They're ignoring you because you are a lunatic. If you were to take the same math test as a 12 year old with a mild learning disability, it would be close, but I'd bet on the 12 year old getting a higher score. I'm dead serious. It's like someone thought it would be funny when you were a kid to teach you a completely wrong way to do math. My math is perfect and Stake did not disprove it! https://ibb.co/Hxf8NpR4.6% of the bets lost after 180,000 bets while the advertised house edge is 0,5%! While there is a deviation from the expected outcome, it can not be 9 times higher after 180,000 bets. Standard deviation for 180,000 coin flips = 212 coin flips = 0,12% (covers 68% of all deviations) 3 times standard deviation = 0,36% (covers 99,7% of all deviations) I lost 4,6% of the bets while the house edge is 0,5%, means my experienced deviation is 4,1% 4,1% : 0,12% = 34 times higher than the standard deviation which covers 68% of all deviations 4,1% : 0,36% = 11 times higher than the 3 times standard deviation which covers 99,7% of all deviations Your math isn't perfect. It's wrong. You didn't lose 4.6% of the bets.  86,612 is 47.88% of 180,904 So, you lost 47.88% of your "bets". But that's irrelevant. You can't use these numbers to calculate your roi, we don't have the stats required. You don't win even money every time you win. Black jack is not the same as flipping a coin. Sometimes your bet is raised, sometimes you win less than even money, sometimes you win more than even money. It's not a coin flip. You also have to play perfect strategy, which you clearly don't have the mental capacity to do. I'm wasting my time now. Seek help. If you want to know your return, as in the % of the wager that you won or lost, which is what the house edge represents, the only numbers you need are total wagered and total won. |
|
|
|
They're ignoring you because you are a lunatic. If you were to take the same math test as a 12 year old with a mild learning disability, it would be close, but I'd bet on the 12 year old getting a higher score. I'm dead serious. It's like someone thought it would be funny when you were a kid to teach you a completely wrong way to do math. What a cruel joke. |
|
|
|
I would have expected Trump to select Karry Lake or MTG as running mate, but picking Tucker it makes sense to his plans. I guess.
I knew that Tucker getting directly involved in politics was just matter of time, but I would have betted he would had waited for Trump to expire politically before stepping ahead as a candidate for the Senate or the presidency, beginning his political career in this way and this early will of course translate into a boost to his future and will completely frighten the opposition, because the kind of political ideas Carlson has shown he holds.
To me Trump is trying to appeal each day more to a radical and far right wing of the voting base and is neglecting those who in the moderate right or in the center. Let us see how this goes, one cannot deny that both Tucker and Trump know one or two things about populism and propaganda, they are a good duo. Let us see if that translate to votes beyond the diehard Trump base.
He'll never pick Tucker. He's too much of a threat. Plus he's on the record bad mouthing Trump in all sorts of ways and worse, he's on the record admitting Trump lost the 2020 election and the Kraken team is "batshit crazy". He also wouldn't go to prison for Trump. Kerry Lake and Elise Stefanik seem like front runners at this point. |
|
|
|
Feels like there will be some official release soon, so to minimize it's impact they decided to front run it by leaking some story and pinning September 2022 sabotage attack on a scapegoat who conveniently has already been arrested since April 2023 for acting without permission in another operation. Also, as an added benefit, the story throws Zaluzhnyy under the bus while protecting Zelensky (makes it sound he doesn't control what's going on in his own country). More ammo to dismiss Ukraine's top general Zaluzhnyy for saying that Ukraine is in a stalemate now.
Or maybe the reporting is accurate and a small group of Ukrainians went rogue and blew up the pipeline without zelenskys approval or knowledge. |
|
|
|
how do you know that these websites are operated by the brand Stake?
mirror list: playstake.io Unfortunately, a name can not be the operator of a website / domain, only companies or natural persons can. These websites neither state who owns them nor who operates them
Yes they do. Scroll all the way to the bottom. No they do not! At the bottom these websites state that the name Stake is owned and operated by Medium Rare N.V. They do not state who owns and operates the website / domain. Now you see what scam artists Bijan, Edward and Mladen are! For example, I am logged in and deposited and play at stake.bet, but instead of stating who owns and operates the website / domain stake.bet, they state who owns and operates the name Stake.  What is the sense of posting a screenshot from the website / domain playstake.io while I said that at the bottom of the websites / domains Stake.ac , Stake.bet , Stake.bz , Stake.ceo , Staketr.com , Stake.games , Stake.jp , Stake.krd , Stake.mba and Stake.pink the owner and operator is not stated? Read the words. Use your brain. You figured out how to use the internet and find this forum so you can't be as stupid as you're acting. |
|
|
|
how do you know that these websites are operated by the brand Stake?
mirror list: playstake.io Unfortunately, a name can not be the operator of a website / domain, only companies or natural persons can. These websites neither state who owns them nor who operates them
Yes they do. Scroll all the way to the bottom. No they do not! At the bottom these websites state that the name Stake is owned and operated by Medium Rare N.V. They do not state who owns and operates the website / domain. Now you see what scam artists Bijan, Edward and Mladen are! For example, I am logged in and deposited and play at stake.bet, but instead of stating who owns and operates the website / domain stake.bet, they state who owns and operates the name Stake. |
|
|
|
how do you know that these websites are operated by the brand Stake?
mirror list: playstake.io These websites neither state who owns them nor who operates them
Yes they do. Scroll all the way to the bottom. |
|
|
|
Does anyone know the email address of the Complaints Department for the websites Stake.ac , Stake.bet , Stake.bz , Stake.ceo , Staketr.com , Stake.games , Stake.jp , Stake.krd , Stake.mba and Stake.pink ?
Those are all mirrors for stake. So... support@stake.comThey will ignore you because your claims are nonsense though. |
|
|
|
This nonsense off topic mess indicates you must be really embarrassed by what an epic failure the Kraken turned out to be.  |
|
|
|
That's what Jack Smith is saying too. Trumps lawyers are literally arguing in court that that the Washington DC charges should be thrown out because for all the crimes he's been charged with involve his official actions as president and therefore he should be immune from criminal prosecution. Jack Smith says he was acting as a candidate and working for his re election campaign, which is separate from office of the president. Things happening in the Trump trials. This first link is different than the article, below.  BREAKING IN GEORGIA! Lawyers withdraw!! - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7q_ZyhBnYE.Stefanik Hits "Radical Leftist" Trump Judge With Ethics Complaint
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stefanik-hits-radical-leftist-trump-judge-ethics-complaintWhile the jury is still out over whether the wife of Judge Arthur Engoron made anti-Trump posts on X, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) has filed an ethics complaint against judge himself, accusing him of displaying "inappropriate bias and judicial intemperance" towards the former president in his civil fraud trial taking place in New York. "I filed an official judicial complaint against Judge Arthur Engoron for his inappropriate bias and judicial intemperance in New York's disgraceful lawsuit against President Donald J. Trump and the Trump Organization," Stefanik told NBC News. "Americans are sick and tired of the blatant corruption by radical Leftist judges in NY. All New Yorkers must speak out against the dangerous weaponized lawfare against President Trump." According to the complaint, Engoron has exhibited "clear judicial bias" against Trump, including telling Trump's attorney that the former president is "just a bad guy," who NY Attorney General Letitia James "should go after." "Simply put, Judge Engoron has displayed a clear judicial bias against the defendant throughout the case, breaking several rules in the New York Code of Judicial Conduct," reads the letter. "Judge Engoron entered summary judgment against the defendant before the trial even began, without witnesses, other evidence, and cross-examination," she continued, noting that this was "despite the fact there's disputed material evidence–and there's no victim of the defendant's supposed fraud. " Stefanik also notes that Engoron and his staff are "partisan Democrat donors," and that Engoron himself, as recently as 2018, "donated to the Manhattan Democrats." ...
 Elise Stefanik wants to run for VP it seems. Former prosecutor on Stefanik’s ethics complaint against NY fraud judge: ‘She knows better’A former federal prosecutor went after Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) on Friday, saying her ethics complaint against the judge presiding over former President Trump’s New York business fraud trail is “irresponsible.”
“She knows better,” Andrew Weissmann told MSNBC on Friday. “And that is really — this idea that it’s constantly a step too far and it’s now normalized where you have somebody in Congress doing that and the judge is just doing his job.”
Weissmann, who was a federal prosecutor in New York and the FBI’s general counsel, described Stefanik as one of “a number of enablers” for Trump.
“You may disagree with him,” he said, referring to the judge. “You can say that. You can say he’s missed evidence. But really? A complaint against him for doing his job? Beyond the pale.”
Stefanik’s complaint against Judge Arthur Engoron alleges that the judge has shown “inappropriate bias and judicial intemperance” against Trump in the case.
Her letter also echoes many of the same arguments Trump’s legal team has in protesting the trial, brought forth by New York Attorney General Letitia James, in which prosecutors are seeking to strip the former president and his adult sons of their state business licenses.
Engoron already ruled that Trump committed business fraud by manipulating the value of his assets, the trial is set to determine damages. Prosecutors are seeking at least $250 million in penalties.
Trump took the stand in the trail on Monday, going on random stump-speech-like tangents which sparked rebuke from Engoron towards Trump’s lawyer, Chris Kise.
“Mr. Kise, can you control your client? This is not a political rally,” Engoron said.
Much of Stefanik’s complaints were over a partial gag order imposed on Trump and his attorneys preventing him from bad-mouthing employees of the court and case witnesses. He has been fined a total of $15,000 for two violations of the order.
“If anyone in America must have the constitutional right to speak out against the judge, his staff, the witnesses, or the process, it’s a defendant going through a process he believes is politicized and weaponized against him,” Stefanik wrote. “To gag a defendant is un-American.”
The seven-week trial remains ongoing. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4305179-former-prosecutor-on-elise-stefaniks-ethics-complaint-ny-fraud-trial/ |
|
|
|
Zelensky sending Ukrainian men and women into the MEAT GRINDER with lunatic orders
Putin sending Russian men and women into the MEAT GRINDER with lunatic orders...
Continued Russian milblogger discussion of widespread Russian infantry-led frontal assaults highlights the challenges Russia will face in using massed infantry assaults to offset the problems contributing to the current positional warfare identified by Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief General Valerii Zaluzhnyi. One milblogger emphasized on November 11 that the Russian practice of conducting tactical assaults intended to storm Ukrainian fortified positions in forest areas of Donbas will not translate into a wider operational breakthrough anywhere on the front.[18] The milblogger noted that there is no way to train enough Russian personnel for the intensive frontal assaults required for significant advances in Ukraine.[19] Another milblogger claimed that the Russian military is about to experience a "real renaissance of infantry combat" because there are fewer tanks, infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs), and armored personnel carriers (APCs) close to the frontline.[20] A critical milblogger responded to the "infantry renaissance" comment and remarked that the comment is a negative reflection of Russian equipment losses and poor frontline coordination that has created a reliance on assault tactics.[21] A Russian Spetsnaz-affiliated Telegram channel additionally complained that the reliance on infantry-led frontal assaults is heavily attriting all Spetsnaz elements that have deployed to Ukraine because the Russian command has reportedly been using Spetsnaz forces for frontal assaults since the beginning of the war.[22] Spetsnaz forces are not meant to conduct such infantry-led assaults like standard Russian motorized rifle infantry, and some Russian sources are clearly frustrated with the ramifications of the misapplication of such Spetsnaz elements.
ISW has previously observed that Russian forces are increasingly relying on such infantry-led frontal assaults, likely to compensate for a lack of adequately trained personnel and due to widespread equipment losses.[23] The Russian General Staff appears to be relying heavily on frontal assaults as the predominant tactic in Ukraine as an important part of the Russian solution to the problems of "military parity" laid out by Zaluzhnyi's essay on the issue of "positional warfare."[24] |
|
|
|
-
Regardless of what polling says, it seems that in reality, those who actually go out their homes and vote are voting for Democrats. Because the election results we all just saw a couple of days ago concerning the Abortion rights Referendum in Ohio, also the Referendum about the legal status of marihuana. That is only in Ohio. On a federal level, it seems this past election has a net win for the democrat party, they managed to get some victories thanks to some governor candidates which managed to conquer relatively conservative states. So, even polls can be useful tools in order to have a glance on where the country is moving politically, it does not mean they are accurate enough to foresee the future, we have learnt that this week and we learnt that with the failed red wave of the midterm elections. Every election since Trump was elected president has been disappointing for republicans with the exception of 2021 I suppose. For the most recent election Virginia was was perhaps the biggest indicator for 2024, republicans were hoping to hold the state senate and flip the general assembly by running on a 15 week abortion ban and anti lgbtq/anti-diversity in public education. Instead, they lost both and now the republican governor has democrats controlling the entire state legislature. I wonder if they will realize before 2024 that taking away rights is not politically popular. |
|
|
|
It shows in the fact that the DS are bringing piddly little charges against Trump
Deep state lol. Trump has been indicted by multiple grand juries across multiple jurisdictions for both federal and state felonies. If convicted on just a few of the nearly 100 charges he could easily spend the rest of his life in prison (although he will most likely spend the rest of his life in the White House or dragging out appeals). Not so piddly imo. In Florida: 31 counts of willful retention of national defense information under the Espionage Act One count of conspiracy to obstruct justice One count of withholding a document or record One count of corruptly concealing a document in a federal investigation One count of concealing a document in a federal investigation One count of scheming to conceal One count of making false statements and representations for allegedly causing his lawyer to certify that all classified documents had been turned over to federal authorities on June 3 In Georgia: Violating Georgia's racketeering act Solicitation of violation of oath by public officer Conspiracy to impersonate a public officer Conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree False statements and writings and filing false documents In DC: https://i.gyazo.com/611e6d0960e8dc271b6684544c2b6468.pnghttps://i.gyazo.com/eeb6ff8b56b19ceda25a7413e3b94920.pngRemember when they used to chant that? I do remember Trump in an electoral debate saying to Hilary - "you are going to jail" and for much much less than what he is accused of and with much much less evidence of any offence. I think that the good thing about the trial in New York is that all the evidence is in written so only those who are willing to simply ignore anything that is not to their liking can keep defending the guy and thinking he is not a felon. Actually, there is a big difference between Trump accusations and Hillary accusations. Trump has done very little wrong regarding his governmental operations. And, he has done a lot of good - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5269905.msg55119252#msg55119252. In addition, Trump is in favor of Making America Great Again - MAGA.Hillary did a lot of bad in government... One example is the Benghazi episode - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Benghazi+Hillary&t=ffab&ia=web. And outside of government, she wants to make American freedom - MAGA - go away. She calls it a cult - Hillary Clinton: "There Needs To Be A Formal Deprogramming" Of The Trump Cult Members - https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/351830-2023-10-07-hillary-clinton-there-needs-to-be-a-formal-deprogramming-of.htm.You are mixing government stuff with personal stuff. The Trump trials are personal stuff. So: That's what Jack Smith is saying too. Trumps lawyers are literally arguing in court that that the Washington DC charges should be thrown out because for all the crimes he's been charged with involve his official actions as president and therefore he should be immune from criminal prosecution. Jack Smith says he was acting as a candidate and working for his re election campaign, which is separate from office of the president. |
|
|
|
Yes, I cry how it is rigged until I get the 30,000 USD back Bijan, Edward and Mladen have illegally taken from me.
They didn't take it from you, you lost it. I lost it from my pocket and they found it?  Yes, I lost it because of their provably rigged in-house Black Jack system, but first they took my Bitcoin. And you ran on the good side of variance and got some generous bonuses considering you only lost $30k after wagering over $9 million.
If losing 4,6% of the bets instead of the advertised 0,5% is "ran on the good side of variance", how much % is running on the bad side of variance? 15%? 20%? Your math is idiotic and your explanation doesn't make sense. Blackjack isn't the same as flipping a coin. Sometimes you win even money, sometimes you push, sometimes you're paid 3:2. If you're playing a game with a 0.5% house edge, that means over the long run you can expect to lose 50 cents for every $100 wagered. If you wager $50,000 your expected losses would be $250 If you wager $200,000 your expected losses would be $1,000 If you wager $8,019,299.22 (in crypto at todays value), your expected losses would be $40,096.50 Whatever calculation you made that resulted in you thinking you would profit over $100k was wrong. Being down $30k with this much wagered is well within the range of possible outcomes. You lost, get over it. |
|
|
|
Yes, I cry how it is rigged until I get the 30,000 USD back Bijan, Edward and Mladen have illegally taken from me.
They didn't take it from you, you lost it. And you ran on the good side of variance and got some generous bonuses considering you only lost $30k after wagering over $9 million. You see, when the house has an edge, it means you don't. That means in the long run you will lose. The more you wager, the more you will lose. So stop crying. |
|
|
|
I will go after Bijan, Edward and Mladen until I have at least the 30,000 USD back I unjustifiably lost from my pocket.
So this guy did some math that only makes sense in his imagination and concluded that black jack on stake is a profitable game, and since he lost 30k after wagering ~9 million it must be rigged... But as I lost around 30,000 USD from my pocket instead of winning 180,000 USD, bets won and lost can not refer to dealer hands won and lost!
Interesting line to cry about how rigged the site is and at the same time cry about not being able to deposit and gamble at the same time. |
|
|
|
But as I lost around 30,000 USD from my pocket instead of winning 180,000 USD, bets won and lost can not refer to dealer hands won and lost!
Your issue is you convinced yourself that you found a way to beat the casino without understanding basic math. Obviously your calculations were wrong then, just like most of the calculations you've made in this thread (which I've already explained in detail several times). When you ended up losing money instead of winning the 180k you expected, you should have considered the possibility that you were mistaken when you determined that you would be able to beat online black jack with common rules and an infinite deck. Instead, you concluded that the game must be rigged and you did a bunch of more convoluted calculations and convinced yourself that you'd proven something you didn't. You'd be better off spending your time taking some online math classes than crying in this thread. I'd recommend starting at grade 6 or 7 level at a site like khan academy. Here: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/on-seventh-grade-math |
|
|
|
Feel free to quickly correct me
You do realize that the bankroll funds are also being refunded along with the ICO funds yeah? 85% of the bankroll investors were also ICO token holders. All of them know what happened. All of them have been seeing refunds since. Most of the money refunded from 2019 until recently was to the bankroll investors. I don't owe you any details, you are not an investor in the ICO or of the bankroll after the ICO (didn't you make money on BetKing pre ICO?) What do you believe my end goal is by trying to refund investors out of my own pocket? Surely regardless of what you think of the site before now, investors getting their money back is a good thing no? Almost no other ICO or hacked site would do that. I'm only trying to do a good thing here and you and the other trolls shit on it as usual. Obviously it's a total waste of time me posting or giving updates here at all. I've posted enough here over the past few months that I wouldn't reach any other investors who haven't already contacted me anyway (way over 95% of the total funds are in contact) so there's no real point in continuing here. Have fun. Ok but it sure seems like you lied about being hacked. Of course as long as you continue to refuse to go into detail about what happened it will be very difficult or impossible to prove that you're lying. But the issue won't just go away and eventually be forgotten. I promise. If you did actually get hacked though, and you decide to explain what happened and provide enough information to independently verify enough of your story, I will apologize and make sure nobody is misled by my previous posts on the matter. |
|
|
|
Just to quickly correct
Feel free to quickly correct me to: - People sent you money to invest in your business. - You claimed that the money they sent to you as an investment was stolen (hacked) by someone that you hired to develop the project. - No other explanation was given. You won't say exactly how much was stolen, you won't say who stole it, where it went, specifically how it was stolen, what you did (or didn't do) to attempt to recover it and you also claim "I don't owe anything." Ok, is that right? Now for my opinion: You're lying. Not sure if you rolled the dice one too many times, got scammed using the money for something on the side, or if you're just a greedy fuck. Your "oops, I've been hacked, sorry your money is gone, let's change the subject" routine smells fishier than a tuna convention. Whenever crypto goes poof, it's a no brainer to side eye the person who was supposed to keep it safe. You're savvy enough to know you'd be suspect #1. If a hacker really did hit you, I'd bet you'd be scrambling to prove your hands are clean. Instead, when it comes to the hack, you're quieter than a mime at a library, almost as if you're afraid to make up any details beyond your vague story because you know that's the only way it can be proven you're lying. Makes you think, huh? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
