For sale 20M BCN for 2.5 BTC
It's a pump and dump! Panic sell now! Are you buying? I'll give you a lollipop for free.  Sadly not, though I would at that price had I the coin. Isn't there still a 35 BTC order open in the spreadsheet? Why not fill some of that at a higher price? G. Sadly, I think it's a phantom buy order. The buyer supposedly never responds.  Is it time for me to fork this "exchange"? might not be a bad idea, I would support it. Here you go: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=579781.0 |
|
|
|
This is a trading thread and OTC exchange for Bytecoin BCN, the anonymous currency based on CryptoNote-ring signatures. Post bids and offers here or PM them to me and I will collect them into the top post. I will escrow for 1% and if you presubmit your coins into escrow with me, your orders will be displayed in bold without your name, and the order can be filled through me. PM me to set this up. Partial fills are allowed by default. If you don't want partial fills, specify "all or none" when posting your order. price (uBTC) / BCN / BTC / trader {member level, click for trust} Bids (to buy)0.112 / 5000000 / 0.56 / danteTOffers (to sell)0.125 / 20000000 / 2.5 / NoodleDoodle { Jr} 0.180 / 10000000 / 1.8 / 33zer0w0lf (min 1m) 0.190 / 300000 / 0.057 / RUNNY0.200 / 500000 / 0.1 / gts4760.200 / 3000000 / 0.6 / madzooka { Member} 0.222 / 900000 / 0.2 / desil0.233 / 3000000 / 0.7 / DarkHarry0.240 / 500000 / 0.12 / amsat0.250 / 800000 / 0.2 / VaultBoy0.280 / 10000000 / 2.8 / NoodleDoodle0.286 / 3500000 / 1 / Yanakitu Tenatako0.300 / 100000 / 0.03 / Vilchaco0.300 / 10000000 / 3 / matej krkic { Jr} 0.300 / 427000 / 0.1281 / skybot13x { Member} 0.471 / 850000 / 0.4 / danteT0.700 / 5000000 / 3.5 / ccienet { Newbie} Orders displayed in bold can be executed with the OP. Other orders must be done peer-to-peer. If you try to fill an order and the counterparty does not honor the order or reply within 24 hours, post on the thread and the order will be removed. price (uBTC) / qty / btc / time Reported Trades 10000000 @ 0.080 2014-05-11 10:12:325000000 @ 0.130 2014-05-10, 10:44:535000000 @ 0.120 2014-05-09 23:21:130.167 / 6000000 / 1 / 2014-04-30 20:10:00 0.100 / 10000000 / 1 / 2014-04-29 14:17:370.125 / 10000000 / 1.25 / 2014-04-28 19:17:040.115 / 10000000 / 1.15 / 2014-04-27 21:48:420.259 / 800000 / 0.2 / 2014-04-26 23:32:350.100 / 10000000 1 / 2014-04-26 16:00:000.250 / 2000000 / 0.5 / 2014-04-23 19:42:480.040 / 2500000 / 0.1 / 2014-04-22 07:20:55 ( auction)
Inactive orders
0.130 / 5000000 / 0.65 / smooth {Sr} min 1m
0.120 / 4000000 / 0.48 / bitfromit {Sr}
0.100 / 10000000 / 1 / MadCow
|
|
|
|
If you read the original paper, the miner is supposed to strive for the maximum reward + transaction fees. I guess the code doesn't do that?
This is the idea case, but you're only supposed to increase block size slowly to avoid reward penalty such as was seen in that block. Right but the paper makes the claim that there is an equilibrium between adding transactions (more fees) and increasing block size (smaller reward). Looks like that is missing from the code you posted. |
|
|
|
We should probably fix the mempool/getblocktemplate at some point to not include ALL transactions at the cost of the block reward 2014-Apr-21 23:51:41.291710 [P2P5]+++++ BLOCK SUCCESSFULLY ADDED
id: <d4c9d4da7ef4fa8ec3e9af41b46e8fa4496c04161ee481da7a9d6020af294097>
PoW: <8bd14baabe4f4f8f285db52e68c4e2d785c04b9f3277e912e1c0fed7f7120000>
HEIGHT 5812, difficulty: 233194
block reward: 2.167697195560(2.167696060291 + 0.000001135269), coinbase_blob_size: 345, cumulative size: 38720, 959(1/609)ms If I was that miner I would be pissed. You should be able to set a max inclusion for transactions from the mempool in bytes somewhere. If you read the original paper, the miner is supposed to strive for the maximum reward + transaction fees. I guess the code doesn't do that? |
|
|
|
This is not gonna be "the next Bitcoin" unless it's forked to a Myriadcoin type revision. Four algorithms at 8-10 minutes each: Groestl, Cryptonote algo, Sha 256, and then either Skein, Heavycoin algo, or X11.
Right now this is just a botnet coin.
lol +1 |
|
|
|
For sale 20M BCN for 2.5 BTC
It's a pump and dump! Panic sell now! Are you buying? I'll give you a lollipop for free. Sadly not, though I would at that price had I the coin. Isn't there still a 35 BTC order open in the spreadsheet? Why not fill some of that at a higher price? G. Sadly, I think it's a phantom buy order. The buyer supposedly never responds. Is it time for me to fork this "exchange"? |
|
|
|
Is solo still the only way to get this coin - im finding it really hard to find a block even though my hash is around 12.
No pool yet. Just solo and be patient. |
|
|
|
|
Difficulty still skyrocketing. At this rate BMR may pass BCN within the next day or so.
|
|
|
|
Selling 1000 BMR for 0.5 BTC
You want to sell 100 of that to eizh? Sure. Thanks. Please confirm when you guys trade so I can take it off the book. |
|
|
|
Selling 1000 BMR for 0.5 BTC
You want to sell 100 of that to eizh? |
|
|
|
Wow, difficulty is going sky high today
Thanks to your trade yesterday giving it some initial seed value  I wonder if the $2.50 I paid for that 100 BMR is worth more than the electricity it cost to mine that much.  Higher difficulty is great. Fewer coins for us, but widespread distribution is the cornerstone of functioning exchange medium. More auctions coming. I plan to continue running auctions on these coins until there are good exchanges. Doing a BCN auction right now. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577308.msg6328204#newI also have an OTC exchange thread for BMR, but no one has used it yet: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=578192.0 |
|
|
|
|
Wow, difficulty is going sky high today
|
|
|
|
I do sell mining contracts on my end thru ebay ...
Either you are cheating newbies or you are losing money. Why would someone buy your mining contract for more than it will mine? Why would you sell your mining contract for less than it will mine? On ebay it is mostly profiting off newbies. But some people do legitimately buy mining contracts to mine an alt that is more temporarily more profitable. If you don't want to spend your time chasing around the best alt you can do a little better by renting out your rig to someone willing to play that game. Often they are new or obscure alts that aren't on the big switching pools. |
|
|
|
The problem with all these variants is the issue of hijacking and confusion. If you don't own the main names, someone else does, and that's a problem.
I agree it makes no sense to discuss the new name on a public forum, but if there is agreement on moving forward with a new name then it should be discussed in private among those interested in helping to choose one.
Again, using any ICANN sanctioned domain is pointless because the domain can be seized and the coin can be maliciously forked. Do you know any non-ICANN sanctionned domain name that the general public can have access to? The bigger question is, what is the best way to distribute binaries that would safeguard against malicious takeovers? At this point I don't really have an answer that would be scalable. But I do think we need to get out of the habit of hosting binaries on dot org sites, especially when it pertains to privacy focused cryptos. The purpose of a web site at this point is to distribute information, to server as a convenient point of reference for resources such as pools, exchanges, this or another forum, etc. Binaries, who knows. Any method has its issues. Once the coin is more established the web site isn't needed as much, because the various resources will be known directly. |
|
|
|
I think the only reason you believe there is a correlation of BTC & USD is because the propaganda of BTC is anti-Central Banking. If there is no correlation then it is still useful for diversification. Negative correlation would be better, of course, but zero correlation makes his argument valid as well. In order to argue that it isn't useful for diversification you would have to show it has perfect correlation. |
|
|
|
|
A slightly better word than hedge is diversification. Diversification is valuable even if the asset you are diversifying from has higher expected return. In fact that is always the case, otherwise you would allocate 100% to the one asset with the highest expected return.
|
|
|
|
Spondoolies have already secured a great DC deal in WA exactly for people who don't have to worry about power issues in their tiny apartment. I don't get what are you trying to say.
Is there any information available about this deal? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
