I am just sick of the "nonsense".
(which is all @ShadowOfHarbringer has been showing)
|
|
|
Sorry. No arguments, not answering this.
Yup - "weak punk" as I thought. If you want to "grow a pair" then challenge me.
|
|
|
Can't stand it, can you ?
So - such a coward you won't agree to a BTC challenge. (seriously you are the kind of weak punk I eat for breakfast)
|
|
|
At the time of the cap's creation, the proportion of avg. block size to block size limit was over 1 MILLION. So today to keep the proportions, the proper block size limit should be around 1 GB.
Who the fuck put *you in charge*? (that's right - no-one so stop trying to tell everyone what the rules should be)
|
|
|
This day just gets better and better.
Let's see - how many people support @ShadowOfHarbringer? How about we set up two BTC addresses to work this out - either support or reject? (you are just an annoying troll)
|
|
|
And Wechat payment, geez, these days people just throw red envelopes back and forth as a way of messaging, try to beat that tps. Albeit tencent can't even achieve internal database consistency IIRC. The point (that you can clearly see) is that China doesn't need a "new payment network". It won't offer anything better than is already available (and has been for years).
|
|
|
Anyway, I don't really care about your opinion.
When you learn to grow up and be more polite then I might bother to give a fuck about anything more that you post but for now I am putting you on "ignore" as you come across as just a stupid troll to me.
|
|
|
Okay. I guess Gavin is an idiot, the Chinese miners are all idiots, Brian Armstrong's an idiot, and anyone that doesn't agree with Blockstream is an idiot! lol
So the answer to everything is actually "who is an idiot" rather than anything scientific? That just shows what an *idiot* you actually are!
|
|
|
So please, stop wasting my time and start the real discussion.
You are about as genuine as a virgin in a whorehouse.
|
|
|
So you can't explain your assertion that 2MB blocks will kill bitcoin? That's what I thought! But you can explain exactly why we need 2MB blocks before April? So please do! (it seems you are just competing for being a bigger "idiot" than others)
|
|
|
So no matter how old I will be, I will never "grow up".
Fine - "Peter Pan" - just don't expect "the adults" to bother talking with you (and please stop trying to lecture them as they don't appreciate it from your "dumb ass"). I don't user Twitter (which shows you are not as old as me straight away).
|
|
|
cryptographer, privacy enhancing tech, ecash, inventor of hashcash (bitcoin is hashcash extended with inflation control)
Well - I think perhaps this is not really the main point that the Chinese are interested in. If good old Gavin's ego wasn't just as big then why would he be dancing between one fork or another just to try and rest control back to himself?
|
|
|
How will 2MB blocks kill Bitcoin?
Blockstream's SegWit is an experimental unproven workaround to a hard fork. Even so, BIP102 does not prevent a future implementation of SegWit.
What BIP102 does is prevent a fracturing of the community while also increasing on-chain throughput. I predict the proposal will pass overwhelmingly.
You have obviously not bothered to research a thing. So your idea is that we should just change things due to politics not science. I am sorry - but "I reject your reality and insert my own".
|
|
|
I don't see it - can you just provide the *exact link* or not?
|
|
|
I will repeat it once more:
Saying that "bitcoin is hashcash extended with inflation control" is exactly like saying that "car is just horse carriage extended with combustion engine"
A person who said such thing must have HUGE ego problems.
Yet - you do not provide the original source of the quote. Hmm.. just an asshole or what? (a "real man" doesn't resort to quoting secondary quotes and then using large fonts to make his point which is seemingly exactly what you do)
|
|
|
You are so naive and have completely no understanding of the topic you are discussing. It would be a waste of time.
Personally I think your parents should have taught you better than to try and lecture your elders about "being naive" but seemingly they didn't (perhaps your parents were not educated at all?). So unfortunately you have a bit of a problem in even knowing how to be polite (apart from not knowing when you are wrong). We'll wait and see if you can ever "grow up" (but I doubt it).
|
|
|
Are you actually serious, or is this some form of sophisticated propaganda ?
It seems rather obvious that you are in fact part of some sort of sophisticated propaganda. I don't think I care to bother with you any more (so please stop wasting my time with your stupid replies).
|
|
|
Yes, but that happened in 1997. 11 years passed before someone figured out how to use it and invent Bitcoin - the fact that he takes credit for inventing Bitcoin in this manner shows insights into the level of ego we are talking about.
Please quote where he does (I remember from when he joined this forum after me that he said in his sig that he invented Hashcash but not Bitcoin). So "I'm calling bullshit".
|
|
|
[sarcasm] Why do we need this satoshi guy anyway for ? Adam Back is the true inventor of Bitcoin after all ! [/sarcasm]
You do realise he invented Hashcash do you not?
|
|
|
I don't know why they can't simply work on the 2MB forked chain. It's not like they are stuck supporting a defunct 1MB chain if it goes that way. Why do they need a 2MB block chain? (so far the answer is just "because Gavin says so" and "maybe this is a popular thing")
|
|
|
|