The idea comes with tradeoffs.

As divisibility increases, the implication that price can be lower increases as well (not necessarily that it will be lower, just that it can be).

It also encourages line-jumping, in the sense that if you only had .00 digits possible then there are only 100 slots in which value can trade so you must wait on a line, for what might be a decent value. If .0000, then 10,000 more slots in which value can trade, so now you must wait in line to make micro or nano-pennies - for what cause?! Will there be value added in being able to distinguish or decide if something is worth 1/10000 more than someone elses offer? Personally, I don't think so. Instead, I feel this creates nothing but turbulence, endless line-jumping, and desperation and frustration of buyers in crypto markets. This is why so many things sit at one satoshi.

It prevents many currently understood trading patterns from being followed correctly, from my observations.

When I trade a stock, I put in offer at .23 or .24 or .22, but not .22000001 or .22000000 or .22000002 because there is no value added to the system, and instead I feel it causes chaotic market actions that do not add value at this point in time. Such resolution would be worthwhile for something in which an individual unit would be worth, say, $1000000, because there is value added in such high resolution at that value. But for something worth a few dollars, it's just not the case.

I understand that these are atomic units we're trading in, but the mental application is still from dollars and cents, euro's, yuan, w/e to individual atomic units - we're just not conditioned to think on these terms though. So why create unnecessary confusion at this point in time?

Of course, at the same time, increasing the number of atomic units while keeping the decimal place in the same visual spot still serves to create the implication that there is an overabundance. So - where does the middle ground lie here between overabundance and scarcity? For now, I think 10k (now), or possibly 100k atomic units might be enough.

Maybe it is not a bad idea to split one Siafund to 100,000 Siafunds to make the total of Siafunds become 1 billions instead of 10,000. This will make the future trading of Siafund easier.

Discovered Sia on Reddit, downloaded the wallet, mined for a few days and played with it. So far I really like it.

I've been waiting for Storj, but that'll still take some time; so it's great to see another project already publicly available.

Btw hi everybody

The network hashes are already 11 GH/s. It's not worth frying your CPU unless you mine to a pool.

You need a CPU miner too. It depends on your OS as to which one you use.

By the way, nice launch devs, it's been smooth sailing from the start.

If you have a GPU, you'll need something like bfgminer to solo.

Correct, you cannot mine from within the Qt.

HZ total coins are 1 billion.

I'm looking to buy some NFDs at the same 25 NFDs to 1 NHZ ratio.

I'm planning on setting up a NFD node to keep the network alive after the transition.  I don't own any NFD coins or assets so I'll need a few to keep the node forging.

If anyone's interested, let me know.

Thanks.