yes, i'm currently doing some more monit rules to alert me asap. This case never happened
so, i reduced the decred pool fees...
All good here, I see the pool is back in shape and we found plenty of blocks over the past 24h! Seeing as some miners dropped off, it's nice to see a larger chunk per block coming my way (though it works out to be exactly the same at the end of the day)  |
|
|
|
|
The YIIMP Decred daemon currently has 0 connections as you can see from the explorers page.
I'm sure that Epsylon3 will quickly fix it as soon as he's around.
|
|
|
|
|
@skunk:
I had some error while trying to get tickets just now as well. Others had reported similar issues in the Decred forum, and I just followed the sequence that seems to have fixed it for everyone else:
- upgrade to 0.0.10
- recreate wallet from seed
- consolidate balance
This worked for me. Should you have any trouble with these steps, you'll probably find better/expanded instructions in the Decred forum.
Good luck!
|
|
|
|
I talked about this at length, many moons ago on that once popular cuda mining application thread. Looks like no1 from our camp decided to pick it up, but there was always some sense in combining a memory-hard algo, with a compute-hard algo, for optimal GPU usage. Great news for the AMD miners if that works out, not-so-great for us here with nvidia  |
|
|
|
@sp_ Open sourcing something that you sold as private to other folks does not seem like a fair deal, just my 2 cents. Claiming performance boosts on account of a default intensity bump is pretty f#$k'ed up, again just my 2 cents. (That's 4 cents I've donated already, you're welcome! ) |
|
|
|
is it just me, or are the pool earnings somewhat off.... 7ghs should roughly average between 6.2-8.47 DCR a day, with difficulty counted for as well. but i am lucky to see 6 dcr on a good day and as low as 4.6 on a normal day......
It's all right. difficuly is encreasing. Better to buy instead of mining at current price. Variance? Affects big as well as little pools (though more severe for the latter ofc). Not all pools are born equal though... I think that some perform consistently better than others. If you think that payouts are systematically off, maybe try switching to another pool? |
|
|
|
Normally the difficulty will drop when the coin is tanking, as people are moving over to other coins.
Yes true.  When do I get legendary? How many more posts.  Legendary:
Activity: the Legendary membergroup has no universal activity requirement.
You are guaranteed to become Legendary somewhere between 775 and 1030 activity,
but the exact point in this range at which you become Legendary is random per user.
Anytime now |
|
|
|
No consumer models announced yet  And so the wait continues |
|
|
|
40k.  A little disappointed. If we go down to 30k is over. Investors will move to more stable price coins. PS: Airdroppers are NOT selling anymore, so please, don't tell the same bullshit "it's cause of airdroppers" you mean 400k, 0.004 is not 40k satoshi, still in the range that like to be played by bots, i would not woryy about, the market is once again diluited because there are coins that look interesting for big investors, like lisk I'm pretty sure that all "investors" really want is high prices and low volatility... |
|
|
|
That's 20 btc trade volume vs 10000 btc trade volume and you guys think the exchange rate has anything to do with mining? |
|
|
|
|
Someone just bought a few vote tickets with a fee of 15 DCR, likely someone doing manual transactions.
If the person keeps it up, will end up with very little coins, very quick...
|
|
|
|
|
A PoS hybrid to add security (so that not only PoW is moving the network along) would make sense, assuming a relatively low interest rate. I've got no particular preference myself, though I imagine that I'd benefit from PoS as I hold a few ZRCs.
More importantly, would be great to start seeing some details soon on how the transition will happen from Ziftrcoins to GoCoins. If any of the technical parameters will change (such as emission rate for example), an early announcement would be ideal...
|
|
|
|
Finally some update! Welcome aboard Jon, best of luck in tackling the challenges ahead.  |
|
|
|
Selling 11-21% boosted ccminer for decred
Runs on CUDA6.5 Compute Capability3.5
Single GTX750ti ->
Single GTX970 ->
0.1BTC each copy pm me
I can confirm that this works as advertised. I second the performance confirmation, here's a couple of before and after pics. This is a Windows 10 box, so presumably, just about the worst reference, as any other OS would perform better! The 750TI is at about 1320 clocks, while the 980 is at 1410. Before:  After:  Cheers! |
|
|
|
|
^ Also not all shares are created equal. A slower miner might be sending a bunch of low-diff shares, while a faster miner might be sending just a few high-diff shares. Shares per second are a useless metric, unless share difficulty is also taken into account.
|
|
|
|
[...] btw - how did you rotate the pools on ccminer? ...
#crysx
On that config sample, the miner would start off with a default to run on the 1st pool. If the 1st pool was down for the time set in timeout, the miner would switch to solo. In the solo config, you'll see I had a time-limit. This was to get the miner to periodically stop and retry the 1st pool again. Worked out pretty well while I used it. I alternated between pool and solo, but certainly the same config would work nicely for a primary/backup pool configuration. |
|
|
|
@crysx: Here's a sample config file doing pool rotation that I used when I was mining ZRC some while back, this should be fairly simple to get you started customizing: {
"_note": "Sample rotation of 2 pools",
"pools":[{
"name": "ZRC Pool",
"url": "stratum+tcp://yiimp.ccminer.org:5533",
"user": "somezrcaddy",
"pass": "x"
},
{
"name": "ZRC Solo",
"url": "127.0.0.1:14486",
"user": "someexclusiveusername",
"pass": "someuniquecomplexpass",
"time-limit": "1800"
}],
"algo" : "zr5",
"api-bind" : "0",
"api-remote" : false,
"quiet" : true,
"timeout" : "120",
"intensity" : "20"
}I think some releases had sample config files on them, not sure if that's always been so. Cheers! |
|
|
|
@joblo, Cryptonight on CPU is a particular case. There's a 2MB scratchpad per thread (or something else which proper name I don't recall). For whatever CPU you have, the ideal number of threads will always be cache-size/2. Most i7's have 8MB cache, so optimal threads = 4. As far as the rest of the details that you posted, way over my head. /searching <nearest exit> |
|
|
|
|
^ Also maybe worthwhile checking if multiple ccminer instances will help.
So you could launch instance 1 with -d 0,1,2, and instance 2 with -d 3,4,5.
In addition, ensure that cpu affinity is reserving specific cpu cores for instance one, and other cpu cores for instance 2.
|
|
|
|
^ Please move that discussion to the appropriate thread? It's bad enough to get the advertisements leaking over to this end  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
