Where can I re-find the QORA light desktop wallet?
|
|
|
This is proving very difficult to compile in this Ubuntu 18 VM :/ make[5]: Entering directory '/home/******/****/smileyCoin/src/qt' CXX libbitcoinqt_a-bitcoin.o In file included from bitcoin.cpp:223:0: bitcoin.moc:13:2: error: #error "This file was generated using the moc from 5.9.5. It" #error "This file was generated using the moc from 5.9.5. It" ^~~~~ bitcoin.moc:14:2: error: #error "cannot be used with the include files from this version of Qt." #error "cannot be used with the include files from this version of Qt." ^~~~~ bitcoin.moc:15:2: error: #error "(The moc has changed too much.)" #error "(The moc has changed too much.)" ^~~~~ bitcoin.moc:19:1: error: ‘QT_WARNING_PUSH’ does not name a type; did you mean ‘QT_NO_WARNINGS’? QT_WARNING_PUSH ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ QT_NO_WARNINGS bitcoin.moc:30:14: error: ‘qt_meta_stringdata_BitcoinCore_t’ does not name a type static const qt_meta_stringdata_BitcoinCore_t qt_meta_stringdata_BitcoinCore = { ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ bitcoin.moc: In static member function ‘static void BitcoinCore::qt_static_metacall(QObject*, QMetaObject::Call, int, void**)’: bitcoin.moc:96:35: error: ‘IndexOfMethod’ is not a member of ‘QMetaObject’ } else if (_c == QMetaObject::IndexOfMethod) { ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ bitcoin.moc: At global scope: bitcoin.moc:123:35: error: ‘qt_meta_stringdata_BitcoinCore’ was not declared in this scope { &QObject::staticMetaObject, qt_meta_stringdata_BitcoinCore.data, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ bitcoin.moc:123:35: note: suggested alternative: ‘qt_meta_data_BitcoinCore’
|
|
|
I don't get it. Is Counterparty forbidden, or does Bittrex have personal issues with Counterparty developers..? Are they going to delist all Counterparty tokens they have on their exchange, and why would they do it? I understand Counterparty and Omni are a bit out of fashion at the moment, but delisting a token because it is based on a non-fashionable (but still perfectly valid and viable) technology, is pure nonsense. I suppose there may be misunderstanding there.
I believe it is the combination of being an XCP token and low volume; if I understood correctly there is some overhead for exchanges (or maybe just Bittrex) when it comes to XCP and its tokens, which would normally be covered by fees gained from trading volume. I notice they are only charging 5 DTB for a withdrawal.
|
|
|
The novaexchange was not hacked. Novaexchange has new owners and therefore the exchange was on a long maintenance.
NovaExchange was hacked, some time ago. They had a page on their site with a progress bar to represent progress towards paying back the victims.
|
|
|
Veil was founded with a different focus...... That's not to say that PIVX can't have similar goals, but.....it falls upon the PIVX network to decide and vote on these goals."
So what is Veil's different focus? What will people be using PIVX for and what will Veil be used for, 10 years from now?
|
|
|
If you do not want to create a wallet from Creary.net you can do it yourself assuming your commission.
Hi, What does it mean, "assuming your commission"?
|
|
|
I think FUDcoin took on the Darkcoin name after Dash abandoned it.
|
|
|
Other coins were hit, but denarius is still on peoples radars and has always been a target, so guess which coin hit the news.
What other coins were hit? I forgot the list, but New York coin was another that I remember off the top of my head. This account I think was listing them, but twitter appears broken for me to find the tweet. https://twitter.com/MisterCh0cWell it's linked in the news article, but he deleted the tweet, so the image of the list is gone.
|
|
|
Other coins were hit, but denarius is still on peoples radars and has always been a target, so guess which coin hit the news.
What other coins were hit?
|
|
|
So is there no way to send this without waiting for the wallet to sync?
|
|
|
So did anyone get their BOLI withdrawn from Cryptopia today? Mine are stuck in "Processing..."
|
|
|
Delisted from Cryptopia. Rest in piece.
|
|
|
Delisted from Cryptopia; RIP
|
|
|
Delisted from topia. Rekt
|
|
|
This domain name has been registered with Gandi.net It is currently being parked by the owner -- bata.io
|
|
|
A portion of the coin emission for Veil will go to budget which is going to be used to fund project-related costs. All pre-launch costs are currently being funded by the founder, 4x13.
This and founder's reward makes me worry about securities laws. Looks like a good project regardless. How about setup? Trustless or trusted?
|
|
|
|