I switched from sgminer-gm 5.5.5 to xmr-stak 2.2.0 and tweaked amd.txt as suggested by @Vlizzjeffrey and I'm getting 1370 H/s out of (3) 2GB XFX RX 560 cards. That's exactly the same as with sgminer, but it seems a lot more stable. The specific problem I was having with sgminer is it would lock the rig up so bad it needed to be hard reset, usually, but not always, when I used the KVM switch to select it after it had been running awhile. Note that I am using the integrated GPU in the Celeron CPU for video, and not one of the mining cards, so this behavior was quite perplexing.
Do not use iGPU with AMD! Bad idead, it blocks OC settings, might be fixed with newer drivers, but it was big problem for most cards for mining. Only with Nvidia cards. Properly configured SGminer has a lot higher hashrate than XMR-STAK 2.2 even older XMR-STAK-AMD has higher hashrate than 2.2. I've compiled latest sources from XMR-STAK it's in my guide for download, it has slightly higher hashrate but still older AMD version is better, also it has lowered dev fee to 1%. Hmm... I just switched my (3) RX 560 rig over to mining UBQ to check this out and I'm getting 38.8 MH/s total with 1200/1900 set in MSI AB. Driver version is Adrenalin 18.2.2 in Compute mode. So my speed does seem a bit low per card (12.9 MH/s) given they all have Elpida memory. Not using the iGPU is a bit of a problem with the Onda D1800 mining mobos, though. EDIT - and dropping all 3 mem clocks to 1800 did not change hashrate as it should have...
|
|
|
So what's the deal on importing keys/balance from the v0.7 wallet into the v1.0 wallet? When I follow the instructions I get a box asking me to input the old private key and password, but the v0.7 wallet never properly backed up the private keys* and never asked me for a password...
* - when I clicked on the "backup keys" button an explorer dialog box pops up to save a file, but no filename is provided and nothing can actually be done.
EDIT - I should note I read the readme.md on the github and the 1st and last 3 pages of this thread...
|
|
|
Excellent work, but please explain the functionality of the scripts a bit more - a lack of any sort of explanation or anything but the most basic of instructions with Nemos' version has been very frustrating.
Also consider the following if not already implemented or in the works:
1. Increase the default interval for polling the API to 120 seconds. <- I use 300, for example. 2. Only obtain profitability info for the selected algos and the pool in use (unless there is a fallback pool specified). 3. Monitor miners so if there is a disconnect or benchmark failure the script moves on to the next algo, rather than just get stuck. 4. Provide a clean way of exiting. Right now I have to ctrl-C the powershell script, then exit the PS environment, then ctrl-C the miner then, even though there are no instructions to do so, I run stop.bat.
I have some other suggestions but I will wait until I've seen how your fork works before commenting further (a novel concept, eh?).
|
|
|
I switched from sgminer-gm 5.5.5 to xmr-stak 2.2.0 and tweaked amd.txt as suggested by @Vlizzjeffrey and I'm getting 1370 H/s out of (3) 2GB XFX RX 560 cards. That's exactly the same as with sgminer, but it seems a lot more stable. The specific problem I was having with sgminer is it would lock the rig up so bad it needed to be hard reset, usually, but not always, when I used the KVM switch to select it after it had been running awhile. Note that I am using the integrated GPU in the Celeron CPU for video, and not one of the mining cards, so this behavior was quite perplexing.
|
|
|
I am looking for a few users to advertise my Campaign Management Services. I will be very picky and only be accepting users with high merits and high quality posts. If most of your posts are in bitcoin discussion, trading discussion, or other shit areas you will not be chosen. I will check all merit points of those who apply as well, if it looks like you were given merit for shit posts you will not be considered Rates Member- .002/week Must have 15 merit to apply Full Member- .004/week Must have 120 Merit to apply Sr- .006/week Must have 275 merit to apply Hero/Legendary- .008/week Must have 525 merit to apply if hero 1025 merit to apply if Legendary
I also saw this signature campaign and I also miss a lot of merits to join it. Now I am asking, will such practice is going to be normal? My activity is enough to become Sr. member already, but I need huge number of merits to it happen! It is just not fair! Good posts stay unnoticable and weak post get merits. The idea, how it was managed by moderators, doesn't actually work and we all suffer. Is it even possible to Merit would be cancelled?Actually, I believe this is precisely the sort of outcome desired by implementing merit: by selecting members who have earned merits (rather than just inherit the minimum amount for their existing rank) @yahoo62278 is filtering out the shitposters which can't help but give his signature campaign a more positive perception. I personally ignore any signature campaign /unless/ the poster made a well-reasoned and expressed post. For example, I ignored the "intensecoin" signature campaign for quite awhile, but then one of the people who joined it made a quality post and that ended up prompting me to click on the sig, then I found out that ITNS has an interesting use case - providing payment/hosting for VPN exit nodes - and I decided to mine a few thousand of it. Granted, I didn't exactly put my life savings into this (potential shit-) coin, but I still "voted with my wallet" and all because a post made a good impression. If that same person had only posted the usual drivel like, "wen can i haz airdrop?" or "is bounty?" or "when exchange listing?" etc. then I would have skipped over as I had done at least a 100 times before.
|
|
|
@MagicSmoker, i think you got me confused - I've never mined on zhash.pro
Right you are, as per usual. Someone else suggested trying zhash.pro and you went on a lengthy tirade about zenmine.pro which eerily matches my experience on zhash.pro, hence the likely cause of the mix-up. Besides me not reading carefully and/or remembering every single post I've read eidetically.
|
|
|
NemosMiner 2.4.2 goes down when Coinbase API is down.... Logic to use arbitrary BTC value or 'previous value' would help ...
Yikes! That's not good. An easy-to-implement 3rd fallback option would be to mine the first algo in the list specified in the start[pool] batch file.
|
|
|
... I'm just getting more heavily involved in the project as of this morning so I'll be fully useful in about an hour I should be able to sort out the CLI command in a few minutes though! I thought your recent messages in this thread had a more "official" tone to them; congrats on the new posting, and to CaptDero for making an excellent decision! Meanwhile, I'll keep buying GPUs when/where I can get them just as I have been doing over the last 2 weeks, all for specifically mining DERO.
|
|
|
Also, it appears that *every* pool (specified by scripts in the pools directory) is polled at every interval; why not just poll the pool that is specified in the batch file?
Easy fix, delete pool files you don't use from POOL folder... That is what I do Huh, that seemed drastic, but it worked!
|
|
|
Important for ashapoolplus users
No impact on other pools There are troubles on the server side. You guys are too many and we’re not scaling. I’m working on getting calculations integrated to the miner to avoid this issue. Currently under test. Should be available tomorrow or next day. Please switch back to ahashpool24hr in the meantime
MrPlus
How about switching miners to 60-120 second intervals? That should reduce load 50-75% I already changed mine to 60 seconds. Thirty seconds is insane! Also, it appears that *every* pool (specified by scripts in the pools directory) is polled at every interval; why not just poll the pool that is specified in the batch file?
|
|
|
Well, interesting... Looks like I am experiencing the same thing as @madmack1. One of my miners switched over to lyra2v2 and it promptly dropped off the list of miners on my BTC address page, and has been off for several minutes now despite that ccminer is happily hashing away.
Wait... just switched from lyra2v2 to hsr... and that miner showed up in the list again.
There are some lyra2v2 coins waiting to be exchanged/mature, but the most recent was from 82 minutes ago so definitely something screwy going on here.
UPDATE - NemosMiner switched back to lyra2v2 and this time the miner shows up in the list. Watching to see if any lyra2v2 coins are added to the exchange queue.
UPDATE 2 - Some monacoin & mobilecash added to the queue, so looks like an intermittent issue.
|
|
|
I'm still trying to figure out who the hardworker from Nigeria is - I thought they were all princes that want to wire me their fortune?
|
|
|
When I read a topic I just read the hero member and legendary's posts, as you know in a large topic other's post only waste time. Now I am a jr member ,who read my posts to merit me? Even good and high quality posts can't improve my position and people like me , and I am a jr member with 100 posts. Merit system only disappointed me and people like me from being a hero member or even a member.
The irony is strong in this one...
|
|
|
I wasn't sure if the i 432 work with 2GB cards, so it does work? I've edited my guide to only 416.
BTW you better to mine AEON with CPU much better for CPU mining.
The primary CN coin I mine is DERO, with ITNS in 2nd place, and EDL in a very distant 3rd (it gets the AMD FX-8300 CPU ). Since I've built up a decent stash of EDL and ITNS I might drop either/both of those for AEON, though. Looks interesting. EDIT - good point about the XMR hard fork!
|
|
|
I can tell you that you should *not* trust the values reported by ccminer-klaust for nvidia ( https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer/issues/59#issuecomment-360972071). Excavator is faster for me than ccminer-klaust on nvidia (pool reports and actual payment) ... but this is offtopic, so let's take the discussion about neoscrypt elsewhere. Slightly more on topic, are you still mining on Zhash.pro or are you back on Flypool? Ever since the server switch on Zhash.pro I have been getting royally screwed on payout (as in - 37% of expected) despite blocks being regularly found, etc. I can understand a pool with this percentage of the network hashrate and a ~1h ttf each block experiencing +/-10% variation in payout on a daily basis, but not -63%. EDIT - got the usual explanation from the pool op: "we were really unlucky last night, so sorry, no blocks for you!" Funny how they never mention that incorrectly setting their PPLNT or PPLNS variables could be at fault, too.
|
|
|
By far the worst coin I´ve bought but keep on praying to sell at profit.
You must have bought very good coins until now; please share your wisdom :-D Not really a coin but a token called eBitcoin. The price is still cheap at $1. Lemme get this straight: ITNS is the worst coin you've bought... out of two?
|
|
|
I also use xmrstak, tweaked to use 2 gpu threads it performs just as good as sgminer.
You going to share that portion of the amd.txt file? The "help" section - such as there is - doesn't explain how to set gpu threads. Hey, to use 2 threads per gpu, just copy every line for your gpu's, so theres 2 lines for every gpu, thats all. this is for my 4 gpu's with 2 threads per gpu: "gpu_threads_conf" : [ { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 432, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 0, "intensity" : 432, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 1, "intensity" : 432, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 1, "intensity" : 432, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 2, "intensity" : 432, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 2, "intensity" : 432, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 3, "intensity" : 432, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, { "index" : 3, "intensity" : 432, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false }, ], Since im using xmrstak again, i can also let my cpu mine at the same time, since its a fx8320 and it does 430 hashes its worth it. Hah, now it's my turn to give you merit for posting a config file! I also put to work an old FX-8300 with xmr-stak in CPU-only mode but only getting about 340 H/s out of it. I spent a LOT of time tweaking the threads on that one, though, so I don't think I can wring any more out of it.
|
|
|
I also use xmrstak, tweaked to use 2 gpu threads it performs just as good as sgminer.
You going to share that portion of the amd.txt file? The "help" section - such as there is - doesn't explain how to set gpu threads.
|
|
|
My balance has been steadily increasing, but I've been using NemosMiner which switches between algos and your fragment of a screenshot suggests you've been on Lyra2v2 the entire time so any issue is likely with one of those coins. I've had good results single-algo mining lyra2v2 here before, but yesterday I noticed a similar problem as you when I tried mining Equihash for about 4 hours - no earned coins in that time so went back to NemosMiner (just trying to get my balance up then I am done with NemosMiner and the other algo-switching programs).
|
|
|
Hello, yes first days on a new server was a low profit in a case we moved miners during day, and yesterday was pool hoppers party on some pools and network was unstable + luck factot and we didn't have enought blocks. Now i see blocks goes well and earnings should return to average. We will now work to take more hashrate on pool. Let me know how you profit is today. We keep the 2nd palce on Zen by hashrate.
Also we don't support Nicehash miners anymore
What's the reason for severe underpayment now? I just resumed mining here yesterday with a hashrate of 1800 Sols/s and in 19 hours I have a balance of 0.073 ZEN with no payouts, when I should have earned 0.195 ZEN in that amount of time - that is only 37% of what is expected! And you really can't blame pool luck at this point because a block is found every hour and pool hashrate is ~2.5 MSols/s so earnings should be back to normal. Before the server switch I was receiving the predicted amount of ZEN every 24 hours from your pool, and prior to trying out your pool I was mining ZEC on Flypool with no issues as well, but ever since the new pool went live I have been getting cheated out of >50% of my earnings. Please explain.
|
|
|
|