There was a guy yesterday who claimed that he invested 40K USD in bitcoin, and then the fork happened, and he was sweating all over because his wife didn't know.. Same guy ?
Online wallets are only for amounts you can afford to lose.
If you at least looked at the date the thread was started you wouldn't even ask... |
|
|
|
They are now also responsible for a fork on the chain, like the spam wasn't enough.
I usually steer clear of these particular trains of thought, but you do understand SD wasn't responsible, right? A bug in the BDB code caused this, and yes, SD did trigger the bug but while it was a nuisance to be very mild (I lost almost 4 hours of what was otherwise already too little sleep for this), it does mean some big enterprise (read government) that happens to find this bug can't create havoc and properly abuse this situation with properly prepared double spends and the like. Honestly, I strongly believe everyone is entitled to their own opinion, mine isn't better than yours outside my own system of values but this community should keep together a little better and your constant calling wolf isn't helping, in my opinion... it is just my opinion! I don't really care too much what other people think anyway, unless I perceive a chance of learning from them. In fact SD didn't trigger the bug. The devs rushing to "fix" things which could be "fixed" by SD changing it's ways instead of "fixed" on the network level was the trigger. +1 Stop +1'ing my posts. Don't you know there's possibly nothing you can learn from them?  |
|
|
|
You can just send the money back to yourself and the transaction will aggregate. It might take a long time to confirm but eventually the age of the inputs will be high enough to give it priority (unless you have bajillions of them).
In future wallets will probably do this by themselves, but for now you have to help them a bit.
I have between six and seven hundred incoming transactions, they range in size from between 1.3 BTC to 0.00000001 BTC and everything in between. Dates from mid 2011 to today. So will it be sufficient if I take all my BTC and send to 1 address I contol in the same wallet? What kind of fee should I set for it? What if it is never picked up due to it's size? I have patience to wait for weeks if need be, but I am afraid I will mess this up and lose my coins, send them into limbo or just waste BTC trying in vain to fix the problem. 1- Set your bitcoin client fee to 0 2- Copy the amount of your entire balance 3- Try to send your entire balance to a newly created address on the same wallet 4- If the client asks for a fee: Cancel. If no fee: Send 5- ?? ?? 6- Profit |
|
|
|
There was a checkbox explaining those restrictions right above the registration button, and you had to check it to activate the button, so...
What do you prefer I call you? Blind, dumb or illiterate?
Let's not even talk about the sticky in this same forum...
Or the billions of topics right here in this forum about this exact situation. Using certain sites' search functions seems to be very advanced for persons who usually use google to find facebook. |
|
|
|
Hope it's down forevere until you fix it.
How do you feel about being responsible for this fuckup because of your inaction to fix your shit?
Please don't be retarded. Someone told you not to be retarded and change the way your game works 6 months ago... ...and you didn't listen... Why should I listen? |
|
|
|
Satoshi is a genius. He can remain unknown for all I care. We all mine for Bitcoins that he created the programs for. I agree, maybe he should remain unknown. Just for the reason, "legal problems". I thank him myself for Bitcoins. It pays my rent and feeds me. Plus has given me progamming skills that I didn't have before. I thank him for this. I don't think that he is Gavin though. If Gavin is Satoshi, he have had a big workload for years. Gavin works for Google at the present time. He also is promoting Linux programs and software. I can't see Gavin been Satoshi. HJe would be a busy man if he was. He would be to worn out to work on such a complex system a Bitcoin.
Gavin doesn't work for Google, Mike Hearn does. |
|
|
|
And coinurl.com. I went from having 20+ clicks/day to 1 click/day in coinurl.com banners. My site is completly loaded and the anners sometimes take 20-30 seconds to load. |
|
|
|
So if instawallet has access your coin isn't this just a matter of time till they are hacked, or "hacked" and they all run off with the coins.
davout is about the last person on this board I'd suspect to pull a stunt like that. Of course, now that I've said that, he'd be able to pull a stunt like that and no one would suspect him.  Just like Pirate... |
|
|
|
I'm newbie in this forum. I want to send this post to
Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Trading Discussion > Scam Accusations
later in hope that it will be more visible there. I have to wait :-)
I will move it right now. |
|
|
|
I don't think that any bank would ever invest in Bitcoins as it is not regulated by any gov etc..
Read the link I posted above. |
|
|
|
|
TIL don't fix things that aren't broken unless you want a hard fork on the network.
|
|
|
|
They are now also responsible for a fork on the chain, like the spam wasn't enough.
I usually steer clear of these particular trains of thought, but you do understand SD wasn't responsible, right? A bug in the BDB code caused this, and yes, SD did trigger the bug but while it was a nuisance to be very mild (I lost almost 4 hours of what was otherwise already too little sleep for this), it does mean some big enterprise (read government) that happens to find this bug can't create havoc and properly abuse this situation with properly prepared double spends and the like. Honestly, I strongly believe everyone is entitled to their own opinion, mine isn't better than yours outside my own system of values but this community should keep together a little better and your constant calling wolf isn't helping, in my opinion... it is just my opinion! I don't really care too much what other people think anyway, unless I perceive a chance of learning from them. In fact SD didn't trigger the bug. The devs rushing to "fix" things which could be "fixed" by SD changing it's ways instead of "fixed" on the network level was the trigger. |
|
|
|
So, can we all agree that rushing things to take care of the volume of transactions that are mostly comprised of satoshidice spam isn't a good idea and it's SD who needs to change and not bitcoin?
Nope. I'm not saying it shouldn't be fixed. Just saying that rushing fixes isn't the way to go, as can be seen from this major fuckup. |
|
|
|
|
Hope it's down forevere until you fix it.
How do you feel about being responsible for this fuckup because of your inaction to fix your shit?
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't it good when people rush to "fix" things and fork the chain because of it?
Bitcoin doesnt need fixing. Satoshidice on the other hand...
They are now also responsible for a fork on the chain, like the spam wasn't enough.
|
|
|
|
|
So, can we all agree that rushing things to take care of the volume of transactions that are mostly comprised of satoshidice spam isn't a good idea and it's SD who needs to change and not bitcoin?
|
|
|
|
|
doobadoo:
You write too much. You should read more. Maybe even triple read you replies before clicking the Post button...
Maybe with a bit more reading you wouldn't confuse Instawallet.org with Blockchain.info....
What the hell is going on with this forum today? Half of the users got brain paralysis or what?
|
|
|
|
What's the criteria to achieve those levels?
anyone knows?
Maybe you should start by reading the sticky thread about that https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=86580.0Come back if you still have any questions the thread couldn't answer. |
|
|
|
|
None of your business, I would dare to say...
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
