|
Is it allowed to any voting system?
|
|
|
|
Shared 30 more merits. Another 4 here. |
|
|
|
If someone steals your bank account information or credit card you can actually retrieve your money back!!! crypto is complete shit."
Give Bangladesh $81 million back which has been stolen from Federal Reserve Bank of New York, I with a lot of people will give up giving a shit to crypto. By the way, why you are here then? And, your post doesn't suit to be here. |
|
|
|
OP, are you still playing innocent even after all the evidence presented above?
As long as you are here, no plagiarist banned account can play innocent. |
|
|
|
S_The rapist
Liked the space  |
|
|
|
Hello, thanks for your explanation, but I still didn't get it. Coinlocket has no trusted feedback. How did qwt added him? I thought a user needed a positive feedback to be added to DT For being a DT member, you don't need to have a trusted feedback. Feedback and DT are two speperate things. This may help you better understand the process- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095944.msg49176783#msg49176783 |
|
|
|
Hello people, I have a question about trust. It's a bit off topic, but is related to the case.
When I see Jeremy profile I can see coinlocket$ feedback in my trusted network. However he doesn't have any feedback from dt. Is it because he has more than 100 earned merit?
Does this mean that anyone with 100+ merit can now tag people?I mean, in the default trust network.
Coinlocket$ is now in DT2 added by DT1 member qwk. Also you have misunderstood the trust system. check this one- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5072734.msg48081277#msg48081277 |
|
|
|
they replied to you
you are happy, me they not replied
You should have quoted it. People will miss it because it's deleted. |
|
|
|
|
I think Lauda got OP wrong. OP tried to say everyone who tries to diddle the rules/system, will be penalized.
Anyway, I think there is no meaning of creating such thread.
Now I realized why OgNasty told me "No sense rubbing salt in the wound." when I created 2 threads about Lauda DT- off.
|
|
|
|
Here's how the voting would work if it were performed right now. The first one comes after all of the other criteria, and is then fed into the second.
-snip-
Nice work, although I believe that the number of people that will understand the process will drop by over 90%. There will be someone who will make it easy and force people to get it within minutes |
|
|
|
|
@ Heisenberg_Hunter
utlptc is my first account which has been created for participating DeepOnion signature. And later I attempted to buy an account, and the result is pkmoney. I was noob back in the days. You can check I have tried to hunt merit from that account by creating thread- List of shitposters. Anyway, I lost the access of that account later.
And came up with S_Therapist.
Your accusation-
I'm not pkmoney or utlptc.
Well, in that case, if someone asks me to sign a message from the Privcy address of pkmoney, I can.
if somewhere in utlptc account, I left DeepOnion address still I can sign message, IIRC, I do have all the private keys of those addresses.
And about the forum concerning issue which make you guys thought like I am someone extremly experienced,
- I can't remember I have done something special other than writing a few Explained article which can be done by a member who spend couple of days with an intention to learn those. It's easy, everything was explained in a little complicated way, I just had made easy to understand. That's it. It doesn't require extraordinary knowledge or spent couple of month/year.
|
|
|
|
If he add more then 10 person then admin/sript will choose the candidate randomly. Seems theymos had edited OP with new updates.
It's not random, imo. If it was random, theymos would not say "whom your vote will be most useful." Each user's number of "votes" in the last two criteria will be limited to floor(earned_merit / (10 or 250, depending on the criteria)). If you trust more people than your limit, then you will vote for the people to whom your vote will be the most useful, more-or-less.
I think it will be choosen by either the members trust score or whom most of the people have included. For example, if someone has 20 earned merits and includes 3 member in trust list, system will check among those 3 member who has been included by most others person. Assume, I have 20 earned merit and included A, B, C in my trust list. Anyone from this 3 will be excluded by- Assume- A- trusted by 20 members B- trusted by 11 members C- trusted by 15 members. Then my vote will go for A and C, B will be excluded. Is that correct, can someone confirm? |
|
|
|
Whoever needs your vote the most gets it. It depends on who is on your list, not the order of their placements.
I.e. I can't determine who needs my 2 votes? And also I don't know who got my 2 votes in the end? Correct. The idea is that you shouldn't be worrying about that. Include people whose judgement you trust. The vote should reflect trust relationships and not be manipulated directly. I kinda wanted the same thing (fine-grained control of voting) earlier in the thread but now I'm thinking that's not that important. We'll see how it works in the next round. I have 214 earned merits. Let's assume I have included 30 persons in my trust list. How will system choose my vote, I mean by which criteria, since I have capability of voting for 21 member. How someone from my 30 members will be excluded/included? |
|
|
|
The list of DT1 members | User name | Current rank [1] | Trust from DT1 members | Trust from DT2 members | | 1) | theymos | Legendary | 6 scores | 28 scores | | 2) | dooglus | Legendary | 5 scores | 14 scores | | 3) | Tomatocage | Legendary | 3 scores | 11 (+12 / -1) scores | | 4) | Maged | Legendary | 3 scores | 9 scores | | 5) | OgNasty | Legendary | 3 scores | 7 (+12 / -5) scores | | 6) | Cyrus | Legendary | 3 scores | 6 scores | | 7) | Blazed | Legendary | 2 scores | 14 (+15 / -1) scores |  | SaltySpitoon | Legendary | 2 scores | 11 scores | | 9) | philipma1957 | Legendary | 2 scores | 5 (+6 / -1) scores | | 10) | HostFat | Legendary | 2 scores | 4 (+7 / -3) scores | | 11) | hilariousandco | Legendary | 1 score | 5 (+6 / -1) scores | | 12) | dserrano5 | Legendary | 1 score | -1 score | | 13) | OldScammerTag | Newbie | No score | No score |
[1] - the rank that is based on the amount of merits regardless of the current activityLook at my next post below. Where have you gotten the info? OgNasty is not in DT1 and Lauda is. Or am I missing something here? Edit- got it. These three posts were relevant for January 4, 2019. |
|
|
|
I am from one of those countries you are talking about.
In fact, there are strict rules against plagiarism, but people don't care especially when there is no financial profit from stealing someone else's work.
If a user is smart enough to find a high quality topic off-site that should be discussed here, he should be also smart enough to read forum rules.
There should be a kind of tolerence when a member with good reputation forget to tell from where he copied his post (scarce cases).
But I can't think of any excuse for those who copy paste a previous post. Such behavior isn't related to the culture where the member come from.
Those kind of users barely copy/paste, at least here in bitcointalk. I have seen only one case here. Possibly he was a Legendary member and participating in sig campaign. He said he did not have enough time to post since his mother was in hospital or something like that. Other than this, everyone who complain "I am banned, why" come up with a bad English. Anyway, this is not something which people have to learn from culture. It's all about self awareness. Using other people's resource without credit or permission isn't allowed in any culture and shouldn't be either. |
|
|
|
If at least one of you can sign a message with the sending or the receiving address I'll revise my feedback to neutral. Thanks for turning it to neutral. Now I will try to break down the every evidence hilari has posted. If someone asks about the same writing style- Here in our country, English isn't used decently. I met mday and find him as a good poster in the forum. mday has spent some years outside Bangladesh and that's why his posting style is quite different from Bangladeshi people. I just started to follow him just to increase my english proficiency. Calling hilari- just a coincidence. Using ~snip~ IIRC, I asked him somewhere or over phone what the fuck ~snip~ means? Pointing out with red arrow- It's easier to use this tool in windows. And someone mentioned somewhere here in this forum that people always use red color when they want to get attention, lol. @coolcryptovator I learned sup sub from emoneyspace which is also using SMF, afaik. @marlboroza I said I have followed mday and most of the time, I try to recall whether I have seen such posts or not. I remembered that one because I engaged in that thread by pkmoney And yes I am a fan of him. I know him personally, like as he said, I trust him, respect him. Thank you everyone. |
|
|
|
If at least one of you can sign a message with the sending or the receiving address I'll revise my feedback to neutral. I think mday can. Since I had used exchange for sending this, I can't. |
|
|
|
Sorry, I missed that. @S_Therapist can you prove this is your alt account? pkmoney or utlptc? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
