It was listed on Crytptohashtank early on but they never had enough people to complete a masternode, the best way to get it added would be to talk to the owners of CHT and see if enough people in their discord would be interested.

Thanks for the feedback, I just found a tutorial on their website with information and a link to a youtube video explaining how to setup for split tickets. Here is the video for anyone who has the same questions as I do https://youtu.be/3RGoUQK0g24

I just found a pool that is doing ticket split beta testing, but I have not tested it yet so I am not sure if its worth trying out.


https://stake.decredbrasil.com/

If anyone in the community has experience with this one let me know

Ticket prices have gone up quite a bit, I am wondering if anyone has had luck with shared ticket purchasing and if so how was the experience? I am not sure if it is even a thing anymore, but I do remember seeing something about it in the forum a while back.

I think that a 70/30 split wouldn't be a bad idea, but at the same time it might also be wise to raise the amount needed for a masternode maybe to 7000 or 10000 or more. I think anything that can encourage running no more than two masternodes per vps would also be a good idea.

Finally had a few hours to spend with this and have the wallet up and miner working well, the only problem is apparently creating a user account without some 3rd party involvement is forbidden. It seems I am too much of an idiot to use this coin so I will have to settle selling my mining power if that ever is an option.

Its appears that way with additional activity on twitter, he always stated he had certain plans for the project so lets see what direction it heads to. Its important to note that if you are having trouble with the sync of your wallet to delete the current peers and use the ones built into the wallet according to recent tweets from the dev/project manager.

Looks like a really cool project, I am going to have to come back to it eventually once I have a day to sit down and figure out the unique wallet setup.

Found tons of people just posting photos they snagged off google image search. Do they have any way to deal with content that is not original? Seems like authorizing users based on other social media accounts might be a good idea. It would be in everyone's interest to have legit content and incentivize legit creators with rewards for links from multiple social media accounts.

I figured it was something like that, glad to see things being upgraded and progressing along nicely. Thanks for the info and I look forward to trying it out once everything is back to normal hopefully in a few days.

Is it just me or is the web interface slow as hell, I just signed up and logged in today and its pretty unusable in its current state. Hopefully its some maintenance or updates being performed and its not always this way.

It looks like the Yobit wallet for XPTX may be having issues, if you use the exchange it might be a good idea to only send a tiny bit to find out if its working for you before sending anything substantial.

Its best to use the most recent ones from http://pool.hashrefinery.com/explorer/peers?id=1531 just copy some of those into your conf file and you should start seeing your wallet move.

Just a heads up for everyone who traded XPTX on Cryptopia, according to their twitter page Cryptopia suffered a major hack and significant loss so who knows when that exchange will be back up again.

https://twitter.com/Cryptopia_NZ/status/1085084168852291586

Glad it helped, but keep in mind that if you have issues in the future it might because some of those peers are offline so you should check the connected peers at http://pool.hashrefinery.com/explore now and then.

Keep in mind you can still use this explorer http://pool.hashrefinery.com/explorer/XPTX

Here is a list of current peers as well

addnode=100.18.1.132:49559
addnode=13.250.246.1:35648
addnode=173.212.233.242:18993
addnode=173.249.18.164:18993
addnode=185.223.29.10:18993
addnode=192.3.1.192:64793
addnode=192.99.19.133:35484
addnode=198.46.179.174:18993
addnode=207.148.106.202:18993
addnode=209.250.255.106:18993
addnode=216.134.166.133:18993
addnode=45.32.232.27:57966
addnode=45.32.51.23:18993
addnode=51.255.97.228:64337
addnode=52.10.96.163:59210
addnode=70.44.123.88:18993
addnode=73.114.183.8:55128
addnode=75.181.50.186:59078
addnode=78.46.18.218:55046
addnode=95.7.133.31:53098
addnode=98.254.154.79:55998


You can find them on the explorer http://pool.hashrefinery.com/explorer by clicking the connection tab for XPTX

A website should be cake if the community desires one

Rank   Donor   User Name   KH/s   GXX/Day   BTC/Day
1      anonymous         1,106      581           0.0639
2      anonymous        632      332           0.0366
3      anonymous          458      240           0.0265
4      anonymous          363      190           0.0210


Those are some insane mining numbers, I wouldn't be surprised if someone was playing around with FPGA miners. CPU and GPU miners do not have a chance

That did the trick on the threadripper but its a power hungry beast so the Ryzen 1500x seems to be the best, thanks for your help.

Those intel core M numbers are impressive, a single GTX 1070 in a system running an amd 200ge (35 watt TDP) with the card set to a power limit of 100 will do about 3.1kH/s with a power draw of 140 watts at the wall and you can get even more density and power efficiency with a 6 card rig.

I have been able to get about 1.4kH/s on a ryzen 1500x and about the same speed on a threadripper 1950x which makes me think the threadripper needs 2 instances to run properly

Here are some GPU benchmarks for anyone that is interested, I ran mine on linux with a power limit of 95 watts for a GTX 1070 so you can get more hash with full power.

FYI GPU mining has been around for at least 6 months from my research.


Benchmarks https://pool2mine.com/bench