He's fun to watch but I had to divest because I got tired of the big swings and worry if I was not on when he was playing. While I believe in math and that Nakowa, if he keeps playing, will lose, it is clear in the short run he wont.
Given how much he has won I've wondered why he hasn't started a giveaway thread or something to really build some good will. Giving out .01 to 100 posters would be cool or going into the JD chat which is loaded with people begging all the time and giving out 100K satoshi to ten people would really rock the JD world. But I guess he is not about that.
He gave $7,200 to Sean's Outpost: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=300827.msg3225545#msg3225545If you won that much would you give any away to random people on here? I would if it is for a good cause like that. |
|
|
|
|
I have seen more then 3 admin online quite a few times. Almost every time I visited.
|
|
|
|
|
Or you just use BitCoinAverage with the no-Mt.Gox option enabled.
|
|
|
|
Like I said before, I agree with TradeFortness on this point (you really should start reading). There is a lot of stuff I disagree with, but that doesn't matter now, because he has a point and I can see past my differences with him.
Have fun making up false facts and trying to get out of the corner you are stuck in.
Uh, was this supposed to a link? I thought you agreed that blind tf cheerleading wasn't helping and you planned to move along. Nope and yep. But if you twist stuff I say, I will have to correct it. |
|
|
|
|
Like I said before, I agree with TradeFortness on this point (you really should start reading). There is a lot of stuff I disagree with, but that doesn't matter now, because he has a point and I can see past my differences with him.
Have fun making up false facts and trying to get out of the corner you are stuck in.
|
|
|
|
The original thread text? You didn't at least change it to something more professional?  Please remove that enormous picture, it's not needed in the thread and makes the page unnecessary longer  And yes, we could change that. EDIT: Thanks dude! |
|
|
|
Well, I've looked at DevFaucet's stats and it's about $0.45/eCPM.
Meh. Maybe. We will see |
|
|
|
|
So, we improved our first post. Looks a lot better now.
|
|
|
|
I would use 50BTC to invest and increase my faucet payouts to 0.0001BTC, maybe even more Your faucet wouldn't sustainable, though, and it would be botted to hell. I do have a Captcha, but yes, you are right. It would be empty within 1 maybe 2 days. As a question, why do you use reCaptcha and not Solve Media? What is the difference / what advance would that get me? Solve Media gives you a bit of cash per thousand solves because their captchas are based on advertisements. And how much is a bit? I mean if I get 1 cent every 1000 solves it isn't worth my time implementing it  |
|
|
|
I would use 50BTC to invest and increase my faucet payouts to 0.0001BTC, maybe even more Your faucet wouldn't sustainable, though, and it would be botted to hell. I do have a Captcha, but yes, you are right. It would be empty within 1 maybe 2 days. As a question, why do you use reCaptcha and not Solve Media? What is the difference / what advance would that get me? |
|
|
|
|
So, when is JouleCoin being added to a exchange?
|
|
|
|
It is funny how popular these threads get!
I find it quite sad. I mean, buying/selling trust for small amounts of BTC? How fucked up is that. |
|
|
|
this is unfair you are backing up tradefortress when he has provided 0 evidence that any coins were taken
I have started multiple scammer tag requests on here with evidence and you guys couldn't give a dam about it
No, that is not true at all. tspacepilot opened the thread up, asking what happened. Tradefortress explained it to him, and rather than tspacepilot saying, No I never took the coins, or no, it wasn't me, they said, no, I never saw the rules so its ok that I took the coin. tspacepilot has admitted to chatting using a bot containing the name b0t rather than bot, and withdrawing about .5BTC rather than 1.5BTC, in light of that, how can you say there is no evidence? I'm sorry salty but this isn't correct. 1) The amounts are invented, I;m not sure from where. Tf asserted 1.5 then .5 and I never withrew near that amount. 2) The b0t thing is a red herring. Yes I registered that username but almost never used it. I had hoped to deploy a bot under that name but never got the bugs worked out before I was banned. Tf and I even had a discussion one time about that bot and he did not object to the name at the time.To bring us back to the point: everyone agrees that tf and I had no currency trade agreement and that he is attempting to use his influence on a third party site to punish me for his grudge about my use of coinchat. The rules state that a bot has to have "bot" in it's name, not "b0t". This has been mentioned before. So using that bot would have given you BTC you didn't deserve, because you break the rules. To bring us back to the point: everyone agrees that tf and I had no currency trade agreement and that he is attempting to use his influence on a third party site to punish me for his grudge about my use of coinchat. For fuck sake, stop bringing this up. We already destroyed that argument. You don't HAVE to be in a currency trade agreement for him to decrease your trust rating. If he thinks you scammed him, he is allowed to, no matter if you guys ever made a trade. God, why do I even bother talking to you. You only see your own truth and nothing else. I am out of here. |
|
|
|
I would use 50BTC to invest and increase my faucet payouts to 0.0001BTC, maybe even more Your faucet wouldn't sustainable, though, and it would be botted to hell. I do have a Captcha, but yes, you are right. It would be empty within 1 maybe 2 days. |
|
|
|
|
Volgens mij bestond zoiets al, maar is het stop gezet doordat het niet populair genoeg was. I don't know.
Anyway, ik hoop dat het bij jullie meer succes zal hebben en ik wens jullie er veel succes mee!
|
|
|
|
You check the terms and conditions of a site, before signing up. That is kind of the expectation that you understand the rules of a site before using it.
The rules explicitly state that all bots must have "bot" in the name so that they Do not get paid for chatting. You make a bot that does not follow those rules, and illegitimately gain .5 BTC. I cant understand what the misunderstanding his here, you stole .5 BTC from Tradefortress by using a bot that was not allowed. You get paid for chatting on coinchat, not having a bot spam for you, and because of your bot, Tradefortress is out .5BTC hence the negative trust.
I'm really not understanding where the question of, why don't I get negative trust for stealing .5BTC from someone? If it was an honest mistake, you would have seen that it was against the rules, said oh sorry, and returned the ill gotten coins.
Edit* And after thinking it over, I don't really buy that you werent aware of the rules in the first place. Why would you have named your bot b0t rather than bot had you not known that names with bot don't get paid?
This is indeed very strange. This would suggest that the OP is lying about it. |
|
|
|
|
Also interested. Have been mining it for fun, but a trading place would be nice.
|
|
|
|
|
JVVfwVf8z47DVytweRi1t2A71yxQ7McEj2
Wanna try this stuff out.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you just seriously called me a sockpuppet? Because I agree with TF's opinion? You must be an idiot.
|
|
|
|
No, I don't want to sell the KGC
That is not what I meant. I won't sell the KGC to give you the loan. I will only sell it when their value is below the amount you loaned. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
