Masalahnya term "FUD" juga sering jadi alat buat tim/proyek ICO untuk mematikan kritik. Ada bedanya antara "FUD" dan kritik, ane aja pernah nanya legalitas dan ngirim link yang menunjukkan legalitas proyek tertentu tidak valid, malah dianggap ngeFUD. Terlepas dari apakah itu "FUD" atau bukan, kalau bisa tim proyek ya menjawab dengan data dan fakta yang sebenarnya (kalau mau dianggap transparan dan bisa dipercaya/verifikasi). Harus dipahami pula bahwa kalau ada satu proyek yang terserang FUD juga ga serta merta nyebar ke ekosistem. Nyatanya Bitfinex di "FUD" terus Binance malah asoy aja buka cabang baru, jadi ya balik ke proyek itu sendiri.

"FUD" itu biasanya:
- Ga ada fakta, atau adapun dipelintirkan biar sesuai kepentingan yang nge-FUD. Maka harusnya bisa diluruskan.
- Emosional, ga mau diklarifikasi, cenderung menyudutkan dan menyerang personal/tim bukan mempermasalahkan fakta.

Selama ada klarifikasi dan verifikasi, FUD bisa ditangani. Publik juga bisa menilai mana FUD konyol sama kritik kok gan.

Justin is a shiller god. He can make trash worth $10 each. I expect BTT continue to pamp until it dies later. But this somehow shows that the market is so immature they follow Justin anywhere.

Btw, if you're looking for other coins that got dumped heavily, ESSENTIA, LYFE, DICET and TBE might be your choice (not guaranteed that you'll make x100 but I'm pretty sure all of them will suffer like hell when BTC dump).

proyek yang agan ikuti itu proyek ponzi/scam gan, hati-hati saja kalau nanti terkena red trust akunnya. masih ada proyek lain yang bisa diikuti kok.

Make a multi-sig (2-3), one key for you, one key for your wife/husband, and one key for your child. If you died, your spouse and your child can move or use the funds. Not the best idea but it should work if you have a family and you can trust them.

The dead of one owner shouldn't be a problem if you use a multi-sig wallet. You can still access the fund with the other keys (depend on your setup).

Anyway, one suggestion would be to build a smart contract which requires to be updated regularly (monthly, yearly and so on) that if it does not get updated, the funds contained whiting the address will be transferred to other address (which ideally their heir address). This way, you don't have to share your private key with somebody else but you can make sure your funds will go to your family when you died.

Nice. Forget US, UK is the next crypto center. But anything that happens in this bear market even though it is positive hardly moves the price. I want to see green candles badly. Hope this will cause some little spike upwards.

Jangan melihat dari ratenya gan, saat ini koin ini kan belum ada harganya di pasar jadi masih bersifat gambling. Lagipula Wetcoin ini agak aneh dari konsepnya umum sekali, ane ga melihat ada proposisi yang unik dan kenapa orang perlu memakai koin ini kalau sudah ada koin seperti BTC, ETH dan sejenisnya. Istilah yang pas menurut ane adalah too good to be true. Silakan dinilai sendiri deh.


Kalau dilihat dari marketing ga konyol" amat sih, karena media sosial bisa menghasilkan exposure yang lebih besar. Tapi ya tergantung juga teman-temannya memang suka kripto atau enggak.

This is a great idea. Is there any development focusing on this matter? Or is this still an idea at the moment?
But I'm not sure if Bitcoin would be able to support this, it should require more complex script, isn't it?

Whatever the act says, I'm not sure it has any relation to bounty hunter. Most project that you promote are doing an ICO, which adds additional layer of definition that can certainly falls to securities, even though the company offers a token/cryptocurrencies. ICO != cryptocurrencies, but ICO is likely the same as IPO. So don't be too hopeful, you can always choose to participate in a bounty that doesn't require KYC though.

The Telegram chat is full of angry bounty hunters who want to get their token asap and sell them on the market. Not great tbh. If I were an investor I'll leave this project asap. Would be better if there's a separate room for bounty and product discussion. But well, they have KIP on their back, isn't it? I think that's not a problem then. But retail investor is surely annoyed because of this.

Kok masih saja ada yang menganggap ini thread membahas Grammarly sebagai tools utama. OP sudah dengan jelas dan sudah berulang kali menyebutkan tujuan thread ini apa. Tidak pernah sekalipun disebutkan kalau pakai Grammarly bakal jadi bagus dengan sendirinya, dan kita perlu kemampuan bahasa Inggris dasar agar bisa paham kapan koreksi benar dan kapan tidak perlu koreksi. Buat OP mending komen" senada ini dihapus saja, ane yakin kalau dibiarin bakal tambah banyak dan berulang walau dengan kalimat yang beda. Mereka juga ga bakal ke thread ini lagi karena cuma nyetor postingan sig camp.

Have you followed the guide over here?[1] Just did some quick Google search and it seems this problem exist on several devices across different OS. Might be better to contact Ledger support directly instead of bumping this old thread.

---

[1] https://support.ledger.com/hc/en-us/articles/360003117594-Ledger-Nano-S-Firmware-Update-FAQ

Nice news. More and more states are looking to make their own stable coin. Will Tether dominance died after this?
Seems like US influence will slowly fade from the market, as people can use blockchain and crypto to outclass the US.

In other words, you can launder your money (2 BTC) for free
It's a common practice on several exchanges, maybe do to regulation and stuff, but yeah it's very annoying when you don't know that withdrawal require KYC, and weirdly there is no information about it when you want to deposit. I know they have terms that we can read but somehow it looks like they deliberately leave it like that so some people will fall for this 'trap'.

Stop quoting like this. Your reply and what you've quoted doesn't have any correlations.


What does king of blockchain means? Seems like people view Bitcoin as some sort of cult leader. Anyway, just because something is priced higher than the other doesn't mean it is the "king", for example: BCH/XRP.

Seems like you ignore the point in OP and continue to define "decentralization" in your own terms, which is unclear. I'm not really sure what kind of decentralization we're talking about, is it: the power to change the rules, how new money come into circulation, deciding which transaction is valid, and so on.

Either way, I believe this topic is broader than we think and as pooya said, sometimes people mix imagination and reality to support their stance.

Sebenarnya ane sendiri malah pesimis dengan hal ini (topik ini udah dibahas di board luar juga btw). Pertama tentunya masalah keamanan, siapa yang bisa jamin itu private key bisa aman dan gak disimpan di cloudnya Samsung? Kalau kehack gimana coba tuh nasib kripto. Kedua agak mubazir juga toh udah ada apps wallet yang bisa didownload dan diinstall di Android, dan sepertinya berita ini dilebih-lebihkan. Tanpa ada hal ini orang juga udah bisa make dan buat wallet kripto di hape mereka sendiri.

Ane sih lebih prefer ga make mobile wallet, apalagi yang integrated dan dibuat oleh perusahaan kayak gini. Mendingan ribet dikit dengan make hardware wallet atau kalau tidak make Electrum/Core. Dan lucunya yang ada di SS malah support ETH, BTC malah ga keliatan.

Thanks, will study it further later.


My first time knowing about this, and it seems very old. Hmm. Why did you choose to use this btw? Why not use popular wallet like Core/Electrum?

Multiple encryption is better I guess. VeraCrypt the folder, veracrypt the veracrypted folder, do it again, and veracrypt the whole device. It should be better than 1 layer encryption, just like 2fa, just my 2 cents.

Eh guys, where did you read that? I only saw "we polled 4000 investors" = we asked 4000 investors about their investment choice.

Anyway, Van Eck just re-submit their ETF application according to many sources. I wonder will this cause another swing in the near future, but it's clear that the average joe is not interested in Bitcoin because there is no momentum for it to go higher for now.