ignore
1714884775
1714884775
#2
1714884775
Report to moderator
1714884775
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1714884775
Ignore
1714884775
1714884775
#2
1714884775
Report to moderator
illodin
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 09:36:11 PM
#82
Quote from: fluffypony on March 06, 2015, 09:23:08 PM
If implementing such a simple formula can't even be done correctly, then it would seem your trust in your "dev" is deeply misplaced.
Quote from: monero on April 25, 2014, 12:38:50 AM
Monero Specifications
Block time: 60 seconds
The last two blocks:
http://chainradar.com/xmr/block/465073
2015-03-06 20:28:34
http://chainradar.com/xmr/block/465074
2015-03-06 20:28:37
You can't even get a simple 60 second number right.
GingerAle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 09:38:27 PM
#83
argh, yeah, was hopin this wouldn't turn into xmr vs. drk.
fundamentals!!
< Track your bitcoins! >
< Track them again! >
<<< [url=https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1qomqt/what_a_landmark_legal_case_from_mid1700s_scotland/] What is fungibility?
>>> 46P88uZ4edEgsk7iKQUGu2FUDYcdHm2HtLFiGLp1inG4e4f9PTb4mbHWYWFZGYUeQidJ8hFym2WUmWc
p34X8HHmFS2LXJkf <<<
Free subdomains at moneroworld.com!! >>>
<<< If you don't want to run your own node, point your wallet to node.moneroworld.com, and get connected to a random node! @@@@ FUCK ALL THE PROFITEERS! PROOF OF WORK OR ITS A SCAM !!! @@@@
g4q34g4qg47ww
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 478
Merit: 250
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 09:42:27 PM
#84
fluffy dev put whole thread to sleep
OP admitted he was wrong
I guess i'll find something else of interest
Evil-Knievel
(OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1168
This message was too old and has been purged
March 06, 2015, 09:44:25 PM
Last edit: April 17, 2016, 07:49:39 PM by Evil-Knievel
#85
This message was too old and has been purged
fluffypony
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060
GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 09:45:25 PM
#86
Quote from: illodin on March 06, 2015, 09:36:11 PM
The last two blocks:
http://chainradar.com/xmr/block/465073
2015-03-06 20:28:34
http://chainradar.com/xmr/block/465074
2015-03-06 20:28:37
You can't even get a simple 60 second number right.
Now you're just trolling. Timestamps are set by miners and are not universally reliable, and in any event difficulty retargeting relies on the law of large numbers (ie. capacity for statistical variance has to exist).
Also hey, the last 5 Darkcoin blocks tell exactly the same story:
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[MyMonero - transact with Monero anywhere, any time]
[OpenAlias - the simple, secure alias standard]
stonehedge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1002
Decentralize Everything
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 09:50:24 PM
#87
Quote from: Evil-Knievel on March 06, 2015, 09:44:25 PM
Quote from: g4q34g4qg47ww on March 06, 2015, 09:42:27 PM
fluffy dev put whole thread to sleep
OP admitted he was wrong
I guess i'll find something else of interest
I never, at no point admitted I was wrong.
The flaw is obvious here, and anyone who tries with a block explorer and a pen and paper can reassemble the correct transaction without shuffling.
I am working on a block explorer which allows deanonymization of darksend transactions ... it is trivial actually, an let it work only in 80% of all cases.
Good luck, we look forward to seeing the results of your endeavours.
qwizzie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 09:55:50 PM
#88
Quote from: Evil-Knievel on March 06, 2015, 09:44:25 PM
Quote from: g4q34g4qg47ww on March 06, 2015, 09:42:27 PM
fluffy dev put whole thread to sleep
OP admitted he was wrong
I guess i'll find something else of interest
I never, at no point admitted I was wrong.
The flaw is obvious here, and anyone who tries with a block explorer and a pen and paper can reassemble the correct transaction without shuffling.
I am working on a block explorer which allows deanonymization of darksend transactions ... it is trivial actually, an let it work only in 80% of all cases.
I'm looking forward to it as any weakness thats exposed in Darkcoin now can only strengthen it in the future but to be honest i think
we having a higher chance of seeing Masternode Blinding implemented on Darkcoin Mainnet before ever seeing a working block explorer that
effectively deanonymize darksend transactions.
But i would love to be proven wrong on this one, maybe you are The One
Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
ðºÞæ
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 09:56:28 PM
#89
op is just pointing out the flaw. who is to say someone else is not already utilizing it for some time without telling anyone
"The existing Visa credit card network processes about 15 million Internet purchases per day worldwide. Bitcoin can already scale much larger than that with existing hardware for a fraction of the cost.
It never really hits a scale ceiling."
Satoshi Nakamoto, April 2009
Avoiding taxes is totally legal if you consider and respect the law.
GingerAle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 09:56:58 PM
#90
Quote from: Evil-Knievel on March 06, 2015, 09:44:25 PM
Quote from: g4q34g4qg47ww on March 06, 2015, 09:42:27 PM
fluffy dev put whole thread to sleep
OP admitted he was wrong
I guess i'll find something else of interest
I never, at no point admitted I was wrong.
The flaw is obvious here, and anyone who tries with a block explorer and a pen and paper can reassemble the correct transaction without shuffling.
I am working on a block explorer which allows deanonymization of darksend transactions ... it is trivial actually, an let it work only in 80% of all cases.
yes - this was an interesting phenomenon in this thread, the magic of "OP admitted he was wrong" appeared somewhere, whereas the last post of the two primary debaters was "good luck making that python thingy" or something along those lines.
< Track your bitcoins! >
< Track them again! >
<<< [url=https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1qomqt/what_a_landmark_legal_case_from_mid1700s_scotland/] What is fungibility?
>>> 46P88uZ4edEgsk7iKQUGu2FUDYcdHm2HtLFiGLp1inG4e4f9PTb4mbHWYWFZGYUeQidJ8hFym2WUmWc
p34X8HHmFS2LXJkf <<<
Free subdomains at moneroworld.com!! >>>
<<< If you don't want to run your own node, point your wallet to node.moneroworld.com, and get connected to a random node! @@@@ FUCK ALL THE PROFITEERS! PROOF OF WORK OR ITS A SCAM !!! @@@@
onemorexmr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 10:00:18 PM
#91
Quote from: qwizzie on March 06, 2015, 09:55:50 PM
Quote from: Evil-Knievel on March 06, 2015, 09:44:25 PM
Quote from: g4q34g4qg47ww on March 06, 2015, 09:42:27 PM
fluffy dev put whole thread to sleep
OP admitted he was wrong
I guess i'll find something else of interest
I never, at no point admitted I was wrong.
The flaw is obvious here, and anyone who tries with a block explorer and a pen and paper can reassemble the correct transaction without shuffling.
I am working on a block explorer which allows deanonymization of darksend transactions ... it is trivial actually, an let it work only in 80% of all cases.
I'm looking forward to it as any weakness thats exposed in Darkcoin now can only strengthen it in the future but to be honest i think
we having a higher chance of seeing Masternode Blinding implemented on Darkcoin Mainnet before ever seeing a working block explorer that
effectively deanonymize darksend transactions.
But i would love to be proven wrong on this one, maybe you are The One
well, thats the reason why i need a formal proof on anonymity and some good reviews by cryptographers before i'll trust an anon feature.
if you make a transaction thinking it is anonymous and a few weeks later someone says: no, sorry. only the next update may be safe (i dont need to proof that of course, because always when i said its anon you believed me: this time will be the same) ->
you may be pretty fucked
. if not: why did you do an anon transaction in the first place?
XMR || Monero ||
monerodice.net
||
xmr.to
||
mymonero.com
||
openalias.org
|| you think bitcoin is fungible?
watch this
g4q34g4qg47ww
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 478
Merit: 250
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 10:02:10 PM
#92
Quote from: Evil-Knievel on March 06, 2015, 04:27:02 PM
For this we have 10*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2 possibilities,
SO TO CHECK HOW THE OUTPUTS WERE ORDERED IN THE PREVIOUS TRANSACTION
... we have to think.
OP has failed to unravel a single darksent transaction, and has found that he is missing a gigantic step in his process.
qwizzie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 10:05:13 PM
#93
back to basics :
Quote
Post 1 from OP
1. Inputs always unsorted
2. Outputs shuffled
3. Next transaction inputs unshuffled again which allows you to reassemble the original order in previous transaction
4. Multiple Amounts/Denominations allow only a few combinations how the original transaction looked like
4. Done!
Reply from Darkcoin lead developer :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=978447.msg10681184#msg10681184
Quote
Interesting approach, although the input order isn't random, it's randomly generated from multiple transactions on the client side. Even if it was completely not random, that doesn't allow you to "jump" the mixing transaction and know which outputs belong to which inputs.
One more thing to note is that after coins are mixed through multiple sessions, there are "final" outputs that are just spent randomly. That can happen in any session, which causes more randomness. You most definitely can't map those randomly spent outputs to the inputs at all. That's what you should be trying to do, you need to be able to show anonymously spent coins and their original source funds.
Nice try though
PS. If you believe it's really a weakness you need to map the outputs to the inputs and show who's anonymously spending money on what. I'm not sure it's worth the time though, because masternode blinding randomizes the input order anyway.
that pretty much summarize this whole discussion and i agree with post above from g4q34g4qg47ww (who's name is remarkbly difficult to type if you happen to be in a situation where you can not copy and paste it).
Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
Evil-Knievel
(OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1168
This message was too old and has been purged
March 06, 2015, 10:06:51 PM
Last edit: April 17, 2016, 07:49:33 PM by Evil-Knievel
#94
This message was too old and has been purged
illodin
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1003
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 10:15:12 PM
#95
Quote from: fluffypony on March 06, 2015, 09:45:25 PM
Quote from: illodin on March 06, 2015, 09:36:11 PM
The last two blocks:
http://chainradar.com/xmr/block/465073
2015-03-06 20:28:34
http://chainradar.com/xmr/block/465074
2015-03-06 20:28:37
You can't even get a simple 60 second number right.
Now you're just trolling. Timestamps are set by miners and are not universally reliable, and in any event difficulty retargeting relies on the law of large numbers (ie. capacity for statistical variance has to exist).
Also hey, the last 5 Darkcoin blocks tell exactly the same story:
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
Yep, your example was basically the same thing. Difficulty retargets slow. And the reward curve described in the whitepaper was taken into use after GPU miners started to appear, so the graph you posted does not use that formula at the beginning.
qwizzie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 10:23:15 PM
#96
Quote from: Evil-Knievel on March 06, 2015, 10:06:51 PM
Quote from: qwizzie on March 06, 2015, 10:05:13 PM
that pretty much summarize this whole discussion.
Yes, and the claims the dev did are imho wrong. If you continue reading you will see the explanation.
Specially, the message with the colors.
i think the claim you are doing is wrong, i mean specifically this one :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=978447.msg10681598#msg10681598
Quote
As long as we have the correct order, all three trails will eventually lead to the originator.
I am pretty sure that a transaction deanonymizer, which does this order reversal, could walk his way all the way back to the transactions where people started to denominating their funds, and get the # of users from the change outputs.
Pls make that transaction deanonymizer and prove your claim, that end trails can indeed be traced back to the originator through following correct order.
You would be the first to deanonymize darksend transactions in the history of Darkcoin.
Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
onemorexmr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 10:31:37 PM
#97
Quote from: qwizzie on March 06, 2015, 10:23:15 PM
You would be the first to deanonymize darksend transactions in the history of Darkcoin.
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/dead-change-an-anonymity-issue.3019/
fixed long ago, not sure if anybody really used it to deanonymize darksend.
but there was a problem... and old transaction may still be deanonymized.
EDIT: my point is: how should i trust him with my privacy. i need some proofs that he is capable to do what he is claiming (formal proof, code reviews, code reviews by other cryptographers).
but the speed at which it is developed cries for bugs (and we see them regularly): under such circumstances i think that good reviews are not even possible -> moving target.
XMR || Monero ||
monerodice.net
||
xmr.to
||
mymonero.com
||
openalias.org
|| you think bitcoin is fungible?
watch this
AizenSou
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 10:37:27 PM
#98
Quote from: Evil-Knievel on March 06, 2015, 09:44:25 PM
Quote from: g4q34g4qg47ww on March 06, 2015, 09:42:27 PM
fluffy dev put whole thread to sleep
OP admitted he was wrong
I guess i'll find something else of interest
I never, at no point admitted I was wrong.
The flaw is obvious here, and anyone who tries with a block explorer and a pen and paper can reassemble the correct transaction without shuffling.
I am working on a block explorer which allows deanonymization of darksend transactions ... it is trivial actually, an let it work only in 80% of all cases.
Trivial? Yes Mr Genius. We're still waiting for your free NXT and your BTC private key cracker, which you claimed trivial too.
qwizzie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 10:44:15 PM
Last edit: March 06, 2015, 11:04:29 PM by qwizzie
#99
Quote from: onemorexmr on March 06, 2015, 10:31:37 PM
Quote from: qwizzie on March 06, 2015, 10:23:15 PM
You would be the first to deanonymize darksend transactions in the history of Darkcoin.
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/dead-change-an-anonymity-issue.3019/
fixed long ago, not sure if anybody really used it to deanonymize darksend.
but there was a problem... and old transaction may still be deanonymized.
yeah, i admit i forgot about the dead change issue : using non-anonimized change
potentially but not necessarily
deanonymize your previously anonymous spend. Aswan who posted about this problem became part of the Darkcoin
Development Team very soon after btw.
I see this differently then the supposed deanonymizer from OP that he claims can deanonymize 80% of current darksend transactions.
edit : with regards to yr own edit .. how to trust our lead developer with your privacy ? Needing code reviews etc
Quote
EDIT: my point is: how should i trust him with my privacy. i need some proofs that he is capable to do what he is claiming (formal proof, code reviews, code reviews by other cryptographers).
Darksend was code reviewed by Kristov Atlas, a well respected person in the cryptocurrency world. He outlined the Darksend mixing,
stated the possible vulnerabilities towards certain types of attack and posted that in our forum and in his blog i think.
An update was issued afterwards to deal with some of these type of attacks.
https://stellartalk.org/topic/5435-kristov-atlas-paper-an-analysis-of-darkcoins-blockchain-privacy-via-darksend/
Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
ahoenk
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 502
Re: [DRK] Darkcoin is NOT Anonymous? Possible Proof inside.
March 06, 2015, 10:48:14 PM
#100
Quote from: AizenSou on March 06, 2015, 10:37:27 PM
Quote from: Evil-Knievel on March 06, 2015, 09:44:25 PM
Quote from: g4q34g4qg47ww on March 06, 2015, 09:42:27 PM
fluffy dev put whole thread to sleep
OP admitted he was wrong
I guess i'll find something else of interest
I never, at no point admitted I was wrong.
The flaw is obvious here, and anyone who tries with a block explorer and a pen and paper can reassemble the correct transaction without shuffling.
I am working on a block explorer which allows deanonymization of darksend transactions ... it is trivial actually, an let it work only in 80% of all cases.
Trivial? Yes Mr Genius. We're still waiting for your free NXT and your BTC private key cracker, which you claimed trivial too.
+10000
i wait for Mr genius claim..lol
█
██████████
█
█
██████
███
████
██
███
██████
██
███
██
█
█████████
████
██
█
███
██
███████
██████
█
███
█████
████
████
██
██
████████
█
██
███
█
██████
████
███
██
█████████
█
████
▄██████████▄
███
▄████████████
▄███▀
████
████
████
▀███▄
███
▀████████████
████
▀██████████▀
▄██████████▄
████████████
████
███████
▀███▄
████
████████
████
████
████████
████
████
████████
████
▀███▄
███████
████
████
████████████
████
▀██████████▀
▄██▄
█████████
▄██▄
▀████▄
█████
▄████▀
▀████▄
█
▄████▀
███████████
▄███
█
▀█████▀
█
███▄
████
█████████
████
████
█████████
████
████
█████████
████
▀███
█████████
███▀
▄███████████████▄
█████████████████
████▀
███
▀██████▀
████
███
▄█████▀
████▄▄██████████▄
█
▀▀██████▀
███
████
█
▄██████▄
███
▄████
█████▀
█
██████████
▀██▀
███
▀████████▀
████
▄███
████████
████
██████
██████
▄███▀
████
███
████
████
███
████
█
██
██
████
█
████
██
█
████
████
███
██
███
████
████
███████
▄███▀
████████████
▀██████████▀
████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
A leading provider of scaling solutions
for Web3 game developers
COCOC BCX Rebranded to COMBO
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████████
.
T W I T T E R
T E L E G R A M
D I S C O R D
|
.
Listed
on
BINANCE
KUCOIN
Gate
.io
|
Pages:
«
1
2
3
4
[
5
]
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
»
All
Print
Bitcoin Forum
>
Alternate cryptocurrencies
>
Altcoin Discussion
>
This message was too old and has been purged
« previous topic
next topic »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Bitcoin
-----------------------------
=> Bitcoin Discussion
===> Legal
===> Press
===> Meetups
===> Important Announcements
=> Development & Technical Discussion
===> Wallet software
=====> Electrum
=====> Bitcoin Wallet for Android
=====> BitcoinJ
=====> Armory
=====> Mycelium
=====> Hardware wallets
=> Mining
===> Mining support
===> Pools
===> Mining software (miners)
===> Hardware
=====> Group buys
===> Mining speculation
=> Bitcoin Technical Support
=> Project Development
-----------------------------
Economy
-----------------------------
=> Economics
===> Speculation
=> Marketplace
===> Goods
=====> Computer hardware
=====> Digital goods
=======> Invites & Accounts
=====> Collectibles
===> Services
===> Currency exchange
===> Gambling
=====> Games and rounds
=====> Investor-based games
=====> Gambling discussion
===> Lending
=====> Long-term offers
===> Securities
===> Auctions
===> Service Announcements
=====> Micro Earnings
===> Service Discussion
=====> Web Wallets
=====> Exchanges
=> Trading Discussion
===> Scam Accusations
===> Reputation
-----------------------------
Other
-----------------------------
=> Meta
===> New forum software
===> Bitcoin Wiki
=> Politics & Society
=> Beginners & Help
=> Off-topic
=> Serious discussion
===> Ivory Tower
=> Archival
===> Корзина
===> CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
===> Chinese students
===> Obsolete (buying)
===> Obsolete (selling)
===> MultiBit
-----------------------------
Alternate cryptocurrencies
-----------------------------
=> Altcoin Discussion
=> Announcements (Altcoins)
===> Tokens (Altcoins)
=> Mining (Altcoins)
===> Pools (Altcoins)
=> Marketplace (Altcoins)
===> Service Announcements (Altcoins)
===> Service Discussion (Altcoins)
===> Bounties (Altcoins)
=> Speculation (Altcoins)
-----------------------------
Local
-----------------------------
=> العربية (Arabic)
===> العملات البديلة (Altcoins)
=====> النقاشات
===> إستفسارات و أسئلة المبتدئين
===> التعدين
===> النقاشات الأخرى
===> منصات التبادل
=> Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
===> Marketplace (Bahasa Indonesia)
===> Mining (Bahasa Indonesia)
===> Altcoins (Bahasa Indonesia)
===> Trading dan Spekulasi
===> Ekonomi, Politik, dan Budaya
===> Topik Lainnya
=> Español (Spanish)
===> Mercado y Economía
=====> Servicios
=====> Trading y especulación
===> Hardware y Minería
===> Esquina Libre
===> Mercadillo
=====> Mexico
=====> Argentina
=====> España
=====> Centroamerica y Caribe
===> Primeros pasos y ayuda
===> Altcoins (criptomonedas alternativas)
=====> Minería de altcoins
=====> Servicios
=====> Tokens (Español)
=> 中文 (Chinese)
===> 跳蚤市场
===> 山寨币
===> 媒体
===> 挖矿
===> 离题万里
=> Hrvatski (Croatian)
===> Trgovina
===> Altcoins (Hrvatski)
=====> Announcements (Hrvatski)
===> Off-topic (Hrvatski)
=> Deutsch (German)
===> Anfänger und Hilfe
===> Mining (Deutsch)
===> Trading und Spekulation
===> Projektentwicklung
===> Off-Topic (Deutsch)
===> Treffen
===> Presse
===> Altcoins (Deutsch)
=====> Announcements (Deutsch)
===> Marktplatz
=====> Auktionen
=====> Suche
=====> Biete
=> Ελληνικά (Greek)
===> Αγορά
===> Mining Discussion (Ελληνικά)
===> Altcoins (Ελληνικά)
=====> Altcoin Announcements (Ελληνικά)
=====> Altcoin Mining (Ελληνικά)
=> עברית (Hebrew)
=> Français
===> Actualité et News
===> Débutants
===> Discussions générales et utilisation du Bitcoin
===> Mining et Hardware
===> Économie et spéculation
===> Place de marché
=====> Échanges
=====> Produits et services
=====> Petites annonces
===> Le Bitcoin et la loi
===> Wiki, documentation et traduction
===> Développement et technique
===> Vos sites et projets
===> Hors-sujet
===> Altcoins (Français)
=====> Annonces
=> India
===> Mining (India)
===> Marketplace (India)
===> Regional Languages (India)
===> Press & News from India
===> Alt Coins (India)
===> Buyer/ Seller Reputations (India)
===> Off-Topic (India)
=> Italiano (Italian)
===> Guide (Italiano)
===> Progetti
===> Discussioni avanzate e sviluppo
===> Trading, analisi e speculazione
===> Mercato
=====> Mercato valute
=====> Beni
=====> Servizi
=====> Esercizi commerciali
=====> Hardware/Mining (Italiano)
=====> Gambling (Italiano)
===> Accuse scam/truffe
===> Mining (Italiano)
===> Alt-Currencies (Italiano)
=====> Annunci
===> Raduni/Meeting (Italiano)
===> Crittografia e decentralizzazione
===> Off-Topic (Italiano)
=> 日本語 (Japanese)
===> アルトコイン
=> Nederlands (Dutch)
===> Markt
===> Gokken/lotterijen
===> Mining (Nederlands)
===> Beurzen
===> Alt Coins (Nederlands)
===> Off-topic (Nederlands)
===> Meetings (Nederlands)
=> Nigeria (Naija)
===> Politics and society (Naija)
===> Off-topic (Naija)
=> 한국어 (Korean)
===> 대체코인 Alt Coins (한국어)
=> Pilipinas
===> Altcoins (Pilipinas)
=====> Altcoin Announcements (Pilipinas)
===> Pamilihan
===> Others (Pilipinas)
=> Polski
===> Tablica ogłoszeń
===> Alternatywne kryptowaluty
=====> Nowe kryptowaluty i tokeny
=====> Tablica ogłoszeń (altcoiny)
=> Português (Portuguese)
===> Primeiros Passos (Iniciantes)
===> Economia & Mercado
===> Mineração em Geral
===> Desenvolvimento & Discussões Técnicas
===> Criptomoedas Alternativas
===> Brasil
===> Portugal
=> Русский (Russian)
===> Новички
===> Бизнес
=====> Барахолка
=====> Обменники
===> Идеи
===> Кодеры
===> Майнеры
===> Политика
===> Трейдеры
===> Альтернативные криптовалюты
=====> Токены
=====> Бayнти и aиpдpoпы
===> Хайпы
===> Работа
===> Разное
===> Oбcyждeниe Bitcoin
=====> Новости
=====> Юристы
=> Română (Romanian)
===> Anunturi importante
===> Offtopic
===> Market
=====> Discutii Servicii
===> Minerit
===> Tutoriale
===> Bine ai venit!
===> Presa
===> Altcoins (Monede Alternative)
=====> Anunturi Monede Alternative
=> Skandinavisk
=> Türkçe (Turkish)
===> Bitcoin Haberleri
===> Pazar Alanı
===> Madencilik
===> Ekonomi
===> Servisler
=====> Fonlar
===> Proje Geliştirme
===> Alternatif Kripto-Paralar
=====> Madencilik (Alternatif Kripto-Paralar)
=====> Duyurular (Alternatif Kripto-Paralar)
===> Konu Dışı
===> Yeni Başlayanlar & Yardım
===> Buluşmalar
=> Other languages/locations
Loading...