Bitcoin Forum
October 31, 2024, 04:42:18 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 [215] 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 ... 2250 »
  Print  
Author Topic: KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2438 blocks  (Read 5351926 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (50 posts by 3+ users deleted.)
Bink
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 04, 2015, 06:20:40 AM
 #4281

Our first 'almost' block - but it wasn't good enough.

ckpool submits the share as a block if it is within a small amount of being a block just to be sure.
So it shows up on the web site, but alas not good enough.

share block was: 52123573961.901596
but current diff is: 52278304845.59168243

It will show up as an orphan, but I guess I need to label it as something else later since it's not an orphan.

I think there are bigger issues, I see the Pool is on the SAME Block as the NETWORK now!!!
kano (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 04, 2015, 08:26:29 AM
 #4282

Our first 'almost' block - but it wasn't good enough.

ckpool submits the share as a block if it is within a small amount of being a block just to be sure.
So it shows up on the web site, but alas not good enough.

share block was: 52123573961.901596
but current diff is: 52278304845.59168243

It will show up as an orphan, but I guess I need to label it as something else later since it's not an orphan.

I think there are bigger issues, I see the Pool is on the SAME Block as the NETWORK now!!!
Not sure what you mean there?

All workinfos that ckpool works on are from calling bitcoind getblocktemplate
(yeah GBT is pretty poorly written in bitcoind but we call it since it is the reference standard code)

At the time when our "368348 block" was found we were working on confirming block height 368347.
Since our bitcoind rejected our "368348 block", we continued to build on block height 368347 that was before ckpool submitted the rejected block - since there was no new block known anywhere.
When some other pool found 368348, we then switched to building on their new 368348 block as expected.

We don't do SPV mining and we don't build empty blocks as an excuse for having crap slow pool code.
We don't need to, our block change handling is probably one of the fastest of all pools on the network.

At no point during that time when ckpool submitted our rejected "368348 block" did any miner on the pool begin work on building on our rejected "368348 block"

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
pekatete
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
August 04, 2015, 08:43:41 AM
 #4283

No it isn't.
His fee is higher and his long term luck is lower ...........
You really have to keep up if you are going to insist on being pig-headed .... there's no fee on slush.

tokingtoking
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 169
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 04, 2015, 09:38:12 AM
 #4284

No it isn't.
His fee is higher and his long term luck is lower ...........
You really have to keep up if you are going to insist on being pig-headed .... there's no fee on slush.

i think he is talking about f2pool, or i missed something.
pekatete
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
August 04, 2015, 09:42:31 AM
 #4285

i think he is talking about f2pool, or i missed something.
You did miss something. He's expressly talking about slush.

kano (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 04, 2015, 09:45:48 AM
 #4286

No it isn't.
His fee is higher and his long term luck is lower ...........
You really have to keep up if you are going to insist on being pig-headed .... there's no fee on slush.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg12047804#msg12047804

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
pekatete
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
August 04, 2015, 10:01:54 AM
 #4287

No it isn't.
His fee is higher and his long term luck is lower ...........
You really have to keep up if you are going to insist on being pig-headed .... there's no fee on slush.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg12047804#msg12047804
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg12047491#msg12047491

It is true, merged mining NMC and no fee at slush since the start of this month (see their facebook page as they don't post in this forum much anymore). Thus, you are wrong, again.

kano (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 04, 2015, 11:32:00 AM
 #4288

No it isn't.
His fee is higher and his long term luck is lower ...........
You really have to keep up if you are going to insist on being pig-headed .... there's no fee on slush.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg12047804#msg12047804
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg12047491#msg12047491

It is true, merged mining NMC and no fee at slush since the start of this month (see their facebook page as they don't post in this forum much anymore). Thus, you are wrong, again.
Thus his official terms of service on his web site are wrong ... or you are wrong.
Maybe slush should keep it up to date ... if he has time to and can afford to?
I've no idea which, but I obviously have no want or desire to have an account on slush or follow crap on facedesk.
Since his official terms of service say he is charging you 2% ...
https://mining.bitcoin.cz/terms-of-service
then who knows ...

If you are correct and slush is wrong, then I'd be more worried about the fact that he effectively has no income supporting his pool according to your statement ... and we are heading for another BAN ... if he is forever charging no fees to anyone ever again.
Though of course your 0% fees since 1-Aug you are talking about, is less than 4 days of mining since however long way back when he finally dropped his fees to 2% ... and finishes when? Tongue

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
pekatete
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
August 04, 2015, 11:56:57 AM
 #4289

No it isn't.
His fee is higher and his long term luck is lower ...........
You really have to keep up if you are going to insist on being pig-headed .... there's no fee on slush.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg12047804#msg12047804
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg12047491#msg12047491

It is true, merged mining NMC and no fee at slush since the start of this month (see their facebook page as they don't post in this forum much anymore). Thus, you are wrong, again.
Thus his official terms of service on his web site are wrong ... or you are wrong.
Maybe slush should keep it up to date ... if he has time to and can afford to?
I've no idea which, but I obviously have no want or desire to have an account on slush or follow crap on facedesk.
Since his official terms of service say he is charging you 2% ...
https://mining.bitcoin.cz/terms-of-service
then who knows ...

If you are correct and slush is wrong, then I'd be more worried about the fact that he effectively has no income supporting his pool according to your statement ... and we are heading for another BAN ... if he is forever charging no fees to anyone ever again.
Though of course your 0% fees since 1-Aug you are talking about, is less than 4 days of mining since however long way back when he finally dropped his fees to 2% ... and finishes when? Tongue

We digress, but yes, I am right and the info on the TOS is outdated, but more pertinent, you are wrong (as indeed anyone can be).
If you insist on sticking your head in the sand (even give the impression of doing so), thats your prerogative. Fact is, even before the demise of the fee on slush, actual payouts were better than kano.is expected (and actual) payouts.

Now that the fees on slush have been dropped AND merged mining NMC introduced, I am as sure as can be that payouts at slush will confortably exceed whatever kano.is can expect to payout, even with the supposed better luck that you claim for kano.is;

Your concerns as to how slush gets on without income are purely for anecdotal value as being the pioneer pool, I am confident they can get their numbers right.

innerchaos
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 145
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 04, 2015, 12:42:06 PM
 #4290

Yay a real one Smiley
TheAnalogKid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 04, 2015, 01:17:15 PM
 #4291

Now that the fees on slush have been dropped AND merged mining NMC introduced, I am as sure as can be that payouts at slush will confortably exceed whatever kano.is can expect to payout, even with the supposed better luck that you claim for kano.is;
So, that being the case, why don't you do what johnnybravo has done elsewhere, and point some hardware at both, record the payouts, and compare them so you can prove your point, rather than continue the cat fight back and forth.

Really, I could give a shit less about what you, or anyone for that matter, "think" or "know" about any pool being better than any other pool with regards to luck or payouts without empirical data, and I'm sure most of the rest would agree.  And, this does not except Kano from that statement either, but he at least has proven before to provide numbers and calculations to attempt to support his assertions, instead of specious knowledge and feelings.

If you prove it with numbers, there is no ability to question or deny at that point.  Until then, it's merely speculation and attempts to denigrate.


kano (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 04, 2015, 01:18:05 PM
 #4292

...
Thus his official terms of service on his web site are wrong ... or you are wrong.
Maybe slush should keep it up to date ... if he has time to and can afford to?
I've no idea which, but I obviously have no want or desire to have an account on slush or follow crap on facedesk.
Since his official terms of service say he is charging you 2% ...
https://mining.bitcoin.cz/terms-of-service
then who knows ...

If you are correct and slush is wrong, then I'd be more worried about the fact that he effectively has no income supporting his pool according to your statement ... and we are heading for another BAN ... if he is forever charging no fees to anyone ever again.
Though of course your 0% fees since 1-Aug you are talking about, is less than 4 days of mining since however long way back when he finally dropped his fees to 2% ... and finishes when? Tongue

We digress, but yes, I am right and the info on the TOS is outdated, but more pertinent, you are wrong (as indeed anyone can be).
If you insist on sticking your head in the sand (even give the impression of doing so), thats your prerogative. Fact is, even before the demise of the fee on slush, actual payouts were better than kano.is expected (and actual) payouts.

Well again I've no idea who is right - since - again - his official terms of service that the pool publishes don't match what you say.
Maybe he's only doing it for a week, so he doesn't go broke paying out many hundreds or thousands of dollars a month running the pool servers, and thus your point is basically irrelevant?

As for payout history ... you don't need to have me prove kano.is is better than slush - look at:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1059040.msg11941177#msg11941177
and since his last report, payouts here have continued like that.
So yeah since kano.is has been the best paying pool against BTCGuild, Antpool, F2Pool and NiceHash for payouts over those 12 weeks and payouts have not fallen even with a 666.666% block in there ... I'd have difficulty believing slush was paying better for the past 3 or 4 months ... especially when you provide no proof of that ... and it was reported when we got the 666.666% block, that slush had a worse than 666.666% block in there also ...

Now that the fees on slush have been dropped AND merged mining NMC introduced, I am as sure as can be that payouts at slush will confortably exceed whatever kano.is can expect to payout, even with the supposed better luck that you claim for kano.is;

Your concerns as to how slush gets on without income are purely for anecdotal value as being the pioneer pool, I am confident they can get their numbers right.
You need to look up the meaning of the word anecdotal.

The numbers, according to you, are zero. So yeah I doubt they can get their numbers right if you are correct in saying their income is zero forever more.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
CapnBDL
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 500


MOBU


View Profile WWW
August 04, 2015, 01:55:45 PM
 #4293

Must we continue this 'Battle of the Pool'? It really comes down to choice. I choose kano.is. Battle over, I win!

           ▄██▄
████▄    ▄██████▄    ▄████
██████▄ ▀████████▀ ▄██████
▐███████▄ ▀████▀ ▄███████▌
▐█████████▄ ▀▀ ▄█████████▌
 ████ ▀█████▄▄█████▀ ████
 ████ ▄ ▀████████▀ ▄ ████
 ▐███ ██▄ ▀████▀ ▄██ ███▌
 ▐███ ████▄ ▀▀ ▄████ ███▌
  ███ ██████▄▄██████ ███
  ███ ██████████████ ███
  ▐██ ██████████████ ██▌
  ▐██ ██████████████ ██▌
   ██ ██████████████ ██
       ▀██████████▀
         ▀██████▀
           ▀██▀
.M O B U.███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
   The Investment Bank of the Future  
The Security Token Protocol and Licensed Security Token Exchange
█▀




█▄
Facebook Medium
Whitepaper ANN
LinkedIn    Reddit
▀█




▄█

         ▄▄▄█████▄▄▄
      ▄███████████████▄
    ▄███████████████████▄
   ███████████████████████
  ████ ▀███████▀    ▀██████
 █████▌  ▀▀███        ▄█████
▐██████▄             ▐██████▌
▐█████▄               ██████▌
▐███████▄            ███████▌
 ███████▄          ▄████████
  ████████       ▄█████████
   █████▀   ▄▄▄███████████
    ▀███████████████████▀
      ▀███████████████▀
         ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀

         ▄▄▄█████▄▄▄
      ▄███████████████▄
    ▄███████████████████▄
   ███████████████████████
  █████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█████
 █████     ▄▄          █████
▐█████     ████▄▄      █████▌
▐█████     ████████    █████▌
▐█████     ████▀▀      █████▌
 █████     ▀▀          █████
  █████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████
   ███████████████████████
    ▀███████████████████▀
      ▀███████████████▀
         ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀

         ▄▄▄█████▄▄▄
      ▄███████████████▄
    ▄███████████████████▄
   ███████████████████████
  ████████████████▀▀▀ ▐████
 ███████████▀▀▀  ▄█▀  ██████
▐█████▀▀▀      ▄█▀    ██████▌
▐███▄▄▄    ▄▄██▀     ███████▌
▐████████ ███▀       ███████▌
 ████████▌█          ███████
  ████████ ▄▄██▄    ███████
   ███████████████▄ ██████
    ▀███████████████████▀
      ▀███████████████▀
         ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀
Dmc123dmc
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10

Time is the one thing you can't run from


View Profile WWW
August 04, 2015, 02:57:07 PM
 #4294

Must we continue this 'Battle of the Pool'? It really comes down to choice. I choose kano.is. Battle over, I win!
Seconded, everybody does there own research and chooses a pool based on what he finds. If you don't like this pool then go find another one!

██████████  ✔  PoSToken - First PoS Smart Contract Token - Get Your Free Tokens Now!
█     PoSToken    █  ✔  Free Airdrop ●  No-ICO  ●  100% Annual Interest First Year
██████████  ✔  ANN ●  WebSite  ●  Twitter  ●  Slack  ●  Whitepaper
kano (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 04, 2015, 04:18:13 PM
 #4295

Must we continue this 'Battle of the Pool'? It really comes down to choice. I choose kano.is. Battle over, I win!
Seconded, everybody does there own research and chooses a pool based on what he finds. If you don't like this pool then go find another one!
Yeah I said that to him in the first post in all this Smiley

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
CapnBDL
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 500


MOBU


View Profile WWW
August 04, 2015, 05:43:12 PM
 #4296

Canaan...you rock!  Block!

           ▄██▄
████▄    ▄██████▄    ▄████
██████▄ ▀████████▀ ▄██████
▐███████▄ ▀████▀ ▄███████▌
▐█████████▄ ▀▀ ▄█████████▌
 ████ ▀█████▄▄█████▀ ████
 ████ ▄ ▀████████▀ ▄ ████
 ▐███ ██▄ ▀████▀ ▄██ ███▌
 ▐███ ████▄ ▀▀ ▄████ ███▌
  ███ ██████▄▄██████ ███
  ███ ██████████████ ███
  ▐██ ██████████████ ██▌
  ▐██ ██████████████ ██▌
   ██ ██████████████ ██
       ▀██████████▀
         ▀██████▀
           ▀██▀
.M O B U.███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
   The Investment Bank of the Future  
The Security Token Protocol and Licensed Security Token Exchange
█▀




█▄
Facebook Medium
Whitepaper ANN
LinkedIn    Reddit
▀█




▄█

         ▄▄▄█████▄▄▄
      ▄███████████████▄
    ▄███████████████████▄
   ███████████████████████
  ████ ▀███████▀    ▀██████
 █████▌  ▀▀███        ▄█████
▐██████▄             ▐██████▌
▐█████▄               ██████▌
▐███████▄            ███████▌
 ███████▄          ▄████████
  ████████       ▄█████████
   █████▀   ▄▄▄███████████
    ▀███████████████████▀
      ▀███████████████▀
         ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀

         ▄▄▄█████▄▄▄
      ▄███████████████▄
    ▄███████████████████▄
   ███████████████████████
  █████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█████
 █████     ▄▄          █████
▐█████     ████▄▄      █████▌
▐█████     ████████    █████▌
▐█████     ████▀▀      █████▌
 █████     ▀▀          █████
  █████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████
   ███████████████████████
    ▀███████████████████▀
      ▀███████████████▀
         ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀

         ▄▄▄█████▄▄▄
      ▄███████████████▄
    ▄███████████████████▄
   ███████████████████████
  ████████████████▀▀▀ ▐████
 ███████████▀▀▀  ▄█▀  ██████
▐█████▀▀▀      ▄█▀    ██████▌
▐███▄▄▄    ▄▄██▀     ███████▌
▐████████ ███▀       ███████▌
 ████████▌█          ███████
  ████████ ▄▄██▄    ███████
   ███████████████▄ ██████
    ▀███████████████████▀
      ▀███████████████▀
         ▀▀▀█████▀▀▀
BlInK311
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 04, 2015, 05:44:50 PM
 #4297

Woohooo block!!  love it!

Was 368348 the 1st orphan for this pool? or was there one early on?
ZACHM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 777
Merit: 1003



View Profile
August 04, 2015, 05:50:01 PM
 #4298

Woohooo block!!  love it!

Was 368348 the 1st orphan for this pool? or was there one early on?

I think we have had two in the past, but this one was not an Orphan:

Our first 'almost' block - but it wasn't good enough.

ckpool submits the share as a block if it is within a small amount of being a block just to be sure.
So it shows up on the web site, but alas not good enough.

share block was: 52123573961.901596
but current diff is: 52278304845.59168243

It will show up as an orphan, but I guess I need to label it as something else later since it's not an orphan.
BlInK311
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 04, 2015, 06:00:23 PM
 #4299

Woohooo block!!  love it!

Was 368348 the 1st orphan for this pool? or was there one early on?

I think we have had two in the past, but this one was not an Orphan:

Our first 'almost' block - but it wasn't good enough.

ckpool submits the share as a block if it is within a small amount of being a block just to be sure.
So it shows up on the web site, but alas not good enough.

share block was: 52123573961.901596
but current diff is: 52278304845.59168243

It will show up as an orphan, but I guess I need to label it as something else later since it's not an orphan.

Ahhhh... I missed that post.  Thanks for the answer tho.
nhminer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 473
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 04, 2015, 09:48:53 PM
 #4300

Our first 'almost' block - but it wasn't good enough.

ckpool submits the share as a block if it is within a small amount of being a block just to be sure.
So it shows up on the web site, but alas not good enough.

share block was: 52123573961.901596
but current diff is: 52278304845.59168243

It will show up as an orphan, but I guess I need to label it as something else later since it's not an orphan.

You could call it a  vagabond or vagrant

BCH - 1EshwUEg9LRbY5WMSw7bkBGQUYQeenkcet
Pages: « 1 ... 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 [215] 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 ... 2250 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!