The main reason I have yet to participate in the ICO is that, the developers are not retaining any OPAIR. They are keeping 100% btc which makes me wonder where the incentive is for them to make this project a success. Another thing is, the project can be manipulated by having no developments/updates and once the price drops below ICO, dev's will start accumulating OPAIR with the btc that was invested.
Or simply reinvest BTC from the ICO into Opair, balloon the ICO value and pump and dump. "So much room for possibly nefarious activities!" Do either of you - @AltcoinScamfinder and @trademark - have any idea how stupid and brainwashed you sound? Read the FULL proposal they are making and follow the questions asked in this thread and absorb the replies those questions get. After that take a deep breath, relax and maybe take a few math classes and/or ask your economics teacher about the reasonability of this proposal (ICO) - Not sure what you are whining about and why or what you try to achieve but your conspiracy theories don't make any sense no matter how I try to twist and turn it. STFU dude. Do you just throw money into stuff without finding out what you're really investing in. What was stupid about my post? Dev's aren't holding any Opair, so their 700btc will always be 700btc. So what is the incentive of making Opair a success? Simple as that. My post was directed to the dev, not to your stupid ass that probably invested quite a bit and my post was threatening to your investment. My intention is not to FUD, I was just getting answers before I invest or not. BTW, don't worry about my math background, I'm sure it's much higher than yours. They already said that they will buy their stake with ICO money after the ICO ends... Thanks. Can you quote the post that they said that? All I see is the below but no mention of buying Opair. Im just wondering what is actually the minimum number of bitcoin invested on this project to provide you guys with ideal financial to deliver everything that you guys promised on the OP?Obviously the larger the better however there should be atleast an ideal amount for this project somehow
To be honest we do not have a specified amount but we believe that, at least, 700 BTC would need to put together. From then on, all collected serve to optimize, accelerate, hire more people, marketing, legal costs, go to more events and create a division that works as an incubator (as we said in our first post: "When we have enough founds, we would like to use some of them to create a division that will work as an incubator to relevant projects (can be IoT related works, DAO, Dapps, frameworks and so on) in the ecosystem we aim to create in Opair."). We believe it is a realistic goal to achieve and we are optimistic about this.
|
|
|
The main reason I have yet to participate in the ICO is that, the developers are not retaining any OPAIR. They are keeping 100% btc which makes me wonder where the incentive is for them to make this project a success. Another thing is, the project can be manipulated by having no developments/updates and once the price drops below ICO, dev's will start accumulating OPAIR with the btc that was invested.
Or simply reinvest BTC from the ICO into Opair, balloon the ICO value and pump and dump. "So much room for possibly nefarious activities!" Do either of you - @AltcoinScamfinder and @trademark - have any idea how stupid and brainwashed you sound? Read the FULL proposal they are making and follow the questions asked in this thread and absorb the replies those questions get. After that take a deep breath, relax and maybe take a few math classes and/or ask your economics teacher about the reasonability of this proposal (ICO) - Not sure what you are whining about and why or what you try to achieve but your conspiracy theories don't make any sense no matter how I try to twist and turn it. STFU dude. Do you just throw money into stuff without finding out what you're really investing in. What was stupid about my post? Dev's aren't holding any Opair, so their 700btc will always be 700btc. So what is the incentive of making Opair a success? Simple as that. My post was directed to the dev, not to your stupid ass that probably invested quite a bit and my post was threatening to your investment. My intention is not to FUD, I was just getting answers before I invest or not. BTW, don't worry about my math background, I'm sure it's much higher than yours.
|
|
|
The main reason I have yet to participate in the ICO is that, the developers are not retaining any OPAIR. They are keeping 100% btc which makes me wonder where the incentive is for them to make this project a success. Another thing is, the project can be manipulated by having no developments/updates and once the price drops below ICO, dev's will start accumulating OPAIR with the btc that was invested.
|
|
|
Those stats from the last 2 days are crazy! 561 BTC rushed in 48 hrs. I also noticed the Stratis tokens available from TVE have dropped significantly since their value has gone up. The TVE platform seems to have worked well for the Bounty distribution and to minimize people trying to exploit the bounties.
I hope more people will rush to buy when we hit on exchanges, maybe polo, maybe bittrex! Just panic pump and panic buy Looks like someone missed out on the ICO or decided they want more Stratis. Stratis is looking great. Marketcap is under 700k, much room for growth. WTB all Statris @ 1.2k Satoshi max 10BTC
|
|
|
Those stats from the last 2 days are crazy! 561 BTC rushed in 48 hrs. I also noticed the Stratis tokens available from TVE have dropped significantly since their value has gone up. The TVE platform seems to have worked well for the Bounty distribution and to minimize people trying to exploit the bounties.
Yeah TVE is flawless. It is a unique bounty distribution website. Chris owns a very valuable website. In the future, he should consider making it a Stratis based site which people can only use it by buying Stratis tokens for credits. This would be huge for Stratis.
|
|
|
Not a good suggestion. Let the Stratis devs concentrate on Stratis. There is no benefit in this. If Opair ends up being a scam, it would have a negative impact on the Stratis project.
|
|
|
It looks like The Viral Exchange is now only giving out 1 Stratis per Twitter retweet, is that a mistake?
|
|
|
Hey, The signature spreadsheet will be updated tonight. Regards Krushang. Sounds good. Thanks for the update.
|
|
|
Cryptocurrency is full of babies and whiners. Maybe it should be pronounced CRY-to-currency. Even if Waves were on Polo and the price somehow is below ICO. People would still come up with other reasons to cry. Grow some balls and man up.
All who cry are little kids who wants to get an instant x2 money from their "investments". When it comes to wait for development, they start to cry on forums like little babies. This is crypto nowadays. They should just stick to video games. Go run around town playing Pokemon Go. Leave crypto to the men/women.
|
|
|
Cryptocurrency is full of babies and whiners. Maybe it should be pronounced CRY-to-currency. Even if Waves were on Polo and the price somehow is below ICO. People would still come up with other reasons to cry. Grow some balls and man up.
|
|
|
Back over 30k. Seems quiet all of a sudden now. lol
|
|
|
I will be providing a update to date later today on the ICO. Breakdown of bonuses and cost per Stratis token.
is there any chance to open another ico or it will ready right away to the market after you segregated those ico investors coin? The ICO is over. We plan to have Stratis added to an exchange within 2 weeks from today. Maybe we could do a second round of ICO with fixed price per token? say 50K-100K satoshi per token? LOL No one will buy unless we hit on exchanges until some projects have been done. Look at IOTA, their market cap is 25000 btc, but only 1300 btc funded, it is 20X already. I was joking before. But seriously now, we can do 2nd round of ICO for 1 week for fix price and fix number of tokens to raise that last 100 BTC example, 2 million Tokens for 100 BTC. Which would be 5000 Satoshi per token. I think we might get some buyers with that. Maybe this will result in immediate dump by early buyers, maybe not.. we can adjust the numbers to make it ideal any thoughts? There will not be another round of funding. 915 BTC is the total. I have worked out the price of each Stratis token is 1128 satoshi (0.00001128). A more detailed update on the ICO period will be later tonight. Please we need big exchanges for this project where it can get the needed exposure and volume, there is no need to rush to list on any exchange with low volume which will crash the price, since the developers have money to achieve most of the plan so there is no need to rush to sell there own tokens. I don't want to name any exchange but we know some of these exchanges are just for pump and dump purpose. Being listed or not listed on an exchange is solely on the exchanges decision. Devs have no control over it, except for maybe being listed on certain exchanges that requires a fee. I'm pretty sure some small exchanges will hop on Stratis first. Maybe even an IOU considering how much attention Stratis has gotten lately. It is what it is.
|
|
|
Are we still able to earn Stratis on TVE or has that ended also?
|
|
|
Your master sash sash has a serious attitude problem thinking he is the man with other people's BTC. my coin dumped from this shit show, yeh yeh all 1000 of them.
You dumping 1000 Waves made such an impact to the wall.
|
|
|
. Didn't Steem hit like $3-4 while on Bittrex alone? I thought 80% of steem was owned by owners so they easily manipulated the bittrex price. Not sure about that though. Was your only reason for investing in Waves was because you thought it would be listed on Polo? no, but if no full nodes is not the reason it is not yet listed on polo then what is the real reason? It's not that waves is not on polo is main concern, concern is why then? Then it's on Polo. Nothing Sasha or Waves can do about it. It's like when you hate someone, nothing they can do will make you like them. why would they hate sasha and waves, that is the question. Dude, that was just an analogy. I don't know if they hate Sasha or not. Maybe you can ask this person.
|
|
|
. Didn't Steem hit like $3-4 while on Bittrex alone? I thought 80% of steem was owned by owners so they easily manipulated the bittrex price. Not sure about that though. Was your only reason for investing in Waves was because you thought it would be listed on Polo? no, but if no full nodes is not the reason it is not yet listed on polo then what is the real reason? It's not that waves is not on polo is main concern, concern is why then? Then it's on Polo. Nothing Sasha or Waves can do about it. It's like when you hate someone, nothing they can do will make you like them.
|
|
|
GUYS I AM DISAPPOINTED, LET'S GET BACK TO THE LAMBO TALK WE USED TO SEE HERE ALL THE TIME, JUST LIKE LISK CUCKS!!!! DO NOT FORGET ALL!!!! For a Lambo, I prefer one of the colors of Skittles candy.
|
|
|
Wow 709 BTC invested so far! Hope it doesn't go way over 1k. Please don't be overbought. +1, it is fucking crazy and insane, ico flippers came again, i still decide to invest or not in a few hours. I prefer trading 2 weeks but if this coin launched on polo, i would regret that i didn't invest. What? You've been posting in here for weeks and haven't invested yet? That's like going to a buffet and not eat.
|
|
|
It's Waves buying time. There's no point in kissing Polo's ass just to try to get listed on there. Sasha spoke his mind and I give him props for it. Whoever is selling in fear of not being listed on Polo will regret it sooner or later. Didn't Steem hit like $3-4 while on Bittrex alone? Polo is about money and once Waves full node is released and they notice the volume, it'll be added. Money talks! Even if it doesn't, who really cares. Was your only reason for investing in Waves was because you thought it would be listed on Polo? That's just as bad as someone I saw posted "I just invested in your ICO, I don't have time to read through the thread, what is your coin about?" lol
|
|
|
|