If you really need and only want to post images, then Copper Member might be a good alternative. No need to hunt for merits if you just want to post image and do your business (I assume you want to do it).

Why would companies want to buy a 'clone' of a blockchain? They'd rather make their own blockchain from scratch. There are several companies who already run this type of business, as said above, such as Blocko and so on. They make blockchain solution for companies who wanted to do it. Even IBM are playing in this field.

Nice initiative. Btw I think it's more practical for users if you build a Telegram bot instead of Windows app. It will be nice if we can have important announcement bot, so there's no need to check email or website. Because it use Telegram, there's no need to install additional apps too. Just my 2 cents.

No official response about the name?
For me, it looks like a copy of Bitcointalk with no alt and local board. How will you compete with marketplace who has escrow functionality?

How can you be so sure that those VIP guys won't scam people either?

I wonder how many people will fail for this scam. It probably won't cause any pump if there's not so many victims. On top of that, after the hacker got those BTC, it's likely he will sell it on exchanges, so Bitcoin can dump again. It's artificial pump at best.

I'm waiting for the days when government will bail out the universities for their debts. The ad itself is cool though.

This is like what paid bumpers did. If OP were found out doing this kind of thing, red-trust is nearly guaranteed.

I'm extremely surprised to see that Bitfinex are "legit" exchange on the report. How can this shady company who have many issues about transparency is a legit one?

Nevertheless, it's clear that wash trading happens nearly everywhere.

Thanks for posting this theymos, somehow it injects new enthusiasm for me to continue learning about coding. I have always been interested in coding but didn't find enough motivation to continue learning it, taking the wrong course and choice of career in the process. I think of giving up pursuing that, thinking maybe I'm not that good on this field as I keep failing, yet I always imagine myself as a coder, or to be precise, a bitcoin developer.

Knowing that satoshi is not that "brilliant" give me a new motivation. I'd probably not achieve the same thing as he did, but I will follow the same path.

Seems like you're indexing sites about Bitcoin. Are you planning to go free forever or will those listing sites needs payment in the future? A nice idea though, but I doubt you'll get enough exposure here. Might as well post ads on Etherscan or others if you seriously wanted to have a big list.

In some crypto group that I joined, they posted several graphs/articles about Bitcoin and stock/traditional asset price movement, and they claim they're related. I do believe professional traders who use both asset to make profits sometimes enter and exit both market at nearly the same time, but of course not so blindly. Still, graph is just a graph.

So, another charity masternode. What's the differences and your competitive point from other such as Zixx? I don't see any differences in terms of business case.

We can simply start mining again using CPU or other devices. I'd gladly mine bitcoin if everybody doesn't want to. Just on a side note, when max supply is reached, there will be no more additional supply. Miner profits will come from transaction fees. At that point, I believe 1 bitcoin will worth more than $100k/$1 m.

Because we're too late to join the train? I do think those established projects price is way expensive for new users, therefore, they look for an ICO opportunity. But in the end, they also need to compete with people who are richer than they are.

I wonder why people still listen to him, even he was requested to testify on Congress meeting about Bitcoin, right? What he says about Bitcoin is very far from reality, makes me realize even a professor can be wrong sometimes.


For real? He's a very famous FUD-der

One way to mitigate that risk is to quickly exchange crypto to fiat via an exchange API. You need to have an access to exchange with high liquidity though. I do think this solution is easy enough to apply, no need any insurance or something like that. Just simple and effective payment and exchange.

Instead of thinking crypto as a medium of payment only, we can use crypto and their blockchain as some kind of notes on payment transactions. This way, we need crypto to write transaction details between two parties into the blockchain but payment can be made via fiat, etc.

Probably they're talking about something other than monetary value, but I really doubt the project. Just as you said, too many things doesn't make sense. ICO in 2 years, but tokens already released, probably they want to do an IPO? Who knows.

Anyway, token that pay out monthly dividends is essentialy securities.

It's impossible to exactly now the bottom, just see the market regularly and try to make profits from it. Anyway, I wouldn't call both of them worthless bullshit, it's too emotional. If you look from the beginning, we're still on profits (Bitcoin start from $0 and now it's worth $3,000). It's just a matter of perspective. Don't try to catch a falling knife or a train, trade wisely. Easier said than done, but it's the golden rule.

There is no way you can fix your trust rating, as it seems DT members think you're using the same modus operandi by people who scam others. Better leave the forum if you don't agree with the way this forum works, namecalling or arguing won't help. Just continue your life, move on.