It all started in this forum although I have read articles about this technology earlier than I got here. Bounties, faucets, & Airdrops. Since I was still a student that time, this industry really helped me financially to support my studies and daily expenses which also pushed me to explore more of this technology.You'd only know that a project is fraud or scam once it get down to its motive but first they will need to establish the trust from their audience, and I think it is just a normal response to be hooked into it. There's infinity of tendencies for us to be fooled in this industry given that almost everything is with anonymity. Some had a good start and ofcourse some are not having the same start up.

I disagree. Bitcoin is just the first crypto to be acknowledged by this industry but I doubt it is the most profitable one. This has something to do with risk. There are many crypto having way higher market peice activity or increase which basically generates bigger profit but also, it would be creating bigger risk. Bitcoin jist happened to have a more visible pattern with its market price action compared to a more volatile ones. So determining which is more profitable depends on the investor whether he/she prefers high risk - high reward kind of asset or the other way around. Profit does not depend on the asset by the way, but to the extent of how will it be handled.

Yes, we are all aware of Bitcoin's advantages but banking and Biycoin in the first place are two different tecnhology and system. One has limitiation and same thing with the other. For example, we have the accessibility with crypto anytime we would want to but would you be using it 24/7? 'coz for sure we are mostly into holding more than spending it due to profit potential. And with banking, amounts we can withdraw is limited but that's dependent with the amount we may put into it. Banking and fiat are accepted and accessible widely across countries while Bitcoin is not. However, wiyh Bitcoin it has a higher increase rate which generates way bigger profit from investing into it. Fiat and crypto are both currencies but are having different characteristics which I think it is nonsense to compare. Let us jist allow people to use whichever would give more convenience depending on your goals and lifestyles.

Well there are investors who prefer small altcoins than mainstream ones. Downside is high rate of market price voaltility unlike with big names of this industry. On the same manner, it generates higher risk. I do also invest to some but more of a short term investment on these coins 'coz I find it nore profitable than with my other assets being held and some planned to be held for a period of time to generate more.

There are many altcoins to choose from but to choose the best for everyone's habit of investment. So far I made huge from altcoin investment, higher than with other projects. Unfortunately, most of the newly listed ones are being a problem when it comes with actual holding and endurance of this ons.

I'm not sure if they're just too optimistic of this industry or if they are just making stories. Indeed if more people will know what and how this industry works, but in such way we are just exposing more people to risk. Let them seek with curiousity and interest. Sharing your knowledge is different from pressuring someone into something they're not familiar with. One's actions are affected by their knowledge and awareness of something. Maybe experienced investors are gaining profit but since they're still new, their decision making in every market price changes would be different as well. Guide them and let them decide wether to continue or not.

Gamblers which are ironic. They're too thrilled to gamble and to win bigtime in an instant and not minding how much they have lost already. These gamblers tend to be surprised and sorrowful once they realize what is left for them. We ain't kids no more thus, we should atleast have awareness of our actions. It is okay to regret our wrongdoings but to continue doing the same mistake should be a problem being solved by us. Also, I hate those who tend to invite people towards gambling industry. Let them have the initiative to bet atleast in such way they'd be ready of the negative consequences 'coz itis them who push themselves toward gambling.

Have never encountered one but most of the support behind casinos are unresponsive and only a few are really being of a help with my concerns. In this cited situation, it would be okay if Customer support won't be too knowledgeable with technical issues but atleast they should raise it to the team in charge for them to act in accordance with the concern. I've been into customer service and for me it will never be valid to know nothing about your company or atleast know what to do with such instances 'coz customers should be heard in parrocular with their concerns.

I hope services will be improved someday and would be as responsive as they should be 'coz if there are platforms who manage to do so  they why are they lacking to it.

Chances of winning ain't that high. Also, avoiding addiction depends to the gambler himself. This is a good thing no doubt but would it work 24/7? 'coz gambling provider won't be earning that much to sustain this "program"if that's the case, and if not then that should already be an answer to the question. However, as I've said, it depends on the gambler whether to get invokved that much to gambling activities or not. As long as such drive to win and be rich in an instant or to get back with losses, are there then we cannot expect less. But mentioned activies will indeed lessen the the tendency of players to engage with betting problem is it won't be open always for players who would want to play and win, also prone to abuse.

To test the bet and to see it for yourself. Ofcourse doubt would be there but you won't bet on it if you don't have enoigh basis or trust into it won't you? Unless you are just too thrilled and excited to get an easy win, which should be avoided. This is gambling industry and no such thing as assured outcome exist unless results would be altered or cheating such as inside info would be done. Unfair as well to other players who are putting their luck on the line. And yes, be careful as well to not bet everything on it just because of that information as long as you yourself has the assurance. When I first saw your previous post it gave me an initial question of why would that informant give you something as important as the winning bet if he could bet on it all by himself. Be careful.

Obviously yes, financial and with my overall functioning as an individual. I get to enjoy playing without stressing that much because of losses unlike before when I wast too hyped and thrilled of winning bigtime. It also helped me managing my mood 'coz before  whenever I am losing my temper also shortens that I'm most of the time irritated. I get to do my job as well because I am able to cope up with my gambling habits. These could be small things to some but for sure these things are worse especially if addiction take over. Gambling should be an activity to entertain us and not for us to stress about.

No specific amount but should be something you can afford losing; as most of us know. This is even cliché to hear. In gambling, we're more likely to lose than to win. This is a better mindset than to believe that you'd have that luck to hit a jackpot 'coz that would push you to play more and despite of losses.Indeed, some lessons in life will be learned the hard way. No matter what caution you give them, if they are still having that drive to play more then let them be and see it for themselves. We would be guilty as well since most of us here experienced huge loss before actually restricting ourselves. We just cannot instantly remove the idea that in gambling there is a chance to win big time.

I agree and the rule as we all know is to accusation will remain one unless otherwise proven. Proving this on the other hand won't be done instantly, there'll be a whole lot of process and that invomves the site's cooperation on this one. So I guess this would be inpossible. If ever Megaplay would be at the edge of being guilty, they can just abandon the gambling platform and make a new one under other people's names. If this is true it will be totally wrong and not only unethical 'coz it is a form of cheating on their end.
Or simply move away from that site if you are being suspiscious of it unless your funds are being held by them. Ofcourse we would be wanting justice for those who were taken advantage of, if ever this is true. However that won't be too easy in web 3.0 for sure.

I do agree with anonymity, but with others, it would be hard for me to say yes as well. I've been betting using fiat and crypto but things are somewhat the same except for anonymity and avoiding taxes. But with speed, in my area I'd say both paymebt options are somewhat the same. With fiat  there is a traffic with 'orders' becaude each payments are being sent to your mobile banking but with crypto is thru exchanges. With odds, I think it is because of the volume of bettors which are obviously larger with fiat which creates differences on it. Let's be real; using crypto in online gambling has its own advantages and so do fiat sinply because there's a huge difference with overall adoption of these two. But if it is jist by concept then for sure betting through Bitcoin and other cryptos would be better however it is not as widely being used yet which creates limitations into it as well.

If you're 100% of it then betting all of it would be a good thing to do. A hundred percent means no risk of losing in comparison with just having high chances of winning; these are two different things. Bit if it is jist a subjective claim then  betting on it won't have a 100% guarantee so betting just a portion would be best in this instance. Taking a loan is not necessary, it'll just put you in more trouble, also being greedy won't put you to somewhere better. I do agree that it depends on that someonw who would ckaim a no chance of losing bet. Bottomline lies between a subjective claim and an assured statement. Asking for his assurance would be best as well and if he would be able to support that claim of his/her with facts, then going all out would be good but never to push you to put more into that bet.

That's just how gambling works; you would win sometimes and lose often. But this has nothing to do with such pattern but rather more of a coincidence. If you would observe it clearly, there'll be no consistency with such thing. You will even sometimes lose for a month and vice versa. There's no assurance with gambling but I prefer assuming a more often losses in order for me to prevent myself from being too greedy of winning.If most of the players are saying such thing  then it could be a fact however, you'd just sometimes associate outcomes and form such pattern to compensate with outcomes especially when losing 'coz this is the same with others who thinks that there's a season wherein most of us are winning; the fact not all of us does  then that breaks the 'pattern' we are seeing.

But those players who are using VPN are simply finding a way to access a gambling platform and not by means of cheating the game. Indeed there are restrictions to some gambling sites regarding this concern but if the house itself allows it  then who are we as players to oppose it without any given cheating incidents? Law is given by people with authority and in this industry  those are gambling site owners or providers. If it is law in general then we would mostly be guilty given that gambling as an activity is prohibited to many countries so what makes us better than others? Also, those who are using Vpn are the ones at risk of being taken advantage of simply because of irregularities with network and overall accessibility to the site.

No relationship I guess. But if it is general possibility then it is possible especially if gambling provider would want to through algorithm. But I doubt it would be an obvious thing 'coz it will be prone to abuse from players who would impossibly not notice such thing. I haven't heard any 'noise' about a period wherein many players are winning in this industry. This would definitely be hard to prove if incase there is given that most of the players are secretive of their gambling money. Also, there's this tendency that perhaps on holiday season there are more players who are winning ( just an example situation) sinply because more people have the money to gamble than the usual month. But still hard to support such possibility.

When odds have changed already. I've experienced this with sportsbetting wherein I was hesitating to bet on a particular team so I decided to bet during the game. When I made up my mind, odds are not as big as it was so I just avoided it and just enjoyed the match. Turned out that it was a better idea 'coz it could have been a losing bet. Well ofcourse feelings would be different if the outcome was a winning bet. So much better to play it safe when you're not sure of what you are betting than to just guess things out. Winning won't come easily so the least thing we can do is to lessen the tendency of losing until we get that win than to go all out early and have nothing in the middle.

To answer your question, it is a no. Partnership to a platform will be required in order to list a token. Therefore  it is safe to say that not all good tokens will automatically be listed on exchanges. Maybe popularity of the project, paid partnership, or is it just those/that exchanges are choosing to list a token because they saw something from it which is more likely having relation to a token or project's popularity and demand from its investors.Exchanges won't mind picking the best ones but rather only those which have a volume will be listed to most of the exchanger platform. At the least, listing to a known exchanger, would benefit the token or management behind it as well.

What would happen on that amount under their authority is something we won't avoid. But indeed, it would be wrong to generalize. We tend to relate FTX's issue with the likes but given that the two platforms have different management, then things would be different. Also, whether they choose to sell that huge amount of Bitcoin or not, we would be left with no other choice but to just ride the wave and hope for a fast recovery with the market price. For now, I would just be glad that huge investors are still into this technology 'coz worrying won't solve any problem. Let's just hope as well that more businesses would consider using this blockchain, for this industry's betterment in the future.