Bitcoin Forum
June 30, 2024, 12:01:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 236 »
141  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: March 10, 2015, 10:18:20 PM

I'm assuming that was the person who made a thread title like it was a BTC Guild announcement (it's deleted now)?  I was going to report the thread, but figured why bother since nobody was bumping it.  Once it leaves the front page it might as well not exist.
142  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: March 09, 2015, 03:25:37 AM
I connect to BTC Guild using a private IP given to me back in 2013. Does this still provide protection from DDoS attacks? I've seen the particular private IP address that I am using leaked for over a year.

The private DNS provided in 2013 during the attack still works, and while it has been leaked, it is unlikely to be noticed.  There's a second private DNS that is given out specifically for DDoS protection.

In both cases, they have been unaffected by recent attacks which were only hitting stratum.btcguild.com (and only the initial server used to validate clients).
143  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: March 08, 2015, 10:27:36 PM
I don't know if you've kept up with other pool threads but in the last 48 hours all of the large pools have been hit with ddos attack or similar. This includes Cex, Ghash, Discues, BW, and possibly others. As it now seems its our turn to fight. Can't help but feel as though this a very organized situation and not a random selective occurrence.

DDoSes on pools have almost always hit multiple targets, ever since 2011.  It was extremely rare for only one pool to be hit (one at a time maybe, but normally it was always at least 2-3 simultaneously, if not more).

Kind of ironic that BTC Guild is on the hitlist when we're not even 5% of the network these days.

Geee.... if every computer used for the ddos is vulnerable - just think about the hashrate if someone would strike back, remotely install a mining program on the involved computers and direct it on one pool *sigh**

It would add up to basically nothing.  Most zombie machines are "mom and dad's computer", the ones that are 5-10 years old with no graphics card.  Sure, there's some gamer rigs infected out there due to people pirating games with trojans embedded, but they are relatively rare.  ASICs have virtually killed Bitcoin mining botnets.
144  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: March 05, 2015, 04:30:29 PM
I don't know if you've kept up with other pool threads but in the last 48 hours all of the large pools have been hit with ddos attack or similar. This includes Cex, Ghash, Discues, BW, and possibly others. As it now seems its our turn to fight. Can't help but feel as though this a very organized situation and not a random selective occurrence.

DDoSes on pools have almost always hit multiple targets, ever since 2011.  It was extremely rare for only one pool to be hit (one at a time maybe, but normally it was always at least 2-3 simultaneously, if not more).

Kind of ironic that BTC Guild is on the hitlist when we're not even 5% of the network these days.
145  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: March 05, 2015, 04:15:55 PM
An attack is hitting the initial pool connection server again.  As usual, this only affects new incoming connections.  If you already have an active mining connection, it is recommended you do not do anything that would cause your miner to restart or change which pool it's connected to for a few hours.  If you do, have a backup pool setup or you may end up with hardware doing nothing while it tries to connect to the frontend mining server.
146  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: March 03, 2015, 01:03:33 AM
Thanks for helping out the last two pages kano.  Was very limited in my ability to use the internet the last few days, was in a car for 30 of the last 48 hours.
147  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: February 23, 2015, 12:22:55 AM
BTC Guild will be temporarily pausing automatic and manual payout processing at 4 PM (PST) in order to clean up the hot wallet fragmentation.  This process should take approximately 2-3 hours to complete, after which time any delayed manual or automatic payouts will be processed.  This will not have any impact on the website or mining servers.

UPDATE:  Maintenance window is being postponed to Monday at 4 PM (PST) in order to line it up with a set of mining server rolling restarts.

Are we still going to be able to mine or do we need to point our miners elsewhere?

Miner's will see about a half second of downtime during the restarts.  Based off the last few times restarts have been required, modern software/hardware is able to reconnect fast enough that you wouldn't even know it happened unless you were watching it at that exact moment.
148  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: February 21, 2015, 09:34:00 PM
BTC Guild will be temporarily pausing automatic and manual payout processing at 4 PM (PST) in order to clean up the hot wallet fragmentation.  This process should take approximately 2-3 hours to complete, after which time any delayed manual or automatic payouts will be processed.  This will not have any impact on the website or mining servers.

UPDATE:  Maintenance window is being postponed to Monday at 4 PM (PST) in order to line it up with a set of mining server rolling restarts.
149  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Satellite internet ping and local pool on: February 19, 2015, 08:11:19 PM
You will get 4-8x more stales on Satellite than your current connection (100-200ms vs 800ms).  That is how your performance is affected by latency.  There's no way to change that via software/pool choice.

You may end up even worse off than that, since most satellite connections are rarely able to hold an 800ms ping, they frequently go above that in my experience.
150  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: February 15, 2015, 08:47:01 PM
The frontend server used to filter botnet/DDoS traffic got a huge spike this morning and was causing it to drop a lot of incoming connections.  Established mining connections were unaffected, but restarting/disconnecting your miners may have resulted in being unable to get back on.  It should be working normally by now.
151  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: February 14, 2015, 11:42:49 PM
Well since you don't respond to my PM's I decided to post it here maybe you will notice it.
"Hello eleuthria, I am going to make it very straight forward and short. The question is: Can you implement this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=952340.msg10437343#msg10437343.I would pay you 1BTC for that and I will pay you extra 0.005BTC0.01 per each 1KB.Please note that transactions that I push will only be valid,standard, and non-double-spend they will be just simple transactions that includes 0 fee and has unconfirmed inputs(which will have to confirmed in one single block).Thank you in advance."

No.
152  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [9000 TH] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + VarDiff on: February 10, 2015, 05:38:41 PM
STOP POOLJUMPING...!  Angry

Take one pool and STAY THERE!
You're mining on the last remaining pool whose reward system is hoppable. What do you expect?

Not sure it is anymore. It seems to be an exponential score PPLNS hybrid since the change in the score method. Anyway, the old way of hopping certainly wont work anymore.

My understanding was Slush is still using the same old system it always has for score, just tweaked some of the variables to account for modern difficulty/pool size.
153  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [10000Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB on: February 10, 2015, 05:36:00 PM
In BTC Guild the shifts mean that you'd need to look across all shifts in the payout to make any use of the luck % (being inverted from share %) and invert it then avg it then invert it again ... to get a number that is related ... so yeah almost no one does that in their head Smiley

BTC Guild's luck % is actually based on overall shift luck, I don't even track per-block luck (nor do I have any implementation to do so).  The payment per share for every share of a given shift compared to what you would earn under 2% PPS.   There's no extra math involved.
154  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [10000Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB on: February 08, 2015, 06:15:14 PM
I've always used Luck as a representation of actual earnings vs expected earnings, because that is what most miners are concerned about, and it is easy for them to understand.  If luck is 200%, they made twice what they expected to earn in that period.  If luck is 50%, they earned half.  CDF is nice for explaining the odds of bad rounds, but most miners are only concerned with earnings, and CDF doesn't help with visualizing what they earned compared to what they "should have" earned.
155  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: February 08, 2015, 06:09:18 PM
How are you going to counter VPN's and such?
I have only gave it a brief read through but I thought they had said they were leaving miners/transaction processing alone?
Note though I do not blame you.

Warning to New York Residents

The latest draft of the BitLicense proposal is out, and it is even worse than the last one when it comes to pools.  This is an approximately 75-day notice that if you are using the pool from New York, you will need to request your withdrawals and change pools.  Once the comment period ends (approx. 30 days) and the BitLicense is approved, unless it is changed, it will leave a 45-day window before it becomes effective.  Once the 45-day window begins, the pool will be implementing Geo-IP to ban the creation of accounts from New York, and a splash screen will appear to users who already have accounts telling them that the pool is no longer able to serve them and that they have 45 (or less) days to request their withdrawals.  After it becomes effective, the site will no longer be available for access from New York.

Their direct wording is any business involved in the transmission of Bitcoin to a New York resident requires a license.  Transmission has no exemptions for mining.  Now, if you're *solo mining* in New York, you wouldn't need one, since you're not transmitting to anybody.  If BTC Guild used coinbase payouts, it would also be able to bypass this, with one exception:  There is no pool doing coinbase payouts (other than p2pool which is not exactly a pool) that doesn't require a failsafe wallet to catch dust/errors, and running a manual fix to distribute the dust/errors later is transmission.  Unless BTC Guild turned itself into p2pool by setting a minimum share difficulty high enough that you would always have enough work in the PPLNS system to receive a payout, it's not an option.

Obviously you can't do anything about VPNs, but all accounts will be required to agree to an updated TOS affirming they are not residents of New York, on top of the Geo-IP ban to anybody accessing the site from New York.
156  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [10000Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB on: February 08, 2015, 03:13:31 AM
* Your pool luck scores conflate losses of blocks to orphans (which will vary) and poor pool luck (which should in the long term equal 1). This means that any analysis of the accepted / expected share values can only be estimates using the method suggested below.

* Whenever a miner compares your luck scores to that of another pool, your score will always appears lower since you include the shares attributed to the orphaned block.

BTC Guild's luck is reported in the same way.  Orphaned block solves are not included.
157  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: February 07, 2015, 09:28:26 PM
Warning to New York Residents

The latest draft of the BitLicense proposal is out, and it is even worse than the last one when it comes to pools.  This is an approximately 75-day notice that if you are using the pool from New York, you will need to request your withdrawals and change pools.  Once the comment period ends (approx. 30 days) and the BitLicense is approved, unless it is changed, it will leave a 45-day window before it becomes effective.  Once the 45-day window begins, the pool will be implementing Geo-IP to ban the creation of accounts from New York, and a splash screen will appear to users who already have accounts telling them that the pool is no longer able to serve them and that they have 45 (or less) days to request their withdrawals.  After it becomes effective, the site will no longer be available for access from New York.
158  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: February 05, 2015, 06:13:10 PM
Is this dropping in luck comes from more orphaned blocks?

 No.  Mining is probability based so its luck (also called variance).
It doesn't really have anything to do with orphaned blocks.


Well, BTC Guild doesn't include orphan blocks we've found in the luck calculations, which I think most other pools do, but that's not a huge impact.  BTC Guild's orphan rate has always been ~1% (you'll rarely see more than 2 out of the last 200 blocks on the pool stats page as being orphaned).
159  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: February 04, 2015, 06:27:32 PM
Everything is running normally, there are no issues with the servers.  People like to throw around withholding attack on every pool having bad luck (plenty of people were talking about the same thing on Eligius).  There is no large scale withholding attack, unless they are doing it in a way that involves a significant number of accounts.

All of the fastest users on the pool (who make up the majority of the pool hash rate) are well within expected block solving rates.  That doesn't mean there isn't withholding, or bugged hardware out there, but it means that the only accounts exhibiting enough hash rate to have a noticeable impact are definitely not withholding blocks.



EDIT:  Just to clarify:  "well within expected block solving rates" does not mean they are functioning at +/- 5% luck, since if that was the case the entire pool would probably be at +/- 5% luck over the last month.  However, there are no accounts that are showing a blocks solved vs blocks expected rate that is severe enough to be a block withholding flag, such as the ones that were discovered last year when a large scale mining farm was discovered to have an error in their miner when dealing with shares resolving to a difficulty greater than a 32-bit value (4.2 billion).
160  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [16000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: January 30, 2015, 05:03:16 AM
Are withdrawals not working for everyone or is it just me?

There's been no issues with payouts.  Automatic payouts happen once per hour for amounts over 0.10, twice per hour for amounts under 0.10, and twice per hour for manual withdrawal requests.

EDIT:  Unless you have a different username, your account hasn't had a balance owed in 5 months, the last bit of the balance was withdrawn in August.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 236 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!