Opinion about what specifically? Narrow it down a bit. Because if that's the case, then of course the price will rise. It isn't even debatable — the better question is, will it happen?
|
|
|
Nope — because there's no way that people will be using Bitcointalk for things outside of bitcoin/crypto. Platforms like Facebook/Instagram/Twitter/Reddit/etc already exist for those purposes. Bitcointalk will always be a niche community.
|
|
|
Pardon me if this topic already exist or there are more important ones I was supposed to include, but you can as well share your knowledge and advice for us to learn and improve.
If the information given is common-knowledge, then it's probably safe to assume that a similar topic has already been posted multiple times already. The only reason you post a similar topic is if you're really confident you actually did a far better job with your topic and if you have some information provided that the others didn't. Obviously there's nothing really new here.
|
|
|
This isn't even viable anymore — you solve so many captchas then after a while, you just have enough for the transaction fee. Even cutting your neighbor's lawn to be able to afford a small amount of BTC is a far more viable option than this one.
|
|
|
In your opinion, how to prevent the use of bitcoin as a means of money laundering? While we may not recommend going to KYC, it is useless and the anonymity of bitcoins will be lost.
You simply cant. A neutral tool will always be used both for good purposes and for bad purposes. Just like how you can't 100% force people to not use knives to stab people, and how you can't 100% force people to not use the internet to scam people.
|
|
|
Also — water is wet, and the pope is catholic.
A "quality post" is also something that hasn't been redundantly and unnecessarily made time and time again without any new information at all.
|
|
|
I've been seeing this multiple times on Twitter as well. Seems like they're getting duped unfortunately — even when we have great bitcoin/crypto peeps in the Philippines like Miguel Cuneta and Luis Buenaventura.
|
|
|
Omg I'm so confused. Sorry for not mentioning binance.us in the OP. I've always been using binance.us for many years and the btc, eth, and all other prices have always been consistent. Why are they lower now?
Regulatory hurdles. Do a quick Google search on Binance US to check their recent issues. Check out Binance US' BTC/USDT(Tether) pair — it's far more on-par with bitcoin's accurate price.
|
|
|
Didn't work. I uninstalled and reinstalled it and logged in and its still lower. I also restarted my phone. I also checked the value by logging in via PC and its still lower.
Double check what currency you're using on the Binance app. All you need to know is that the problem is on your side, because everything's fine with everyone lol. You can even check CoinGecko's Binance price.
|
|
|
It's the lack of knowledge in technology and finance in general mostly, not necessarily lack of knowledge in cryptocurrency. Do you agree that kids is the future of Bitcoin than with seniors?
The younger generation is the future when it comes to technology in general — not just bitcoin/crypto. And which of them will contribute the most?
You simply don't expect majority of the older generation to buy bitcoin, unless fiat currencies get screwed in the next decade and bitcoin goes supercycle.
|
|
|
No one knows — but one thing's for sure, it will take a while for it to happen if it were to happen. And while it will likely be a major country(or BRICS) that would replace it(if it actually happens), let's just hope that it's BTC lol.
|
|
|
This is not fasle news or a rumor. I've checked it a thousand times, bitcoin is lower in my Binance app.
Binance is an exchange with very high trading volume and liquidity. It's very unlikely that Binance would have that much of a spread difference knowing the fact. Your app is probably borked; probably reinstall it.
|
|
|
Before trading using a bot, maybe try learning how to trade manually first. Trading bots are used to automate some of the things a trader does; it's not something that you just set up once and you run it forever and make money. That's not how it works.
|
|
|
Yeah, really bullish on BTC, and maybe too much. Because as you remind, you can't really predict the price. Don't forget playing with the company's funds is not the same as playing with your personnal finance. Different responsabilities since you have employees, shareholders, cash flow,... You don't the MSTR going down to 0.
(edited to correct a typo)
The mere reason why they're averaging in, is actually because they know you can't predict short-mid term price. And it's not even "playing with the company's funds" — there's a reason why holdings companies exist.
|
|
|
It's either your friend is actually good(which is quite rare), or your friend is just lucky. If it's the latter, at some point he's going to lose out because of overconfidence and the likes. It's like gambling — roll the dice one, twice, or a few times, you can exit with a win. Play the game in a long-enough timeframe, you'll highly likely end up losing.
|
|
|
Nothing wrong with just buying BTC — if anything, it's the best option for 99% of people, instead of trying to bet on altcoins. You shouldn't be holding the bitcoin on Coinbase(a custodial exchange) though, go non-custodial. https://NotYourKeys.org/
|
|
|
If I remember correctly I've seen a post by MetaMask back then that they were going to support Bitcoin(yes, BTC not wBTC). They must've changed their mind.
But anyway — just download BlueWallet on your mobile phone; or use a hardware wallet if you want cold storage.
|
|
|
Is 8-12% worth it knowing that the custodial that holds your bitcoin could end up getting hacked or end up going insolvent? I don't think so. Bitcoin's price appreciation alone is more than enough for me; the extra yield poses too much unnecessary risk. https://chainsec.io/exchange-hacks
|
|
|
They have capital because they have reserves, and because the company actually has some revenue from their software products. (Yes, they actually have software products in the healthcare, retail, and financial services industry lololol.)
|
|
|
I believe the company has trapped itself in a kind of DCA strategy to make up for last year's losses. (which must be in excess of 1 billion?). So I don't know if they have any choice but to continue investing in BTC.
I'm pretty sure MicroStrategy has some smart-enough people to think that sunk-cost fallacy isn't the way to go. It's simply just the fact that Saylor is really bullish on bitcoin, and the fact that you really can't predict price in the short-mid term — hence MSTR being down months ago.
|
|
|
|