Is it vaible to have a "deposits" option like XDN has? It pays you for having coins deposited like some kind of strange yet useful PoS.
You seem to be fixated on earning interest from your (shit-)coin and trying to get DERO to be something it isn't; might I suggest Bitbeans (BITB)/Beancash (BEAN) or Trezarcoin (TZC) instead? |
|
|
|
Tell me, pls,can I buy the rank above (Ful member,St member)? You can in PM.
Quoted for posterity... I bet you try passing cops on the interstate, too, dontcha? |
|
|
|
Hey Crackfoo, apologies in advance if this has already been asked (but I just can't face reading 223 pages of this thread):
any specific reason you only have 3 poor little coins on the equihash port? What about ZEC, ZEL, ZEN, BTG, BTCZ, SNG, HUSH?... Is it hard to implement somehow?
they are a real pain yeah. Each of them have changed their coinbase structure so there's no one code that can facilite them all. BTZ and HUSH are on there already and working, HUSH however is not listed as cryptopia still has it in maint. I've not heard of ZEL and SNG, maybe those I can get working if they are on an exchange. ZEN used to work, but then stopped after one of their wallet upgrades. ZEC & BTG I tried and ended up with only rejects. I was wondering the same thing as @dragonmike... I personally suggest adding ZEN both because there aren't any pools that control a majority of its hashrate (as is the case, unfortunately, with ZEC - namely Flypool) and it is listed on Bittrex, so it's very liquid/tradeable. |
|
|
|
Sorry, I was referring to a different bug--not the one you described.
And yes, that one should be more straightforward and it is being worked on AFAIK. Yeah, a Windows wallet pretty much needs to be able to deal with "unexpected reboots," because Windows...  Your input about the wallet information output is duly noted--a few other people have had similar thoughts. I am not aware of this being planned for the next update, but it is something that is being mentioned periodically as something to improve sooner than later. And finally, I'm not sure what you mean by " arguing that your clients/customers/users are too stupid to understand"... I don't recall any messages, particularly recently, implying anything like that?  I personally agree, for what it's worth, and hope that the documentation and software will continue to improve such that we can serve a reasonable lowest-common-denominator of users.  I direct you back to msg #2481 where you basically said that it might not be a good idea to put a staking estimator/calculator in the wallet because it might confuse people or make them think they were entitled to a certain reward, etc. I may have employed a bit of hyperbole in my previous post when I characterized this as essentially calling your clients/customers/users stupid, but it's not too far off the mark. EDIT - so I just found this document on setting up the Linux wallet for staking and something in it really tweaked my knobs: If you send a transaction from a staking wallet, every input time will reset to 0. So you should have a regular wallet
and a PoS one (you can follow the Local Wallet + PoS Headless Wallet on VPS for setting up such confguration). What the... If I send TZC from my wallet all of my coins will be reset to minimum age?!? What is the point of punishing people for actually using a coin, or does the dev team think we should "hodl forever!1!!1!"? |
|
|
|
What gpu are you using?
I had the same problem with a gtx 750ti, cpu was hashing along but gpu not.
For me it was the configuration for the gpu that was the problem.
So depending what gpu you got change the parameters in the nvidia config or the AMD config, depends what gpu you got.
Hi I'm using an AMD Radeon card. Which parameters did you change in your config file? Thx @Set Ready go says he has an Nvidia GTX 750 Ti; his nvidia.txt configuration isn't going to be terribly useful for your AMD card... The easiest thing to do is to run xmr-stak from the command line without any parameters and it will prompt you to enter currency type (either Monero for most Cryptonote coins, or AEON for AEON), pool address and your wallet address. It will then create cpu.txt and either amd.txt or nvidia.txt automatically. Once you have those you can then tweak them to improve performance. |
|
|
|
The purse is working properly. An error may occur as a result of improper shutdown of the computer. But this is not the fault of the wallet.
I agree. But then again, some more robustness would be nice. @Noruka: AFAIK, such improvements are on the docket. Unfortunately, some of the issues have been tricky to reproduce in development environments, so it's been a difficult process to debug. But should be coming down the pipeline. Not sure what other issues you are referring to, but the one where the wallet is fatally compromised if the computer is shutdown improperly or locks up is pretty easy to reproduce. I'm no programmer, but it seems to me this is the result of leaving files open that have been written to/modified, rather than only opening them for long enough to write/update then close them again. Also, I am going to reiterate my earlier comments to this thread about the absolutely useless data reported in the Penrose triangle: even after reading the whitepaper I still have no idea what, "inputs weighing x coin days," means; this bunch of gobblydegook that only a C programmer could love should be replaced with something like, "estimated daily* chance of receiving a block from staking: %" Basically, as long as it is made clear that receiving a block from staking is a probabilistic event, and not something guaranteed to happen after x days with n coins, then there shouldn't be too much confusion. Frankly, arguing that your clients/customers/users are too stupid to understand what you are offering never struck me as sound business (even if it is true...). * - or weekly, monthly, etc... |
|
|
|
...
As of now the "full" algo list I am using with NemosMiner 2.4.2 on Zpool is:
poly,hsr,xevan,skunk,tribus,c11,x11evo,phi,skein,equihash,sib,bitcore,x17,blakecoin,Nist5,MyriadGroestl,Lyra2RE2,neoscrypt,blake2s,lyra2z
And an even more heavily-pruned algo list I am testing out on two rigs is:
xevan,c11,tribus,phi,skein,equihash,x17,Nist5,Lyra2RE2,neoscrypt,blake2s,lyra2z
Algos that has gone ASIC, "scrypt", "myr-gr", "lbry", "keccak" and "skein" - Pointless having any in a GPU mining list. I knew about the first 4, but did not know skein had been ASIC'ed and it's projected profitability is still in the middle of the pack, which suggests that there isn't widespread use of ASICs on it yet. Still, you are right that there is no point competing against an ASIC with a GPU. |
|
|
|
I had big issues with Palgin and i switched to cminer and since than everything was fine so i vote for removing Palgin.
Also i have a question. Is there any scrypt i can mine with CPU on ahashpool and if there is how to setup NPlusMiner to use CPU?
My CPU was mining around 2USD a day on Nicehash so i guess it should mine even more with NPM
Thanks
You can run xmr-stak in CPU-only mode at the same time as a GPU miner. You'll have to choose an appropriate coin (likely using Cryptonote/Cryptonight) and pool. |
|
|
|
A reminder to anyone running botnets, you're a target to get your address and IP's banned from zpool. Mostly for yescrypt miners who have 500+ little miners chewing away on my resources. If you want to mine here and stay off my radar use the stratum-proxy @Malthrax so generously updated to work with yescrypt: https://github.com/MalthraxCrypto/stratum-proxy/releases/I suspect most of those bots don't even realize they are one. Might be better to just raise the minimum difficulty on the port so they don't find a share except every few minutes... or hours. |
|
|
|
once again GPU-Z recognizes the cards but MSI AB doesn't..
MSI AB will not recognize Polaris/Baffin cards with newer drivers, something is broken there. It actually will recognize them if you have 1-2 cards in the rig, but not if there's more (maybe up to 3 cards are recognized, I don't remember, but I read somewhere that this whole thing was broken on purpose due to MSI AB dev hating miners or something). The last driver that works with MSI AB is the August Blockchain beta. It's not that big a deal though, the only thing that MSI AB does well for AMD cards is the custom fan curve. Actual clocks/voltages control is way better in OverdriveNTool anyway, it's the fan control that sucks there, especially for "0 DB" cards (with target temps at ~ 50-60 C, I'm regularly seeing some of my rx560 cards stopping their fans and starting them again, sometimes every 5 minutes or so; still haven't figured out how to deal with this myself). That would explain why everything was fine when I had 3 cards, but broke when I added the 4th. Meanwhile, I'm still trying to figure out how to properly use OverDrivenTool. I'll get there... eventually. EDIT - well, threw caution to the wind and just started changing stuff and seeing what worked and I made some progress. Got the new core and mem clocks to stick on every card and set a target temp of 64C for the fans. Saved the profile and next I'll see about automatically applying that profile either at boot or right before starting a miner (pretty much only Cryptonight or Ethash will be run on this rig). EDIT 2 - and some weirdness, of course: looks like Cryptonight hashrate is up on the 1st and 4th cards, but not the 2nd and 3rd. GPU-Z reports the new clock rates for all 4 of the RX 560s, though, and I used the same 2-thread/intensity config for all cards in xmr-stak. |
|
|
|
Post your actual command and your wallet address. (that part is for crackfoo)
This is the command I'm using ccminer-x64.exe -a equihash -o stratum+tcp://equihash.mine.zpool.ca:2142 -u 15henJFBwtdn6yrttYbeNTrnuNedSZ8QmF -p c=BTC,equihash I'm pretty sure you should not state the algo in the password switch. You can state a workername using the format: -p ID=workername,c=BTC But that is the only additional variable that can be put into the password switch field, AFAIK. PS - ccminer is not even remotely as fast as dstm at Equihash. |
|
|
|
|
Well, I DDU'ed the existing Adrenalin 18.2.2 driver, reinstalled it, re-patched all the BIOS and... once again GPU-Z recognizes the cards but MSI AB doesn't..
So I d/l'ed OverDrivenTool and now I am looking at a UI that seems very capable of causing trouble, if not outright damage. While I tend to prefer more Spartan UIs than the overly gaudy, and resource hogging, MSI AB, I also prefer there be some sort of documentation I can peruse, rather than just search for what others did and hope I don't fry something.
|
|
|
|
|
Just installed the 4th RX 560 on my Onda D1800 and it looks like I'm playing "one step forward, two steps backwards" with it. Went through all the rigamarole to patch the BIOS and now MSI AB doesn't recognize any of the cards while GPU-Z does. I also bought more HDMI dummy plugs so every card has one now and still no change. Hashrate on XMR-stak has also dropped on the first card back to what it was before - 420-440 H/s instead of ~500 - and the other cards are, of course, performing similarly.
I don't think I'm going to tinker with it any more tonight - I've set it mining DERO and even though the total hashrate of 1800 H/s isn't quite what I wanted to achieve, it's still 400 more than it was before I installed the 4th card.
|
|
|
|
On 2.5 version when start zpoolplus i have this error on phi algo:
Running:
Speed Started Active Cnt Command
----- ------- ------ --- -------
0,00 PH/s 00:00:00 00:00:00 Once Bin\NVIDIA-Alexis78Phi\ccminer.exe -a phi -o stratum+tcp://: -u -p -d 0,1,2,3,4,5 --api-r
emote
That's because the Phi port has been disabled on Zpool - seems to happen frequently, btw. Only benchmarking will fail because of this, but currently the failure is not handled gracefully, that's for sure. |
|
|
|
Okay, something else seems to not be working right. I just noticed that the algo listed as most profitable was not only not being currently run, it was not even switched to at the next update: Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
----- --------- ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
CcminerAlexis78Phi Phi 24.65 MH/s 0.311 0.00031 3.640 0.01261 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Tribus 74.75 MH/s 0.310 0.00031 3.626 0.00414 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos X17 13.78 MH/s 0.298 0.00030 3.495 0.02166 zpoolplus-
CcminerAlexis78cuda9 Xevan 4.21 MH/s 0.282 0.00028 3.297 0.06694 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotx64 Lyra2z 2.22 MH/s 0.281 0.00028 3.286 0.12660 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Lyra2RE2 51.35 MH/s 0.256 0.00026 3.003 0.00499 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Skein 680.42 MH/s 0.239 0.00024 2.801 0.00035 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvot Bitcore 17.34 MH/s 0.224 0.00022 2.618 0.01289 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Nist5 57.22 MH/s 0.223 0.00022 2.607 0.00389 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos C11 21.05 MH/s 0.212 0.00021 2.488 0.01009 zpoolplus-
PalginHSR NeoScrypt 1.26 MH/s 0.211 0.00021 2.476 0.16770 zpoolplus-
DSTM Equihash 513.85 H/s 0.211 0.00021 2.465 409.73627 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Hsr 14.95 MH/s 0.201 0.00020 2.349 0.01342 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Sib 16.23 MH/s 0.186 0.00019 2.177 0.01146 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 X11evo 15.07 MH/s 0.157 0.00016 1.842 0.01044 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Blake2s 5.12 GH/s 0.126 0.00013 1.472 0.00002 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Blakecoin 6.27 GH/s 0.089 0.00009 1.044 0.00001 zpoolplus-
Running:
Speed Started Active Cnt Command
----- ------- ------ --- -------
74.75 MH/s 00:00:13 00:00:13 Once Bin\NVIDIA-TPruvotcuda9\ccminer.exe -a tribus -o
stratum+tcp://tribus.mine.zpool.ca:8533 -u
DGZ73Rx7jfbCfBcYtKPN7oiXCgQ1kqxPya -p ID=eleusis1,c=XVG -d 0
--api-remote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Refresh: 02/20/2018 16:31:55
Sleep 180 sec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Running:
Speed Started Active Cnt Command
----- ------- ------ --- -------
74.75 MH/s 00:00:16 00:00:16 Once Bin\NVIDIA-TPruvotcuda9\ccminer.exe -a tribus -o
stratum+tcp://tribus.mine.zpool.ca:8533 -u
DGZ73Rx7jfbCfBcYtKPN7oiXCgQ1kqxPya -p ID=eleusis1,c=XVG -d 0
--api-remote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Refresh: 02/20/2018 16:34:55
Sleep 180 sec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stats ' Tribus ' -> 74.85 MH after 1163 sec
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loading BTC rate from 'api.coinbase.com'..
Loading pool stats..
Loading miners..
Idle: 1
Speed Exited Active Cnt Command
----- ------ ------ --- -------
1.27 MH/s 00:00:19 00:00:36 Once Bin\NeoScrypt-Palgin\hsrminer_neoscrypt.exe -o
stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233 -u
DGZ73Rx7jfbCfBcYtKPN7oiXCgQ1kqxPya -p ID=eleusis1,c=XVG -d 0
1BTC = 11709.98 USD
+++++ DGZ73Rx7jfbCfBcYtKPN7oiXCgQ1kqxPya
zpoolplus Balance= 0.25198962 2,520%
Trust Level 8%
[ 00 days 00:29 ]
Average BTC/H BTC = 6.53107357 | mBTC = 6,531.074
Average BTC/D
BTC = 156.74576559 | mBTC = 156,745.766
Estimated Pay Date 2/20/2018 4:30:00 PM > 0.01 BTC
+++++
Type: NVIDIA
Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
----- --------- ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Tribus 74.85 MH/s 0.326 0.00033 3.817 0.00435 zpoolplus-
CcminerAlexis78Phi Phi 24.65 MH/s 0.308 0.00031 3.604 0.01249 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos X17 13.78 MH/s 0.295 0.00030 3.458 0.02143 zpoolplus-
CcminerAlexis78cuda9 Xevan 4.21 MH/s 0.270 0.00027 3.166 0.06428 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Lyra2RE2 51.35 MH/s 0.256 0.00026 2.998 0.00499 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotx64 Lyra2z 2.22 MH/s 0.244 0.00024 2.860 0.11018 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Skein 680.42 MH/s 0.243 0.00024 2.840 0.00036 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvot Bitcore 17.34 MH/s 0.222 0.00022 2.604 0.01282 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Nist5 57.22 MH/s 0.215 0.00022 2.522 0.00376 zpoolplus-
PalginHSR NeoScrypt 1.26 MH/s 0.211 0.00021 2.474 0.16756 zpoolplus-
DSTM Equihash 513.85 H/s 0.208 0.00021 2.434 404.53610 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Hsr 14.95 MH/s 0.201 0.00020 2.349 0.01342 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos C11 21.05 MH/s 0.199 0.00020 2.336 0.00948 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Sib 16.23 MH/s 0.184 0.00018 2.153 0.01133 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 X11evo 15.07 MH/s 0.143 0.00014 1.673 0.00948 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Blake2s 5.12 GH/s 0.111 0.00011 1.305 0.00002 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Blakecoin 6.27 GH/s 0.089 0.00009 1.044 0.00001 zpoolplus-
Running:
Speed Started Active Cnt Command
----- ------- ------ --- -------
74.85 MH/s 00:00:19 00:00:19 Once Bin\NVIDIA-TPruvotcuda9\ccminer.exe -a tribus -o
stratum+tcp://tribus.mine.zpool.ca:8533 -u
DGZ73Rx7jfbCfBcYtKPN7oiXCgQ1kqxPya -p ID=eleusis1,c=XVG -d 0
--api-remote
Phi was the most profitable algo but tribus was still running. Next update, neoscrypt is loaded even though it isn't anywhere close to being the most profitable. Finally, tribus is deemed most profitable and the correct miner is loaded...  EDIT - A possible clue! The Phi port was disabled on Zpool once again, though I am not sure exactly when. The last Phi coin in my exchange queue came in around 1 hour before I wrote the original post (about 2 hours at the time of this edit). |
|
|
|
Anyone has an idea about how to be sure of the memory brand from a AMD RX card ?
I may have a wrong bios flashed in mine, and I don't know how to check which kind of memory the card really is.
Does gpu-z show the real memory brand ? or does it show the memory of the flashed bios ??
If it has a dual vbios (assuming that hasn't been flashed as well). Flip the switch, boot up and see what memory it has. If no dual vbios, you may have to pull the heatsink to be 100% sure. Correct - GPU-Z pulls the memory brand info from the BIOS, so if you flashed the wrong BIOS and it isn't a dual-BIOS version then the easiest solution by far is to reflash with the original BIOS... you did download the original from the card before flashing it, right? If not:  |
|
|
|
|
Just to make things interesting I am running NPlusMiner 1.3 on one of my single GTX 1080 test rigs and NemosMiner 2.4.2 on the other one to see which algos they choose and how the estimated profitability changes. There is a huge variation of the latter between them, but they are often choosing the same algo...
E.g. - X17 runs at 13.23 MH/s on Rig 1 (NPlusMiner) and is projected to earn 0.335 mBTC per day, while it runs at 13.39 MH/s on Rig 2 but is only projected to earn 0.206 mBTC per day... So a slightly higher hashrate results in a much lower projected earnings?!?
|
|
|
|
I'd also vote to remove Palagin. It seems hes gone mia from the dev side and it consistently just causes issues. I've been playing with justaminers fork but have been using klaus-T for the past few weeks.
Yep, klaust works best for me out of the ccminer variants I have tried, but I think there might be another one of them that is even better at Neoscrypt (alexis78?). Also, Palgin's miner already has a 1% devfee and that can really hurt you if you are only mining for a few minutes each time it is loaded; that 1% could potentially turn into 20%. Finally, Palgin's miner starts off strong on all my rigs, but then after some random period of time exceeding 1hr the hashrate drops dramatically - by at least 10% - and this is reflected on the pool side (also, Palgin seems to be notorious for overstating hashrate in his miners, from what I've read here). |
|
|
|
I'm failing to repro the two miners opened
Thinking of taking Plagin away for NeoScrypt. Seems to be a lot issues with it.
Need more testimonies for decision.
You got my vote to replace Palgin's hsrminer_neoscript with whichever ccminer variant you already have runs neoscrypt. And the formatting issue I just described seemed to get fixed after benchmarking completed. Not that it was a big issue in the first place. |
|
|
|
4 - On this one version upgrade (Not true for all versions) you could copy your stats folder over to avoid benchmarks if on the same rig.
I did just that and it looks like the table columns are compressed or otherwise not formatted properly: Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
----- --------- ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
CcminerAlexis78Phi Phi 24.65 MH/s 0.356 0.00036 4.188 0.01446 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Tribus 74.54 MH/s 0.318 0.00032 3.731 0.00426 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos X17 13.78 MH/s 0.316 0.00032 3.716 0.02295 zpoolplus-
CcminerAlexis78c... Xevan 4.21 MH/s 0.264 0.00026 3.099 0.06269 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotx64 Lyra2z 2.22 MH/s 0.253 0.00025 2.974 0.11416 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Lyra2RE2 51.35 MH/s 0.250 0.00025 2.938 0.00487 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos C11 21.05 MH/s 0.246 0.00025 2.886 0.01167 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Nist5 57.22 MH/s 0.242 0.00024 2.843 0.00423 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Skein ...42 MH/s 0.233 0.00023 2.742 0.00034 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvot Bitcore 17.34 MH/s 0.224 0.00022 2.628 0.01290 zpoolplus-
DSTM Equihash ...85 H/s 0.221 0.00022 2.595 429.79544 zpoolplus-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9 X11evo 15.07 MH/s 0.209 0.00021 2.453 0.01386 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Hsr 14.95 MH/s 0.176 0.00018 2.068 0.01177 zpoolplus-
ccminerpolytimos Blake2s 5.12 GH/s 0.127 0.00013 1.490 0.00002 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Blakecoin 6.27 GH/s 0.080 0.00008 0.939 0.00001 zpoolplus-
ccminerAlexis78 Sib 16.23 MH/s 0.057 0.00006 0.672 0.00352 zpoolplus-
PalginHSR NeoScrypt ...marking ...rking ...king ...king 0.18308 zpoolplus-
Note Skein and Equihash hashrates, as well as the "benchmarking" stats for NeoScrypt in particular. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
