i quit

[mellon]

This really sucks, second fork in one day, wow, such awesome coin!

Why second?

i got fork about 12 hours ago, and now again fork so it makes them 2

And both on LDOGE?

[xPooky]

This really sucks, second fork in one day, wow, such awesome coin!

Why second?

i got fork about 12 hours ago, and now again fork so it makes them 2

And both on LDOGE?

yes and i just resynced( at least i tried) it says its sync with 40075 as last block and 5M less coins then my address shows on the block explorer, so i would say again wrong

[mellon]

This really sucks, second fork in one day, wow, such awesome coin!

Why second?

i got fork about 12 hours ago, and now again fork so it makes them 2

And both on LDOGE?

yes and i just resynced( at least i tried) it says its sync with 40075 as last block and 5M less coins then my address shows on the block explorer, so i would say again wrong

My unfortune block is 40150. But wallet is shown 40875 at last time before I'm delete it

[xPooky]

This really sucks, second fork in one day, wow, such awesome coin!

Why second?

i got fork about 12 hours ago, and now again fork so it makes them 2

And both on LDOGE?

yes and i just resynced( at least i tried) it says its sync with 40075 as last block and 5M less coins then my address shows on the block explorer, so i would say again wrong

My unfortune block is 40150. But wallet is shown 40875 at last time before I'm delete it

bitrex has LDOGE wallet disabled, seems their wallet is also out of sync

[not.you]

So fractured network and no dev is that about the size of it? 

[gross]

Please,admin fix this wallet 

[bitrev]

Please,admin fix this wallet 

I agree this is not good.

@mellon can you do a fix on all wallets?

[loszhor]

Overnight, Some of my blocks were accepted to the network on the blockchain but afterwards it ending up doing the same thing with the inflated block finds. I as well would recommend some sort of official maintenance be done.

NOTE:

This post is in responds to my last one in regards to my fix attempt. Seen here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=985182.msg11082275#msg11082275

[mellon]

Please,admin fix this wallet 

I agree this is not good.

@mellon can you do a fix on all wallets?

Lol Im not a coder. Im try to understand where is a problem here,but im not currently know PoS 2.0 with spreadcoin scheme,how it must work?

[mellon]

Overnight, Some of my blocks were accepted to the network on the blockchain but afterwards it ending up doing the same thing with the inflated block finds. I as well would recommend some sort of official maintenance be done.

Same with my adress to its strange fork. Im send to bittrex 1 LDOGE and get it lol today at 4 PM. But all wallets around include my not currently sinced. And also one detail guys look at yours wallet that how much total coins it show to your? Command in console "getinfo". My show me 2783 billions but in block exp. 2730 billion.

[mellon]

Lol guys mb. Needs to check block explorer too?

[xPooky]

maybe adding hardcoded nodes would fix this

[mellon]

maybe adding hardcoded nodes would fix this

Mb im think about that. We can change all seeds to another and recompile wallet for check this. Im want to do that but used one two nodes for two wallets in test. But why not to change it in full value. If anyone can get node wellcome guys.

[xPooky]

maybe adding hardcoded nodes would fix this

Mb im think about that. We can change all seeds to another and recompile wallet for check this. Im want to do that but used one two nodes for two wallets in test. But why not to change it in full value. If anyone can get node wellcome guys.

i can add node on one of my servers

[MinerFTW]

maybe adding hardcoded nodes would fix this

there are 3 hardcoded seeds/nodes in wallet. but those are on different chain then explorer and exchanges are. adding more corrupt nodes will only provide more chaos.

i hate to say it but it would be the best if you don't try to sync again (risk to end on a side chain is high) and hope the dev fix it.

i closed 3 servers with nodes earlier today and i will wait with booting them until i see dev doing something first before we break all other chains.

[not.you]

maybe adding hardcoded nodes would fix this

there are 3 hardcoded seeds/nodes in wallet. but those are on different chain then explorer and exchanges are. adding more corrupt nodes will only provide more chaos.

i hate to say it but it would be the best if you don't try to sync again (risk to end on a side chain is high) and hope the dev fix it.

i closed 3 servers with nodes earlier today and i will wait with booting them until i see dev doing something first before we break all other chains.

My wallet never would sync without addnodes in the conf file.  Hard coded nodes were not connecting for me.  I have my wallet turned off also because if I do add the addnodes in the conf file it syncs to a small branch of the chain and then starts cranking out tons of stake blocks. 

[PeterVenter]

maybe adding hardcoded nodes would fix this

there are 3 hardcoded seeds/nodes in wallet. but those are on different chain then explorer and exchanges are. adding more corrupt nodes will only provide more chaos.

i hate to say it but it would be the best if you don't try to sync again (risk to end on a side chain is high) and hope the dev fix it.

i closed 3 servers with nodes earlier today and i will wait with booting them until i see dev doing something first before we break all other chains.

My wallet never would sync without addnodes in the conf file.  Hard coded nodes were not connecting for me.  I have my wallet turned off also because if I do add the addnodes in the conf file it syncs to a small branch of the chain and then starts cranking out tons of stake blocks. 

I've  forwarded all the files requested by the dev to him for the updating of the wallet - it's up to him now to fix and compile the new wallet.

 

[MinerFTW]

only need a fix compiling can be done later.

if he just push a fix we can get things going again.

[mellon]

maybe adding hardcoded nodes would fix this

there are 3 hardcoded seeds/nodes in wallet. but those are on different chain then explorer and exchanges are. adding more corrupt nodes will only provide more chaos.

i hate to say it but it would be the best if you don't try to sync again (risk to end on a side chain is high) and hope the dev fix it.

i closed 3 servers with nodes earlier today and i will wait with booting them until i see dev doing something first before we break all other chains.

About what node you say? Here more than 20 seed/nodes in seed file. Which are not worked until that fork. When i can sync without .conf file im get a my own chain on a half. If chain even stop anyway its can be relauched. And coins are rechanged one to one. Its not so danger. Dangerous if now coins start to migrate from adress to adress/ Im already lost around 100K only resyncing my wallet. How its going not understand for me now. If im start two recompiling adresses with new nodes what its changed if not present successfull result? We can wait dev month here,but m.b. 10 minutes and if it come here any garantie that he can fork it ?

[mellon]

maybe adding hardcoded nodes would fix this

there are 3 hardcoded seeds/nodes in wallet. but those are on different chain then explorer and exchanges are. adding more corrupt nodes will only provide more chaos.

i hate to say it but it would be the best if you don't try to sync again (risk to end on a side chain is high) and hope the dev fix it.

i closed 3 servers with nodes earlier today and i will wait with booting them until i see dev doing something first before we break all other chains.

My wallet never would sync without addnodes in the conf file.  Hard coded nodes were not connecting for me.  I have my wallet turned off also because if I do add the addnodes in the conf file it syncs to a small branch of the chain and then starts cranking out tons of stake blocks. 

I've  forwarded all the files requested by the dev to him for the updating of the wallet - it's up to him now to fix and compile the new wallet.

 

When you speak with them?