Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 08:31:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 67 »
141  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: 1155GH(+OverClock Potential), In Stock $0.319/GH & 0.51W/GH on: August 07, 2015, 09:32:55 AM
Agree, getting a PSU for that is going to be tricky (and I would not want to rely on bitmain made PSU's ...). And the fans look less than the "standard" 38mm's ... so maybe being targeted at hobby miners ... but then any peace and quiet will certainly be shattered by the PSU fans ... Oh well.
142  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: CloudThink.IO NEW 8TH/s Imperator Bitcoin Miner - Apply for a FREE test unit on: August 04, 2015, 09:42:18 PM
The only way this rig can exist (and be viable) is if cloudthink bought the entire last production round of the BM1384 from bitmain (even the IP to the BM1384) on the condition that bitmain do not, in the immediate future, release any new rig containing their next-gen chip.

In my book, that'd take a tad over a million US$ or multiples thereof, ... but lay out that much and you'd expect the investor to have a few quid for an office, not a serviced one in the dingy back streets of Manchester whose occupancy is 95% comprised of liquidated companies (in good company may I add, pun intended).

BM1384 couldn't get 400GH a chip.

You are such an idiot, you really can't see beyond disagreeing with whatever I post? Whatever the chip, hashfas, bm1380 bm1389 et al, like you, this is a pie in the sky .... a waste of space!

Come on Pek, you know you were completely wrong on the BM1384 comment as it's physically impossible given their claimed "specs".  As someone mentioned to me, they are claiming to be using HashFast chips which do in fact match the stated performance. However, as you, Dogie, and everyone with a 3 digit IQ (and apparently some without...) know, this is vaporware and will never mine for anything but suckers.

Don't get too familiar .... just like your idiot alt dogie the fraudster.

If the BM1384 is impossible, would it then be that they've actually bought hashfast chips as you suggest? Or that they are well financed to the tune of not being able to afford an office yet they are inviting people to sign up for their give away worth over 60,000  US$ worth of gear?

But you miss the point, what difference (even value) does the fraudster's comment add to clarifying the imperator issue? None whatsoever!
143  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: August 04, 2015, 11:56:57 AM
No it isn't.
His fee is higher and his long term luck is lower ...........
You really have to keep up if you are going to insist on being pig-headed .... there's no fee on slush.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg12047804#msg12047804
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg12047491#msg12047491

It is true, merged mining NMC and no fee at slush since the start of this month (see their facebook page as they don't post in this forum much anymore). Thus, you are wrong, again.
Thus his official terms of service on his web site are wrong ... or you are wrong.
Maybe slush should keep it up to date ... if he has time to and can afford to?
I've no idea which, but I obviously have no want or desire to have an account on slush or follow crap on facedesk.
Since his official terms of service say he is charging you 2% ...
https://mining.bitcoin.cz/terms-of-service
then who knows ...

If you are correct and slush is wrong, then I'd be more worried about the fact that he effectively has no income supporting his pool according to your statement ... and we are heading for another BAN ... if he is forever charging no fees to anyone ever again.
Though of course your 0% fees since 1-Aug you are talking about, is less than 4 days of mining since however long way back when he finally dropped his fees to 2% ... and finishes when? Tongue

We digress, but yes, I am right and the info on the TOS is outdated, but more pertinent, you are wrong (as indeed anyone can be).
If you insist on sticking your head in the sand (even give the impression of doing so), thats your prerogative. Fact is, even before the demise of the fee on slush, actual payouts were better than kano.is expected (and actual) payouts.

Now that the fees on slush have been dropped AND merged mining NMC introduced, I am as sure as can be that payouts at slush will confortably exceed whatever kano.is can expect to payout, even with the supposed better luck that you claim for kano.is;

Your concerns as to how slush gets on without income are purely for anecdotal value as being the pioneer pool, I am confident they can get their numbers right.
144  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: August 04, 2015, 10:01:54 AM
No it isn't.
His fee is higher and his long term luck is lower ...........
You really have to keep up if you are going to insist on being pig-headed .... there's no fee on slush.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg12047804#msg12047804
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg12047491#msg12047491

It is true, merged mining NMC and no fee at slush since the start of this month (see their facebook page as they don't post in this forum much anymore). Thus, you are wrong, again.
145  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: August 04, 2015, 09:42:31 AM
i think he is talking about f2pool, or i missed something.
You did miss something. He's expressly talking about slush.
146  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: CloudThink.IO NEW 8TH/s Imperator Bitcoin Miner - Apply for a FREE test unit on: August 04, 2015, 08:52:38 AM
The only way this rig can exist (and be viable) is if cloudthink bought the entire last production round of the BM1384 from bitmain (even the IP to the BM1384) on the condition that bitmain do not, in the immediate future, release any new rig containing their next-gen chip.

In my book, that'd take a tad over a million US$ or multiples thereof, ... but lay out that much and you'd expect the investor to have a few quid for an office, not a serviced one in the dingy back streets of Manchester whose occupancy is 95% comprised of liquidated companies (in good company may I add, pun intended).

BM1384 couldn't get 400GH a chip.

You are such an idiot, you really can't see beyond disagreeing with whatever I post? Whatever the chip, hashfas, bm1380 bm1389 et al, like you, this is a pie in the sky .... a waste of space!
147  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: August 04, 2015, 08:43:41 AM
No it isn't.
His fee is higher and his long term luck is lower ...........
You really have to keep up if you are going to insist on being pig-headed .... there's no fee on slush.
148  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: August 04, 2015, 01:04:42 AM
I mined NMC with the "majority" because I had no choice....

Which places you firmly in the minority (akin to extremists in this forsaken landscape). Still, no skin off the majority's nostrils.
... well you missed one rather important point in my post:

F2Pool is 75% of the NMC mining and those mining there are averaging less payout than the expected average here.

... still sounds like a majority of fools to me.

You did miss that detail that I have NEVER mined at F2Pool then ... (as in no skin off my nose). Lets just say the "actual" average payout at slush is more than the "expected" average here. Now there.
149  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: August 04, 2015, 12:55:42 AM
I mined NMC with the "majority" because I had no choice....

Which places you firmly in the minority (akin to extremists in this forsaken coin-scape). Still, no skin off the majority's nostrils.
150  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: August 04, 2015, 12:31:07 AM
I've actually never mined at F2Pool, but certainly have mined here, slush and GHash (however, there are choices galore!).
BTC is not a religion for you to froth at the mouth while denigrating what the majority of people mining BTC consider good value, but I'll leave you to your own devices.
151  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2900 TH] Kano CKPool (kano.is) from the cgminer devs [0.9% PPLNS] on: August 03, 2015, 11:55:33 PM
F2Pool risks SPV mining purely for profit and mines empty blocks, and does not care what effect that has on BTC, and has absolute control over an alt-coin ... wow gotta love the scams in the alt-coin world ... which is why this pool will not merge mine alt-coins.

Hopefully the value of NMC vs BTC will fall to zero once the fools who consider it has value, open their eyes and realise it has none ... and the coin will die.

It may indeed be that F2Pool risks SPV mining purely for their selfish short term profitability aim, but calling the people who consider NMC valuable fools, is ill advised, as they are the very same kind of people that will mine at your pool, for the universally simple aim of making a profit on their mining "operation". If, as we stand, NMC tops up that profitability then why not? If it ever looses value, then that bridge will be crossed then, but that little profit earned now will be banked (akin to the proverbial make hay while the sun shines!).

And last I checked, there were a lot more people (both in individual numbers and hash-speed) choosing to mine BTC with alt-coin at other pools (even slush offers NMC now!) than kano.is, so that's telling ......

152  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.9.2 on: August 03, 2015, 07:07:57 PM
Hi,
Can anyone please give me the link to ck try your luck at solo mining BITCOIN plz? The thread that tells you how to solo mine to your wallet at his pool. If you hit a block it's yours.  Smiley
mine to: stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333
with your address
153  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: CloudThink.IO NEW 8TH/s Imperator Bitcoin Miner - Apply for a FREE test unit on: August 03, 2015, 06:48:35 PM
The only way this rig can exist (and be viable) is if cloudthink bought the entire last production round of the BM1384 from bitmain (even the IP to the BM1384) on the condition that bitmain do not, in the immediate future, release any new rig containing their next-gen chip.

In my book, that'd take a tad over a million US$ or multiples thereof, ... but lay out that much and you'd expect the investor to have a few quid for an office, not a serviced one in the dingy back streets of Manchester whose occupancy is 95% comprised of liquidated companies (in good company may I add, pun intended).
154  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: CloudThink.IO NEW 8TH/s Imperator Bitcoin Miner - Apply for a FREE test unit on: August 03, 2015, 06:25:32 PM
Could you please ask your gullible potential reviewers to stop spamming the hardware subforum with review threads that are clearly NEVER going to happen? I mean, even though they still hold hope of getting a FREE 8Th/s rig, could they hold fire until they receive one before spamming?

I can not call this a scam, 'cause its a mere request for reviewers for a last-gen rig "released" on the cusp of new-gen hardware hitting the market, but the gullibility of some supposedly reputable people on the forum is eye-opening to say the least.
155  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Sfards: SF100-the first 28nm Dual-Mode Miner gets into mass production on: August 03, 2015, 01:17:09 PM
after the promise to managers  (official SFARDS)  in general I have lost the desire to do with him...

first tried to buy failed

http://sendimage.me/MBTQjxqN


then he accuses me and passed on to me his guilt for custom error


http://sendimage.me/97H7RxqQ

how much I still need you to listen to bullshit to get back his Huh?

Whoa! Now I am weary of even doing any business with these guys .... barely on the market and their policy is NOT to issue refunds?
I am mindful that the circumstances in this case may be a tad more involved than we know, but that is no way to address a customer, I mean, even bitmain customer services' worst trick in the book of obfuscating their initial responses in bad English to put you off (only to magically become proficient in the language after you persist) puts this in the shade.
156  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Antminer S3 batch 6 overclocking on: August 03, 2015, 10:45:46 AM
Hey

http://ixmsk.eu/bcoin/cutimage.JPG

231.25M
0750 volt

how much should be reduced?
That's a lot HW?

HW is OK .... go to
250M
0750 volt

if you have a good PSU.

Hp DPS-800GB A 1000W 230v

You are good to go .... even 262.5M @0750 volt (if cables are bigger than 16AWG populate all 4 PCI-E ports)
157  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Antminer S3 batch 6 overclocking on: August 03, 2015, 10:39:55 AM
Hey

http://ixmsk.eu/bcoin/cutimage.JPG

231.25M
0750 volt

how much should be reduced?
That's a lot HW?

HW is OK .... go to
250M
0750 volt

if you have a good PSU.
158  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Innosilicon official reponse to Bitmine bankruptcy - Let the evidence talk on: August 01, 2015, 04:05:07 PM
Storm in a tea-cup really ... 5th paragraph says:

Quote
If found guilty, Karpeles could face up to five years in prison, or a fine of up to 500,000 yen (£2,650).
159  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.9.2 on: July 31, 2015, 12:16:04 PM
....

Just a thought ....

All good .... banish the thought.
160  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.9.2 on: July 31, 2015, 10:20:48 AM
I was working on another project and came across this API Style guide, re implementaion of the cgminer API -  pertinently Collection Resources

Just a thought ....
It's not an HTTP server and never will be.

It's designed the way it is on purpose.
A miner's MOST important feature is it's performance when mining.

The API socket is low level and as simple as possible yet contains the information required without burdening the computer by wasting resources that may be scarce and wasting it's time matching up to the other 10 million other random formats that each person prefers.

Tacking on other crap like proxy servers and web based interfaces are design flaws that clearly certain other people have no idea about design and performance ... (not referring to you)

I was actually thinking more of the styling of the API commands than turning it into an http server ... but as usual you clearly had that covered. Its becoming clearer to me, though, why manufacturers that ship cgminer on their rigs more often than not do not ship the "out of the box" API, despite it having all the required information.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 67 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!