Mr. Def
I just updated the wallet, and look at that:
Hi Cap - to fix, clear out your LottoShares directory - everything except the wallet.dat Directory will be something like - C:\Users\x\AppData\Roaming\LottoShares fortunatly blockchain still downloads fast fixed wait a sec. now all transactions are gone (minus the tickets)  |
|
|
|
Mr. Def
I just updated the wallet, and look at that:
Hi Cap - to fix, clear out your LottoShares directory - everything except the wallet.dat Directory will be something like - C:\Users\x\AppData\Roaming\LottoShares fortunatly blockchain still downloads fast fixed |
|
|
|
Does anyone know if there is going to be API available. I didn't see any info on the website about it.
probably....This page seams to be kind of beta still |
|
|
|
And how can someone figure out if it's a ponzi or not?
generaly, if it looks like a ponzi, smells like a ponzi and it's saying but not proofing it's not a ponzi, it is a ponzi |
|
|
|
any more expiriences on that one?
Some experience with lending BTC: you don't really get paid for the first day, if you deposit you get your first payment ~48 hours after and then every 24hours. Also the interest is very low (but still higher than bitfinex!). Withdrawing from the lending system is instantly, but again you forfeit 1 day of interest. I like the bitfinex way much more. thank's...I'll give it a try as a trader |
|
|
|
Where did you get your package? Sometimes you have to be in the lottoshares/release directory when you start the wallet to allow it to read in the correct balances for the genesis block.
i don't understand....this is the exe software, if you think i use the linux package |
|
|
|
well, it should be possible for them to document at least some of their trades no?
There are no trades. That's the impression that they should PROOF it's wrong |
|
|
|
Mr. Def I just updated the wallet, and look at that:  |
|
|
|
|
well, it should be possible for them to document at least some of their trades no?
|
|
|
|
|
any more expiriences on that one?
|
|
|
|
btw: the more money you use to arbitrage the less you gain because of slippage
For my understanding, could you explain this further? the page says it live from arbitrage between alts right? there is not much liquidity, so the amount you can play is very limited |
|
|
|
|
why don't they just show the alegeded trades they do?
btw: the more money you use to arbitrage the less you gain because of slippage
|
|
|
|
I officially say it. FUCK YOU DEV. You are a lazy cunt.
You even couldn't sell your own coins for a good prize because of such a behavior.
I'd like to +1 Pablo. Fuck you, dev. Eat your damned stake. You lost 2 last supporters. I dont even mind wasted time and Btc. I mean the devs attitude, his devotion. You are a definition of disappointment 'dear' dev. I hope you read this. Feel free to check out this thread, started by the core group of a coin's community when they finally had it with the (original) dev: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=708702.0I'm sure the OP will be happy to pass along the nuts-and-bolts details of the community takeover. I just hope the dev comes back and see the potential of COMM and does what the community thinks best. Its very unlikely that Dev will comeback and support COMM again . yes, not even Jesuscoin resurged https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=443355.0 |
|
|
|
|
for me it seams that basing on activity will reduce the max payout
|
|
|
|
Maybe 1000 would be nice, but that would just bring a lot of spammers.
Now he is reducing more in near future as bringing pay per activity which give some more tough time for spammers well, how does that work? max acitivty you gain is 14 every 14 days |
|
|
|
BTC 2,4? damn.....i came too late
2.4 means you have to post 5x more posts than the current limit of 0.48 BTC, meaning you have to posts 2000 posts a month. hahaha a fulltime-job. i'm glad we have 400 now as limit |
|
|
|
|
BTC 2,4? damn.....i came too late
|
|
|
|
so you guys think payment is correct? should they pay more? pay less?
Depends on the competition. If there is only one signature campaign, it could get away with paying almost nothing.  I mean form the user's point of view |
|
|
|
|
so you guys think payment is correct? should they pay more? pay less?
|
|
|
|
I have added the PocketRocketsCasino campaign as requested. CodyAlfaridzi, thanks a lot for posting the information with the correct format. Makes it a lot easier for me.
Regarding an Altcoin Overview
If someone wants to make one, please do. However, if you want to use any elements from my topic, please thank me somewhere (since I put a lot of work into it).
I am not seeing demand for it |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
