Price stability can be only achieved if the coin has good
 distribution at the beginning and has a big user base.
The good distribution of the coins should be kept by the system as long as possible.
Good distribution will be achieved if any user is able to participate and adopt the coin
if he is willing to without restrictions once the NEM system is launched.

During time the capital tends flow into hands of the few.
This is happening with FIAT and it happens with bitcoin as bitcoin is becoming more and more
similar to FIAT regarding centralization.
We see in bitcoin that those who have the power can abuse it to gain more profit
and to gain more power.
Is it not possible for me to participate in bitcoin network as a common user
unless i buy the coin or unless i buy ASIC GPUS or other shit to start mining.

This could for sure be the case with NEM as POS coin if the POS reward is to big because
if it happens  that a few big stake holders will be created during time
and they will become powerful in NEM system as central banks are in FIAT system.
Once the majority of capital is in the hands of the few than it can be subject to manipulation
like coin price can be manipulated in the market and can be dumped and bought back,
similar to "loans" today in fiat where fake crisis and shortage can be made by the few.

To avoid this kind of scenario we need to find best ratio between POS and PON.
Just not to forget that also if to much weight to the PON is given than that
this can maybe be exploited by botnets

Currently suggested ratios are:
40% POS / 60% PON
60% POS / 40% PON

It would be nice if an economic model simulation could be somehow
made before the any decision about this is taken.

Actually I think there was not any dev but just scammer pretending to be a dev.

There is no exchange in OB1.
Read the release posts.

All information is here:
http://forum.emunie.com/index.php?/topic/1339-ob1-live-whats-in-and-whats-not/#entry14988

and also on the 1st page of this thread.

php code to read from file:
php code to read from url:

python code to read from file:


java code to read from file:


The code speaks by itself.

Yes and if hi puts it into graphical diagram
using arrows and blocks it will be understandable by anyone

Hello.

I'd like to pledge 1000 NXT.

Maybe they see it as proprietary technology developed by a corporation?!
Compared to python I think is P.I.T.A. to develop in java
as it requires to write bunch of code to do some simple tasks.

I agree with you therefore i have written that the concept should be partially adapted
as the number of coins in NEM is finite. Part of the forging fee should go to nodes that are securing the netowrk using PON.
The best POS / PON ratio yet shuld be found.

+1 to your advice 40 % POS / 60 % PON or something in that range to avoid hoarding.

+1

Hello.

This is good as it may facilitate mass adoption because people
could just join NEM by running a client without buying coins and earn some fees
by helping the network.
I would suggest you to check the concept of timekoin at http://timekoin.org/
which uses similar concept.

The user earn coins by running a node.
The difference is that timekoin has an infinite number
of coins that can be generated and the there are no fees i think.
Every node is allowed to generate a coin in random time frame.
More time the node is online the more chances to generate coins it has.

I think this would be worth investigating how partially port this concept to NEM
that part of the fees goes to
nodes depending on the time spent securing the network.

I see NXT as pure POS coin has problems of distribution because of the sudden exponential price rise
people won't buy the coin because and because it requires big amounts of NXT to forge something as
the number of transaction i currently low.

I think that with the concept above this scenario can be avoided.

greetins

Wasn't this Shakira song?!

It seems to me that it work with java6 also.
I was able to run the last version of the
client using openjdk6 on linux without major problems.

what about timekoin?
http://www.timekoin.org/

Is anybody here using it?!

Does it still have the web client interface on
http://localhost:7874 and https://localhost:7875 ?!

What are the plans for the web client in future?
Will be developed further on or will be removed from the
distribution?

In case size of email is bigger than AM does it get splited in more AMs?

Can it be made that the AM only contains the email header data
and the body part with message and  
attachments is send off chain to the service provider
and then like mentioned above the service process the email further on?!

I found a language with only 8 opcodes but i'm not sure that this will
be a good for your needs as the language is completely f*d up and if you uset it can f**k up your brain.


I called brain fuck.
http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/bf/

by this you mean instructions?!

Sorry my mistake I though you need something that could work on java VM
and is already implemented.

Choose your language:

Versions of non-JVM languages Language    On JVM
Erlang    Erjang
JavaScript    Rhino
Pascal    Free Pascal
PHP            Quercus
Python    Jython
REXX    NetRexx[2]
Ruby    JRuby
Tcl            Jacl
   
Languages designed expressly for JVM Language
BBj
Clojure
Fantom
Groovy
MIDletPascal
Scala
Kawa

Hello.

Will the current web client at
http://localhost:7874/ and https://localhost:7875/
still be available in versions 0.6.0 or 0.7.0 and further?

Thanks.

I'm interested in the project.
Can you post here the link of the new thread when created.

Thanks.