... the interesting part of the trustee GOXing was it took so few coins to accomplish a ~14k drop in price, i.e. 36,000 btc or ~$380 million spread over ~50 days.
The flip side to that being how high/fast BTC price can appreciate when similar sized inflows are experienced.
Yes, let's ignore the usual trading games and consider supply and demand. I guess it was a big chunk for the ecosystem. The 'natural' amount added by mining during 50 days is 50 * 24 * 6 * 12.5 = 90k BTC at the moment. He added 36k or 40%. Let's say miners will sell just half of their mined BTC to cover running costs. Then Mr. Kobayashi added 80% to the natural supply... If he really dumped this amount on exchanges not using OTC trades I would say it was at least good fuel for the FUD campaigns we've seen so far in Q1 and the price keeps up very well.  |
|
|
|
Na toll, dann braucht es ja keine CR mehr, wenn der Insolvenzverwalter jetzt vollendete Tatsachen schafft.  Vollendete Tatsachen bringt es auf den Punkt. Das ist an Schwachsinnigkeit nicht zu überbieten: I made efforts to sell BTC and BCC at as high a price as possible in light of the market price of BTC and BCC at the timing of sale.
I plan to consult with the court and determine further sale of BTC and BCC. Wenn sich Herr Kobayashi irgendwelches Fiat "sichern" will, soll er meinetwegen die BeeCash und alle späteren ForkCoins verhökern, aber unsere BTC in einer Panikattacke dumpen? Hat ihm jemand in den Sake gespuckt? WTF? |
|
|
|
In this reality these things just don't have the needed mechanics for the job..
Don't take me as a pessimist by this. I think that in the future we will have an cryptoasset that is able to break this currency boundary and will be able to actually offer an predictable value without the need for the support of fiat value.
And this so called future cryptoasset would look like what exactly, Mr. Genius? Put up or shut up. Criticize or create. All you fkn idiot trolls are the same. You come with heaps of smarmy handwaving and criticism, but offer zero solutions. It would look like a crypto asset with a value stabilization mechanism?  Not sure if you checked the fundamentals? https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Controlled_supplyOne BTC remains one BTC. A scheduled (!) halving/inflation. Stable enough for me. |
|
|
|
Not sure what "we can provide our customers with bitcoin withdrawal fees that are up to 20 percent lower" means. As far as I can remember they paid transaction fees during the whole BeeCash spam attack, I've never paid any transaction fees for a withdrawal, which is nice.
Maybe you just didn't notice them. On the withdrawal page it currently shows a fee of 0.0006 BTC. If you click the help link next to it you see this: Notice
There is a small network fee for sending a BTC transaction.
The transaction fee is updated periodically based on BTC network activity in order to achieve reasonable transaction confirmation times.
There's been a fee as long as I can remember but it has always been lower than most exchanges. I'd guess that announcement means they've adjusted their formula lower by 20%. I can also confirm on the deposit page if you request a new address it gives a Segwit one. I agree it's odd they didn't announce the change on the site itself. You're right, when I try to withdraw BTC there is (now) a fee displayed. I would have sworn it was not there before, at least during the period with high transaction fees/the mempool spam attack and wondered why... But well, my memory could be wrong. As they charge (now) fees, the statement makes more sense. In general a SegWit transaction will use less block space and fees are calculated per byte. It might be they estimate their fee based on the actual transaction/mempool size and pending transaction fees. This should charge the customer a realistic fee, which is good (compared to other exchanges with fixed fees). Well then, let's generate and use our new shiny SegWit addresses. |
|
|
|
Who could explain the announcement regarding SegWit support because since there was no difference between a '3' SegWit address and a Multi sig address, both withdrawals and deposits should've worked before or does it mean they will process all withdrawal using SW?
Wow, hard to find this 'announcement'. Nothing to see on https://www.bitfinex.com/posts. Their Twitter account points to https://medium.com/bitfinex/bitfinex-adopts-segwit-8e6c5d72fcf9, the information provided does not make much sense. In the past they used P2SH (3) addresses for deposits and switched to P2PKH (1), guess after the hack 2016? And have now implemented SegWit addresses (P2SH-P2WPKH? starting with 3 again), which is great. Not sure what "we can provide our customers with bitcoin withdrawal fees that are up to 20 percent lower" means. As far as I can remember they paid transaction fees during the whole BeeCash spam attack, I've never paid any transaction fees for a withdrawal, which is nice. Using your (new) SegWit address will enable them to save transaction fees/size, which is good. However, they already used batch transactions since... a very long time. So yes, it looks like they want to use SegWit for batch processing withdrawals and therefore ask us kindly to use a new SegWit address for our deposits (not sure, but as far as I know you need SegWit address inputs for a SewgWit transaction). But this is just my guess, the marketing story does not make much sense.  |
|
|
|
Racist is a meaningless buzzword, stating facts is now racist, yes jews control the media, and the banks, that's a fact, get over it.
yes blacks on average score much lower on IQ tests and commit a disproportionately high amount violent crimes? is that ''racist''? don't know, don't care, but it happens to be true.
OMG People of color score lower on Ethnocentric tests. I'm not even going to dignify the rest of your crap. Get a grip, you're a racist. P.S. This thread is about BTC. *sigh* no. IQ tests are simply pattern recognition. There is nothing cultural about it. That tired old excuse is... tiresome. And they do commit more crime. About four or five times as much per capita. Again, easy enough to look up for anyone who actually cares. Socio-economic status is a far more reliable predictor of IQ test performance. Low SES children consistently underperform interesting read. https://pumpkinperson.com/2016/02/11/the-incredible-correlation-between-iq-income/Yes, interesting read. On the other hand... When I triple my slave time per day, I could triple my income. When I triple my slave time per day and move to another part of my country, I could increase my income sixfold. When I triple my slave time per day and move to a country next to mine, I could increase my income tenfold. Choosing one of these options will increase my IQ? I would not deny some sort of correlation between intelligence and income but argue location, EQ, blind ambition and pure chance are more important. The most intelligent individuals surrounding me have an average income (for my area). All high income folks I know seem to have an average intelligence. For sure it will be hard to harvest a high income for people with lower IQ. With other words, a higher IQ will increase your chance to have a higher income, not more or less. |
|
|
|
I will try to mine it this soon, Maybe i can get some coins!
You will. I have my tiny miner with ~ 400 khash/s pointed to a pool and get ~ 0.01 to 0.08 SCIFI per block at the moment. It should not take long and you'll have your first SCIFI. Welcome to the SCIFI family. |
|
|
|
Ich habe mich mal hingesetzt und die neuen Adressen aufgenommen. Da ich auf eine Segwit-Wallet umgestiegen bin und keinen Zugriff mehr auf die alte Adresse habe, habe ich neu und in Batches signiert. Die neue Adresse ist: Nachricht: Die Adresse 3PYdk7csc5KgBtXa99mwpiZYNTG2s9D4iP wird von phantastisch (bitcointalk.org) kontrolliert. 04.02.2018 Signatur: I1RPsXkvUtRznPKjse4i1YUOvGVv+ITWxTPUMDpoPXx9RW6TxL+PR99NqiOczwohPwZtKHgR2kbzE9IChNvaK1w=
Ahoi, kannst Du bei Gelegenheit meine Adresse bitte auch noch einpflegen? Vielen Dank! Nachricht: Die Adresse 163KXihj65n6HBwGj6HPsCNYsXqtFvB3cz wird von Dunkelheit667 (bitcointalk.org) kontrolliert. 17.08.2015 Signatur: IEjN+Qwl5MH8A2cAEpsAVJvgzYarbbmP3RCGaxBzLnEMHc1kcxvk3YomQlViYM82bLBmVUc6R9mgu509hnyYQw0= Danke.
@Koal-84 jFYI, mit dieser Version funktioniert das verifizieren von Segwit-Adressen. |
|
|
|
VIELEN DANK! Leider habe ich nicht mehr vergebbare sMerits auf Lager gehabt... danke danke danke Auf das wäre ich nie gekommen... bei ""Import Bitcoin addresses or private keys" hatte ich immer nur die Adresse und nie den Key versucht da lt. Beschreibung beides funktionieren sollte  Gern geschehen und vielen Dank! Ja, man kann beides importieren. Wird die öffentliche Adresse importiert, arbeitet Electrum im "watch-only" Modus. Du siehst dann also alle Transaktionen, an der diese Adresse beteiligt war. Zum Signieren von Transaktionen oder Nachrichten wird dann allerdings eine zweite Wallet benötigt, welche den Private Key enthält. Zur Erklärung, warum es die Möglichkeit gibt, sowohl eine öffentliche Adresse als auch den private Key zu importieren: http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/coldstorage.html Habe wieder mehr Zeit und werde das Adressverzeichnis bald wieder aktiv pflegen.
Auch von meiner Wenigkeit ein Dankeschön, wir freuen uns schon. |
|
|
|
Hmm, ich hab's kurz durchgespielt, funktioniert hier soweit. 1) Auf bitaddress.org eine öffentliche Adresse (Public Key) mit dazugehörigem Private Key erzeugt. 2) Electrum 3.0.5 als portable Version von electrum.org heruntergeladen und gestartet. 3) Durchgeklickt -> "Auto connect" -> "default_wallet" -> "Import Bitcoin addresses or private keys" -> nun den Private Key eingeben (gibt man die öffentliche Adresse ein, kann weder eine Transaktion, noch eine Nachricht signiert werden) -> "Next" 4) "Tools" -> "Sign/verify Message". Unter "Message" eine Nachricht eingeben, bei "Address" die öffentliche Adresse einfügen. -> "Sign" Die Signatur wurde erzeugt, es gab keine Fehlermeldung. Hier der Output: |
|
|
|
Hallo, wäre es bitte möglich meine BTC Adresse wie in Punkt 2 erwähnt hier aufzunehmen? 1ABA9YtvBiugQ4F7Va31vCvzqe6q4HQJGN Die Wartezeit von einer Woche wäre in Ordnung. Ich habe leider keine Möglichkeit für die Signierung ohne Installation div. Tools gefunden  Die Adresse (Paper Wallet) habe ich heute erstellt um hier auf der sicheren Seite zu sein... habe Angst um meinen Account  Gruß und danke, Mole phantastisch scheint den Thread nicht mehr zu pflegen, hiermit ist Deine Adresse aber gequotet, das sollte im Zweifelsfall genügen. Tipp: Um später im Fall der Fälle eine Nachricht zu signieren, kannst Du dann z.B. Electrum verwenden. Die portable Version muss nicht installiert werden, der (idealerweise offline) PC auf dem es verwendet wird sollte natürlich hinreichend "sicher" sein. Den Private Key Deiner Paper Wallet kannst Du dort ggf. recht einfach importieren. |
|
|
|
couple things, one, we are still trying to contact the Grans Negus for an interview, as well as other sci fi coin developers, plz contact us at will@calltofreedomlive.comIt's refreshing to see some interest outside our little "community" for sci-fi themed coins. The original developer of GPL/KED/UFC diappeared years ago. The original developer of QBT (Cubits) was paid for his job and is not longer involved. Grand Nagus continued the development for GPL/KED/UFC/QBT and started his own project (SCIFI), he kept the projects alive. You can contact him on this forum, his username is vampirus over here. His profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=387880Send a PM: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=pm;sa=send;u=387880The Cubits project was started by cassieheart. She is still around, you might contact her as well: Her profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=135788Send a PM: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=pm;sa=send;u=135788Hope this helps and all the best for your show! also, can not seem to sync my newly installed GPL wallet
Try to add the following nodes to your GoldPressedLatinum.conf: addnode=64.71.72.56:23635
addnode=109.254.30.43:23635
addnode=47.20.253.239:23635
addnode=176.24.251.14:23635
addnode=81.182.216.77:23635
addnode=78.66.36.36:23635
addnode=73.203.94.6:23635
addnode=24.196.133.201:23635
addnode=46.208.83.224:23635
addnode=151.249.96.73:23635 |
|
|
|
Damn really? I just bought into GPL last week. Is there a reason why the hardfork is this way?? The 'swap' is/was not a hardfork. If you had GPL on October 5th you got SCIFI for free and kept your GPL. You can read here why it's done this way (basically to focus the development on one coin). If you still want free SCIFI, there is one last chance. If you hold QBT on January 31st (February 1st) and got your QBT-address verified by vampirus, you can participate in the last SCIFI swap. This is not an advice to buy QBT, just a hint. |
|
|
|
Thank you vampirus! Maybe some coordinated efforts will bring the magic number up? I've sent a request in addition to yours. Let's see what happens. |
|
|
|
"Circulating Supply" added to Coinmarketcap. Need some time for update.
We are almost there. If I'm not wrong, "Total Supply" and "Max Supply" were added but not "Circulating Supply". |
|
|
|
I'll try the homespun solution, install docker and all. I'd be interested in your Internet bandwidth consumption, should you be wiling to share.
I will post some data, but don't hold your breath. I'll need some free time to install the thing - starting with Docker - and some more to figure out how to measure LN's bandwitdh tax unbundled from bitcoind's base requirements. Got any suggestions? I dunno.... filter a wireshark dump of all port 8333 traffic? Wild speculation. I don't know how LN comms are routed within the host networking layer. I was hoping not to have to install special instrumentation like wireshark. Well, when I get to that I'll do what I have to. BTW, 8333 is for bitcoind. LN uses a different port (can't recall right now). No need to install any additional package. You can utilize iptables as shown there: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/398176 |
|
|
|
Thanks updated my .conf file.
still stuck on block 314336. hope to get upto date I do solo mining on GPU along with BlakeCoin. Blake is algo not Bake's 7 sci FI
Just started the Windows machine (with 2.5.5) over here, got the same connections you've posted and my wallet synced fine upto 314351. Will try to start my miner tomorrow, connect it to the Windows client and let you know if this worked as well. Cheers! Edit: Can confirm mining against 2.5.5 is working fine over here, just got three blocks. New block count: 314355. Cheers! |
|
|
|
I only have 2 peers but both are 2.5.6
The second one is mine (a linux machine), compiled 2.5.6 from source: git clone https://github.com/scificrypto/Federation-Credits.git
cd Federation-Credits
git checkout master
So 2.5.6 is the latest version, yes. Again, as far as I remember, this was just an UI color/theme change. The latest compiled Windows version I can find is 2.5.5 from the google drive link above, have it running on a Windows machine. Both working fine together since... forever. There was a compiled 2.5.6 version for Windows available on the scificointalk-forum, but can't find any reference to this one anymore, sorry. Just checked the node and have at the moment three 2.5.6 and three 2.5.5 peers. Here you have their IPs, but guess some of them will not allow inbound connections: addnode=99.192.82.190
addnode=64.71.72.56
addnode=142.68.146.143
addnode=2.94.237.180
addnode=45.50.28.121
addnode=119.123.48.54 Last block is 314351, created on Thursday, 18. January 2018 22:11:50 GMT. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
