...
GPU 2: sieve size = 550556388001 (7 bits)
GPU 2: max bits used 341/352
Connecting to frontend: 54.187.143.168:6666 ...
Connecting to bitcoin: 54.187.143.168:60002 ...
Connecting to signals: 54.187.143.168:60003 ...
Work received: height=529506 diff=10.890167 latency=760ms
error: ProbablePrimeChainTestFast 0/4
I have win7, 13.2 driver and I clocked both mem and core to 1000. 280x. Restart and still same error. I know newer driver should be installed but I got the same software setup on other rigs and it works fine.
Does it crash and stop mining? or shows only one error and keeps going? It crashes. Sometimes it has several rows of error: ProbablePrimeChainTestFast 0/4. Like 20 or so. On two other rigs I have pretty much all same except processors are Sempron 145 and this rig has i5. And I use this rig for gaming and stuff also, so maybe there is some kind of other issues. I will try driver update later. Actually there is something odd: GPU 2: sieve size = 550556388001 (7 bits) This value is wrong and it's no wonder the miner crashes. I'm gonna have to investigate how this can happen... It should be: GPU 2: sieve size = 55050240 (26 bits) Isn't it required to use 14.3 or higher driver, he is using 13.2. |
|
|
|
|
Hey madMAX, I notice the share values change. How is that calculated? What's the value of 11-ch/higher or is it the same as 10-ch on the pool?
|
|
|
|
Is this miner free or is it a 10% dev fee like others?
Pool fee is 10%, so yup, it's the same. At least this miner is the fastest one currently. |
|
|
|
I'm running a MSI Twin Frozr III HD7970 OC BE @ 1150core/1500mem getting 4.29~4.35 CPD Temp=62C and a Gigabyte HD7850 2GB @ 1150core/1500mem getting 2.08~2.17 CPD Temp=52C.
Nice work on the new pool and nice to have an alternative to ypool.
What will happen to the rewards system once it hits 11 on the Diff?
How do the miner calculate the CPD? ie. 1-ch,2-ch,3-ch,4-ch, etc.....
Nice to know it works on 7850, and pretty good actually. How do you keep that 7970 so cool?  2.) Don't know yet. Keep in mind diff 11 is still easily ~5 times more difficult than 10.9 so it's gonna be a while. 3.) It depends on the cpuload setting: with cpuload=1 it uses 4-ch and with cpuload=2 it uses 3-ch and so on. But still, i'm using a custom formula that has proven itself to be pretty accurate. Found 1 devices
Using device 0 as GPU 0
N=11 SIZE=4096 STRIPES=420 WIDTH=20 PCOUNT=40960 TARGET=10
GPU 0: has 40 CUs
GPU 0: hash primorial = 30030 (14 bits)
GPU 0: sieve primorial = 435656388001 (58 bits)
GPU 0: sieve size = 550556388001 (7 bits)
GPU 0: max bits used 341/352
Failed to ADL_Adapter_ID_Get. Error -1Failed to ADL_Adapter_ID_Get. Error -1Con
ecting to frontend: 54.187.143.168:6666 ...
Connecting to bitcoin: 54.187.143.168:60002 ...
Connecting to signals: 54.187.143.168:60003 ...
Work received: height=529501 diff=10.890152 latency=842ms
error: ProbablePrimeChainTestFast 0/2
error: ProbablePrimeChainTestFast 0/2
error: ProbablePrimeChainTestFast 0/2
W8x64 with 14.4
Any suggestions?
There are 2 problems: ADL not working and "error: ProbablePrimeChainTestFast". The first one is probably win8 related. The second one is either too much OC or some other driver/win8 problem... Right now i have no time to test/debug win8. Maybe try 14.3 driver... Cool, great to know the calculation part. The 7970 has an aftermarket cooler, Arctic Accelero 7970 Extreme and it's in Corsair 400R case also. The 7850 2GB I own runs like a champ and cool. LOL As of now, these are my stats: 7970: CPD=4.33 7850: CPD=2.24 7850 is using the same sieveprimorial as the 7970. Same temps stills, both cards are in the same ATX case. |
|
|
|
|
I'm running a MSI Twin Frozr III HD7970 OC BE @ 1150core/1500mem getting 4.29~4.35 CPD Temp=62C and a Gigabyte HD7850 2GB @ 1150core/1500mem getting 2.08~2.17 CPD Temp=52C.
Nice work on the new pool and nice to have an alternative to ypool.
What will happen to the rewards system once it hits 11 on the Diff?
How does the miner calculates the CPD? ie. 1-ch,2-ch,3-ch,4-ch, etc.....
|
|
|
|
|
For fun, I tried to mine with a 6950 2GB and 6970. Got a TRT ~1000 and CPD~.3 to .4. LOL Definitely GCN cards are best to use for XPM GPU miners.
For the older cards, it only works for 2GB GDDR5 cards.
|
|
|
|
unbelievable... there's just something wrong... i usually hit a block at least...
Primecoin GPU miner ver. 2.00
-----------------------------
Mining time: 16.16 hours
Est. Average Chains Per Day (CPD): 9.80
Est. Spot Chains Per Day (CPD): 9.361
Pass: 36434
GPU #0 time: 167
GPU #1 time: 119
GPU #2 time: 125
GPU #3 time: 116
10-ch found: 9 expected: 6.594
blocks found: 0 expected: 0.777
The difficulty is 10.88 now  A pool is much needed at this point, since the difficulty is high. I notice I get a lot of 10.7 to 10.2 out of the 10-ch I find, no blocks for 96 hours of mining. So, I had to switch to the other miner for pool mining. |
|
|
|
|
How's the progress with the pool?
|
|
|
|
|
The command to control how many cores to mine doesn't seem to work, it just uses all cores. ie. "setgenerate true 3" will still do all cores in a quad core cpu.
This reminds me of Scrypt-OG with lower memory requirement, but this in theory seems to be much less than Scrypt-OG.
|
|
|
|
|
What part of the world do you live in to get electricity on the super low? The Pacific Northwest of the US?
|
|
|
|
Nope. Doge won't rise very fast. It will be a slow pump.
Slow pump if the car doesn't place in top finishes in each race event. |
|
|
|
|
Cool it made it on a NASCAR car, that's good advertisement for the coin. Think that's a first for any digital currency.
|
|
|
|
|
Why the decision to not limit the supply?
|
|
|
|
|
Kind of weird that the prices aren't going up before the PoS is 10%. Just only can wait and see if there's going to be a positive trend hopefully.
|
|
|
|
i have to move to Claymore miner since its the only miner that accept catalyst 13.12 and those drivers are the only one who will work on 6 x GPU at same board.
Well, I'm not sure it's more profitable to mine on 6 280x's with Claymore's than on 5 cards with our miner. Your miner is more tuned for the 280x than the other miner. I'm hoping soon you will have the pool version, because the miner seems really stable with AMD drivers 14.3 and 14.4. The other miner only supports 13.12. |
|
|
|
This is not a giveaway . No coins left!
Pls stop PM me.
Thanks
Focus on the real problems...the lastest altcoin scams and think more before investing in this.
With half of these devs, we never know their true intentions for their coins and with what they want out of the community. Hopefully this coin will thrive with the backing of the community. It's nice of you for giving some coins out to the community. |
|
|
|
3rd orphaned block found... 3 in a row... is this unluck or something else? 2 x block orphaned with version 2.00 + 1 x block orphaned with 2.02 right after the other two
There's definitely some luck involved, but it also might be sub-par internet connection. Anyway, it look's like we have some progress with a pool. Once ready, it should remedy your unluck. Which pool are you going to use? |
|
|
|
|
Never know, the market is mostly unpredictable. Just like doge, no one really thought it would do what it did.
Can only wait and see.
|
|
|
|
I deleted everything but the wallet and the .conf
gonna try it.. im noticing a ton of orphan blocks now tho when I "listtransactions" :/ I just did a list transactions and they didn't poof... I keep mining some, they show up, then vanish instantly now... when I do listtransactions they all show orphan now haha Probably those are blocks that were premined. |
|
|
|
Hey, what's the algo? Not a dafuq is it?  It's based off LiteCoin so it's Scrypt algo. California needs a coin because why? Is the state getting kicked out of the union? 4.5% premine?! That will magically be transferred to the people of California?? How will pull that off? Doesn't seem shady at all.  It's a lot less than the Auroracoin pre-mine. There is many ways to authenticate who really lives in California without violating user privacy, for example establishing a TeamViewer connection to check their IP/ISP. Or simply sending a text message & looking up their carrier on http://www.fonefinder.net/Scrypt algo? Why not another algo? That doesn't represent the diverseness of California. Maybe X11, Myriad, Heavy, etc.... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
