finally felt my first outage.  I am sure this is normal because a new machine is stepping in and there were DB migrations mentioned... maybe the coinbox has been reset.  She pings clearly though.

Here's the rub...
It's not mined coins... as their stratum just relays you workunits from the purchaser's pool....... so nicehash sees nothing of the mining results.  Only on their own reward pools did you have a chance of reimbursement, but its complicated given their internal exchange system we dont know much about other than crappily designed with one wallet....

I myself wondered at how profitable it would be to throw the equivalent of ~10PH at trying to generate a private key for one of the first 500 blocks.........   That could be some sweet rewards.....

agreed...

besides, you always have the option to try somewhere else as well....

but maybe the fact that most major pools had severe blackouts in the last day(s) makes you consider how rash you are being....  and why you haven't switched pools.... maybe.... who knows.  I don't think you understand the magnitude of whats happening... or care to understand it fully.

What I can tell you for sure is:
My miners and ones I manage are online and have been online with little to no interruptions.  And they are still online and producing valid shares this very minute.  I think my only interruptions were from my own ISP as per norm with my cellular connections.

To conclude,
The website front-end is not updating;  yes...
...but the pool is still functioning rather well considering the facts at hand....

If you are upset at not being able to see stats right away during these rare times;  again;  there are other options out there.   Go get em.

I plan on ordering one of these myself....  They are too good to pass up, and i always like to support the community whenever able =)

idling, unloaded the 450w is already at 308w....  i can't imagine what its current spikes to when under load.... but you are close without even making the cards actually work.... this is not good.   I just don't see it happening reliably with that configuration.  Sometimes running on the razors edge works, but i have always seen the psu fail after not long.

case in point orbs I had powered on converted 400W ATX psu.....  I would hook up almost 2x the amount of devices per the available amperage.   They would run stable once clocks trimmed for heatsoak... but i killed countless psu and they ended up not being able to ever handle their original load capability after.... but some psu wouldn't even handle 80% duty over 100% time.... they just would fault out or reset.

75x6 is still 450w.... and that's not facotring in the average of -18%.....   that's the most each card can pull from the PCIE slot.  Now, how many watts is the cpu and rest of the motherboard pulling from +12v?

Given most power supplies will clearly supply their amperage rating per voltage, you can do the math quickly...  dont assume it does one specific thing.    I am seeing the limits being pushed in either when simply factoring overhead for the pcie slot allotment alone, or the rest of the system power draws on the 12v rail.

Well, I am unsure why its not connecting, but, I do not know your miner or settings....

as mentioned above, the address to connect to that algo is as I mentioned above.  This is one problem you must remedy that I can tell so far....

walk me through this replies are mostly what I end up doing on this side, when its not discussing things of importance otherwise.....


Most people get overwhelmed with the amount of things to learn and throw their hands in the air too quickly.

Schooling over the past many years has thought them to act that way apparently...

probably mixed up thinking it was a D1800 =)

so your board must be a 1.0 =)

Looks like it should work.  I dont think the onda board has a low voltage requirement.


Now... that depends on what version of the board.


V2.0 takes DDR3......

V1.0 takes DDR4......

as per the last time i looked at the specs on ONDA's website.

google their site, go to it, google can translate it for you.  find the board, look for the V2.0 and 1.0 specs listed....

I'm sorry, but its happened to me on a personal wallet, and on this site.  This is not an uncommon problem.
It sounds like you are blaming the pool for what happened to the blockchain......

Yeah, see my note above.

This huge influx of miners has changed the dynamics a little and the pool servers must be playing catch up.


Check your wallet page to see if balance and total earned have increased since last view... its probably just the graphs behind.


I see one problem with your connection already:
neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233 is the correct address......... you omitted "neoscrypt."  Also check the reply just above this one.  He was having issues with his miner app version.  I dont know if it applies to you or not.

Be sure password contains "c=<SYMBOL>,neoscrypt" plus any other flags/options you have set, as well as any other algos in your autoswitch script if doing autoswitching =)

I loved zpool for my SHA256 asics....  direct BTC payout.... was pretty painless up until they had the issue with S7's not staying online.....   what a debacle that was at the beginning of last year.

zpool isn't too bad.   I have rarely had major issues with the pool, and have seen no real issues for as long as I have had a failover set for those major failure/connect/disconnect times.

but...

4000+ BTC.....


Those quacks at nicehash....  oah gawd.  How retarded can you be?

4000 BTC stolen....

thousands of new miners on the site;  and im going to be leaving for the mountains to work for a week :/
what timing.....

Still speechless.





zpool is secure as it can be.   I dont see much $ in the hot wallet(s) I get paid from when I do personal checks now and then.
the most insecure parts of zpool are:  public wallet/mining availability to view, and other people mining to your wallet address......  I can't think of much else past the hot wallet, and the exchanges the pool uses....

Did you notice the profit on that coin mysteriously skyrocket out of nowhere, not matching the exchanges prices rocket at the same time?   Anytime I see this I report it to the pool... because its usually a sign of something not being right.  Every now and then there's a crazy exchange buy price and you see the gigantic jumps....   But if the amount of blocks found each day multiplies by 2-5x+, and your profitability jumps by the same;  then something is definitely not right.   Profitability doesn't change in the 100's+ of percent overnight.....


Wallets fork.  Its a fact of life in the altcoin world.

Let me elaborate a little:
Who would you get your "approximate" funds from if your own wallet you mine to forks and the same happens?   Nobody;  because the generated funds don't exist.  Those TX's apparently were on a forked chain; and I bet they were the only forked TX's at the end of that chain....

What could have caused this fork?   Hrm, the most obvious guess would be that a large farm from NH went to another pool, or their own wallet and basically achieved something similar to a 50% attack....  This is one guess of many out there.....

Now;  I know it sucks mining to a wallet that was on a fork... but honestly, look at how many coins are on this site.   crackfoo is the admin.  He handles all of it as far as I know by himself.  He tends to catch forks relatively quickly... but he can only do so much at once and have his focus on one coin/issue at a time... even when there are no apparent issues his focus can be rather limited with so much to handle.   Its especially harder to catch a forked wallet than it is to catch a wallet that is offline/no nodes....  harder by a large factor comparatively.

This is one of the things that can happen, and if you feel it was not handled to your liking, to set up a wallet of your own, sync a blockchain, and mine directly to that....   then it would be in your hands and not relying on another service....   Its always an option if you think you can do it/handle it better/faster.

I hope this helped explain the details.... and not dissuade you from this service that usually goes relatively smooth.

well verifying the tx's on the blockchain in question is the first step in seeing what the deal is with the tx.... 

blockchain.info has a blockchain explorer for BTC... maybe there is a similar site for your coin....

else you will have to download and sync a wallet and do it all manually....  This is a big problem with depositing funds to an exchange, they have the info;  check with the exchange about the TXid's you had sent there if you cant figure out how to look up the tx yourself online or in the wallet.....  they may be able to help.

I don't need the site's version of the TX, I need the blockchain's recorded version of the tx.......  thus, the link I dont have as I dont work with that coin personally.

Can you post a link to the TX's on your blockchain;  for instance one of the ones that didn't arrive?  I dont have the link.

1080ti average=220w depending on config.  so lets say:

220x6=1320w

You wonder why it's not working......


remember;  450w isn't 450w of 12V, its "n"amps of 12V;  lets be generous and say 32A.   32x12=384W.  Not enough for two cards.  And all of this is without subtracting the % overhead of efficiency (so multiply capability of PSU by 0.8 to 0.9 depending on rating: by my example 384x0.8=307.2w)

Check the PSU label.  See what it can really do.

http://www.zpool.ca/site/tx?address=8bp6fWhffNNFGeahTaYiVTey4txFPg7T7g

I see payouts matching the graph.

I like the idea of a NAS box for swap.    Assuming your network is fast enough, I am wondering on how many miners you could run on this type of scheme.....    I would assume a fiber link to this share would be ideal;  maybe even a separate fiber network just for the swap shares.....


I have these massive old 4U SCSI raids I wanna do something with eventually... maybe ill pop them on a miner and turn it into solely swap space just to hear what it's 'song' sounds like.......   The geek in me really coming out in this one....    They are massive and heavy... and I have two of them.    They need two full SCSI channels per unit to interface.   I don't have any PCI interfaces with 2x connectors...... yet.......

My concern is the large file writes.

See;  I have killed 4 SSD's last year by continually shuffling large files from my gopro to my laptop (256Gb SSD), then when home; laptop to server.   Sometimes its downloading a 1-3Gb torrent, but I always preallocate space as to relieve strain on the file tables....   But with SSD's over time of handling very large files, you will notice the machine having pauses with a seemingly solid HDD light, but it will always recover... then one day it will happen and never come back...  Just dead to system drives now.  When it pauses, its like a processing lag glitch.... you don't pick up on it until its already very serious and it takes 15+seconds or more to continue doing what it is doing.

This behavior has happened on business class drives (Apacer), user class drives such as sanforce chipped units.... and in expensive samsung 840EVO black series drives.    I have a bunch of them I need to try and hack into the serial port on them and see if I can recover the data.....   I lost a lot of important files more than once....     I dont want to have to remove the flash chips, read them in a flasher off the board, then reassemble the image on a pc and recover....     It's a LOT of work, and the NAND readers aren't exactly cheap themselves......