|
What kind of security can you provide?
|
|
|
|
|
Looks great! Good luck with future updates.
|
|
|
|
Post #526 in this thread: Would it scale the same, and turn your .02 into 0.0274? If so, let me know. And let me know what the timeframe is like.
Post #2 from this thread: Would it scale the same, and turn your .02 into 0.0274? If so, let me know. And let me know what the timeframe is like.
Signus == laterill == sock puppets? A mod told me that they are some kind of bots. Like a few pages back. The mod said you should report them. |
|
|
|
|
DAMN, that looks great. Amazing idea and well done. Good job dude!
|
|
|
|
|
Armory can do that. But its a fat wallet ;p
|
|
|
|
Hi guys, If anyone is willing to help me out I could pay them back .03 btc back by this upcoming Thursday. I'm willing to abide by your rules.
my address : 14tKp6XFkUiNFN8b4oRPPoLLTHs3YNCivj
Thanks!
You are a newbie asking for a loan? Talk about scam attempt. There is a subforum for it, but yeah, you cannot post there can you? You should first build up some trust before you request a loan, even if it is a small one. |
|
|
|
|
M7zATHsbRTcR7UsEhZVao68vm7vHCSRRSK
Thanks dude. You are awesome.
|
|
|
|
Until you get at least 2 verifications always assume a scam. This looks like
Multiple people got a payment, so with your logic this isn't a scam. |
|
|
|
Set &fee to 5430 satoshi, but now I get this:
The Maximum Very Small Outputs Exceeded (10)
I really want to send my faucet payments... As far as I know I have one huge chunck of 0.04736 BTC
Please try now. No second password
Sent To Multiple Recipients
Cleared table Thanks you so much! What did you change? |
|
|
|
My current transaction would be a total of 0.0033BTC without fee's. I could send that without a problem then?
If you include a fee yes. If you don't include a fee and outputs are less than 0.0000543 BTC you may receive errors. Set &fee to 5430 satoshi, but now I get this: The Maximum Very Small Outputs Exceeded (10) I really want to send my faucet payments... As far as I know I have one huge chunck of 0.04736 BTC |
|
|
|
Must have to do with the current limit blocking transactions smaller than 5240 satoshis.
Indeed. Someone is being a real PITA recently creating submitting 1000's of dust transactions from the Horse Battery Staple address ( http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1ehixs/curious_blockchain_spam_with_correct_horse/). I had to put some new rules in place to keep it under control. A single transaction can now: 1) Create a maximum of 10 outputs < 5430 satoshi. 2) Consume a maximum 50 inputs < 5430 satoshi. 3) You can submit a maximum of 3 transactions per 5 minutes which have all outputs less < 5430 satoshi. My current transaction would be a total of 0.0033BTC without fee's. I could send that without a problem then? |
|
|
|
Hmm, weird. If you can, please post any information from them. I'm curious what's going on and it could be helpful information to others too. Thanks.
Will do. |
|
|
|
Titeti is a spam bot, I banned him. They sometimes copy posts in longer threads like this one, sometimes with amusing effects. Report them if you see it.
I see, will do. |
|
|
|
You're talking about blockchain.info? It's not completely clear to me from the message, but it sounds like a) they will not accept transactions with any outputs that are too small, or b) they will not accept transactions with too many small outputs. You would have to talk to blockchain.info to figure out the specifics, but they may have either adopted the new dust banning, or something similar. Try withholding payouts less than 5430 satoshi and see if the transaction goes through (if there are any payouts left to be made.) I looked at your faucet code on Github and didn't see any checks for this. If the network adopts v0.8.2 as it is and doesn't change default settings, transactions with any outputs less than 5430 satoshis will likely not be processed, or at least they will have to wait a long time for the first confirmation. Yeah, I am talking about blockchain.info. The thing is, sending a batch with only 10 payments so 0.0001BTC works. But sending more then 200 payments at once doesn't work. It doesn't make sense. EDIT: Send them a help request, lets hope they can help me. |
|
|
|
according to this thread the "payouts" don't appear on the blockchain, so most probably a scam
according to this thread the "payouts" don't appear on the blockchain, so most probably a scam
Why do you guys post the same thing? |
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
I am currently having a problem with my faucet. I keep getting the message: "The Maximum Very Small Outputs Exceeded" when the cronjob is run. I don't know what it means and I never had it before. I could always send to 100 people or more at once. Now I need to send it in small batches, which costs me more fee's then what the payments are worth.
Does anybody know how to solve this?
Thank you in advance,
BitCoin Information
|
|
|
|
Hey, basically I used the infamous Mining United a few days ago now, followed my payment and it seems they have as promised sent back what I sent + a little bit more.. (see proof below)
My only question is when will I actually receive the BTC into my wallet?
It's been quite a few days since "2013-05-04 18:50:29" & I know BTC payments are slower than LTC but all others seem to have completed by now..
Any help?
Well you already have it. It just sounds like your wallet hasn't synced properly or you just didn't see it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
